ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Amazon obviously has a framework in place that allows them to tie certain discounts to individual accounts"

Employee discounts at amazon are tied to an account for the remaining year, or til you redeem its maximum value. In order for an Employee to continue getting their discounts, they are required to get a new discount code each year. So yes, the framework is there, they just decided to use one time codes for one reason or another.
 
[quote name='maxfisher']I've been following bits and pieces of this discussion since it started. Interesting to see some ECA people posting here and that gypsy's been a member since last year. Kind of sad that people would resort to personal attacks on her, even if she does some work for an organization we now have a pretty low opinion of.[/QUOTE]

To be fair, even though there have been a number of attacks on her as a person, the majority of the attacks have been on how she has been handling this whole situation. It really doesn't matter how long she has been there. She is also the one that made a post on her own forums asking her own members to pretty much "retaliate". You can try and defend her all you want, but in this situation, she only made things worse and is now trying to get sympathy for having done nothing right. It just doesn't make sense to let her off the hook now since she was the one that seems to be holding onto this for dear life. Only been there a year and shes trying to start her own war with gaming communities and their previous sponsors (Ha ha, take that ECA). If she can't handle all of this publicity she is getting, then she shouldn't be in this position and should resign, because I have no patience for people who cry about their "situation" when they themselves caused it.
 
Something that's bothered me: we talk bad about exploiters figuring out a way to stack codes, and I understand that those who did it intentionally were, in fact, cheating the system. However, i found two weeks after a preorder thy I had somehow accidentally stacked two 10% coupons. I never read how exploiters were doing it, but I guess I stumbled on it without realizing it.

The amazon codes seemed to change the way they functioned at some point with no explanation whatsoever to ECA members. Far as I can tell, I did nothing different when using a code than I had in the past. Now, exploiters not included, who's fault is it that I ended up stacking for an order? Mine for not knowing that I can't do whatever I did? Amazons for not coding the coupons properly? Or the ECAs for not informing me of changes and procedures?
 
[quote name='Squarehard']To be fair, even though there have been a number of attacks on her as a person, the majority of the attacks have been on how she has been handling this whole situation. It really doesn't matter how long she has been there. She is also the one that made a post on her own forums asking her own members to pretty much "retaliate". You can try and defend her all you want, but in this situation, she only made things worse and is now trying to get sympathy for having done nothing right. It just doesn't make sense to let her off the hook now since she was the one that seems to be holding onto this for dear life. Only been there a year and shes trying to start her own war with gaming communities and their previous sponsors (Ha ha, take that ECA). If she can't handle all of this publicity she is getting, then she shouldn't be in this position and should resign, because I have no patience for people who cry about their "situation" when they themselves caused it.[/QUOTE]

I don't really see how this relates to the post you quoted/replied to. Are you trying to justify the personal attacks?
 
[quote name='georox']I don't really see how this relates to the post you quoted/replied to. Are you trying to justify the personal attacks?[/QUOTE]

I don't think he was trying to justify the personal attacks.
In either case, no one should change the renewal, cancel, and other issues with the ECA into personal issues. Let's be professional here.
 
[quote name='georox']I don't really see how this relates to the post you quoted/replied to. Are you trying to justify the personal attacks?[/QUOTE]

Actually I was trying to say that the majority of the attacks were of why people had a low opinion of her. I was just trying to make sure that he knew the majority of the attacks are not personal attacks of her as a person, because let's be honest, who can judge that, but are of how she has handled this whole entire situation thus far. And so what if she has been a member for a year. Her only 4 posts were to try and defend herself in this thread. She does not give a crap about the CAG community, and now she is trying to post to get herself some brownie points with our community. Sure there were some personal attacks here and there, but to be honest, the majority of the attacks were on how she has been handling this whole situation, and those are actually the comments that are making her look worse and probably hurt her reputation more if anything. And now that she is losing the fight, she is trying to call a truce? I am not saying personal attacks are okay, but it seems to me that those are not really the things she is even taking offense to. So why try and defend her now that she is losing the fight. We don't think she is doing a bad job because she is part of an organization we hate, but we what we hate is how she is parading herself as the savior for the ECA and trying to call everyone else out on it, except herself. That's all.
 
I emailed them over 4 days ago and I still didn't get any answer. OP mentioned a part of the terms of service where they state that if your credit card expired, they'll change the expiration date and charge you again.

How is that supposed to work?

Of course, hoping my old card number won't work is not good enough for me. They can say that since I didn't send a letter, I wanted to renew, and since I haven't paid, I'm liable for that amount.

And those are the people supposed to represent us!

