ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder how it is the Eca maintains its tax exempt status when clearly the last line of this paragraph second one here http://www.irs.gov/charities/nonprofits/article/0,,id=96178,00.html seems to almost be fitting to how the operation is going about things (I am no tax expert by any means so Im just speculating if anyone who happens to be an accountant, irs agent, etc wants to explain it to me I'd appreciate it in advance.)
To be operated exclusively to promote social welfare, an organization must operate primarily to further the common good and general welfare of the people of the community (such as by bringing about civic betterment and social improvements). An organization whose purposes are charitable within the meaning of Code section 501(c)(3) may also be a social welfare organization under section 501(c)(4).
An organization that restricts the use of its facilities to employees of selected corporations and their guests is primarily benefiting a private group rather than the community and, therefore, does not qualify as a section 501(c)(4) organization. Similarly, an organization formed to represent member-tenants of an apartment complex does not qualify, since its activities benefit the member-tenants and not all tenants in the community, while an organization formed to promote the legal rights of all tenants in a particular community may qualify under section 501(c)(4) as a social welfare organization. An organization is not operated primarily for the promotion of social welfare if its primary activity is operating a social club for the benefit, pleasure, or recreation of its members, or is carrying on a business with the general public in a manner similar to organizations operated for profit.
 
[quote name='Reira']Link back online.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Information & Helpful Hints:

1) Type out your name, ECA e-mail, & ECA username.
2) Do not type "hidden" for your e-mail. I will change your e-mail to hidden once I have the info in the offline file.
3) I will update every 15 minutes or so until further notice.
4) Watch to see if others are online. You might want to skip a line or two to avoid typing over someone else's info or visa versa.
5) If you're not sure if you're in the list due to the various shuffles, just do a "find" operation on your browser. (If you PM'd me, you're probably not in the public file.)
6) If you have a blank in your e-mail or username, I do not have that info. If you typed it previously, it might have gotten lost in the various shuffles, sorry. If you have (at least one) "hidden" for your e-mail, you're fine.
7) Please, insert rows. Insert your cursor at the bottom blank row, then click "Table" in the menu, then "Insert row below." Or click on the left at the very bottom until you see an "x" between two triangles, and click down.
8) I deleted the numbers from the first column, as they were being messed up in the revised file.
9) Post the link or reply to this message to avoid it getting buried.[/QUOTE]
Signed.
 
[quote name='Dead of Knight']And this is why you're quickly becoming one of my favorite posters.[/QUOTE]

[quote name='Vader582']I wholeheartedly agree with you, Dead of Knight! Well-said n8rockerasu!
Who knew we all were joining the consumer advocacy equivalent of Columbia House? :lol:[/QUOTE]

Well, I do what I can. :) I mean, I'm not surprised someone would play the role of "defense attorney" for the ECA, but COME ON. There are so many reasonable questions to be raised (many of which have been already).

1. Why is the ECA inconveniencing ALL members due to the actions of a "very small and not representative" group of members?

2. How is it that the existence of an "auto-renew button" was a "website glitch...only visible on certain browsers", which was never fully functional to begin with, but its removal is due to the fact that members were able to sign up, cancel, and sign up again? Hello? Hello, McFly??? Hellooooo????

3. Why does the ECA not address concerns that several of their so called "exclusive benefits" (Fandango, Buy.com, etc.) are offers any Tom, Dick, and Sally on the internet could use and have absolutely nothing do with any affiliation with the ECA?

4. Why is the ECA so secretive about sharing what political accomplishments and/or efforts they've made for the people they claim to represent. If we're supposed to be taking the moral high road and not be "in it for the discounts", then show us WHY you're a worthwhile cause.

And finally, one of the biggest questions that I feel is brewing due to this entire mess:

5. If your relationship with your members is so combative and dysfunctional that you have to severely limit their freedom of choice involving whether or not they want to continue to support your cause, WHY (other than for purposes of financial gain) would you care to run a group advocating for these members rights?

