ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will chip in $5 for gas money if someone videotapes this. We don't need 60 people. Just 2.

I will even chip in $2 extra for a dollar menu stop. ;)

Hit em on all fronts:

a) Hand deliver for the show
b) USPS for the TOS meeting
c) email for the hell of it
 
[quote name='confoosious']I will chip in $5 for gas money if someone videotapes this. We don't need 60 people. Just 2.

I will even chip in $2 extra for a dollar menu stop. ;)

Hit em on all fronts:

a) Hand deliver for the show
b) USPS for the TOS meeting
c) email for the hell of it[/QUOTE]

And then we call them up to read all the names. Just because we haven't read about the new TOS update(s).
 
[quote name='Reira']715 entries!

And with that, I'm going to bed. If the list is getting low on rows, please add some more.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

Thanks for your comments on the letter. Any other comments/questions/suggestions on the letter or anything else (like requests to be added), you're probably best PM'ing me, just in case I don't get a chance to get caught up in the morning on the thread.[/QUOTE]


Someone should take a copy of that list and email it to the ECA sponsors to show them just how many that small group of unhappy people really are.
 
[quote name='aladdnzane']Someone should take a copy of that list and email it to the ECA sponsors to show them just how many that small group of unhappy people really are.[/QUOTE]

100% agree. I also agree with the idea of sending it to gaming news sites, specifically ones which have already covered this story. That way the ECA will either have to respond, or simply let the facts fall where they may.
 
[quote name='aladdnzane']someone should take a copy of that list and email it to the eca sponsors to show them just how many that small group of unhappy people really are.[/quote]
this!
 
[quote name='Strell']Once again, this ought to be on the front page of this site, in the actual news feed. Why isn't it?[/QUOTE]


Probably because there's too much trolling in this thread. It goes from joke to dead horse complaints to legal snooze fests to creepy stalkers to trolls and then the cycle repeats itself. Today was a fairly constructive day. So we're over due for some trolling.
 
Boy, trolling would have put an end to a LOT of news feed posts if that were the case.

I see your point, but that doesn't mean you can't get, say, Shipwreck to write an editorial about it. Just run down the facts (in a timeline), pick a few choice posts, put up Reira's letter link list, a few choice quotes from Hal, etc. Would take all of an hour to get that running, and it's over an already heated and volatile topic.

It needs exposure. There's been some, but this needs to be up at Gamasutra, Penny Arcade, more social network sites, etc. Could get much bigger than it is now and really drive the stakes home.
 
My apologies if this has been posted, but I just noticed this on Neogaf. My apologies if this has been posted, but I just noticed this on Neogaf. Hal spins and spins with a lot of misinformation and downplaying of the situation... fuel for the fire, I suppose:

http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Example:
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.


Yep, everything had been asked and answered.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sent my letter today in a box explaining my anger, that whole box smells like something died in thanks to a special something. I also put a bottle of no more tears shampoo in there to.
 
[quote name='kodave']Probably because there's too much trolling in this thread. It goes from joke to dead horse complaints to legal snooze fests to creepy stalkers to trolls and then the cycle repeats itself. Today was a fairly constructive day. So we're over due for some trolling.[/QUOTE]

Speaking of legal snooze fests, I still want to know if they have to accept that everyone put their information on that list of their own volition.

Or at least what to tell them if they say everyone has to send one out personally.
 
[quote name='Strell']
I see your point, but that doesn't mean you can't get, say, Shipwreck to write an editorial about it. Just run down the facts (in a timeline), pick a few choice posts, put up Reira's letter link list, a few choice quotes from Hal, etc. Would take all of an hour to get that running, and it's over an already heated and volatile topic.

It needs exposure. There's been some, but this needs to be up at Gamasutra, Penny Arcade, more social network sites, etc. Could get much bigger than it is now and really drive the stakes home.[/QUOTE]
If you want to give it a shot, feel free. This thread is so large, I wouldn't mind someone starting a new one with updated info in the OP.
 
[quote name='Strell'] Could get much bigger than it is now and really drive the stakes home.[/QUOTE]

food-art-009.jpg


All I could think of...
 