I'd join an organization working against the ECA if that organization is treating its members with more respect.
 
[quote name='DeadlyMan']This. Anyone?[/QUOTE]

At this point just expect they will do anything to put the charge through including sending you to collections so do what you can do cancel NOW
 
[quote name='Squarehard']To be fair, even though there have been a number of attacks on her as a person, the majority of the attacks have been on how she has been handling this whole situation. It really doesn't matter how long she has been there. She is also the one that made a post on her own forums asking her own members to pretty much "retaliate". You can try and defend her all you want, but in this situation, she only made things worse and is now trying to get sympathy for having done nothing right. It just doesn't make sense to let her off the hook now since she was the one that seems to be holding onto this for dear life. Only been there a year and shes trying to start her own war with gaming communities and their previous sponsors (Ha ha, take that ECA). If she can't handle all of this publicity she is getting, then she shouldn't be in this position and should resign, because I have no patience for people who cry about their "situation" when they themselves caused it.[/QUOTE]


:applause:
Agrees whole heartedly
 
Wow. I'm sorry I ever signed up with this garbage organization. Even if it was a "free" membership, these assholes are not getting a penny out of me in renewal fees.

Hopefully they go out of business.
 
I signed up with a $5 gift card from a General Mills box, (expires in May, no way for them to charge the card) but I did use my real name on the card and website. I knew some shit like this would happen, but do I have to cancel?
 
[quote name='Doomed']I signed up with a $5 gift card from a General Mills box, (expires in May, no way for them to charge the card) but I did use my real name on the card and website. I knew some shit like this would happen, but do I have to cancel?[/QUOTE]

I hear they will get a collection Agency after ya if they don't successfully charge your account. Someone please confirm?
 
[quote name='Kandal']I hear they will get a collection Agency after ya if they don't successfully charge your account. Someone please confirm?[/QUOTE]

It's only speculation, I doubt they would waste the resources really, and they don't have much to stand on legally. If they can't get your money easily they'll probably just cancel your membership.
 
[quote name='x Famous x']Seems to me that people are making a big deal over $20.[/QUOTE]

You are right: shady practices are a big deal, but not enough that anyone is going to go to Gypsy's house and do anything.

[quote name='x Famous x']Also after reading most of the posts here it seems that most of you joined for the amazon 10% deal. You should have educated yourselves with what the ECA was about before giving them your information. Joining a organization to save money without knowing what the company stands for is dumb.[/QUOTE]

I find it funny that you call them a company.

Anyway, it's fine and dandy that they stand for those things, but I have yet to see any major action, even listed on their website. Furthermore, it's obvious that benefits are the only reason they expect people to join, because the Amazon discount is still listed. After all this, it's still there.

[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Guys, I didn't write any article I don't work for the marketing department or technical. I'm just an admin and work with their chapters. I don't know why some are still making this personal as I didn't call anyone names, call anyone inept, a lier, treat you like a piece of meat, call you a whore, track your address down or threatened to attack you on Twitter and the PMS forums like they're doing on NeoGaf. I've never attacked anyone beyond the legal boundaries I've seen being done. The only thing I've tried to do is keep the peace until the higher ups can work on the fix. I have relayed everything others have asked or have suggested and they are working on all of it.

And yes, I still believe in ECA, from the moment I joined I believed in ECA and will continue to. It's the same reason I joined PMS, they are my closest friends (from the founders to many of the Generals, and division members) and I would take a million character attacks to protect them as they would me because if you're dedicated you don't jump ship when things go bad.

I understand that in every community there are a few that take it to another level and don't represent a community as a whole and I appreciate the CAG mod removing the nastier comments.[/QUOTE]

Between your last post and this, no one has attacked you in that way. People are rightfully critical of your actions, to which you still have not responded. "They're my buddies and we protect each other" is not sufficient.

:wall: This is why they need a professional community manager, who is actually tied to the ECA.
 
[quote name='Kandal']I hear they will get a collection Agency after ya if they don't successfully charge your account. Someone please confirm?[/QUOTE]

It's certainly possible for them to do that, but I haven't seen any official word from ECA regarding collections. In any case, I'm not going to freak out over it. I'd rather deal with a collection agency than the ECA folks.
 
[quote name='Kandal']I hear they will get a collection Agency after ya if they don't successfully charge your account. Someone please confirm?[/QUOTE]

No a collection agency is only able to collect if a service has been delivered. Since you own the ECA nothing (for the next year's dues) the ECA would merely suspend your account for non-payment.

Just cancel your credit card and get a new number if you're really concerned.
 
