[quote name='animalspinners']On the PC, if I remember correctly, there are also more enemies on screen at one time.
The console version has lower difficulty all around - normal mode on the consoles is akin to the PC version of easy. Friendly fire, by default, is also turned off on the console versions. The difficulty was bumped up on the PC due to being able to take a more tactical view in the battlefield.
To me, Dragon Age on the consoles was more akin to KOTOR. On the PC, it reminded me heavily of Baldur's Gate. You have to really micro manage on the PC version, but on the 360 version I never really bothered to dictate what the other NPC's did most of the time.
It is entirely possible you will like it on the consoles when you didn't like it on the PC. The game is less tactical due to the loss of the overhead view and more in your face when it comes to the action, and a bit easier, so it sounds like you would enjoy this version a lot more. I have a friend with the same complaints as you and he went to throughly enjoy the 360 version, even finishing it.
For $35, it's worth trying out.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the post. I wouldn't go as far as to say that I didn't like the PC version. It was well done but it just got to be too much of a hassle micromanaging everyone all the time after putting about 25 hours in. I don't mind tough games that are action oriented but I really don't like to have to sit there and figure out a plan to get through almost every battle. That's why I pretty much detest strategy games...lol. I remember beating Baldur's Gate 1 but 2 got to be overwhelming in the later stages so I never finished it. I guess part of it is my stubbornness for refusing to turn the difficulty down to easy.
Anyway, after reading your post, I think I would enjoy one of the console versions more. I'll probably give the 360 Ultimate edition a go for $35 and since I never bought any of the DLC or Awakenings, I'll be getting plenty of new content for my money.