ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Uh...what are you talking about?!? Halpin McDuck himself said banks are now investigating us for fraud! I wouldn't even bother. Just get charged and suck it up.
 
[quote name='woof321']But didn't Hal say he's heard some banks are now investigating their own members for fraudulent reports? I certainly don't want my bank to do that! I'd rather just pay the $20.[/QUOTE]

And the Connecticut Attorney General is investigating Mr. Halpin. He is a desperate man, making desperate statements.

If he had any intelligence, he would have kept his mouth shut and not insulted his remaining member base.

Bottom line is that if you send a certified cancellation letter, and the ECA doesn't honor your request to cancel, you're bank will side with you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Marcoaurelius']anyone have the full link and can PM it to me or something?[/QUOTE]

You should just be able to click it, but anyway.

Code:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en
 
[quote name='gettinmoney662']Wow, I'm almost done reading this entire thread, but I still wanna say, why are you guys wasting your time and money sending them a certified letter? Why are you so worried about being charged? All I'm going to do is send them an e-mail saying that I want to cancel and that any future charges will be disputed. I then hope they do still charge me because after I dispute it, the credit card company will do a chargeback. On top of the money they charged, they will also be fined.[/QUOTE]

Let us know how that turns out for you...:roll:

Personally, I have $40 on the line to save, and seeing as membership benefits are shit for the most part, that's $40 I can put towards a game that will benefit me more than ANYTHING ECA has ever done.

Though I will say, I made my first membership fee back after a few purchases on Amazon (note: I did not stack).

Also, is anyone else having difficult accessing the Google Doc signature list?
 
[quote name='gettinmoney662']Wow, I'm almost done reading this entire thread, but I still wanna say, why are you guys wasting your time and money sending them a certified letter? Why are you so worried about being charged? All I'm going to do is send them an e-mail saying that I want to cancel and that any future charges will be disputed. I then hope they do still charge me because after I dispute it, the credit card company will do a chargeback. On top of the money they charged, they will also be fined.[/QUOTE]

Because it all depends how nasty they want to get. They COULD send you to collections claiming you are defaulting on a payment as you have no proof you ever sent a letter to cancel. The mere act of which can damage your credit even if its dismissed later. I'll wait a few months see if they offer a web version to cancel, and if not send a certified letter.

It's not worth the potential hassle over a $4 letter to cancel.
 
[quote name='arcane93']Here's the thing -- he can't. I have asked this question again and again, both here and on their forums, and the most answer that I ever get is "read the website" -- despite the fact that I have noted each and every time that I had already done so. I have been all through the website -- I see lots of position statements, and I see petitions (including one very poorly planned generic petition to Congress linked on the front page asking them in very vague terms to "protect the rights of gamers" -- who thought that was a good idea?). When I go to the forums, I see links to interviews and some discussion amongst members. So sure, there's a lot of talk about what the issues are, and that's great.

What I don't see anywhere is anything about what actions the ECA actually is taking or what they've actually accomplished. Nothing. And when I asked on the ECA forums, I was directed to a lot of smoke and mirrors. One person (GamesLaw, I believe) directed me to a several-year-old forum post by Hal Halpin himself in which he stated that he can't tell us what they're doing because then their enemies would know too (paranoid much?). Another person (Gypsyfly) gave me a bunch of links to those same position statements and petitions that I mentioned earlier -- again, great, I'm glad you have positions, but that doesn't tell me what you're doing. A third one (the infamous KN, who is the first apparently actually mod sanctioned troll I've seen on a forum) called me a "front page tard who can never hope to fit into our community" for even asking. Um, ok, sure -- with that attitude, I don't want to be a part of your "community". Thanks.

Likewise, in a post in the former ECA thread here, Gypsyfly actually had the nerve to say that members need to do "research" to know what the ECA is doing. You know what? No. Part of the purpose of any advocacy organization is to educate and keep their members informed. The ECA has massively failed in that respect. I shouldn't have to dig through a forum site looking for any sliver of information that I can manage to find in order to simply know what the organization that I've joined is up to. I should be receiving regular updates from the ECA -- not general gaming industry news, but specific ECA news telling me what they've got going on.