They aren't going to hire a collection agency to collect $20. In order to send an account into collections you have to sell off your account at a discount to the agency. Basically it's like the collection agency pays ECA $5 for each $20 past due balance account in the hopes that they can turn around and collect the $20, at which point they make a $15 profit. And do you really think a collection agency can justify spending any resources in order to make $15 on an account? Even if they make one attempt (phone call or letter) and manage to collect on the account, it would cost them more in wages and expenses to collect that account.

This is an empty threat at best. Trust me, they'd have to be complete morons to attempt something like this. Wait a minute.........

Haha, but seriously, no collection agency is going to invest in collecting this nominal fee. You can rest easy in that regard.
 
Everyone who has or is planning to cancel your credit card is over-reacting majorly, especially since probably 99% of us don't have to worry about a renewal until next fall. So:

#1 You can still send the letter in and then do a chargeback if they still bill you

#2 We're going to have online cancellation this week if I had to guess

No need to freak out and take the scissors to your card and waste your time and waste the time and resources of your credit card company and trying to deal with them.
 
[quote name='kodave']
No need to freak out and take the scissors to your card and waste your time and waste the time and resources of your credit card company and trying to deal with them.[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't deal with that, I'd just dispute the charge. I've done it a few times, it's very low hassle and I've never lost.

It's much easier than writing a letter to ECA, plus I'm sure it causes the ECA some grief dealing with your bank's lawyers.
 
[quote name='mikejenks']I wouldn't deal with that, I'd just dispute the charge. I've done it a few times, it's very low hassle and I've never lost.

It's much easier than writing a letter to ECA, plus I'm sure it causes the ECA some grief dealing with your bank's lawyers.[/QUOTE]

Well you have to cancel in some form before you can dispute the charge.

So either you send a letter in now (which apparently you don't want to do), or you wait a bit until the online cancellation comes - because it is coming - and those are the first two things I said before what you quoted.

I've just seen numerous posts in this thread with people acting like they had to get on the horn with their CC company and get all of their information changed ASAP when there's no impending doom just yet.

Even if you thought you did the right thing by canceling auto-renew earlier, I know ECA is going to do the right thing and notify us all about the option when they put it up and it actually works.

Then you'll have notice that the cancellation didn't work the first time (which seriously, your credit card company isn't going to waste the time and legal sources to disprove), and you'll have to spend 30 seconds doing it again.

And really, its not the end of the world to have to do it again. Its something that never should have happened in the first place, but it won't kill anyone to do it.

There's really no need to be a dick and NOT turn off autorenew when they bring it back shortly and notify you its back and working, just to dispute a charge a year from now because you thought you already turned off auto-renew.
 
[quote name='Squarehard']because I have no patience for people who cry about their "situation" when they themselves caused it.[/QUOTE]

I just love that this is in a thread where a bunch of people are angry because they joined a consumer advocacy group purely to take advantage of a promotional offer, and now they can't skip out on the rest of their obligation as easily as they imagined.

Irony, yet again, your name is CAG.
 
[quote name='trq']I just love that this is in a thread where a bunch of people are angry because they joined a consumer advocacy group purely to take advantage of a promotional offer, and now they can't skip out on the rest of their obligation as easily as they imagined.

Irony, yet again, your name is CAG.[/QUOTE]

I planned to continue my membership with the ECA, but after all this I've decided against it.
 
To TRQ: Ummmm many of us PAID for our memberships. Many of us did so when there were NO discounts. Many of us have seen the shady actions of the ECA and no longer want to be associated with them.

We aren't asking for refunds. We are simply asking for our accounts to be canceled so we have no more ties to an organization that has proven to abuse and attack its own members.

We are well within our rights to want our accounts canceled before the next billing period. We paid our dues for the year. We don't like the company. We are opting out of next year's membership. End of story.

That is not irony at all. The only irony is that we joined a company that was supposed to go to bat and stand up for gamers. But rather, the ECA is attacking, mocking, and abusing their members. Now that is irony.
 
[quote name='trq']I just love that this is in a thread where a bunch of people are angry because they joined a consumer advocacy group purely to take advantage of a promotional offer, and now they can't skip out on the rest of their obligation as easily as they imagined.

Irony, yet again, your name is CAG.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for your input, troll.
 
I don’t know for sure, but for the most part, this forum seems to have only a handful of people that would actually go out of their way to personally attack the ECA employees. However, if there is way more personal stalking and attacking than I think there is from CAG, it’s probably best to stop: to retain our credibility after all this is over. It is unfortunate that the ECA hasn’t spent the time in this thread to discern the verbally abusive minority from the ones posting legitimate concerns. I would even go as far as to saying that—currently—the employees are afflicted with a tunnel-vision that only sees the onslaught of attacks and very few (if not none) of the underlying issues. However, I have to admit, we have it, too.

