ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
one thing tho... the way this has all gone down it clearly looks very predatory.... I wonder what the IRS would think of these predatory practices from a supposed nonprofit organization?
 
[quote name='JCAll']I hear it has to be hand written in the blood of virgins.[/QUOTE]

I got pig blood and goat blood but I don't really know if they were virgins. I got extra virgin olive oil but that might be too hard to read.
 
I too joined up during the free promo. I was told about it a long time ago before the promo and considered joining then but they were small and unimportant at the time. Since then they have grown into this evil, unresponsive, PR nightmare of a monster.

I never got in on any of the Amazon codes and was disappointed with that but most recently I got in on Think Geek's promo for the Tryptophan T-Shirt with any $25 purchase and hey why not use the coupon on ECA? Funny thing is I found a better code for $10 and $40 purchase rather than $10 off $50 and another funny thing is I got the same $10 off $50 code from the catalog given to me for free.

Seriously the ECA has stepped into a hole that it should never return from.

Sending off my request immediately tomorrow via certified mail. I can't believe the bullshit hoops I will have to jump through because of the ECA's incompetence, ignorance and greed.
 
I have a question-- ECA is non-profit, right while GameFly is FOR profit? So GameFly can't do the same thing what ECA is trying to do?
 
[quote name='slickkill77']Ok well I'll start compiling all the letters that I can find. CheapyD is on right now so maybe we could get him to do it.

Letter to send to all companies advertising on the ECA. Thank you blissskr

Currently I see that on the ECA's (Entertainment Consumers Association) web site you are listed as a participating partner offering benefits for ECA members. You may not be aware of the recent consumer backlash against this organization and its actions which are being viewed as dishonest. This organization has recently removed members' options to cancel membership through online account access or by telephone and states it must be done through regular mail. However, in their own terms and conditions it states 'they aren't responsible for any mail being lost the members claim to send in'. This has resulted in growing consumer backlash and a quick Internet search will show all the news articles that are continuing consumer sentiment of dissatisfaction. You can see such articles on the Consumerist- http://consumerist.com/2009/12/eca-tries-to-prevent-members-from-canceling.html and gaming site Kotaku- http://kotaku.com/5417143/entertainment-consumers-outraged-over-eca-cancellation-policy. The organization's response has been to release a statement not addressing the actual issues at hand, but by taking a condescending tone with consumers and blaming them for the issues at hand. As a member of this organization now seeking to cancel as it's ironic that they fail to represent gamers in anyway and are more concerned with their own self interests. However, they have succeeded in uniting gamers across the Internet in a campaign to spread the word of the ECA's practices and inform partner businesses what we think of their association with this organization and seek their support for us, their consumers, in asking that they consider severing ties with an organization that doesn't represent our voice but simply tries to drown it out.
[/QUOTE]

Fixed some of the grammar mistakes.
 
[quote name='Josef']You got to love how Hal Halpin is basically trying to scare people into not contacting their credit card companies:

http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105[/QUOTE]

:rofl: What a douche.

That's complete BS. The only time a credit card company will investigate it's own customers if a customer files complaints frequently and they're found to be illicit.

There's no question that what the ECA is doing is shady as hell... I'm sure any bank/credit card company could see that if a customer explained it to them.
 
Ha! I used a one time use credit card (through the Paypal plugin). What are you going to do now, ECA? Nevertheless, I think I might write an actual letter just to be safe if this situation doesn't resolve itself...
 
I'm quoting my self in hopes that a mod or cheapy sees this. I believe that a new thread fresh of the insults and everything else would be appropriate at this point

[quote name='slickkill77']Ok well I'll start compiling all the letters that I can find. CheapyD is on right now so maybe we could get him to do it.