When every response you give to legitimate questions and concerns about how you run the organization is an attack on the very members you claim to be representing, it just doesn't add up. It's so easy for media outlets and people on the outside to look at the NPO status and start a slow clap, saying "Look at that man, fighting for the rights of others! What a great humanitarian!"

But as CheapyD mentioned in the CAGcast, when you take people's money, you have a responsibility to them. If you're not providing tangible benefits, then show what you're doing "for us". If you're unable to do any of that, then close up shop. But don't point the finger at the people who were willing to take you at your word, give you their money, and then feel cheated when it turns out you're not delivering on any of your promises.

If I'm wrong, ECA, SHOW ME. Instead of getting defensive and crying "woe is me", take this negative press and turn it around by showing everyone why you're worth supporting. Put OUR money where your mouth is, and do something.

(Wow...where did all that come from? lol. Sorry for being so long-winded. It just bothers me that they can't even defend themselves with a modicum of intelligence, respectability, or even business savy. I took one freaking PR class in college and could do a better job running this org. Good PR mostly just takes common sense and humility. Hal-Hal seems to possess neither.)
 
[quote name='Reira']Link back online.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Information & Helpful Hints:

1) Type out your name, ECA e-mail, & ECA username.
2) Do not type "hidden" for your e-mail. I will change your e-mail to hidden once I have the info in the offline file.
3) I will update every 15 minutes or so until further notice.
4) Watch to see if others are online. You might want to skip a line or two to avoid typing over someone else's info or visa versa.
5) If you're not sure if you're in the list due to the various shuffles, just do a "find" operation on your browser. (If you PM'd me, you're probably not in the public file.)
6) If you have a blank in your e-mail or username, I do not have that info. If you typed it previously, it might have gotten lost in the various shuffles, sorry. If you have (at least one) "hidden" for your e-mail, you're fine.
7) Please, insert rows. Insert your cursor at the bottom blank row, then click "Table" in the menu, then "Insert row below." Or click on the left at the very bottom until you see an "x" between two triangles, and click down.
8) I deleted the numbers from the first column, as they were being messed up in the revised file.
9) Post the link or reply to this message to avoid it getting buried.[/QUOTE]


Signed. Thanks for this compile.
 
[quote name='blissskr']I wonder how it is the Eca maintains its tax exempt status when clearly the last line of this paragraph second one here http://www.irs.gov/charities/nonprofits/article/0,,id=96178,00.html seems to almost be fitting to how the operation is going about things (I am no tax expert by any means so Im just speculating if anyone who happens to be an accountant, irs agent, etc wants to explain it to me I'd appreciate it in advance.)
To be operated exclusively to promote social welfare, an organization must operate primarily to further the common good and general welfare of the people of the community (such as by bringing about civic betterment and social improvements). An organization whose purposes are charitable within the meaning of Code section 501(c)(3) may also be a social welfare organization under section 501(c)(4).
An organization that restricts the use of its facilities to employees of selected corporations and their guests is primarily benefiting a private group rather than the community and, therefore, does not qualify as a section 501(c)(4) organization. Similarly, an organization formed to represent member-tenants of an apartment complex does not qualify, since its activities benefit the member-tenants and not all tenants in the community, while an organization formed to promote the legal rights of all tenants in a particular community may qualify under section 501(c)(4) as a social welfare organization. An organization is not operated primarily for the promotion of social welfare if its primary activity is operating a social club for the benefit, pleasure, or recreation of its members, or is carrying on a business with the general public in a manner similar to organizations operated for profit.[/QUOTE]
Does the IRS have a web-form where you can ask them to investigate a company's tax-exempt status?

*EDIT*
Cursory search only brought up this so far
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f3949a.pdf

*EDIT 2*
I believe THIS is the correct form. If anyone has experienced excitement mailing physical letters, this might be fun. Its a pretty short form, by IRS standards.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f13909.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
More of these articles and blog posts need to point out the impossible logic of "members joining, canceling, and rejoining" when there was no way to cancel in the first place since the button never worked, as well as this, from the ECA's own rules:

12. Receipt of Mail. ECA cannot guarantee that it receives any mail that Member claims to have sent. Member should, at Member’s own expense, send any notices to ECA in a form to ensure to Member that their communication arrived at ECA, which form may include but not be limited to FedEx, UPS, USPS Return Receipt Requested and USPS Certified Mail.
 