I think it’s best to note and understand that sometimes working in a company (especially a non-profit), employees have to adopt a sort of cult of personality (well, not to a particular person, but to the organization itself). Employees have to believe in their company—its people, its issues, and its cause—to fight a constantly uphill PR battle. And I do want to believe that some of the employees at the ECA really joined to fight the good fight.

However, like any new business or fledgling operation, they do not have the human resources or experience to correctly resolve this public relations nightmare. The saddest thing about this whole ordeal is that the ECA made relatively small mistakes and oversights that could’ve been simply addressed or corrected. Unfortunately, the solutions and statements were fraught with aggressive diction and the over-generalizations of specific communities (i.e., ‘lol these guys think they are planning a revolution or something’) make for extremely inflammatory situations. Those remarks only beget more dissatisfaction and aren’t conducive to salvaging relationships; essentially, each side is forced respond again and again and again. The opposing sides to this altercation are so deeply entrenched in the other’s mudslinging that it probably won’t end until only one side is left standing.

What we could’ve done better: help the ECA stay accountable and honest when contact was first made (March 2009), rather than get into a flame war as a reactionary instinct (December 2009). I think there is an amazing community underneath the ‘deal seekers’ hat we all wear. The ECA may not want to admit it right now, but there are many more organizers, leaders, go-getters, movers and shakers here that I gave the forum credit for. With all the bright minds and hopeful idealism (which, sadly, has been replaced with scathing realism for the time being), we should’ve been able to keep the ECA on their toes and on their way to actually doing something to achieve their/ our goals. I know a few tried and were constantly redirected to interviews, old news articles and newsletters. However, if more people tried or helped the ‘think tank’ by contributing ideas and opinions, we would’ve seen the ECA’s true color and full potential much earlier than this. Nine months is a long time to give a company your membership dues and find out that they haven’t been doing much of anything since 2006 (which can easily be attributed many factors, including us, them, the discount, the PR, the nature of business-running, and the internet and its giant troll).

What the ECA could’ve done better: transparency. In the scheme of business relationships with their constituents, transparency equals trust. I am constantly reminded of the many times the ECA has said, ‘No, we don’t have to do this. Please, read the Terms of Service.’ Yes, I agree: legally, there are many things that a business does not have to do. However, there are many things that a successful business does that they didn’t have to. This should be a fundamental principle. While the Terms of Service are meant to protect the business from punitive damages, clinging to the terms and doing only what is required is not (and will never be) good enough to transform any organization into a vehicle of change. If the ECA had only sent out mass e-mails or updates—about a) what they are currently trying to do, b) what things they have decided to do/change, and c) what they want to do, but currently can’t—I would almost guarantee that no once-or-future member would be able to find fault in the ECA with a solid foundation of truth. Sure, each individual member determines their own level of involvement, but the ECA should at least meet them half way. This isn’t Fight Club or a movie where people automatically flock—you have to reach out the hand for someone to grab it; you have to involve them or give them no reason to stay uninvolved. If you cannot trust the members with the intricate details of the organization’s business, then they have no reason to trust you with them either. I would even say transparency is more important than honesty. If the people were able to see what you are doing and hear exactly what you hope to do, then you wouldn’t have to answer the questions that would force you to lie.
 
[quote name='trq']I just love that this is in a thread where a bunch of people are angry because they joined a consumer advocacy group purely to take advantage of a promotional offer, and now they can't skip out on the rest of their obligation as easily as they imagined.

Irony, yet again, your name is CAG.[/QUOTE]
Yes, I TOTALLY want to give money to a consumer advocacy group that I disagree with completely and don't trust. Why didn't I see the light sooner?

P.S. That was sarcasm
 
[quote name='kodave']Everyone who has or is planning to cancel your credit card is over-reacting majorly, especially since probably 99% of us don't have to worry about a renewal until next fall. So:

#1 You can still send the letter in and then do a chargeback if they still bill you

#2 We're going to have online cancellation this week if I had to guess

No need to freak out and take the scissors to your card and waste your time and waste the time and resources of your credit card company and trying to deal with them.[/QUOTE]

This is absolutely correct. Just dispute the charge if it goes through. I'm guessing most people here have never done this before, but the credit card company is on your side 100%. If there's any doubt at all they always side with the customer. Remember, you're the customer and the one making them money. The card company works for you, not ECA. There's no way you'll have to pay that charge.