Letter to send to all companies advertising on the ECA. Thank you blissskr
Currently I see that on the ECA's (Entertainment Consumers Association) web site you are listed as a participating partner offering benefits for ECA members. You may not be aware of the recent consumer backlash against this organization and its actions which are being viewed as dishonest. This organization has recently removed member's options to cancel membership through online account access or by telephone and states it must be done through regular mail. However, in there own terms and conditions it states 'they aren't responsible for any mail being lost the members claim to send in'. This has resulted in growing consumer backlash and a quick Internet search will show all the news articles that are continuing consumer sentiment of dissatisfaction. You can see such articles on the Consumerist- http://consumerist.com/2009/12/eca-tries-to-prevent-members-from-canceling.html and gaming site Kotukus- http://kotaku.com/5417143/entertainment-consumers-outraged-over-eca-cancellation-policy. The organizations response has been to release a statement not addressing the actual issues at hand but by taking a condescending tone with consumers and blaming them for the issues at hand. As a member of this organization now seeking to cancel as its ironic that they fail to represent gamers in anyway and are more interested in there own self interests. However, they have succeeded in uniting gamers across the Internet in a campaign to spread the word of the Eca's practices and inform partner businesses what we think of there association with this organization and seek there support for us there consumers in asking that they consider severing ties with an organization that doesn't represent our voice but simply try's to drown it out.


Letter to send to Walmart.com and Target.com
Thanks to blissskr and ashkpa
You're currently offering the ECA (Entertainment Consumer Association) Membership Card for sale online and in stores, this card represents a prepaid one year membership card to the previously mentioned organization. However, you may not realize that even with the purchase of the card this organization requires the consumers credit card information to be added to the users account and they have an automatic recurring annual membership fee. They have so far canceled all ways of canceling this charge except by sending a letter through the mail, no longer by phone or online. Under their own terms it states that they are not responsible for lost mail that a member may have claimed to sent. A quick Internet search will reveal how many members and consumers are upset with what is now being viewed as dishonest organization. You can find info on this at the Consumerist- http://consumerist.com/2009/12/eca-t...canceling.html or the gaming site Kotaku http://kotaku.com/5417143/entertainm...llation-policy as well as many other news sites which now feature an article about this organizations actions and the growing consumer backlash. I would hope you would consider removing this product and your general support of the organization through sales of these prepaid memberships in order to protect your consumers and avoid your company being in any way associated with it. Thank you.


Letter to send to the Connect AG
Thanks to lord_ebonstone
To The Honorable Richard Blumenthal,

My name is (YOUR NAME). I am a resident of (YOUR STATE) who "subscribed" to a Connecticut-based organization known as the "Electronics Consumer Association" (ECA). They self-define:

The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA) is the non-profit membership organization that represents consumers of interactive entertainment in the US and Canada.
-http://theeca.com/about_eca

The organization charges an annual membership fee of $19.99 (or $14.99 for students/military) and offers:

...an exclusive package of incentives just for joining! And we'll keep your information on file and process your membership renewals each year on your anniversary of joining.
-http://theeca.com/user/register

The original "hook" of joining this organization was the promise of 10% off coupons to Amazon.com when applied to video/computer game purchases. This "benefit" was subsequently cancelled within the first year, despite the head of the organization using this "benefit" as a selling point for membership:

"If you buy three games or so a year through Amazon, your ECA membership is basically free," he told Ars, while also saying that he's working to bring the discount to even more retailers and game organizations. -ECA President and Founder Hal Halpin
-http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/03/eca-membership-now-brings-game-savings-at-amazoncom.ars

Until recently, the organization made it (apparently) easy to cancel this recurring fee via a form on their website. I cancelled my subscription and considered issuing a chargeback as I felt like I had been the victim of a "bait and switch." Other "members" felt the same way and threatened chargebacks on the official forum. Mr. Halpin appeared in the forum discussion making coercive remarks to the effect that attempted chargebacks would be met with legal action, as the organization was a non-profit in the same way as a charity. They didn't "owe" us anything. I would provide a source for these comments, however the ECA has been aggressively deleting both old and new forum discussions in an obvious attempt to hide their electronic "paper trail."

