ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='chakan']He's about to get "knocked down again" by a 8 pound mass cancellation package.

USPS.com
2307 1770 0000 1360 8470[/QUOTE]

Everyone has been acting like the ECA is going to be so surprised when the package arrives. They must at least know if it, they've probably even viewed the document online.
 
[quote name='Vegan']Everyone has been acting like the ECA is going to be so surprised when the package arrives. They must at least know if it, they've probably even viewed the document online.[/QUOTE]

I don't think that will be the surprise. The google postcards, maybe more of a surprise.
 
[quote name='chakan']He's about to get "knocked down again" by a 8 pound mass cancellation package.

USPS.com
2307 1770 0000 1360 8470[/QUOTE]

I'm sorry, what is that package?
 
[quote name='Jaysonguy']No because Gamefly isn't trying to give you an excuse to cover for something

If you went to apply for a Gamefly trial someone would say "sorry but you already used your free trial"

Something the ECA could have done very easily[/QUOTE]

Glad somebody brought this up. The "Gamefly scam" wouldn't work because Gamefly actually has a system to prevent users from abusing their generosity. You get one trial per home address. If the ECA's entire structure wasn't so loosely put together, they could have avoided 99% of these problems.

I've yet to get an explanation why a full year membership with full benefits is considered a "trial". I've said numerous times, if they had just given people one month, with 3-5 Amazon codes and 1 Gamefly trial, I promise you it would have been enough to get people to pay for the membership. That is the purpose of a TRIAL after all. It's amazing what a little business sense will do for you.
 
[quote name='Vader582']The link was to a video of the song "Tubthumpin'" by Chumbawanba

Here are the lyrics:
Chumbawamba
Tubthumper (1997)
Tubthumping


We'll be singing
When we're winning
We'll be singing

I get knocked down
But I get up again
You're never going to keep me down

Pissing the night away
Pissing the night away

He drinks a whisky drink
He drinks a vodka drink
He drinks a lager drink
He drinks a cider drink
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the good times
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the better times:

'Oh Danny Boy
Danny Boy
Danny Boy...'

I get knocked down
But I get up again
You're never going to keep me down

Pissing the night away
Pissing the night away

He drinks a whisky drink
He drinks a vodka drink
He drinks a lager drink
He drinks a cider drink
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the good times
He sings the songs that remind him
Of the better times:

'Don't cry for me
Next door neighbour...'

I get knocked down
But I get up again
You're never going to keep me down

We'll be singing
When we're winning
We'll be singing
He obviously still thinks that he is the victim here. :roll:[/QUOTE]



That is ridiculous. He just doesnt learn. No wonder Gameslay and Gypsy acted the way they did on the ECA Forums, look at who their leader is. And, again, Hal thinks he is the Victim. We all knocked him down. Whatever. He knocked himself down. This is their leader, throwing that up on his twitter. And what does "Paying it Forward" have to do with anything?



One of the biggest problems I have with this whole situation, is they are doing all of this against their prime supporters, GAMERS. The Gaming Industry is unlike other industries because they have conferences and shows all over the world throughout the year. The ECA should/will be at the shows every single year. You know who else will be there? GAMERS.

Why in the world they would keep trying to act like the victim by taking potshots through things like Hal's twitters and challenging their members with their mods on their forums? They are going to run into these same gamers multiple times a year for many years to come. They are never going to be able to explain this. People will be wearing anti ECA T-Shirts, calling Hal out at all of his Q & A's, standing by their booth and debating with them, this is never going to get better. They will never be able to avoid the core group they have alienated and "smeared" in some ways. Never! E3, PAX, Lepzig, Tokyo Game Show, gamers will be there. All of these journalists writing stories about the ECA will be there. Hal Halpin will be there.


I really do not see how this is ever going to get better. Especially with Hal's attitude throughout the whole process. People are seriously mad at him, and will try to debate with him every time they get a chance, whether this year, next year, or in 3 years.
 
Wow.. whats in that 8lb package... I know when i 1st discovered the google postcard thing I posted it a bazillion pages ago.. I sent one to myself to my work.. When I get it I'll expect they'll get it a day after me. Since me and google are on the west coast and ECA is on the east coast.