In addition, Hal saying that customers themselves were being investigated for fraud is absolute BS. That doesn't happen unless you literally go into a store, buy a TV, and then say you didn't. You WILL NOT have to pay the $20 as long as its on a credit card.

[quote name='trq']I just love that this is in a thread where a bunch of people are angry because they joined a consumer advocacy group purely to take advantage of a promotional offer, and now they can't skip out on the rest of their obligation as easily as they imagined.
[/QUOTE]

Wow, talk about completely missing the point. Promotional discounts are one of the benefits of their advocacy, and they advertise this. Joining to receive benefits is not dishonest in any way, it's there to attract members. But, regardless of reasons for joining, they're still a completely shady and illegitimate organization. You use the word "obligation". Where when I signed up did it say I was obliged to keep paying $20 a year for the rest of my life? Where did it say I was obliged to spend money on a certified letter to cancel an account? It said that nowhere. I wasn't obligated to do anything.

[quote name='trq']
Irony, yet again, your name is CAG.[/QUOTE]

You want real irony?

"EULAs are a real and tangible problem for our business. Quite simply, they're out of control. The best intentions of lawyers in the business aside, these contracts have become so unwieldy that they regularly infringe on consumer rights. Many would likely be unenforceable in a court of law. Others, consumers would be shocked to find out what all of that fine print actually meant." -Hal Halpin

That's irony.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='trq']I just love that this is in a thread where a bunch of people are angry because they joined a consumer advocacy group purely to take advantage of a promotional offer, and now they can't skip out on the rest of their obligation as easily as they imagined.

Irony, yet again, your name is CAG.[/QUOTE]

I wasn't aware that we caused ECA to become a terrible and totally unreliable company that lie out of their ass. I was under the impression that they did that to themselves and we are the fallout of that and when we signed up for it, we weren't under the impression we were going to get screwed. I appreciate trying to be clever. Really, I do. Here's an applause for it.

:applause:

[quote name='kodave']Everyone who has or is planning to cancel your credit card is over-reacting majorly, especially since probably 99% of us don't have to worry about a renewal until next fall. So:

#1 You can still send the letter in and then do a chargeback if they still bill you

#2 We're going to have online cancellation this week if I had to guess

No need to freak out and take the scissors to your card and waste your time and waste the time and resources of your credit card company and trying to deal with them.[/QUOTE]

Very true. There's no point in freaking out, unless your membership is literally going to expire in the next month, otherwise I don't see any need to freak out. Just remember, the purpose of this thread isn't to talk about getting our money back and etc., but for once, it really is about the principle of the thing. ECA can not keep going on to conduct business the way they have been doing thus far, and they need to either change that or just not do business anymore. If they don't even listen to what the gaming communities have to say, which are the people they claim to be fighting for, then why even stay in business?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='kodave']There's really no need to be a dick and NOT turn off autorenew when they bring it back shortly and notify you its back and working, just to dispute a charge a year from now because you thought you already turned off auto-renew.[/QUOTE]I turned off auto-renew initially, so when they "bring it back" then it should already be off. If it isn't off, then there is a reason to be a dick, and that reason is that I don't like them and at this point they can go fuck themselves with Bank of America's lawyers.

[quote name='kodave']
Even if you thought you did the right thing by canceling auto-renew earlier, I know ECA is going to do the right thing [/QUOTE]
Should I even bother reading the rest? I mean, really???????????
 
[quote name='mis0']My uber post about the ECA being Nazis got deleted. :[

Oh well.. I did drop the fuck bomb like every other sentence.[/QUOTE]

tact mis0, tact!! now that you mention it, how did you get fuck to come up iso shaq-fu?? but, it's all good man, I think everyone here knew exactly where you coming from. I'm all for swearing as a natural freedom of speech, but when the mods are out, what can you do? :roll:
 
[quote name='vherub']perhaps this thread has lost it's original noble purpose and should be moved to another location[/QUOTE]

while it's had its problems, IMHO it shouldn't be moved until the ECA follows through with its promises its working on. I believe this thread, with its 150k views, does put pressure on them to do the right thing.
 
[quote name='Mizz Behavin']To TRQ: Ummmm many of us PAID for our memberships.[/QUOTE]

Never said you didn't; merely that nobody put a gun to anyone's head and forced them to join anything, so complaining that you can't tolerate people whining about situations they got themselves into is a bit hypocritical.