[quote name='Kirin Lemon']More of these articles and blog posts need to point out the impossible logic of "members joining, canceling, and rejoining" when there was no way to cancel in the first place since the button never worked...[/I][/QUOTE]

Initially you were able to cancel via phone. Prior to them changing the TOS without notice. Regardless there is a lot of a holes in this logic.
 
[quote name='chakan']Does the IRS have a web-form where you can ask them to investigate a company's tax-exempt status?[/QUOTE]
I work for part of the government that should have access to this type of information. I will see if we have a fraud-report phone number in our directory when I get into work on Monday.
 
[quote name='Izod517']Initially you were able to cancel via phone. Prior to them changing the TOS without notice. Regardless there is a lot of a holes in this logic.[/QUOTE]
Still I think it just seems ridiculous someone would sign up, call to cancel and sign up again just to get two amazon codes a day or more lol.
 
[quote name='Kain']I work for part of the government that should have access to this type of information. I will see if we have a fraud-report phone number in our directory when I get into work on Monday.[/QUOTE]


Only way I know how...maybe you can send them a gmail card.

Link to PDF

A reward may even be applicable for reporting...


EDIT - This should be on every page (surely I'm not the only one that takes advantage of 100 post count pages):






[quote name='Izod517']Someone requested a list of sponsors and their contacts. Here you go, I suggest everyone write, call, and fill out webforms.



Direct Email available:

New York Comic Con - Larry Settembrini - Sales Manager at 203-840-5321 or [email protected]

Warcry - [email protected] / [email protected]

PowerUP Games - [email protected]

Patriot Memory - [email protected]

Leashtec - [email protected]

Buttkicker - [email protected]

g8brand - [email protected]

BringIt - [email protected]

Email all at once (use BCC):
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]



Webform:


Fandango - http://fandango.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/fandango.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php

IGN & D2D - http://games.ign.com/email.html

Gamefly - http://www.gamefly.com/help/Default/Contact/

Buy.com - https://ssl.buy.com/ac/contact/ContactEmail.aspx


Jinx - http://www.jinx.com/help.aspx?cat=feedback#contactus

Hyatt Consumer Affairs - call 800.323.7249

ThinkGeek - http://www.thinkgeek.com/brain/custserv/gethelp.cgi

GOG.com - http://www.gog.com/en/support/contact/other_questions_issues

Maingear - http://www.maingear.com/support/

MaxModz - http://www.maxmodz.com/about-us.php

Astrogaming - http://www.astrogaming.com/support/


Phone Only:
RockyBid - 1-877-7000-BID (243)


I'm missing a couple but they had no easy to find contact info. Of note is that some of these are not perfect but were the only available contacts. It's not a perfect list but pretty good.

Of note for those who missed it, Target and Walmart sell the membership cards, I recommend contacting them as well:

Walmart: http://walmartstores.com/contactus/feedback.aspx
Target: http://www.target.com/gp/help/display-contact-us-form.html?displayLink=tci[/QUOTE]
 
[quote name='blissskr']IRS stuff.[/QUOTE]

Unfortunately I don't see a significant argument against them really as far as the IRS is concerned. Most of it can be explained away. The seem to loosely fall under charitable... very loosely ("eliminating prejudice and discrimination" against gamers??). I don't believe providing membership benefits counts as disallowing services to the community as a whole, since they are in fact for legal reform, which would benefit everyone. Operating "as a business" is pretty swift and loose and could easily be gotten around - they are using the majority of funds (theorectically) to further the organization and its views, not to make a profit for specific people or stockholders, etc. Leadership in NPOs are allowed to be paid, there are no rules against that, although there may be thresholds. My real question with them is how they avoid filing completely. All NPOs of significant size still have to file, however, according to a previous post (that had some IRS link) the ECA doesn't file taxes because they don't reach the income threshold. That threshold has got to be pretty darned high all things considered. I believe NPOs have to publicily report things like leadership pay and such - some digging could find what Halpin gets paid as president.