Anyways this is the most festive thread I've read in months.
To quote a certain group of people.
!mget 4000
 
To the person that said they could still see MAINGEAR as an affiliate - could you screen cap it or link me to it? I was informed they pulled our info as of Monday.

Best,

Chris Morley
CTO
MAINGEAR Computers
 
[quote name='3rdamention']And what does "Paying it Forward" have to do with anything?[/QUOTE]
I just figured one of his cronies/sycophants was trying to cheer up the over-abused and saddened Kingpin of the ECA. Poor baby...he was "paying it forward" to other ECA-apologists who are also sad pandas.:lol:

Don't worry. I won't cry for you Hal. ;)
 
[quote name='ChrisMorley']To the person that said they could still see MAINGEAR as an affiliate - could you screen cap it or link me to it? I was informed they pulled our info as of Monday.

Best,

Chris Morley
CTO
MAINGEAR Computers[/QUOTE]
To be fair, it took months for them to take down the Amazon discount. :lol:

maingear.png

 
I appreciate the update. I am a free member and still have about 10 months to go. They don't seem so evil after finally explaining the issue so I'll sit it out. If need be I'll cancel the last month.
 
[quote name='simmias']Unfortunately I can't access this site from work, but as Reira said the package has been mailed around noon today (EST). The tracking number is 2307 1770 0000 1360 8470 if anyone wants to watch its progress.

Since each letter meets the criteria for cancellation outlined by the ECA, I don't see how they could deny them without causing more stink for themselves. But in any case, I can't wait for them to open up 700+ cancellation letters. :)[/QUOTE]

If they deny the mass of cancellation, we have over 700 cases of fraud on their part.:shame:
 
[quote name='psyXcho']I appreciate the update. I am a free member and still have about 10 months to go. They don't seem so evil after finally explaining the issue so I'll sit it out. If need be I'll cancel the last month.[/QUOTE]
You do realize that Halpin more or less interviewed himself, right?
 
[quote name='botticus']To be fair, it took months for them to take down the Amazon discount. :lol:[/QUOTE]

Yeah but the Amazon discount at least said "not available" - this still has Maingear's coupon code :p
 
[quote name='botticus']To be fair, it took months for them to take down the Amazon discount. :lol:
[/QUOTE]

hahaha.

I'm not even sure what maingear is but I think i'll make a purchase as soon as their link is off the ECA site.
 
[quote name='SDC']Over 700 CAGs cutting ties with the ECA.[/QUOTE]

So is that different from the free Google postcard cancellations? I must have missed that part of the CAG story -- what happened?
 
[quote name='ChrisMorley']To the person that said they could still see MAINGEAR as an affiliate - could you screen cap it or link me to it? I was informed they pulled our info as of Monday.

Best,

Chris Morley
CTO
MAINGEAR Computers[/QUOTE]

It's not listed on the page telling people what benefits they'll get if they sign up, but it is on the actual members benefit page you have to sign up for and log in to access:

MAINGEAR

logo_maingear.jpg

MAINGEAR is a renowned manufacturer of award winning, record breaking, top performing gaming PCs.
Code: [Code Removed By Me]
Offer: Receive 5% off any purchase. Call 1-800-MAINGEAR to redeem.
 
[quote name='Vader582']You do realize that Halpin more or less interviewed himself, right?[/QUOTE]

I know this, but at the same time, I sort of agree that at least this is the right *type* of response (even though it's completely spun to favor him). If he had said this strait up at the beginning of this whole mess, I would probably be a lot less pissed at them. Instead he blames/threatens everyone and only later comes back with this after all the fallout from his first response.
 
[quote name='Warlock82']I know this, but at the same time, I sort of agree that at least this is the right *type* of response (even though it's completely spun to favor him). If he had said this strait up at the beginning of this whole mess, I would probably be a lot less pissed at them. Instead he blames/threatens everyone and only later comes back with this after all the fallout from his first response.[/QUOTE]
Well, I agree with you there. If this had been the first statement I might have been more willing to wait it out. Although the attitude of the ECA forum mods would have probably still pushed me over the edge.
I was just trying to warn him to take the interview with a grain of salt.:) There are still alot of half-truths and spin in there.
 