And there's the problem. The ECA makes themselves look very good on the surface. They put important sounding position statements up on their site, which I'm pretty sure that the majority of us who play games would agree with. Hal writes articles in magazines like Game Informer about how these issues are so very important. They put out several newsletters of general gaming industry news, the information in which, I'm sure, is largely (and probably through automated means) culled from other sources and available elsewhere. But try to go beneath that, and find out what advocacy work they're actually doing (other than writing about how the issues are really important), how they're actually affecting those issues, and what they're accomplishing, and you hit a brick wall.

Honestly, even if I wanted to be more actively involved in the ECA's work, I wouldn't know how to even begin. Other than providing a few lame web petitions for me to sign and collecting my membership dues, they have provided no means for me as a member to be involved. Unless, apparently, I'd like to do some "research" first.

And yet all that their staff and their apologists like this guy can do is run off these generic lines about the "important" work that they're doing, and spout insults at those who ask questions. I'm honestly baffled -- are these people somehow seeing what I'm not, or are they the ones who only look at the surface?

Really, I tried. Yes, the Amazon discount was what enticed me into actually taking the leap and joining, but I also had an interest in some of their issues. I really wanted them to be a good, legitimate organization that I would be proud to be a member of. But the entire attitude, even before all of this went down, has completely turned me off to them.

At this point, I don't think anyone can answer that question about what they've done for us, because honestly, I don't think anyone actually knows.[/QUOTE]


Let me pose this question:

How much representation do gamers really need?

For years uninformed and ignorant Congressmen have been threatening to ban violent video games and things of that sort. For years the media has used violent video games as a scapegoat. And always, someone has responded and tried their best to rebut these guys. But with the exception of requiring ID to sell a violent video game to youngins, my rights as a video gamer have not changed at all. No one has taken away my ability to play whatever video game I want whenever I want over the past 20 years. And that definitely is longer than the ECA's lifespan.

Yes, there are issues about net neutrality and EULAs, but those issues affect far more than gamers and are being contested by much more important lobbies than the "ECA." If the ECA didn't exist, there are still plenty of powerful people protecting my right to net neutrality and contesting the legal legitimacy of deceptive EULAs. EULAs have been contested since the dawn of of EULAs. It's nothing new.

So I mean, so what if the ECA dies? Chances are we'll still be protected by the various consumer groups that look out for consumers of the internet and software at large. And nothing will stop lazy senators and the joke that is the news media from attacking video games when they need a scapegoat.
 
lol, this thread is becoming more and more complicated to understand.

although, there are some useful posts in here.
 
[quote name='Brian9824']Because it all depends how nasty they want to get. They COULD send you to collections claiming you are defaulting on a payment as you have no proof you ever sent a letter to cancel. The mere act of which can damage your credit even if its dismissed later. I'll wait a few months see if they offer a web version to cancel, and if not send a certified letter.

It's not worth the potential hassle over a $4 letter to cancel.[/QUOTE]

I've disputed charges before. I don't know about your bank, but Citibank sides with the customer almost all the time. As long as I tell them that I want to cancel, I'm good. They also can't send me to collections because I'm not paying for any services rendered or product that I have received.
 
How much do we "need" a group to represent us? Probably not at all. But I admit it was nice belonging to an organization that I thought would represent me, as a gamer, to all the blowhards in Washington and elsewhere.

Now, not so much.
 
[quote name='kodave']Let me pose this question:

How much representation do gamers really need?

For years uninformed and ignorant Congressmen have been threatening to ban violent video games and things of that sort. For years the media has used violent video games as a scapegoat. And always, someone has responded and tried their best to rebut these guys. But with the exception of requiring ID to sell a violent video game to youngins, my rights as a video gamer have not changed at all. No one has taken away my ability to play whatever video game I want whenever I want over the past 20 years. And that definitely is longer than the ECA's lifespan.

Yes, there are issues about net neutrality and EULAs, but those issues affect far more than gamers and are being contested by much more important lobbies than the "ECA." If the ECA didn't exist, there are still plenty of powerful people protecting my right to net neutrality and contesting the legal legitimacy of deceptive EULAs. EULAs have been contested since the dawn of of EULAs. It's nothing new.

So I mean, so what if the ECA dies? Chances are we'll still be protected by the various consumer groups that look out for consumers of the internet and software at large. And nothing will stop lazy senators and the joke that is the news media from attacking video games when they need a scapegoat.[/QUOTE]

Well the problem with the ECA is that they are almost more about awareness rather than activism. Activism is going out and setting up large protests, fundraising for the cause, and holding conferences developed around the topic at hand.