Sources: Aided accounting of NPO (small preschool), Entry level college classes on tax-law and accounting - that I mostly don't remember.
 
I saw that form, also MF, but the one I posted above you is more specifically for tax-exempts. Plus you can email the completed pdf.
 
[quote name='chakan']The areas I believe the ECA has violated are:

"Organization engaged in deceptive or improper fundraising practices"
[/QUOTE]

This however does hold a significant amount of water.
 
Originally Posted by Reira
Link back online.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Af...jbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Information & Helpful Hints:

1) Type out your name, ECA e-mail, & ECA username.
2) Do not type "hidden" for your e-mail. I will change your e-mail to hidden once I have the info in the offline file.
3) I will update every 15 minutes or so until further notice.
4) Watch to see if others are online. You might want to skip a line or two to avoid typing over someone else's info or visa versa.
5) If you're not sure if you're in the list due to the various shuffles, just do a "find" operation on your browser. (If you PM'd me, you're probably not in the public file.)
6) If you have a blank in your e-mail or username, I do not have that info. If you typed it previously, it might have gotten lost in the various shuffles, sorry. If you have (at least one) "hidden" for your e-mail, you're fine.
7) Please, insert rows. Insert your cursor at the bottom blank row, then click "Table" in the menu, then "Insert row below." Or click on the left at the very bottom until you see an "x" between two triangles, and click down.
8) I deleted the numbers from the first column, as they were being messed up in the revised file.
9) Post the link or reply to this message to avoid it getting buried.




just keeping this bumped
 
[quote name='Muthafodder']EDIT - This should be on every page (surely I'm not the only one that takes advantage of 100 post count pages):[/QUOTE]

There is a similar post in the OP that I didn't notice until now. Maybe just the OP could be updated?
 
Whew, finally got caught up on this thread. So many good letters, posts, etc. Glad more sponsors are pulling their support.

Glad how most people are taking this whole situation (not just the letter) seriously and getting the word out. According to my master list, 359 people have signed. Oh, and you're welcome, everybody. I don't take credit for the idea, though.

Link to post with info & letter link here.
 
[quote name='Izod517']Unfortunately I don't see a significant argument against them really as far as the IRS is concerned. Most of it can be explained away. The seem to loosely fall under charitable... very loosely ("eliminating prejudice and discrimination" against gamers??). I don't believe providing membership benefits counts as disallowing services to the community as a whole, since they are in fact for legal reform, which would benefit everyone. Operating "as a business" is pretty swift and loose and could easily be gotten around - they are using the majority of funds (theorectically) to further the organization and its views, not to make a profit for specific people or stockholders, etc. Leadership in NPOs are allowed to be paid, there are no rules against that, although there may be thresholds. My real question with them is how they avoid filing completely. All NPOs of significant size still have to file, however, according to a previous post (that had some IRS link) the ECA doesn't file taxes because they don't reach the income threshold. That threshold has got to be pretty darned high all things considered. I believe NPOs have to publicily report things like leadership pay and such - some digging could find what Halpin gets paid as president.

Sources: Aided accounting of NPO (small preschool), Entry level college classes on tax-law and accounting - that I mostly don't remember.[/QUOTE]
They provide discounts
They cannot demonstrate any actual activism, only position statements
They auto-renew membership, which is something a magazine does, not a charity.

[quote name='Izod517']This however does hold a significant amount of water.[/QUOTE]
I respectfully disagree, autorenewing membership and making it difficult to cancel seem shady to me. I say we let the IRS decide.
 