[quote name='caltab']Ya, it seems like they've revised their terms of service to get rid of that clause. Again, I think this is a very positive step. We should be encouraging them with at least some acknowledgment that they are taking the right steps, and not solely be focused on their past mistakes.[/QUOTE]
It's good that they changed the Terms to benefit the consumer, but it makes me further upset that they've changed them again without notifying anyone. Is it that hard to send out a mass email that says: "The Terms have changed: see the new ones here."; and to tell us what differences exist from the previous version?
 
[quote name='caltab']Ya, it seems like they've revised their terms of service to get rid of that clause. Again, I think this is a very positive step. We should be encouraging them with at least some acknowledgment that they are taking the right steps, and not solely be focused on their past mistakes.[/QUOTE]

The thing is, there is a difference between doing the right thing and covering your ass. After everything Hal Halpin has said there is no way I'm going to believe he is doing the right thing.

If you haven't noticed he is still playing the victim and attacking his members by touting the "exploiter" issue. He is even doing staged interviews on his affiliates in order to make himself and the ECA look better. Not to mention, changing your member contract - on what seems like a daily basis now - without notification is massively hypocritical of Hal and the ECA.

For me, Hal Halpin and the ECA are irreparably damaged. Hal has proven himself to be a slimeball who can't be trusted so it really doesn't matter how many things he and his organizations "make right".
 
[quote name='Scrubking']The thing is, there is a difference between doing the right thing and covering your ass. After everything Hal Halpin has said there is no way I'm going to believe he is doing the right thing.

If you haven't noticed he is still playing the victim and attacking his members by touting the "exploiter" issue. He is even doing staged interviews on his affiliates in order to make himself and the ECA look better. Not to mention, changing your member contract - on what seems like a daily basis now - without notification is massively hypocritical of Hal and the ECA.

For me, Hal Halpin and the ECA are irreparably damaged. Hal has proven himself to be a slimeball who can't be trusted so it really doesn't matter how many things he and his organizations "make right".[/QUOTE]

*Absolutely agreed
 
[quote name='Scrubking']The thing is, there is a difference between doing the right thing and covering your ass. After everything Hal Halpin has said there is no way I'm going to believe he is doing the right thing.

If you haven't noticed he is still playing the victim and attacking his members by touting the "exploiter" issue. He is even doing staged interviews on his affiliates in order to make himself and the ECA look better. Not to mention, changing your member contract - on what seems like a daily basis now - without notification is massively hypocritical of Hal and the ECA.

For me, Hal Halpin and the ECA are irreparably damaged. Hal has proven himself to be a slimeball who can't be trusted so it really doesn't matter how many things he and his organizations "make right".[/QUOTE]

Agreed.

This whole fiasco has not been accounted for by any means. Changing their TOS in this manner directly contradicts their organization's purpose.

fucking hypocritical asshole with a shitty goatee. Not to mention he's retarded and cocky. How the hell do people like him own businesses, regardless of whether they're successful or not. It sickens me that people can actually look at this guy, or listen to/read what he thinks...And then follow him.

Someone this stupid CAN'T be that influential.
 
[quote name='psyXcho']I appreciate the update. I am a free member and still have about 10 months to go. They don't seem so evil after finally explaining the issue so I'll sit it out. If need be I'll cancel the last month.[/QUOTE]
Last month will be too late. You have to cancel the month before that or else you are renewed.
 
[quote name='foxdvd']It looks like someone signed for it already?[/QUOTE]

Not yet. It's just been "accepted" at the post office it was originally mailed at. You'll definitely know when it's been signed for.
 
[quote name='Scrubking']The thing is, there is a difference between doing the right thing and covering your ass. After everything Hal Halpin has said there is no way I'm going to believe he is doing the right thing.

If you haven't noticed he is still playing the victim and attacking his members by touting the "exploiter" issue. He is even doing staged interviews on his affiliates in order to make himself and the ECA look better. Not to mention, changing your member contract - on what seems like a daily basis now - without notification is massively hypocritical of Hal and the ECA.