The ECA doesn't really do any of that, and the only reason why they are remotely about spreading awareness is because they bought game politics.
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']How much do we "need" a group to represent us? Probably not at all. But I admit it was nice belonging to an organization that I thought would represent me, as a gamer, to all the blowhards in Washington and elsewhere.

Now, not so much.[/QUOTE]

Right, it's not needed *now*. But who knows, maybe someday those blowhards will actually get something accomplished, and then what? That's what I was *hoping* this group would fight. But it seems they aren't really doing much of anything.
 
[quote name='woof321']But didn't Hal say he's heard some banks are now investigating their own members for fraudulent reports? I certainly don't want my bank to do that! I'd rather just pay the $20.[/QUOTE]

You are a costumer of your bank...they work for you. If your bank wants to investigate you for fraud ,because you are trying to stop payment on automatic deduction from a more than questionable website, then I suggest finding a new bank.
 
[quote name='woof321']But didn't Hal say he's heard some banks are now investigating their own members for fraudulent reports? I certainly don't want my bank to do that! I'd rather just pay the $20.[/QUOTE]


This is/was actually somewhat related to the Amazon promotional, but everything is being taken out of context.

I imagine what happened here is when the Amazon promotional went away, several users were trying to perform charge-backs based on this year's membership dues. The ECA is taking this out of context and using it as a scare tactic to apply to any charge-backs. The ECA may have a little bit of a leg to stand on if you were to attempt to charge-back this year's membership fee because of the loss the Amazon promotion. They do not have any ground to stand on for future charge-backs if you have a proof of attempt of cancellation. They are simply stretching things out of context on purpose as a scare tactic.

Even still, I imagine your credit card company might still side with you anyway if you were to charge-back this year's membership fees. They had the Amazon promotional listed for several weeks before Amazon pulled support completely. Contrary to Hal's statement, the Amazon promotional has always been listed on the site and still to this day has language that "hints" at a return. Had I signed up in the weeks prior with the Amazon discount still listed but not working, I would call my credit card company and find whether or not a charge-back would be an option.

Unless there was a full reorganization of the ECA, I seriously doubt I would pledge support to them again. I'd much rather pledge support to an organization that I know is getting work done, like Child's Play, than to give anything to this sham again.
 
[quote name='Warlock82']Right, it's not needed *now*. But who knows, maybe someday those blowhards will actually get something accomplished, and then what? That's what I was *hoping* this group would fight. But it seems they aren't really doing much of anything.[/QUOTE]


Not so true, the Eca helped me in finding out that Wario Is Hal Halpins favorite character, plus, that he is anxiously anticipating Star Wars: The Old Republic, an upcoming title for the Personal Computer.

His is also the first photo on the Eca website, its placed on top because he is an Important Person, he also makes this known by his smirk and the way he narrows his eyes when having his picture taken.

His quotes are also fantastic reads, like this one:

"“It's gratifying to see the community accept us.”

http://thinkexist.com/quotes/hal_halpin/
 
[quote name='arcane93']Here's the thing -- he can't. I have asked this question again and again, both here and on their forums, and the most answer that I ever get is "read the website" -- despite the fact that I have noted each and every time that I had already done so. I have been all through the website -- I see lots of position statements, and I see petitions (including one very poorly planned generic petition to Congress linked on the front page asking them in very vague terms to "protect the rights of gamers" -- who thought that was a good idea?). When I go to the forums, I see links to interviews and some discussion amongst members. So sure, there's a lot of talk about what the issues are, and that's great.

What I don't see anywhere is anything about what actions the ECA actually is taking or what they've actually accomplished. Nothing. And when I asked on the ECA forums, I was directed to a lot of smoke and mirrors. One person (GamesLaw, I believe) directed me to a several-year-old forum post by Hal Halpin himself in which he stated that he can't tell us what they're doing because then their enemies would know too (paranoid much?). Another person (Gypsyfly) gave me a bunch of links to those same position statements and petitions that I mentioned earlier -- again, great, I'm glad you have positions, but that doesn't tell me what you're doing. A third one (the infamous KN, who is the first apparently actually mod sanctioned troll I've seen on a forum) called me a "front page tard who can never hope to fit into our community" for even asking. Um, ok, sure -- with that attitude, I don't want to be a part of your "community". Thanks.

