tivo
CAGiversary!
Conservative is defined as "resistant to change"
Liberal is defined as "broad-mindedness"; "tolerant" or "generous and broad sympathies"
But are these definitions aptly applied to today's political groups?
Thomas Sowell Responds:
[1] - reminded me of the law in Oregon which bans self service at gas stations.
This has been stemming from some time but reemerged on my BS radar when Obama made the recent car analogy about going forward in D and reverse in R. So, like so many other terms which mean one thing but do the other, even these two labels are wrongly defined in public views (especially among today's youth).
Liberal is defined as "broad-mindedness"; "tolerant" or "generous and broad sympathies"
But are these definitions aptly applied to today's political groups?
Thomas Sowell Responds:
Among the many words that don't mean what they say, but which too many of us accept as if they did, are those staples of political discussion, "liberals" and "conservatives."
Most liberals are not liberal and most conservatives are not conservative.
The late liberal Professor Tony Judt of New York University gave this definition of liberals: "A liberal is someone who opposes interference in the affairs of others: who is tolerant of dissenting attitudes and unconventional behavior." According to Professor Judt, liberals favor "keeping other people out of our lives, leaving individuals the maximum space in which to live and flourish as they choose."
That is certainly in keeping with the dictionary definition of liberalism and with most contemporary liberals' vision of themselves.
Most of us would probably regard the current administration in Washington-- both the White House and the Congress-- as "liberal," even though the word "progressive" may be more in vogue.
Does the sweeping legislation empowering federal officials to tell doctors, patients, hospitals, and insurance companies what to do, when it comes to medical care, sound like leaving individuals the maximum space to live their lives as they choose?
Communities that have had overwhelmingly liberal elected officials for decades abound in nanny state regulations, micro-managing everything from home-building to garbage collection. San Francisco is a classic example. Among its innumerable micro-managing laws is one recently passed requiring that gas stations must remove the little levers that allow motorists to pump gas into their cars without having to hold the nozzle. [1]
Liberals are usually willing to let people violate the traditional standards of the larger society but crack down on those who dare to violate liberals' own notions and fetishes.
Our academic institutions are overwhelmingly dominated by liberals. They feature speech codes that punish politically incorrect statements. Even to apply to many colleges and universities, students must have spent time as "volunteers" for activities arbitrarily defined by admissions committees as "community service."
As for conservatism, it has no specific political meaning, because everything depends on what you are trying to conserve.
Conservatism, in its original meaning, would require preserving the welfare state and widespread government intervention in the economy.
Liberals often flatter themselves with having the generosity that the word implies.
We are probably stuck with having to use words like liberal and conservative. But we can at least recognize them as nothing more than political flags of convenience. We need not accept these words literally.
[1] - reminded me of the law in Oregon which bans self service at gas stations.
This has been stemming from some time but reemerged on my BS radar when Obama made the recent car analogy about going forward in D and reverse in R. So, like so many other terms which mean one thing but do the other, even these two labels are wrongly defined in public views (especially among today's youth).