[quote name='confoosious']Thanks for your input, troll.[/QUOTE]

You think that's trolling? Okay, then here's the substantive post:

The cancellation method isn't written in Aramaic. Clearly the ECA didn't make it easy to cancel, but that's the point: they don't want it to be easy to join, take advantage of their benefits, and then leave. So other than people who planned to do just that, who's inconvenienced, and why should I care about angry exploiters? Maybe they could have made it easier to cancel, but then they also probably should have made it a lot harder to join. This very thread is littered with people who posted about how they joined purely for the goal of using the Amazon code, didn't get to use it, and now -- boo hoo -- canceling is a hassle. Whoever thinks this thread would be some kind of damning evidence against the ECA if it's shown to the sponsors clearly has a misguided idea of what nerdrage looks like to business people, because there's more here that proves the ECA right than the other way around.

I'm a member of the ECA because I actually give a shit about things like game-censoring legislation and when you guys are done shooting yourselves (and the rest of us) in the foot over three bucks off Far Cry 2, I still will be. Should I eventually decide to cancel, you know what I'm gonna do? That's right: send 'em a letter, like a real adult who's responsible for his own actions, unlike a good portion of the people here. Given the number of things I've seen some CAGs abuse and ruin for the rest of us, this thread isn't surprising, even if it's still disappointing.

How's that, dude? Better?
 
[quote name='trq']I just love that this is in a thread where a bunch of people are angry because they joined a consumer advocacy group purely to take advantage of a promotional offer, and now they can't skip out on the rest of their obligation as easily as they imagined.

Irony, yet again, your name is CAG.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for your useless input.

[quote name='JBaby']No a collection agency is only able to collect if a service has been delivered. Since you own the ECA nothing (for the next year's dues) the ECA would merely suspend your account for non-payment.

Just cancel your credit card and get a new number if you're really concerned.[/QUOTE]

Incorrect. If you sign up for a membership to something and do not opt of it, the company is legally within their rights to keep your account active and either obtain new billing information (say, if your credit card has a new expiration date) or send you to collections if they cannot collect their money (in the case of you canceling your card and getting a new number).

The question many people have raised, though, which I definitely find legitimate, is whether or not a non-profit organization can do this. Seeing as the ECA, though, has already engaged in shady practices and has also made it quite clear that the people who are pissed about the whole policy are getting under their skins, I could definitely see them trying to screw around with us.

And believe me, even if you have a non-legitimate item on your credit report, it can take months to get it off. I had something on mine that took the involvement of a state's attorney general to get removed.
 
[quote name='mkm1998']Haha, but seriously, no collection agency is going to invest in collecting this nominal fee. You can rest easy in that regard.[/QUOTE]

I guess you never had a late fee at Blockbuster.
 
[quote name='dino88']I guess you never had a late fee at Blockbuster.[/QUOTE]

Wow, indeed. Do not doubt the depths a collection agency will go to make a few bucks. Besides, you can't look at it in terms of one account. The ECA would turn over hundreds or thousands of accounts to them. A collection agency would jump at the opportunity, especially in the case of such a small fee. People are more likely to get bullied into paying $20 to get something removed from their credit report.
 
[quote name='mikejenks']I turned off auto-renew initially, so when they "bring it back" then it should already be off. If it isn't off, then there is a reason to be a dick, and that reason is that I don't like them and at this point they can go fuck themselves with Bank of America's lawyers.


Should I even bother reading the rest? I mean, really???????????[/QUOTE]

Try to comprehend this:

Whether or not that button ever worked doesn't really matter.

The ECA is just going to claim it didn't work and there is absolutely no record of anyone who used it. Consider it the equivalent of a huge stack of cancellation letters coming in, but then the office catches fire and they're all destroyed before they can even read the names on the envelopes. Yeah, you did something, but the ECA has no way of knowing who sent in their cancellation notice. So they ask you to kindly do it again. Their database is going to show no record of anyone having ever checked the box, so no, you won't come up as ever having checked that box.

No lawyer and bank is going to take the time to investigate it when a new remedy has appeared: The option to just do that again in all of 30 seconds, of which you'll have had 9 months of notice to do so.

You're going to look like an idiot when you claim you clicked a button when you didn't print out a confirmation page or screen shot or any other proof that the "disable auto-renew" button was checked, especially when you had 9 months to take 30 seconds to do it all over again.

Your bank isn't going to take the time to file suit against the ECA to try and get a forensic computer scientist in there to examine their database and any and all changes they may have ever made to it. Maybe the AG of CT would be more likely to do that, but once he sees that the ECA claimed it was all a mistake and that they've come up with online cancellation, he's just going to give them a slap on the wrist and walk away.

After the ECA gives us notice of the online cancellation option and says that it didn't work in the past, then you're going to be in a really hard position 9 months from now trying to argue your way out of that $20 charge.