Likewise, in a post in the former ECA thread here, Gypsyfly actually had the nerve to say that members need to do "research" to know what the ECA is doing. You know what? No. Part of the purpose of any advocacy organization is to educate and keep their members informed. The ECA has massively failed in that respect. I shouldn't have to dig through a forum site looking for any sliver of information that I can manage to find in order to simply know what the organization that I've joined is up to. I should be receiving regular updates from the ECA -- not general gaming industry news, but specific ECA news telling me what they've got going on.

And there's the problem. The ECA makes themselves look very good on the surface. They put important sounding position statements up on their site, which I'm pretty sure that the majority of us who play games would agree with. Hal writes articles in magazines like Game Informer about how these issues are so very important. They put out several newsletters of general gaming industry news, the information in which, I'm sure, is largely (and probably through automated means) culled from other sources and available elsewhere. But try to go beneath that, and find out what advocacy work they're actually doing (other than writing about how the issues are really important), how they're actually affecting those issues, and what they're accomplishing, and you hit a brick wall.

Honestly, even if I wanted to be more actively involved in the ECA's work, I wouldn't know how to even begin. Other than providing a few lame web petitions for me to sign and collecting my membership dues, they have provided no means for me as a member to be involved. Unless, apparently, I'd like to do some "research" first.

And yet all that their staff and their apologists like this guy can do is run off these generic lines about the "important" work that they're doing, and spout insults at those who ask questions. I'm honestly baffled -- are these people somehow seeing what I'm not, or are they the ones who only look at the surface?

Really, I tried. Yes, the Amazon discount was what enticed me into actually taking the leap and joining, but I also had an interest in some of their issues. I really wanted them to be a good, legitimate organization that I would be proud to be a member of. But the entire attitude, even before all of this went down, has completely turned me off to them.

At this point, I don't think anyone can answer that question about what they've done for us, because honestly, I don't think anyone actually knows.[/QUOTE]

Another fucking great post.
 
That's the thing, there are more important efforts to be sure

It's hard to be a leader of an advocacy group to fight against the power, when they try to do shift crap to keep you on - I took a look in good faith, I didn't blame them for the Amazon deal going away even though that was a big reason to join and I never got to use it, but this stuff is CRAP.

In one fell swoop I think they've tanked themselves. I could be wrong of course.
But it wouldn't surprise me. A shame, I was starting to like it before they went excorcist on us. I think it's sad this might have all come about due to stupid exploiters, but their reaction was so poor they'll loose the good eggs too, IMO.

-- And per Arcane's post, were they really doing that much for the gamer, anyways?
 
[quote name='Warlock82']Right, it's not needed *now*. But who knows, maybe someday those blowhards will actually get something accomplished, and then what? That's what I was *hoping* this group would fight. But it seems they aren't really doing much of anything.[/QUOTE]

Personally, I'd put more faith and money into the ESA, who from what I've read and heard, has pushed issues further than the ECA, particularly when it comes to government legislation and how it effects out beloved video games...

More info here:
Entertainment Software Association
http://www.theesa.com/
 
[quote name='Z(+)DIAC']Personally, I'd put more faith and money into the ESA, who from what I've read and heard, has pushed issues further than the ECA, particularly when it comes to government legislation and how it effects out beloved video games...

More info here:
Entertainment Software Association
http://www.theesa.com/[/QUOTE]
The ESA doesn't champion consumer rights, however. They're not going to change TOSs or EULAs to benefit the consumer. Their job is to protect the publishers of video games, which likely means more confusing EULAs and more DRM.
 
A couple pages back, someone referenced the CT law requiring them to accept electronic cancellation notice when they allow electronic signup. Just thought I'd post it again.

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/sup/chap739.htm

(c) (1) Any person, firm, partnership, association or corporation that sells or offers to sell any products or services used primarily for personal, family or household purposes for a specified period of time of more than one hundred eighty days pursuant to a written contract that contains a provision for automatic renewal of the contract for a period of time of more than thirty-one days at the end of the period of time specified in the contract shall provide the recipient of such products or services with a clear and conspicuous written notice that the recipient may cancel such contract. Such notice shall include the procedure for such cancellation. Such notice shall be given at least fifteen days but not more than sixty days prior to: (A) The date upon which the contract will be renewed, or (B) the expiration of the time period for cancellation by the recipient, whichever time period is earlier. Mailing of the written notice required by this subdivision by United States mail to the address of the recipient listed in the contract shall satisfy the notice requirements of this subdivision. If a contract subject to the provisions of this subsection is entered into electronically or the consumer agrees to receive notice electronically, the written notice required by this subsection may be transmitted by electronic mail.
 