[quote name='blissskr']I wonder how it is the Eca maintains its tax exempt status when clearly the last line of this paragraph second one here http://www.irs.gov/charities/nonprofits/article/0,,id=96178,00.html seems to almost be fitting to how the operation is going about things (I am no tax expert by any means so Im just speculating if anyone who happens to be an accountant, irs agent, etc wants to explain it to me I'd appreciate it in advance.)
To be operated exclusively to promote social welfare, an organization must operate primarily to further the common good and general welfare of the people of the community (such as by bringing about civic betterment and social improvements). An organization whose purposes are charitable within the meaning of Code section 501(c)(3) may also be a social welfare organization under section 501(c)(4).
An organization that restricts the use of its facilities to employees of selected corporations and their guests is primarily benefiting a private group rather than the community and, therefore, does not qualify as a section 501(c)(4) organization. Similarly, an organization formed to represent member-tenants of an apartment complex does not qualify, since its activities benefit the member-tenants and not all tenants in the community, while an organization formed to promote the legal rights of all tenants in a particular community may qualify under section 501(c)(4) as a social welfare organization. An organization is not operated primarily for the promotion of social welfare if its primary activity is operating a social club for the benefit, pleasure, or recreation of its members, or is carrying on a business with the general public in a manner similar to organizations operated for profit.[/QUOTE]

I am basically a CPA (passed the exam and am in the process of getting my license) and I don't think what you are referring to really applies here. Hal is a dickhead and a complete douche but that doesn't mean he's carrying on the business like it's operated for profit. He may be taking almost all the money for himself and leaving a very small portion just for the business but that doesn't exactly mean what you bolded. It's a very, very complicated issue. You guys can contact the IRS and alert them to the issue, but I think there are more effective, efficient ways of fucking them over right now, such as alerting sponsors, the CT AG, and the BBB about what's going on. An investigation with the IRS would take much longer and is less likely to produce results in this case compared to what we've already been doing. Maybe like one person can contact the IRS, but I wouldn't make it a major part of the campaign we're doing.\

[quote name='Izod517']Unfortunately I don't see a significant argument against them really as far as the IRS is concerned. Most of it can be explained away. The seem to loosely fall under charitable... very loosely ("eliminating prejudice and discrimination" against gamers??). I don't believe providing membership benefits counts as disallowing services to the community as a whole, since they are in fact for legal reform, which would benefit everyone. Operating "as a business" is pretty swift and loose and could easily be gotten around - they are using the majority of funds (theorectically) to further the organization and its views, not to make a profit for specific people or stockholders, etc. Leadership in NPOs are allowed to be paid, there are no rules against that, although there may be thresholds. My real question with them is how they avoid filing completely. All NPOs of significant size still have to file, however, according to a previous post (that had some IRS link) the ECA doesn't file taxes because they don't reach the income threshold. That threshold has got to be pretty darned high all things considered. I believe NPOs have to publicily report things like leadership pay and such - some digging could find what Halpin gets paid as president.

Sources: Aided accounting of NPO (small preschool), Entry level college classes on tax-law and accounting - that I mostly don't remember.[/QUOTE]
Shit, why did I make such a long, convoluted post when this was pretty much what I wanted to say?
 
Can we get the OP updated with which sponsors have replied to CAGs notifying them and/or canceled their affiliation with the ECA?

Also, I still think the violation of Visa's terms is significant and should be mentioned in the OP too.
 
[quote name='Izod517']Unfortunately I don't see a significant argument against them really as far as the IRS is concerned.[/QUOTE]

I don't think anyone would enjoy being audited.

Hell, sometimes I don't enjoy auditing :)
 
Also in relation to the OP: You have contact info for "Game Jobs" on there... I'm fairly certain Game Jobs is owned by the ECA, or even if it wasn't, it was created by Hal Halpin and is under the Crest organization of which Halpin is president.

I don't think they'll be removing their affiliation with the ECA any time soon.
 
[quote name='Muthafodder']I don't think anyone would enjoy being audited.

Hell, sometimes I don't enjoy auditing :)[/QUOTE]

Are you an auditor like me? I am not in tax so I wonder what the odds are of the ECA getting audited if enough people complain. You are very right that even if it doesn't result in anything other than an audit, an audit is a GIANT hassle for companies and I am all for causing more hassle for the ECA. Contacting the IRS may be worth pursuing after all if it would indeed lead to an audit.
 