In short, don't be a retard, just cancel your account in a few days when the option re-appears. We've backed the ECA into a corner and they have no choice but to let us cancel online. Then everyone can just walk away soon rather than squabble with banks in 9 months.
 
Exactly, kodave. Whether or not ECA is being douchy is kind of meaningless at that point. If they do come up with an actual way to cancel online, just take the three seconds to do it. Don't be stubborn just to be stubborn.
 
[quote name='trq']why should I care about angry exploiters? [/QUOTE]

Just stop.

Kodave has the right idea. I had always planned on waiting a bit before passing some concerned letters around. I've been a member of the ESA sponsored VGVN for quite some time. I like the idea of the ECA. I just can't believe an advocacy group would handle a situation like this so poorly. There were so many opportunities to maintain good relations with members and sponsors. I have no confidence in the group anymore and intend to leave as soon as online cancellation returns.

However, I am left with such a poor opinion about the ECA's professionalism that I sincerely question the security of my information. I may just end up taking that step as well. It doesn't take too long to also contact my bank and resolve matters there. That's easily done over the phone.
 
[quote name='trq']
You think that's trolling? Okay, then here's the substantive post:

The cancellation method isn't written in Aramaic. Clearly the ECA didn't make it easy to cancel, but that's the point: they don't want it to be easy to join, take advantage of their benefits, and then leave. So other than people who planned to do just that, who's inconvenienced, and why should I care about angry exploiters? Maybe they could have made it easier to cancel, but then they also probably should have made it a lot harder to join. This very thread is littered with people who posted about how they joined purely for the goal of using the Amazon code, didn't get to use it, and now -- boo hoo -- canceling is a hassle. Whoever thinks this thread would be some kind of damning evidence against the ECA if it's shown to the sponsors clearly has a misguided idea of what nerdrage looks like to business people, because there's more here that proves the ECA right than the other way around.

I'm a member of the ECA because I actually give a shit about things like game-censoring legislation and when you guys are done shooting yourselves (and the rest of us) in the foot over three bucks off Far Cry 2, I still will be. Should I eventually decide to cancel, you know what I'm gonna do? That's right: send 'em a letter, like a real adult who's responsible for his own actions, unlike a good portion of the people here. Given the number of things I've seen some CAGs abuse and ruin for the rest of us, this thread isn't surprising, even if it's still disappointing.[/QUOTE]

Haven't a lot of people already sent letters? Don't we have mass letter being made in googledocs? My complaint has never been the fact that I have to send in a letter or that it is hard to cancel, but the fact that instead of informing us the button was not functioning we had to find out pretty much ourselves. When they finally did make a statement they went out of their way to blame us and completely ignore the fact that they never informed anyone.

I joined while it was, but have yet to actually use one of their codes. I enjoy reading their newsletters because well, they are good. Having the amazon codes would have made me pay for another year for sure, but even with the removal of them I was still probably going to sign up for another year.

However I do not think any company or organization should do what they have done. Yes the button may not have been working, but we didn't know that and I am sure many people broke all their ties with the ECA after pushing the button and may still not know.

If they would have come out and said "the button did not work so anyone that has used it has not actually canceled their subscription" in an email prior to us finding out, it would not have made me even consider taking a stance against them and just would have seen it as a little mistake.

Obviously you can support them and disagree with me because that is your opinion. I won't call you a troll because if you truly agree with everything the ECA has done then you should be able to express that.

But like you and many of the ECA, the point just seems to be lost. The only reason the Amazon codes were brought into the mix is because of Hals statement and that doesn't change the fact that there probably 90 other things that could have done to stop them from being taken like that rather than what they did (again no problem with the letter). The point of this has always (to me at least) been the fact they did not notify us on the matter.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']Exactly, kodave. Whether or not ECA is being douchy is kind of meaningless at that point. If they do come up with an actual way to cancel online, just take the three seconds to do it. Don't be stubborn just to be stubborn.[/QUOTE]

What if the goal isn't cancellation but opting out of an auto-renewal. It would be a mistake to assume that the only goal for everyone who is extremely unhappy with the ECA's behavior is a desire for an easy cancellation. I want that too, but does the ECA really want everyone gone for good who is upset with them now?
 
This is why you shouldn't respond to trolls.

They conveniently leave out the main issues.

Such as paying members (myself) who clicked off auto-renew only to be informed by a random post on CAG (not the ECA) that that feature never worked and I'd be billed come renewal time.
 