It has now been revealed (or claimed) that the online cancellation request was totally non-functional, as according to this discussion on the official forums:

-http://forums.theeca.com/showpost.php?p=113186&postcount=59

Currently the only way to cancel the recurring fee is to write a (physical) letter providing a cancellation request. However, the following clause in the membership agreement makes the practicality of this prospect a little disturbing based on the current behavior of the organization up to this point:

12. Receipt of Mail. ECA cannot guarantee that it receives any mail that Member claims to have sent. Member should, at Member’s own expense, send any notices to ECA in a form to ensure to Member that their communication arrived at ECA, which form may include but not be limited to FedEx, UPS, USPS Return Receipt Requested and USPS Certified Mail.

-http://theeca.com/terms

Further, in the terms of use are several clauses that allow the ECA to aggressively find ways to charge you:

5. Right to update Credit Card Account Information. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.

4. ECA Service Fee; Renewal Fees ...Unless Member notifies ECA that he or she does not wish to renew membership in the ECA Service pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement at least 30 days prior to the end of Member’s Membership Term, then ECA will automatically renew membership at the end of each Membership Term as authorized upon enrollment and bill the then-current renewal Service Fee to the designated billing source.

-http://theeca.com/terms

In effect, if your letter of cancellation is not received thirty days BEFORE the next charge cycle, you will still be charged, despite the organization essentially requiring you to submit, in writing, a letter that can prove it was received on a certain date.

It has become clear to me at this point that this organization seeks to make cancellation of their annual fees an inconvenient process compared to the utter simplicity of its registration (and payment) process. Further, it has put aggressive means in place to ensure that it will be able to squeeze every last dime out of you that it is "legally" able.

The fact that there was an (apparently) functional cancellation function on the website that displayed information that both confirmed the cancellation had taken place AND showed that the account had been disabled in a "status" window smacks of fraud to me, especially because the ECA did not actually inform its members about the fact that this process was non-functional (or simply fraudulent). The only way I found out was by noticing a news update on another website I frequent.

I am outraged by how this organization has treated me and my rights and ability to cancel my membership on demand. It seems clear to me at this point that the ECA is attempting a last-ditch moneygrab due to the massive backlash and cancellations the organization experienced when many of its members rightfully felt like they had been "baited and switched" by the cancellation of the advertised Amazon discount. Again, I stress that my perception is that this discount was ADVERTISED due to the statements made by ECA President and Founder Hal Halpin, which flies in the face of the organization being "non-profit" or later being equated to a charity by suggesting the membership fees were equivalent to donations.

Mr. Halpin has chosen to change the definition of his organization on the fly as he sees fit to coerce its "members" (or are we donors?) from pursuing legal or credit-based chargeback action against the ECA.

The ECA's contact information is as follows:

Entertainment Consumers Association
64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406 USA
phone: +1 (203) 761-6180
fax: +1 (203) 761-6184

The Consumerist, a respected consumer advocate website, has an article with further information on the situation, including links to specific discussions on the ECA website:
http://consumerist.com/2009/12/eca-t...canceling.html

Finally, I want to thank you for your time and state that I have a deep respect for the time, effort, and work you put into our defense as citizens and consumers. You are doing our communities a great service.

Sincerely,
(YOUR NAME)
(YOUR CITY, STATE)
[email protected]
[/QUOTE]
 
[quote name='distgfx']Not only that, you can still be charged even on a canceled card. Supposedly it's to "protect" businesses. That I had to find out from my card company though. =\
[/QUOTE]

This might explain why I was asked when my next billing was going to be. When I told the guy it wasn't going to be billed until next Sept. he said "nevermind. it won't matter then."

I told him I wanted this fixed now so I don't forget and he agreed. I had this happen once before where I had to cancel a cc due to a scam and they tried charging me on the canceled card and it was rejected. Has something changed to that rule in the last few years?
 
[quote name='Casteor']I have a question-- ECA is non-profit, right while GameFly is FOR profit? So GameFly can't do the same thing what ECA is trying to do?[/QUOTE]

Gamefly can do it. ECA can do it too I think. The issue is more about the hoops you have to jump through to cancel your ECA membership. If you get sick of Gamefly, you can easily cancel it online and unless you try and keep some games, you won't get charged again.
 