[quote name='kodave']Let me pose this question:

How much representation do gamers really need?[/QUOTE]

Oh, I absolutely agree with every one of your points. That's why, like I said, it was the Amazon discounts which finally enticed me to join, and not the advocacy.

That being said, I was perfectly willing to listen and give them a chance. Even if I don't see an immediate pressing need for them, I do agree, in principle, with almost all of their positions. If they had been able to prove to me that they were serving a useful purpose, I would have been more than happy to keep up my support.

The problem is, they didn't. I have seen no signs that they are accomplishing, or even really trying to accomplish, anything. I have received insults and abuse from both members and staff. And now they won't even make it easy for me to leave. And that is why I'm where I'm at with them today.
 
[quote name='Z(+)DIAC']Personally, I'd put more faith and money into the ESA, who from what I've read and heard, has pushed issues further than the ECA, particularly when it comes to government legislation and how it effects out beloved video games...

More info here:
Entertainment Software Association
http://www.theesa.com/[/QUOTE]

The problem with that is that the ESA are first and foremost industry shills, who have the interest of the gaming companies in mind, and not those of the customers. So you'll never see them take on issues like EULAs. That is, to my understanding the void that the ECA was (ineptly) trying to fill.

Really, saying to give money to the ESA is like saying to give it to the RIAA. Thanks, but no thanks.
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']The ESA doesn't champion consumer rights, however. They're not going to change TOSs or EULAs to benefit the consumer. Their job is to protect the publishers of video games, which likely means more confusing EULAs and more DRM.[/QUOTE]

True, but they have the interest of the gaming industry (basically lobbying) which obviously can work for or in certain cases against the gamer, but if they keep putting up the good fight to combat censoring and in some cases banning of certain games, than I'm all for them.

Besides, as it was pointed out in one article posted here (can't find the link right now) Hal is an uber hypocrite when it comes to EULAs, particularly in the instance of the ECA changing its membership agreement in regards to the channel in which we have to cancel. I'll try to find it and post it, it's makes for a good lol.
 
[quote name='arcane93']Here's the thing -- he can't. I have asked this question again and again, both here and on their forums, and the most answer that I ever get is "read the website" -- despite the fact that I have noted each and every time that I had already done so. I have been all through the website -- I see lots of position statements, and I see petitions (including one very poorly planned generic petition to Congress linked on the front page asking them in very vague terms to "protect the rights of gamers" -- who thought that was a good idea?). When I go to the forums, I see links to interviews and some discussion amongst members. So sure, there's a lot of talk about what the issues are, and that's great.

What I don't see anywhere is anything about what actions the ECA actually is taking or what they've actually accomplished. Nothing. And when I asked on the ECA forums, I was directed to a lot of smoke and mirrors. One person (GamesLaw, I believe) directed me to a several-year-old forum post by Hal Halpin himself in which he stated that he can't tell us what they're doing because then their enemies would know too (paranoid much?). Another person (Gypsyfly) gave me a bunch of links to those same position statements and petitions that I mentioned earlier -- again, great, I'm glad you have positions, but that doesn't tell me what you're doing. A third one (the infamous KN, who is the first apparently actually mod sanctioned troll I've seen on a forum) called me a "front page tard who can never hope to fit into our community" for even asking. Um, ok, sure -- with that attitude, I don't want to be a part of your "community". Thanks.

Likewise, in a post in the former ECA thread here, Gypsyfly actually had the nerve to say that members need to do "research" to know what the ECA is doing. You know what? No. Part of the purpose of any advocacy organization is to educate and keep their members informed. The ECA has massively failed in that respect. I shouldn't have to dig through a forum site looking for any sliver of information that I can manage to find in order to simply know what the organization that I've joined is up to. I should be receiving regular updates from the ECA -- not general gaming industry news, but specific ECA news telling me what they've got going on.