You know what? All of this wouldve been avoided if some dumbass at theeca (or perhaps hal himself) hadn't thought it was a good idea to give out the GIMAG code for free.
 
[quote name='Dead of Knight']Shit, why did I make such a long, convoluted post when this was pretty much what I wanted to say?[/QUOTE]

Haha, well at least it's backed by a CPA and not simply my entry level college classes I took half-drunk! :lol:

RE:
They provide discounts
The law posted doesn't say they can't provide benefits, only that their ultimate goal cannot be exclusive. Legal reform effects everyone. That's how they get around this.

They cannot demonstrate any actual activism, only position statements

This may have some validity, but they could also say they are in the business of educating society with their position statements in hopes of legal reform.

They auto-renew membership, which is something a magazine does, not a charity.

/ It's a great service to their members in order to make their lives easier! /endsarcasm :roll: Unfortunately this doesn't qualify them as a business or having business like practices. Just because the Girl Scouts sell cookies that's not considered a business like practice, so I'm assuming that's probably the easiest thing in that law to get around.
 
[quote name='Dead of Knight']Are you an auditor like me? I am not in tax so I wonder what the odds are of the ECA getting audited if enough people complain. You are very right that even if it doesn't result in anything other than an audit, an audit is a GIANT hassle for companies and I am all for causing more hassle for the ECA. Contacting the IRS may be worth pursuing after all if it would indeed lead to an audit.[/QUOTE]

Exactly :) Izod517, you make excellent points, but I still think there's enough shadiness on ECA's part to warrant an investigation. If the IRS determines there is not grounds based on my complaint, so be it.
 
I signed the list.

I also wanted to give all of you guys doing work on the behalf CAGers like myself, who just got caught in the crossfire, a thumbs up (I signed up and paid the ECA, mainly due to the fact they gave guys like us a real "voice," needless to say that is corrupt now). I love a little headhunting and though this whole thing seems to have blown up, they could have easily prevented it but instead they put their heads in the sand and refused to dare change anything.

At first, I was willing to just let this whole thing blow over and see what happened, but after reading their forums I saw, amazingly, how stuck up the "professionals" were. I get that they are just posting on a forum, but they all seemed so pretentious and it just seemed to have a clubhouse feel that pushed away outsiders and shunned them for daring to break the status quo.

Anyway, thanks once again for the document and I will continue keeping up with what you guys do. It has been quite amazing to watch from behind the scenes and I wish you all continued success.
 
[quote name='Dead of Knight']Are you an auditor like me? I am not in tax so I wonder what the odds are of the ECA getting audited if enough people complain.[/QUOTE]

Yup...Taxes were the only Accounting textbooks I literally read cover to cover...to say fellow students disliked taking courses with me would be an understatement.

Edit - I'll add...Governmental Accounting was my favorite course :)

I'll let you make your own assumption of my employer.
 
[quote name='Izod517']Haha, well at least it's backed by a CPA and not simply my entry level college classes I took half-drunk! :lol:
[/QUOTE]

Well I am not a tax practitioner (though I have taken tax classes and passed the tax/regulation part of the CPA exam with a high score) so I cannot give you complete assurance that you're right, but I think you're on the right track. But if it would lead to an audit if enough people complained, regardless of whether the ECA was found doing anything wrong, it would still be a giant hassle, especially since the ECA doesn't even file tax returns to begin with. As shown by what's gone down the past few days, their accounting department is very obviously incompetent and something tells me they'd have an extremely hard time dealing with an IRS audit when they don't even have tax files on record. Given that I would definitely say go for it in terms of contacting the IRS. It wouldn't hurt.

[quote name='Muthafodder']Yup...Taxes were the only Accounting textbooks I literally read cover to cover...to say fellow students disliked taking courses with me would be an understatement.

Edit - I'll add...Governmental Accounting was my favorite course :)

I'll let you make your own assumption of my employer.[/QUOTE]

My college didn't even offer an undergrad (not sure about grad) course in governmental accounting. I had to learn it from scratch for the CPA exam.
 