5.Right to update Credit Card Account Information. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.

Just got off the phone with my Discover card, seeing if there was anyway they could block future charges. The customer service representative told me that they would re-issue me a card and close the account because there is no way to really stop charges from posting, I could dispute them but that would take time. A new card would be easier to make sure they don't charge my account next year.

Also. The terms mentioned above she told me was illegal and ECA could not do this with any credit card. She said she would be passing on this information to higher ups concerning the matter of ECA charges on peoples cards. So if anyone used a discover card just give them a call they'll help you out.

P.s I'm sending a certified letter tomorrow or Friday.
 
[quote name='Halo05']Gamefly can do it. ECA can do it too I think. The issue is more about the hoops you have to jump through to cancel your ECA membership. If you get sick of Gamefly, you can easily cancel it online and unless you try and keep some games, you won't get charged again.[/QUOTE]

Ah, ok. I got lost along the way while reading some posts. The issue is in regards to the "difficulty" and inefficiency in canceling membership. Why do people want to cancel all of a sudden (or is it because of this new policy)?
 
I am composing my letter right now and it's going out certified mail tomorrow. I will also be sending a letter all affiliates and will be boycotting all companies associated with the eca!!!
 
[quote name='Casteor']Ah, ok. I got lost along the way while reading some posts. The issue is in regards to the "difficulty" and inefficiency in canceling membership. Why do people want to cancel all of a sudden (or is it because of this new policy)?[/QUOTE]

It's not just the new difficulty. It's also because they said that anyone who unchecked the "auto renew" button before didn't actually do it. Basically that the auto renew checkbox wasn't really working.

Which is complete BS.
 
[quote name='Monroeski']The severity of the situation?

Being possibly billed $20 ten months from now? :D[/QUOTE]

Don't forget they can change their terms at anytime they want, without notifying the customer.

What is preventing them from jacking up their annual fee to $200? Or maybe $2000?
 
[quote name='wampa8jedi']I really don't mean anything mean by my comment ;) It's just that when threads like these pop up and people start spouting misinformation about legal matters left and right, all the while acting like their analysis is gospel, I can't help but comment on it occasionally.... I imagine that doctors, builders, dancers, and athletes get similar chuckles when they see people acting like they know stuff that they clearly don't :p[/QUOTE]

It's all good...it was my mistake after all. Nevertheless...ECA and Hal remain less than scrupulous...at the very least. It may also be considered fraud on how they schemed their cancellation process in order to maintain members to feed off of like the vultures they are.

Snail mail only to cancel...but we cannot guarantee we'll get your letter.

Shady? More like criminal. What's next Hal? Ponzi schemes?
 
[quote name='Casteor']Ah, ok. I got lost along the way while reading some posts. The issue is in regards to the "difficulty" and inefficiency in canceling membership. Why do people want to cancel all of a sudden (or is it because of this new policy)?[/QUOTE]

I'm riled up because I already canceled via their site and was never sent notification that this was apparently a non-functioning option.
 
[quote name='Monroeski']The severity of the situation?

Being possibly billed $20 ten months from now? :D[/QUOTE]

Times how many people they roped in, that equals a hell of a lot of money that they didn't earn one bit.

If they have 15k members (which I think is a fairly low estimate considering the free giveaway) they just made about $300,000.. shit 30k and they are looking at $600k for doing jack shit and being a shady ass company.

I'm not going to get too bent out of shape, I used a prepaid card on it and I figure the amount of venom at these people will cause them to change their minds.
 
So let me get this straight. ECA had the cancellation button on their website clear as day for a very long time. Just recently, soon after hooking in thousands of new members (or to them seen as credit cards), they decide to announce that it never worked. Now, they make cancellation possible through the hardest way? Disgusting.
 
For the record, ECA DID allow email cancellations at one point. Right after I heard their Amazon benefit was being dropped, I checked the website and it said to email customer support to cancel. I did, and got a quick response back that I could cancel but I would lose anything I paid. I told them I didn't pay anything and I didn't want to be a member anymore and cancel. They responded it was cancelled.