And there's the problem. The ECA makes themselves look very good on the surface. They put important sounding position statements up on their site, which I'm pretty sure that the majority of us who play games would agree with. Hal writes articles in magazines like Game Informer about how these issues are so very important. They put out several newsletters of general gaming industry news, the information in which, I'm sure, is largely (and probably through automated means) culled from other sources and available elsewhere. But try to go beneath that, and find out what advocacy work they're actually doing (other than writing about how the issues are really important), how they're actually affecting those issues, and what they're accomplishing, and you hit a brick wall.

Honestly, even if I wanted to be more actively involved in the ECA's work, I wouldn't know how to even begin. Other than providing a few lame web petitions for me to sign and collecting my membership dues, they have provided no means for me as a member to be involved. Unless, apparently, I'd like to do some "research" first.

And yet all that their staff and their apologists like this guy can do is run off these generic lines about the "important" work that they're doing, and spout insults at those who ask questions. I'm honestly baffled -- are these people somehow seeing what I'm not, or are they the ones who only look at the surface?

Really, I tried. Yes, the Amazon discount was what enticed me into actually taking the leap and joining, but I also had an interest in some of their issues. I really wanted them to be a good, legitimate organization that I would be proud to be a member of. But the entire attitude, even before all of this went down, has completely turned me off to them.

At this point, I don't think anyone can answer that question about what they've done for us, because honestly, I don't think anyone actually knows.[/QUOTE]

From all these questions of what the ECA actually does I keep coming back to the idea that the organization is a pretty perfect parallel to Gavin Volure's (Steve Martin) company Sunstream from 30 Rock:

"Jack goes back to Volure's castle in Connecticut for an explanation. The money Jack and Kenneth invested is all gone, spent on disguises for Gavin's escape and there is no Sunstream money, Gavin's company, because there was never any such thing as Sunstream. "You watch our commercials we never actually say what we did." CUT TO: a Sunstream commercial. Images of a bald eagle in flight, an arrow hitting a bulls eye, tall glass buildings, rapidly moving cityscapes of New York, and a rising sun along with the words innovation, tomorrow, America, and Sunstream. Gavin is in fact penniless."
 
[quote name='BlueLobstah']This is/was actually somewhat related to the Amazon promotional, but everything is being taken out of context.

I imagine what happened here is when the Amazon promotional went away, several users were trying to perform charge-backs based on this year's membership dues. The ECA is taking this out of context and using it as a scare tactic to apply to any charge-backs. The ECA may have a little bit of a leg to stand on if you were to attempt to charge-back this year's membership fee because of the loss the Amazon promotion. They do not have any ground to stand on for future charge-backs if you have a proof of attempt of cancellation. They are simply stretching things out of context on purpose as a scare tactic.[/QUOTE]

This x 9000
 
[quote name='Izod517']Hi Lobstah! How ya been?[/QUOTE]


Hangin' in there. Work's been busy. :D

People need to stop taking that CT law out of context. It simply says an electronic notice is acceptable in lieu of a letter. What should actually be highlighted is this:

Such notice shall be given at least fifteen days but not more than sixty days prior to: (A) The date upon which the contract will be renewed, or (B) the expiration of the time period for cancellation by the recipient, whichever time period is earlier.


According to the ECA's terms:

[quote name='ECA Terms of Service']Unless Member notifies ECA that he or she does not wish to renew membership in the ECA Service pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement at least 30 days prior to the end of Member’s Membership Term, then ECA will automatically renew membership at the end of each Membership Term as authorized upon enrollment and bill the then-current renewal Service Fee to the designated billing source.[/quote]


And yet again, according to their staff, notification is sent out 30 days before renewal:

[quote name='http://forums.theeca.com/showpost.php?p=114177&postcount=22']
Originally Posted by Gypsyfly
You will be notified a month beforehand of your account renewal. So you have time to cancel if you decide to.[/quote]


This means, according to CT law, they are required to send out a notification no later than 45 days before renewal if their TOS is to be believed. They're clearly in violation of the law if notices are sent out 30 days before renewal, but the member must notify the ECA before the notification is even sent out.
 
I found this amusing:
[quote name='"tex13579: Mod @ the ECA forums"']
Quote:
[quote name='"Originally Posted by [B']kodave[/B]"]
The old TOS is available on archive.org

Just put in the URL of the current TOS page into their search box.
[/quote]

What specific changes am I looking for other than the one that is already noted?[/quote]
Haven't the mods been telling us to read the TOS and now he needs to be handheld through finding the differences? One things for sure, the mods aren't anemic on the ECA forums. :lol:
 
Now that I've had a chance to think over this situation more, I've come to the conclusion that Hal is a just a no-good son-of-a-b*tch. I can't believe he is trying to prey on our personal (and private) information just to keep membership numbers up and get more dues next year.