I love the fact that the ECA, its supporters, and people looking to start fights in this thread keep bringing up the Amazon codes. It's their crutch. Fine, most of us joined for the Amazon codes. You're 100% right. But guess what? That's exactly why the ECA got them! They didn't do it to reward their current members. They wanted to attract new members, which is the same reason Hal himself wrote that article in GameInformer and gave out the free membership code. That's how the process works. They draw people in with the discount and then say, "Here's why would should stay, because we're doing this, this, and this."

As far as a a lot of people are concerned, the ECA never did that. A lot of people in this thread and the previous ones discussing the ECA have questioned what good the ECA has actually done, and none of their supporters have an answer. They point us to us some old news postings about them "organizing" alleged protests, and most of the time, the articles are on GamePolitics, which is run by the ECA.

And even if the ECA has done some good, and we're simply missing it, nothing excuses the way they have behaved in this matter. They had a link on their site that clearly made users believe they were canceling the auto-renewal of their membership. If it never worked, and it was never intended to be there, the ECA should have made it a priority to inform ALL of their members, not just the ones that are active on their forums. Sorry, but no matter how you wanna look at it, it seems very shady when a company that is hoping that people keep renewing their membership doesn't let people know that they actually didn't cancel. And once the shit hit the fan over this matter, things obviously got a lot worse. ECA's representatives have insulted their "vocal" members (aren't we suppose to be vocal as members of an advocacy group) and even accused some of us of fraud.
 
[quote name='trq']
The cancellation method isn't written in Aramaic.
[/QUOTE]

I respect your opinion, and won't attack you for having one, but the problem isn't just their cancellation policy. The ECA's website allegedly had a major glitch, and that glitch just so happened to do with the most important source of their future funding- auto renewals. The ECA wasn't giving away free memberships just out of the goodness of their heart- they, like every other entity that does free trial memberships, were banking on renewals. It just so happens, they have a glitch that led any reasonable person to believe they had canceled the auto-renewal(as I have said a vital part of their future funding), and you were even given instant verification. This function wasn't available for a few minutes, or even days...it was up for months. Now the ECA claims that function was a glitch. OK, lets give them the benefit of the doubt that it was....they are OBLIGATED to notify all their members of this glitch. They send out newsletters, they have everyone's email address, it would literally take 2 minutes to send out notification to their members. To date this has not been done. In my opinion, that is indefensible for any organization to do, especially a consumer advocacy group.

It also just so happens that they have a policy to not allow you to simply turn off auto-renewals by any method, but promise to give you 30 days notice of the pending renewal. Coincidentally you must cancel your membership 30 days in advanced. I just don't see how anyone could view this as not being a problem.

I would LOVE for you or someone from the ECA to directly respond to these 2 points...I have been unable to find anyone representing the ECA or defending them willing to do so.

The bothersome snail mail requirement is annoying and not very consumer friendly, but to me that is not the real issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='trq']Clearly the ECA didn't make it easy to cancel, but that's the point: they don't want it to be easy to join, take advantage of their benefits, and then leave. So other than people who planned to do just that, who's inconvenienced, and why should I care about angry exploiters? Maybe they could have made it easier to cancel, but then they also probably should have made it a lot harder to join.[/quote]

Maybe they shouldn't entice people to join with benefits. They advertise that more than any advocating that they've done, are doing, or plan to do. They still have the Amazon discount listed as "currently" discontinued.
 
[quote name='trq']
How's that, dude? Better?[/QUOTE]

No. You still sound like you're fresh out of high school and lack the literacy to comprehend the English language.

If anything else, your post is more of a nerdrage than everyone else's.
 
[quote name='Kaltic']The point of this has always (to me at least) been the fact they did not notify us on the matter.[/QUOTE]

This has been my biggest problem with the whole situation, too. People want to know things, industry doesn't want us to know them (not always, but the generalization stands). As a consumer advocacy group that is supposed to be representing the people, it should focus on how we want to know about changes that apply to us. And this change of a button that seemed to work being taken down and no notification going out just screams of industry to me. Whether the button work I don't care, so long as they provided us the knowledge I would have been fine with the change.

Also, excuse me if a lot of this sounds like a philosophical conspiracy rant. I've been reading Ayn Rand lately.
 
I was wondering about the whole option to cancel membership online... It is due to come back, but how long is it going to take? Considering the fact that the "Button" that did not function properly was left there for months, how soon can the "Button" be fixed with their ToS changed to reflect that? I don't know... ECA did inform us Amazon codes were going to be fixed and coming back soon. We were fed that for weeks until it went BOOM...

P.S. I would imagine the labor involved of receiving snail mails for the membership cancellation will be exhausting if they are not adequately staffed. I hope they get the "Button" fixed asap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top