Of course, I didn't save the email, but I also note my account no longer exists at theeca.com website. So whew, I think I made it in time before they made the draconian cancellation policies. This whole 'you must cancel via mail because people were re-signing up repeatedly' may have made sense when they had the Amazon discount and people were trying to get as many codes as they can, but now that they don't have it.. they just want to keep their membership #s up for their lobbying. This organization has really fallen from grace.
 
I actually sent an e-mail of cancellation request way before any of this happened (on my brothers account), and it has still yet to be answered. This was months ago (when the cancel option was still there, mind you). I'm going to send in another e-mail, not regarding cancellation, and I'll see how fast I get a response.

Also, I have a special letter I'm going to be sending them. I'd say it here, but that would ruin the surprise (and no, it's not anything deadly or harmful; just a new outlook on the whole "tracking" thing).
 
[quote name='Shadow Cloud']Ha! I used a one time use credit card (through the Paypal plugin). What are you going to do now, ECA? Nevertheless, I think I might write an actual letter just to be safe if this situation doesn't resolve itself...[/QUOTE]

My bank changed my card number a few weeks ago due to some fraud it detected.

In any case The ECA isn't going to send me an invoice for $20 will they? They have our billing address remember.
 
[quote name='distgfx']I'm riled up because I already canceled via their site and was never sent notification that this was apparently a non-functioning option.[/QUOTE]

That function was operable. It became inoperable the moment the mass exodus of members began shortly after the loss of Amazon benefits. Coincidental? Maybe...then again...maybe Superman is real and Krypton still exists and never exploded.

Hal and his half-baked excuses are just a pile of steaming bullshit.
 
[quote name='SmileyMcSmiles']That function was operable. It became inoperable the moment the mass exodus of members began shortly after the loss of Amazon benefits. Coincidental? Maybe...then again...maybe Superman is real and Krypton still exists and never exploded.

Hal and his half-baked excuses are just a pile of steaming bullshit.[/QUOTE]

I assumed it was working, but according to them it wasn't and was never meant to be there.
 
Pretty obvious what happened... People stacked mad codes and got way more $ off Amazon games than they should have. Then Amazon decided they weren't going to take the loss and went to the ECA to reimburse them. The ECA doesn't have the money to cover that and is undoubtably in the hole for God knows how much, so they are trying to do whatever they can to get it back. I am a paying member who signed up soley for the disounts at Amazon and it sucks that they are screwing me,but I understand totally WHY they are doing what they are doing. Its a dog eat dog world. They got screwed and the only way out it to try to screw other people. Doesn't make it right but unfortunately thats the way things work. I actually feel a little bad for them cuz I stand to lose $15.00 here and there but can't imagine the debt they're in. I'm sure they never intended or forsaw the problem with the codes until it was too late. I can't say I wouldn't have stacked codes if given the opportunity either cuz a few bucks is a few bucks, but I guess this is proof that there is sometimes consequences to doing unethical crap, so personally I can't even be mad. There are some more honest people that wouldn't, but I'm sure there are a ton that say no but they would. I'm amazed that people seem surprised at the whole situation. Everyone should have the collapse of this shit a mile away. I think everyone did and now they are mad cuz they are getting screwed. Alright I'm done with my book here I guess, so I'll stop here and leave it to the flames.
 
[quote name='distgfx']I assumed it was working, but according to them it wasn't and was never meant to be there.[/QUOTE]

Yes, according to them. They even had a legitimate sounding excuse. Except for the fact that my renewal is off and I used that button to do it the minute I signed up.
 
I stood up for the ECA when they lost the amazon deals as it really wasn't their fault but the fault of the stackers who abused it. Now however after this they can burn in the fiery depths of hell for all I care.
 