Thanks to all who continue to apply pressure to the ECA. You're actions are not in vain and will certainly help this community as many of us have entrusted Hal with our personal information.

I spoke to my family's lawyer about this and we will be ready to strike as soon as a charge possibly occurs on my account. Until then, we're going to keep documentation of opting out of their membership on their terms but if there are shenannigans after that, game on. :boxing:
 
I'm in for a class-action, they're pretty clearly trying to get away with crap.

So we can get their newsletters, but they won't tell people they're back on track for autopayment? And they'll notify them too late to boot? Priceless.

Might be time for some anti-ECA advocacy, eh? Meh. What a waste.
 
[quote name='BlueLobstah']Hangin' in there. Work's been busy. :D

People need to stop taking that CT law out of context. It simply says an electronic notice is acceptable in lieu of a letter. What should actually be highlighted is this:




According to the ECA's terms:




And yet again, according to their staff, notification is sent out 30 days before renewal:




This means, according to CT law, they are required to send out a notification no later than 45 days before renewal if their TOS is to be believed. They're clearly in violation of the law if notices are sent out 30 days before renewal, but the member must notify the ECA before the notification is even sent out.[/QUOTE]

Logical and Unquestionable! Now we should contact the CT AG!
 
This thread makes me feel both angry about the ECA thing and warm and fuzzy about the CAG community.

Many thanks to the OP for bringing this up and everyone else that's been helping along the way. Added my info to the doc, hopefully that works or ECA lightens up a bit, either way.
 
Cancel and dispute any further ECA charges. Even call your credit card and note now that you think this may be a problem in the future. Don't let them take your $20. That's bullshit.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Can people stop with the connecticut law!!!

Unless you're a lawyer, that subsection has already been proved not to apply.[/QUOTE]
Where was it proved? I'm not pretending to be an armchair lawyer or anything, but I have seen opinions going both ways in this thread. This is an honest question, not trying to stoke a fire or anything.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']Seriously. Way too many armchair lawyers in this thread.[/QUOTE]

Well, we can't be any less qualified than Hal is to run a consumer advocacy group.
 
[quote name='Z(+)DIAC']You'd be surprised how far some schmucks will stick to their guns, ESPECIALLY when there is a lot of money to be made and LOST, particularly lost with this backlash, not only by members, but by support and SPONSORSHIPS nonetheless from the greater gaming community. I mean to basically sever a relationship with Amazon (to a point) and being dropped by Penny Arcade, can definitely put a dent in the wallets over at ECA, as well as their reputation.

Personally, I've always had my reservations with the ECA, when I first signed-up with a PAID membership, I mean look at their forums. It's like Nazi-Germany over there as far as ECA reps treating MEMBERS (the very backbone of the association) like peasants. ECA deserves all that they are receiving.[/QUOTE]

Your post reminded me of my suspicions when first signing up for the ECA. I put my suspicions aside based on the reputation of some of their benefit sponsors. It appears I chose poorly.
 
[quote name='gettinmoney662']I've disputed charges before. I don't know about your bank, but Citibank sides with the customer almost all the time. As long as I tell them that I want to cancel, I'm good. They also can't send me to collections because I'm not paying for any services rendered or product that I have received.[/QUOTE]

yes the bank will side with you but you can still be sent to collections. You are recieving a service. Access to their site and their codes. Whether you use it or not is another story and irrelevant.

The simple point is you can be sent to collections and they will go after you whether you legally owe the money or not. This happens ALL THE TIME. People are forced to fight this which causes lost wages, aggravation and damage to your credit which can take years to recover.

If they send collections after you then you have to respond, file court paperwork, etc. It's a hassle hence why so many people will just settle. It's better safe then sorry.
 
[quote name='aeri']Someone who still has an account should make a thread concerning misinformation in this thread regarding BBB information.

http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105

They're boasting a B+ rating, ATM the company is unrated.

http://www.bbb.org/connecticut/busi...sociation-in-wilton-ct-87070995#ratingdetails[/QUOTE]
It was a B+ rating at the time of that post. They started with a D+, it suspiciously was raised to a B+, then (yesterday, I believe) they unrated them, due to the complaints.
 