[quote name='CheapyD']If you want to give it a shot, feel free. This thread is so large, I wouldn't mind someone starting a new one with updated info in the OP.[/QUOTE]

Fair enough.

[quote name='SpazX']
food-art-009.jpg


All I could think of...
[/QUOTE]

Oh no, steak is driving car! HOW CAN THIS BE
 
The fact that this thread has so many replies and views (and that caltab has been updating) makes me think we should keep this one...
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']My apologies if this has been posted, but I just noticed this on Neogaf. Hal spins and spins with a lot of misinformation and downplaying of the situation... fuel for the fire, I suppose:

http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

...

Yep, everything had been asked and answered.[/QUOTE]


Whatever he's smoking, I want some of it.

He attributes the problem to free memberships, but clearly plenty of paying members are quite upset with how the situation has been handled as well. And he seems to also place the blame on the whole Amazon situation as well. But you know what? The whole Amazon situation didn't change my support of the ECA. I joined for the benefits, but was willing to continue my support because I really wanted to believe in what the ECA said they were supposedly doing.

But this and the continued actions leaves me firm in my resolve to no longer associate myself with the ECA. They can't uphold their core values and continually place the blame on the very members they claim to support. I would love to support an organization/movement that fights for gamer's rights, but it will not be the ECA.
 
I respectfully disagree, he seems like a proud man and actually seems to backing down and has listened to our complaints, that can be hard for someone like that to do.
 
Bottom line in all of this, I think we should be happy that our complaints were apparently heard, Halpin was forced to change his tone, and it would seem that we definitely had impact on this issue. CAG > ECA.

[quote name='omnicious']Huh I used the free GIMAG code or something so I don't think I can them my cc info. Do I have to worry?[/QUOTE]

You gave them your info. You couldn't have signed up with it.
 
I read it and still found it insulting, misleading, and still leaving many questions unanswered. This article just furthered my desire to remove myself from this company as soon as possible. Notice Gamecrazy is published by the ECA (bias anyone?). I thought it was all complete spin and see he is still attacking members and labeling them as a small minority. I've never in my life been one to vehemently oppose an organization, but I felt so mistreated and deceived by this organization I've actively filed complaints against them.

I found Hal's whole bit about removing the forums because everything had been asked and answered complete bs and anyone with the slightest bit of insight can tell the article doesn't add up. As soon as the online cancellation feature is implemented I'm gone. I also think Hal Halpin has complete arrogance and disregard for the situation and can't understand why anyone would want him representing their company. After all this though the organization is going to be worthless, and rightfully so.
 
Well, it's a bit better than before with a quasi-apology, but they really need to send out an official notice/apology for any of this to matter. And still, there's quite a bit of spin, even if he makes some concessions.
 
So the ECA jizzes on our faces, but this time they hand us a towel, and you guys are happy about it? He's misinterpreting the chain of events to his own self-centered benefit. Nothing has been accomplished.
 
[quote name='dchrisd']So the ECA jizzes on our faces, but this time they hand us a towel, and you guys are happy about it?[/QUOTE]

Mature language indeed. Anyway, you're completely missing the point. I don't think anyone said anything positive about the ECA, but we are glad to see that Halpin was apparently advised or took it upon himself to finally drop much of his bullshit. It would seem that we did some good. Now, the real test is whether or not the online cancellation pops up.
 
I don't care if they get on their knees and apologize. It's too late. What's done has been done. The fact that they tried to pull a fast one over the very same consumers they were trying to protect can never be changed. Their reputation has been tarnished and they deserve it.

The only reason Hal-Hal is backing down now is because we pushed back. If nobody had said anything, and forced some of their sponsors to sever ties with their organization, they would've gotten away with it and you would not hear a peep from Hal-Hal.
 
[quote name='caltab']everyone needs to read this...Hal has really said a lot of good stuff that people wanted to hear

http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints[/QUOTE]
I'm glad they've started to change their tone a little. There's still a lot of "spin" there, some half-truths etc.

