Hmm
Pros- He can multiply
He's not stupid enough to think everything is rosy at Sony
Cons- He has no idea of the costs associated with producing, but for the sake of arguement, let's assume his costs are correct, or close enough to correct:
1.) He doesn't allow for decreasing production costs within the Six million Ps3s. Though I doubt that the costs will decrease dramatically by April, let's say that each month the costs of making an additional Ps3 goes down by $20, so by April it costs $100 less to make a Ps3. Now, the assesment would be accurate If all the Ps3's were made before the costs decreased.
So, using the numbers above, and the initial launch of 500,000 units between Japan and america, the total costs would be 1.579x 10^8 USD (For Japan, since the price is cheaper by $79, add $79 to initial launch and mult by 100,000 units. For America, mult remaining units by 300, then add).
Now, let's say Sony ships another 500,000 the next month when it costs them $20 less to produce. So, you have for Japan (assuming they split the allocation evenly) 250,000(379-20), and for America 250,000(300-20). The Sum of these is now 1.5975x10^8.
As this is a constant decreasing cost, we can put it into an Algebraic function so that (let the variable x equal the amount lost, "U" equal total units, and "m" the total number of months since launch) L= U(300-20(m)) for the US and L=U(379-20(m)) for Japan If we do this for each month until April, we see that the losses are 636million in Japan and 370 million in the US. While sizeable, it is 794 million less than this guy's calculation, and a sizeable chunk of change. We do not know the decreasing costs of the PS3, so it could be even more.
Then there's the software. He assumes that people will naturally buy the 360 version. There are a few things wrong with that. First of all, not everyone wants a 360. Brand loyalty can play a huge part in things. There's also Japan which..well, hasn't taken well to it. Secondly, he's ignoring exclusives because he assumes the launch exclusives (or lack thereof) are indicative of future exclusives. Fundamentally untrue.
2.) He assumes that since Sony only has a value of 27 Billion USD, they are limited by it such that if they lose that much they will go out of business/ be bought. This is only true if Sony has NO MORE OPTIONS to get money (borrowing, holding dividends etc). Additionally, accounting losses do not always lead to hostile takeovers. In reality, sales data (if good) could increase the amount of stock purchased by investors, which is countered to what is desired in terms of a takeover (where the opposing firm hopes to acquire stock incredibly cheaply)The explanation is longer than this, but you guys get the point.
IF the Ps3 becomes significantly cheaper to produce within an acceptable timeframe, AND the software prices are not off-putting, then it is absolutely baseless to claim that the Ps3 will put sony out of business. Their game division has been keeping the company from sinking, and I don't doubt the Ps3 will do the same.