[quote name='zenintrude']lol.
Yes, some people actually like films that involve thins other than explosions and one-liners (although Criterion does offer The Rock, Armageddon, and RoboCop) or wizards and vampires (although Criterion does offer The Magician and Vampyr).
But the short answer is yes, there are many movies from Criterion that are completely watchable even if you aren't a stuffy film snob... and many more if you are.
Would you like a short list of their films that you will probably enjoy?
Ok...
#2 Seven Samurai
#5 The 400 Blows
#47 Insomnia
#52/53 Yojimbo/Sanjuro
#54 For All Mankind
#65 Rushmore
#75 Chasing Amy
#97 Do the Right Thing
#99 Gimme Shelter
#133 The Vanishing
#155 Tokyo Olympiad
#157 The Royal Tenenbaums
#175 Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
#247 Slacker
#289 Hoop Dreams
#300 The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou
#336 Dazed and Confused
#340 Koko: A Talking Gorilla
#374 Bicycle Thieves
#401 Night on Earth
#453 Chungking Express
#476 The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
#516 Stagecoach
#533 Crumb
#551 Cronos
All of those are pretty
ing accessible... and I left out a bunch that I love, like most of Jim Jarmusch's stuff, Videodrome, and In the Mood for Love... but as you can see, there is a lot there which can be picked up and enjoyed with out being obtuse.[/QUOTE]
I hate that you took all the time typing that up, but I know what Criterion offers, and I know what they do. I just see a lot of times people go crazy and buy tons of Criterion movies, and honestly some of them don't offer anything of interest to me and I wonder if people actually just buy them as collectibles or really watch some of those films. However, stuff like The Seventh Seal should be given an updated treatment on blu-ray, as the DVD subtitles were hard to read given the film was B&W and the subs were solid white.
And while I do enjoy blockbusters, I enjoy underground stuff, classics, and a lot of the stuff mainstream audiences don't get. I love movies of all kinds and I'm not snooty about it, if someone likes something, then good for them, but if not, so what?
Bergman has some great films on the Criterion list, as does Cronenberg (even though I'm not a huge fan of his work). Heck, I wish David Lynch had've let them properly do Eraserhead instead of just giving us the DVD he did with no chapter skips and one feature that had nothing to do with the film, really. Instead, he just threw the offer back in their face.
Pretty harsh to jump on someone for asking a simple question, eh?