However, this comment from Hal seems like an mildly implied threat of some sort, imo.
[quote name='"Hal Halpin"']
Q: Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Hal: Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?![/quote]

Almost seems like a passive-aggressive way of saying "Shut up! We have your info and know where you live!"
I hope the ECA changes, for it's own sake but as a paying member, I no longer want to be associated with them for a multitude of reasons.
 
[quote name='caltab']I respectfully disagree, he seems like a proud man and actually seems to backing down and has listened to our complaints, that can be hard for someone like that to do.[/QUOTE]

Of course he is backing down...his actions are causing thousands of members to leave, which means less money, and less power for the organization. Unfortunately, the damage is already done. Hal himself has been rude and talked down to members far too many times, and the Moderators could care less for anyone but themselves. It is nice that he is tried to "apologize," but I don't buy it. It is a fake front he is using to try and limit any further damage.

The thing that bugs me is the fact that he stated that all of these members kept joining, leaving, and then joining to get the Amazon discounts. I really can't see why anyone would do that. You could have easily cleared the cache on your computer, reloaded the page for the Amazon code, and got a new code every time...that and you got a new code everyday without having to clear the cache. Was there really this group of people that was leaving and joining loads of times each day? That doesn't make sense at all. It seems that Hal is still using this reasoning to defend his decision for all of this other crap we are dealing with. Excuses excuses...

Sorry though, I won't sympathize with a man who abused his members again and again and again, and allows his moderators to abuse and silence all of the members, and then pretends to say sorry....nope, not happening!
 
As much as my nerdrage is advising against it, I have to admit that was a decent response. Either way, it's the best we're going to get out of him and it still doesn't matter because they have yet to e-mail all of their members and update them about this issue.
 
[quote name='caltab']I respectfully disagree, he seems like a proud man and actually seems to backing down and has listened to our complaints, that can be hard for someone like that to do.[/QUOTE]


It's am improvement from earlier statements yes, but still fails to address many of the concerns we have placed. At least 2/3 of the letter talks about the Amazon codes which really aren't the issue. There's statements in there that aren't factually true, downplays the amount impact we've had, and still stands by earlier efforts were a "solution" to the problem. It's all spin and bullshit, and I'm not buying it.

Aside from that, of course we expect that he would eventually come back with some sort of statement based on our actions. The ECA had no choice with all the negative press that has been passed around. At this point it's not about restoring the ability to cancel, albeit a small part of what we expect, but in whole how the ECA has responded to the situation which still isn't being addressed.
 
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.

So anyone who wants to quit is abusing the system. Sounds like his stance on treating the members like trash is still the same.

Also, if it was really such a small minority of users that brought the outrage against them, why did they feel the need to change anything just for that minor group of people?
 
[quote name='Vader582']I'm glad they've started to change their tone a little. There's still a lot of "spin" there, some half-truths etc.

However, this comment from Hal seems like an mildly implied threat of some sort, imo.


Almost seems like a passive-aggressive way of saying "Shut up! We have your info and know where you live!"
I hope the ECA changes, for it's own sake but as a paying member, I no longer want to be associated with them for a multitude of reasons.[/QUOTE]

If does seem like an implied threat. So what if he he has their information? What's he going to do? There is nothing illegal going on here. The sponsors weren't forced to sever ties with the ECA. They made that choice on their own based on feedback.
 
This new statement might not make him sound insane, but he's still saying the same old shit.

The free users weren't an issue? He said the exact opposite a few months back. There wasn't widespread abuse of stacking? Well, it was large enough to discontinue the codes... if it was a minor issue, they would have banned the abusers (just as they did to those who were selling codes on eBay).

He's playing nice guy now because he knows he fucked up and basically lost the trust of the people he was supposed to represent: the consumers.
 
reading over it again I believe there may be some references to CAG, I'm not sure though. I know that he is actually a member here and is one of the last people to look at my profile.
 
I'd have been more impressed if the whole thing didn't read like "How to give a good interview when you have 100% control over all questions asked."