For me, Hal Halpin and the ECA are irreparably damaged. Hal has proven himself to be a slimeball who can't be trusted so it really doesn't matter how many things he and his organizations "make right".[/QUOTE]
Agreed. I don't know why some people are declaring victory because the ECA still hasn't really done anything yet. Hal half-apologized for some mistakes and claimed that they were working on things in his self-interview, but they've only officially announced the removal of Section 5 of the TOS in their newsletter. How hard is it to notify all members of what's been going on regarding the TOS, cancellations, board downtime, etcetera? Unless they do do so, I'll assume they're trying to keep other members in the dark about this ugly incident as much as they can and carry on with business as if nothing happened.​

Yes, they've taken a step in the right direction(which is nice) after running wildly in the wrong direction, but they need to fully follow through for that to mean anything. Until then, we should not declare
bush-mission574x315.jpg
:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, just a complete observation here, but it really is in line with the ECA Practices at this point. I am a 6th Grade Computer Teacher. One of the lessons we have in my class covers Internet Domain Name Suffixes (you know, .com, .org. edu, .mil, etc.) I always tell them that you can normally tell a lot from a website simply by glancing at its domain name suffix. So a college or university is .edu, the military is .mil, most not for profit organizations and charities are .org. Finally, a .com, which is derived from "commercial" or "commerce" is a site that may offer a service (many times for free) but most likely (not all the time) gets paid by selling items online or ads and banner clicks.


Today I got to thinking. Why does the ECA, which is a not for profit organization, have a website that is a .com? The EFF is a .org, PETA is a .org, why is the ECA a .com?


I just thought with the recent actions of the ECA to try and "trap" its customers into reaccuring credit card charges, it is funny that they have a .com as a Domain Name Suffix, when they should, if they are a true not for profit organization, have a .org Domain Name Suffix. Of course you can give your website nearly any suffix you want, there are no restrictions, but considering what .org is supposed to be for, i lol'd.
 
I'm sure this has been mentioned, but wasn't part of the reason to pull the online cancellation due to lack of staff/time constraints at the ECA? I feel a bit bad for the poor bastard who has to manually delete all those names from the USPS package, let alone the Google postcards.

"Hi honey, what did you do today at work?"
[insert 4-chan fuck comic here]
 
Wow 3900 posts. Sorry to all those that got screwed. Not for profit does not equal not a scam. Since it's a non-profit Halpin is forced by law to disclose how much dirty money he is scamming from you as a salary/benefits. It would be a good idea to spam that number everywhere. Just saying.
 
[quote name='watcher0']If they deny the mass of cancellation, we have over 700 cases of fraud on their part.:shame:[/QUOTE]



Maybe not fraud, but it will make them look bad. Their TOS simply said a letter, Seth later said it didn't need to be certified or anything, just the letter with your name and email address or whatever. The TOS also never stated it had to be sent from the individual user or that "mass cancellations" were not accepted.

I think they will probably change that, again, AFTER they receive the huge box, so something like this never happens again.


Did the list of the Super 718 get emailed to the websites reporting the story and to the ECA Partners? I dont know if anyone confirmed that or not.
 
[quote name='3rdamention']Ok, just a complete observation here, but it really is in line with the ECA Practices at this point. I am a 6th Grade Computer Teacher. One of the lessons we have in my class covers Internet Domain Name Suffixes (you know, .com, .org. edu, .mil, etc.) I always tell them that you can normally tell a lot from a website simply by glancing at its domain name suffix. So a college or university is .edu, the military is .mil, most not for profit organizations and charities are .org. Finally, a .com, which is derived from "commercial" or "commerce" is a site that may offer a service (many times for free) but most likely (not all the time) gets paid by selling items online or ads and banner clicks.


Today I got to thinking. Why does the ECA, which is a not for profit organization, have a website that is a .com? The EFF is a .org, PETA is a .org, why is the ECA a .com?