I've been absent for a bit (specifically, it looks like you guys have added 40 pages since I last checked in). Wanted to add that ArsTechnica is covering this story now as well. I do find it interesting that the ECA is pointing to mass fraud as their reason for making people jump through hoops. Of course, the fraud they're referring to is the rampant, and blatant, abuse of the Amazon discounts that many referred to earlier. Interesting argument to say the least...

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/...tm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']Pretty obvious what happened... People stacked mad codes and got way more $ off Amazon games than they should have. Then Amazon decided they weren't going to take the loss and went to the ECA to reimburse them. [/QUOTE]

Wow... I'm not even gonna comment on the rest. That might be the absolutely dumbest thing I've read on here yet.

Really? What country do you live in?
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']Pretty obvious what happened... People stacked mad codes and got way more $ off Amazon games than they should have. Then Amazon decided they weren't going to take the loss and went to the ECA to reimburse them. The ECA doesn't have the money to cover that and is undoubtably in the hole for God knows how much, so they are trying to do whatever they can to get it back. I am a paying member who signed up soley for the disounts at Amazon and it sucks that they are screwing me,but I understand totally WHY they are doing what they are doing. Its a dog eat dog world. They got screwed and the only way out it to try to screw other people. Doesn't make it right but unfortunately thats the way things work. I actually feel a little bad for them cuz I stand to lose $15.00 here and there but can't imagine the debt they're in. I'm sure they never intended or forsaw the problem with the codes until it was too late. I can't say I wouldn't have stacked codes if given the opportunity either cuz a few bucks is a few bucks, but I guess this is proof that there is sometimes consequences to doing unethical crap, so personally I can't even be mad. There are some more honest people that wouldn't, but I'm sure there are a ton that say no but they would. I'm amazed that people seem surprised at the whole situation. Everyone should have the collapse of this shit a mile away. I think everyone did and now they are mad cuz they are getting screwed. Alright I'm done with my book here I guess, so I'll stop here and leave it to the flames.[/QUOTE]


People potentially abusing the system does not justify them punishing everyone else, particularly when they claim to be a consumer advocacy group. This is the part that surprises me, how can they claim to be a consumer advocacy group and implement blatently anti-consumer policies. If they claimed to be a for-profit company that would be different.
 
And seriously the people on the Eca forums defending them, out of control moderators, and even there president trashing on members of the organization, thats just low. And I myself paid to join and I'm unhappy and vocal and a bunch of others are that paid are also. But according to Hal its just a small number of hooligans that joined for free causing all the problems. Anyone whether paid member or free has a right to be upset that canceling is some asinine archaic process in which it isn't the Eca's fault if they lose your cancel letter. And the online cancel button did used to actually work if it didn't it wouldn't have changed my member ship term from active to showing an end date which it clearly did when I used it weeks ago. This guy really needs to pull his head out his ass or have someones foot shoved up his lol. Its really quite funny how a group that operates counter to what its suppose to stand for, has now apparently united a large group of gamers who are using their voice to destroy the group that was intended to serve there interests all along but didn't do much besides serve its self interests. I myself can't get over what Hal posted as his response to the whole issue and the approach he took, he's either way to full of himself or he's just not very bright by placing blame on the members of the group that most likely represent the goose laying his golden egg.
 
Not surprised. Weren't any of you concerned months ago when The ECA president and their ECA Chapter Manager essentially called their customers assholes and treating them like scums for not reading every little fine print and read through every posts in their forum before asking them questions that they claimed they have already answered? They were also quite brazen in expressing their disgust and apathy with other little nuances too, which I thought was odd as it was highly unprofessional. In their latest statement I wonder why they would call it exploitation that some members repeatedly join and quit to take advantage of their offers. Since there are no refunds and new members have to pay 20 bucks each time they sign up, as well as no welcoming gifts, how exactly are they exploiting ECA when they cancel their membership before expiration without refund and pay membership fee again when signing up later?
 
[quote name='Unrealevil']Yes, according to them. They even had a legitimate sounding excuse. Except for the fact that my renewal is off and I used that button to do it the minute I signed up.[/QUOTE]

Indeed, it was a while ago but I recall it being listed as a recurring subscription then stating it will expire at a certain date after I had cancelled. So it obviously did something, but according to the ECA it did jack shit.
 