[quote name='aeri']Someone who still has an account should make a thread concerning misinformation in this thread regarding BBB information.

http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105

They're boasting a B+ rating, ATM the company is unrated.

http://www.bbb.org/connecticut/busi...sociation-in-wilton-ct-87070995#ratingdetails[/QUOTE]

At the point at which that forum post was made, the BBB was listing them at a B+. This was, of course, before they began processing the many complaints that they've received in the past few days, and it has changed to the unrated status since then. Still, attempting to call them out on a now dated forum post which was accurate at the time it was posted is a little beside the point.
 
My favorite post in the ECA forum is this:

DisgruntledGamer
user_offline.gif

Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 10
reputation_pos.gif



icon1.gif

Would it be possible for me to get Hal Halpin's contact email address pm'd to me while you're at it? I want to personally address my issues to him about the membership policies.


Person was banned for that comment, shesh
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']It was a B+ rating at the time of that post. They started with a D+, it suspiciously was raised to a B+, then (yesterday, I believe) they unrated them, due to the complaints.[/QUOTE]

Yeah I know, but it still should be fixed and we should pester them as often as possible. In addition make it clear to every non-CAGer on their forum that they're NR'd
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']It was a B+ rating at the time of that post. They started with a D+, it suspiciously was raised to a B+, then (yesterday, I believe) they unrated them, due to the complaints.[/QUOTE]

There were two complaints which were resolved because the ECA/Hal responded to them. That's suspicious unless the complaints were anonymous and the BBB had no way of contacting the persons who made the complaints. I know one of them was someone on GAF who said he did not do it anonymously.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Can people stop with the connecticut law!!!

Unless you're a lawyer, that subsection has already been proved not to apply.[/QUOTE]

Actually, I am a lawyer (well... I'm about 8 hours away from being sworn in). And that code section isn't being taken out of context. I agree that the notification provision is in violation of CT law. But as far as I can tell, aside from being contrary to CT law, no one cares all that much about it. It's a side issue. Look back to the two or three fantastic posts that got choruses of "amens" in the past half dozen pages. The big issue here is the ECA making it hard for people to unsubscribe after luring us in with coupons and good discounts.

[quote name='BlueLobstah']People need to stop taking that CT law out of context. It simply says an electronic notice is acceptable in lieu of a letter. What should actually be highlighted is this:[/quote]

We already covered this back in the 70s-ish pages. Sec. 42-126b(c)(1) is not being taken out of context. It applies to the contract between the ECA and each of us. You're right that "electronic notice is acceptable in lieu of a letter." As in, electronic notice is legally adequate notice of cancellation. Meaning that whether the ECA likes it or not, it's legally obligated to accept and honor electronic cancellation because it is acceptable, under CT law, in lieu of a letter.

In practice, the likely remedy for late communication on the renewal would be either (a) reformation of the contract, requiring earlier notice and extending the period during which you can cancel for anyone who didn't receive notice in time, or (b) rescission of the contract, ending obligations of no parties. The latter might be nice for a lot of us, but I don't think that's what's bugging people. It's certainly not what bothers me. What bothers me is that whether I have an extra month to cancel or not, the ECA is trying to tell me that I have to jump through a bunch of hoops to cover my ass, or else they reserve the right to fraudulently deny receipt of my cancellation notice.

That's where 42-126b(c)(1) comes in. No matter when I notify the ECA of my cancellation, it's legally adequate whether I do so by letter or by appropriate electronic means.

If you submit a cancellation via their electronic feedback, properly labeled, it's going to be legally binding. Period. What's more, the auto-reply e-mail you get (which says they don't honor electronic cancellations) is confirmation that they have actual notice, which means they can't even make up some crap about never receiving it, as they did with the button on the website.
 
[quote name='Unrealevil']There were two complaints which were resolved because the ECA/Hal responded to them. That's suspicious unless the complaints were anonymous and the BBB had no way of contacting the persons who made the complaints. I know one of them was someone on GAF who said he did not do it anonymously.[/QUOTE]

I got the feeling the two complaints that were resolved were along the lines of "they promised the amazon discount and then took it away", which I'll agree there isn't much reason for the BBB to get involved in those. Those are probably also what Hal was refering to in his big response.

I imagine all the recent complaints about this issue have not been processed yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top