I just thought with the recent actions of the ECA to try and "trap" its customers into reaccuring credit card charges, it is funny that they have a .com as a Domain Name Suffix, when they should, if they are a true not for profit organization, have a .org Domain Name Suffix. Of course you can give your website nearly any suffix you want, there are no restrictions, but considering what .org is supposed to be for, i lol'd.[/QUOTE]

Honestly, with the exception of .edu and .mil, I don't think many people follow those guidelines too rigidly anymore. Generally speaking, most go for .com, .net is second choice if .com is taken, and .org is last choice if both of those are taken (with .tv and its ilk for the desperate :)). They *used* to mean something, but at this point I think everyone is just so familiar with .com that it has sort of become the standard that most people want to get.
 
[quote name='Warlock82']Honestly, with the exception of .edu and .mil, I don't think many people follow those guidelines too rigidly anymore. Generally speaking, most go for .com, .net is second choice if .com is taken, and .org is last choice if both of those are taken (with .tv and its ilk for the desperate :)). They *used* to mean something, but at this point I think everyone is just so familiar with .com that it has sort of become the standard that most people want to get.[/QUOTE]


Oh, I know, it was just an observation. However, most if not all of the legitimate not for profit organizations have a .org. Like I said, even the EFF has a .org. I know .com is sexier and most people automatically relate .com to an internet website of ANY TYPE. I just thought it was interesting, and in my silly messed up mind, makes me feel even BETTER about the EFF.
 
[quote name='Warlock82']Honestly, with the exception of .edu and .mil, I don't think many people follow those guidelines too rigidly anymore. Generally speaking, most go for .com, .net is second choice if .com is taken, and .org is last choice if both of those are taken (with .tv and its ilk for the desperate :)). They *used* to mean something, but at this point I think everyone is just so familiar with .com that it has sort of become the standard that most people want to get.[/QUOTE]

I'd say a majority of non-profits still try to use dot org whenever they can, but many of them supplement it with dot coms.
 
[quote name='3rdamention']Oh, I know, it was just an observation. However, most if not all of the legitimate not for profit organizations have a .org. Like I said, even the EFF has a .org. I know .com is sexier and most people automatically relate .com to an internet website of ANY TYPE. I just thought it was interesting, and in my silly messed up mind, makes me feel even BETTER about the EFF.[/QUOTE]

Curious about this, I just typed eff.com into my browser. It redirected me to eff.org. The fact that they have both but prefer to use the .org does make me feel better, because if nothing else they feel like they have a reputation to uphold as an NPO.
 
[quote name='3rdamention']Maybe not fraud, but it will make them look bad. Their TOS simply said a letter, Seth later said it didn't need to be certified or anything, just the letter with your name and email address or whatever. The TOS also never stated it had to be sent from the individual user or that "mass cancellations" were not accepted.

I think they will probably change that, again, AFTER they receive the huge box, so something like this never happens again.


Did the list of the Super 718 get emailed to the websites reporting the story and to the ECA Partners? I dont know if anyone confirmed that or not.[/QUOTE]

From what I remember of basic contract law: Legally, they have to abide by the terms (TOS) they've laid out on the day that it is postmarked (today). So they have to follow through with the cancellation requests. Otherwise, if they bill anyone that cancelled per their TOS cancellation instructions, it's fraud.
 
[quote name='3rdamention']Today I got to thinking. Why does the ECA, which is a not for profit organization, have a website that is a .com? The EFF is a .org, PETA is a .org, why is the ECA a .com?[/QUOTE]

Interestingly, it looks like they do own theeca.org, so it's hard to tell why they're not actually using it:

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Domain ID: D29679475-LROR
Domain Name: THEECA.ORG
Created On: 21-Jun-2000 11:46:32 UTC
Last Updated On: 03-Dec-2009 04:33:41 UTC
Expiration Date: 21-Jun-2010 11:46:32 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)
Status: CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Status: CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
Status: CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status: CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID: CR31258262
Registrant Name: Domain Manager
Registrant Organization: Crest Group LLC
Registrant Street1: 64 DANBURY RD STE 700
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City: Wilton
Registrant State/Province: Connecticut
Registrant Postal Code: 06987
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.2037616180
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email: [email protected]
[/FONT]
I wonder what the deal is with this "Crest Group LLC" -- all I could find was this: http://www.manta.com/company/mmdlkrm and this: http://www.crestgroup.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='3rdamention']Today I got to thinking. Why does the ECA, which is a not for profit organization, have a website that is a .com? The EFF is a .org, PETA is a .org, why is the ECA a .com?[/QUOTE]


You should know this as a teacher, but those particular TLDs aren't enforced and haven't been for quite some time. Many organizations will will often register any TLD in their name that is available (try visiting Microsoft.org/biz/net, they all redirect to .com).