[quote name='Josef']You got to love how Hal Halpin is basically trying to scare people into not contacting their credit card companies:

http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105[/QUOTE]
I hate when customers have a problem with a company and they just restate the terms...... It just feels like they're laughing at us and waving contracts in our face. :p I like how they tried to act like the members are wrong here and we should stop picking on them. :cry:

I like what The ECA is about and i really want to support them but their responses on the forums and everywhere else towards members seem very robotic and finger pointy. Some of the people working with them are great people that care A LOT about games and can do some good against the "Ban the video games" people on Earth. Just be nice ECA, BE NICE! Kay? ;)
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']Pretty obvious what happened... People stacked mad codes and got way more $ off Amazon games than they should have. Then Amazon decided they weren't going to take the loss and went to the ECA to reimburse them. The ECA doesn't have the money to cover that and is undoubtably in the hole for God knows how much, so they are trying to do whatever they can to get it back. I am a paying member who signed up soley for the disounts at Amazon and it sucks that they are screwing me,but I understand totally WHY they are doing what they are doing. Its a dog eat dog world. They got screwed and the only way out it to try to screw other people. Doesn't make it right but unfortunately thats the way things work. I actually feel a little bad for them cuz I stand to lose $15.00 here and there but can't imagine the debt they're in. I'm sure they never intended or forsaw the problem with the codes until it was too late. I can't say I wouldn't have stacked codes if given the opportunity either cuz a few bucks is a few bucks, but I guess this is proof that there is sometimes consequences to doing unethical crap, so personally I can't even be mad. There are some more honest people that wouldn't, but I'm sure there are a ton that say no but they would. I'm amazed that people seem surprised at the whole situation. Everyone should have the collapse of this shit a mile away. I think everyone did and now they are mad cuz they are getting screwed. Alright I'm done with my book here I guess, so I'll stop here and leave it to the flames.[/QUOTE]


You make some valid points, but the onus is on ECA to provide functioning coupons and web content, devoid of the kind of exploits and financial dangers they now PUT THEMSELVES INTO. I don't think the average consumer should pay ECA because a minority group of exploiters took advantage of some bad programming, coupon-writing, or other such technical error.

I know Joe Dokes WILL pay for the damages (in the same way a dumb woman in McDonald's can spill hot coffee all over her lap, sue, and we end up paying more $$$ for coffee therein, to cover the lawsuit to "McDonald's"). Frankly, none of you should take the attitude quoted above - just because you're most likely to be screwed in all of this doesn't mean you should find a nice table and bend over.

Most online coupons I've used have not been exploited like this. Maybe that's because most issuers of online coupons aren't as sloppy as ECA was. In any event, their reaction to all of this is morally reprehensible. They shift blame to the members and ignore their unethical business practices (forcing you to jump through hoops to cancel memberships, auto-renewing your CC info, etc.).

I'm glad I was indecisive about joining... The benefits never seemed all that impressive to me, and now I see that the biggest benefit of all came to those who DIDN'T join: no ECA cancellation hassles!
 
People need to stop playing into Hal's little game of words. The Amazon code stacking issue has absolutely NOTHING...AT ALL...to do with shady ,and possibly fraudulent, account cancellation procedures.

So enough with the stacking deal...it is not pertinent to this issue other than Hal willfully removing online canceling after Amazon opted out and their members and more importantly, funds, began to dwindle.
 
[quote name='SmileyMcSmiles']People need to stop playing into Hal's little game of words. The Amazon code stacking issue has absolutely NOTHING...AT ALL...to do with shady ,and possibly fraudulent, account cancellation procedures.

So enough with the stacking deal...it is not pertinent to this issue other than Hal willfully removing online canceling after Amazon opted out and their members and more importantly, funds, began to dwindle.[/QUOTE]

Yea- and I'm pretty sure that the blame would fall squarely on amazon here- nothing that the ECA could do about amazon issuing stackable codes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top