[quote name='chakan']Exactly :) Izod517, you make excellent points, but I still think there's enough shadiness on ECA's part to warrant an investigation. If the IRS determines there is not grounds based on my complaint, so be it.[/QUOTE]
+1 sending a form in and let the people whose job it is to decide these matters make a determination.
 
We should also start compiling a database of print screens for their EULA and sponsor pages so we know what they are changing...surely google cache has one before the phone number was removed from the cancellation section.
 
[quote name='confoosious']You know what? All of this wouldve been avoided if some dumbass at theeca (or perhaps hal himself) hadn't thought it was a good idea to give out the GIMAG code for free.[/QUOTE]

Don't kid yourself, the ECA wasn't 'converted' into a bunch of sketchball fools just by that fiasco. The other way around actually.

The organizations true shady nature would have become clear over time either way, this was simply a catalyst.
 
[quote name='Reira']Link back online.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Information & Helpful Hints:

1) Type out your name, ECA e-mail, & ECA username.
2) Do not type "hidden" for your e-mail. I will change your e-mail to hidden once I have the info in the offline file.
3) I will update every 15 minutes or so until further notice.
4) Watch to see if others are online. You might want to skip a line or two to avoid typing over someone else's info or visa versa.
5) If you're not sure if you're in the list due to the various shuffles, just do a "find" operation on your browser. (If you PM'd me, you're probably not in the public file.)
6) If you have a blank in your e-mail or username, I do not have that info. If you typed it previously, it might have gotten lost in the various shuffles, sorry. If you have (at least one) "hidden" for your e-mail, you're fine.
7) Please, insert rows. Insert your cursor at the bottom blank row, then click "Table" in the menu, then "Insert row below." Or click on the left at the very bottom until you see an "x" between two triangles, and click down.
8) I deleted the numbers from the first column, as they were being messed up in the revised file.
9) Post the link or reply to this message to avoid it getting buried.[/QUOTE]

Signed, Reira. Keep up the good fight! It's much appreciated!
 
[quote name='Vartan87']Amazing, I never thought I'd be surrounded by others who majored in accounting.[/QUOTE]

Really...I couldn't think of a nerdier degree/career for a gamer.
 
[quote name='Kaltic']programming...[/QUOTE]



...but that doesn't require pocket protectors


pocket_500x375.jpg
 
Google doc is a great way to go on this. Thanks for setting it up. If I wasn't drowning in my own law school finals, I'd go to town on this. Shitty life of a 1L. But at first glance, the ECA seems to be violating some major tenets of being an NPO.
 
[quote name='chakan']Consider filling out this form. Its short by IRS standards.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f13909.pdf

The areas I believe the ECA has violated are:

Organization is engaged in commercial, for-profit business activities

Organization engaged in deceptive or improper fundraising practices


Unlike the ECA, the IRS will accept this form by email at [email protected][/QUOTE]


That should go on the first post along with the list of sponsor contact info.

Also, has anyone noticed the tags on this thread? My personal LOLer was "all your $ r belong 2 hal"
 
[quote name='chakan']Does the IRS have a web-form where you can ask them to investigate a company's tax-exempt status?

*EDIT*
Cursory search only brought up this so far
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f3949a.pdf

*EDIT 2*
I believe THIS is the correct form. If anyone has experienced excitement mailing physical letters, this might be fun. Its a pretty short form, by IRS standards.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f13909.pdf[/QUOTE]

I work in a accounting firm and you'd be surprised how many companies qualify for a non-profit organization. What you were looking at is a 501(c)4 reules which is very rare. What your looking for is 501(c)3 status which a lot of organizations fall under. The IRS review NPO's biannually and there shouldn't be a problem but if anyone wants to take a look at their tax documents they can see it through this link. All non-profits are required by law to have their tax documents available for public viewing.

http://www2.guidestar.org/ReportNonProfit.aspx?ein=20-5490032&Mode=NonGx&lid=100890909&dl=False

You have to register in order to see the details and download their Form-990, but its free. I use this site to research NPO and they don't send spam.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top