Most NPOs do tend to use .org when available, but it's commonly the exception rather than the rule.
 
Crest Group Llc Business Information

Claim This Profile
Crest Group Llc is a private company categorized under Business Services (Unclassified) and located in Wilton, CT. Our records show it was established in 2005* and incorporated in Connecticut*. Current estimates show this company has an annual revenue of $1 to 2.5 million and employs a staff of approximately 1 to 4.







lol....$1-$2.5M per year in revenue....# of staff 1 to 4.....wonder where all the money is going?
 
Maybe someone should tweet this video back to Hal. WARNING NSFW (language)

[removed link]

Forget it, I'm better than that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah hah. From the Hal Halpin Wikipedia article:

Halpin is currently the president of the Crest Group, a consulting company serving the video game industry. Crest Group is the association management company that previously managed IEMA and now manages the Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA).
And then, if you click on that "association management company" link:

An association management company (AMC) provides management and specialized administrative services to trade associations and professional societies using a for-profit approach that runs not-for-profit associations like businesses.
Hm . . . So no one thinks that it's a conflict of interest that the founder and president of the non-profit ECA also happens to run the for-profit company that provides "management and specialized administrative services" to it? Is this the way that these things usually work?
 
[quote name='arcane93']Ah hah. From the Hal Halpin Wikipedia article:

And then, if you click on that "association management company" link:

Hm . . . So no one thinks that it's a conflict of interest that the founder and president of the non-profit ECA also happens to run the for-profit company that provides "management and specialized administrative services" to it? Is this the way that these things usually work?[/QUOTE]

My company works similar in which a for profit company(owned by the same people) take a nice cut out off our "non-for-profit" profits. I work for a reciprocal exchange and our attorney-in-fact gets paid based on rates determined by us. The owner owns both of these and basically looks like she just funnels money to herself but its all legit.

Not sure if related but worth mentioning
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']This is a site to find deals on games. It doesn't surprise me that most of the talk was about the discounts. Just because people were only vocal (again on a site called Cheap Ass Gamer) about the discounts does not mean they didn't care about the organization's stated goals.[/QUOTE]

I never mentioned what someone might care about behind the scenes, nor did I pm everyone to put together a survey. All I was doing was pointing out the fact that most people were only discussing the discount. I was responding to someone stating most people were there for the discount AND the cause. You yourself just agreed with me, but I don't think you know it.
 
[quote name='arcane93']
Hm . . . So no one thinks that it's a conflict of interest that the founder and president of the non-profit ECA also happens to run the for-profit company that provides "management and specialized administrative services" to it? Is this the way that these things usually work?[/QUOTE]

That seems incredibly sketchy to me. Just more proof of Hal Hal's sketchiness.
 
[quote name='arcane93']Ah hah. From the Hal Halpin Wikipedia article:

And then, if you click on that "association management company" link:

Hm . . . So no one thinks that it's a conflict of interest that the founder and president of the non-profit ECA also happens to run the for-profit company that provides "management and specialized administrative services" to it? Is this the way that these things usually work?[/QUOTE]

Now I'm not saying it's a scam. But the more layers of crap involved, the easier it is to run a scam.

Just saying. ;)

And to jacknichlson, I'm sure no laws are being broken, but it sure looks ethicly challanged.
 
[quote name='jacknicklson']My company works similar in which a for profit company(owned by the same people) take a nice cut out off our "non-for-profit" profits. I work for a reciprocal exchange and our attorney-in-fact gets paid based on rates determined by us. The owner owns both of these and basically looks like she just funnels money to herself but its all legit.

Not sure if related but worth mentioning[/QUOTE]

Well, maybe it's perfectly normal for how these things operate. I have no idea. I just found it interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top