It's the same party line, the same obvious lies (A "very small number" of people calling to cancel and reopen an account repeatedly to exploit Amazon--even though cancelling doesn't help them much--so overwhelm the accounting staff that the org changes their entire membership policy, even though it was a very small number of agitators that they know everything about causing the issue. Either it was a bunch of people and unmanagable, or it was like three people and they should probably have bucked up and banned said exploiters, yet somehow it is at once few and many people), the same blame-shifting (we didn't do anything wrong, people just overreacted!), and the same apparent security in unbelievably asinine statements (Congrats on all being members; you should still probably test out a membership sign-up thoroughly before it goes live. Cuts out those pesky programmed and coded checkboxes that sometimes materialize in pages out of nowhere.)

Provided they follow up with an actual solution, I'm ready to wash my hands of them and call it a day. I just can't be very impressed with the interview, given that it's a glorified press release. If they get off their asses and mass e-mail everyone a warning that they might be charged despite opting-out, then I'll take their explanations seriously.
 
[quote name='iammeiam']If they get off their asses and mass e-mail everyone a warning that they might be charged despite opting-out, then I'll take their explanations seriously.[/QUOTE]

I'm sure it's only a matter of time at this point.
 
[quote name='caltab']reading over it again I believe there may be some references to CAG, I'm not sure though. I know that he is actually a member here and is one of the last people to look at my profile.[/QUOTE]

You should feel honored to have such a privilege bestowed upon you.

But in all seriousness, I am taking some satisfaction from this new "interview" even though it still seems halfway an attack on us members. The important thing is that we made a difference, rather than letting this blow over. I feel confident enough that when the time comes I will be able to cancel without hassle and be done with it. The only other thing I could ask at this point would be a notification warning those who attempted the "non-working" auto-renew, but I know we've done a great job of getting the word out on that, too.
 
[quote name='Unrealevil']As much as my nerdrage is advising against it, I have to admit that was a decent response. Either way, it's the best we're going to get out of him and it still doesn't matter because they have yet to e-mail all of their members and update them about this issue.[/QUOTE]

It was decent in the context of previous performance.

[quote name='caltab']I'm sure it's only a matter of time at this point.[/QUOTE]

I'm wondering why that didn't happen before the 'interview.' It should have been press release, newsletter, and then interview. Just a really oddly run Consumer Advocacy Group.

I've seen other Consumer Advocacy Groups rally together with blinding efficiency to effect change.
 
I still don't get why people are finding any sense of satisfaction out of this interview. Sure they're now starting to yield to our concerns, but only because it's seriously cost their company. I for one remain skeptical until they actually implement the online cancellation feature. I still think the ECA tried to pull a fast one on its consumers and was caught doing some unethical things, and is now caving to the pressure.
 
I'm sorry, but this still isn't enough for me. I was one of the first batch of people to join for $20 once the Amazon promotion was offered, which according to my profile on ECA was April 2009. I have never had an issue with the fact that the ECA devalued my membership by giving away thousands of free memberships and while I was bothered by the fact that they repeatedly made promises to get us one time use codes and a more permanent Amazon discount, I was fine with the fact that it seemed like Amazon had decided not to continue the program and I didn't expect a refund or anything else. I willingly and voluntarily joined their organization knowing that it was for the discounts and understanding that it was possible the Amazon codes could go away at any time and never return.

My anger in this situation and what I'm sure all of us feel is that this allegedly consumer oriented organization engaged in what is clearly the lowest form of anti-consumer activity by making it very, very difficult to decline automated renewals. I have joined dozens of non-profit and charitable organizations over the years and not a single one has ever forced an auto-renewal on me. They always send me a renewal notice every year whether by regular mail or e-mail and they leave the choice of whether I want to renew to me. The fact that ECA, an organization that claims to be a consumer advocacy group failed to pay me and thousands of other paid members this courtesy is unforgiveable.

I want and expect Mr. Halpin to stop raising unrelated issues, apologize for his attacks on members who joined his organization (even if they joined for what he considers to be the wrong reasons or joined for free...it doesn't matter, they are and should be considered equal members of his organization) and simply come out on the record and guarantee that not a single person will have their membership automatically renewed without being contacted in a reasonable manner and given the chance to decide. That's all he has to do and this whole thing will be over as far as I'm concerned.
 
[quote name='iammeiam']I'd have been more impressed if the whole thing didn't read like "How to give a good interview when you have 100% control over all questions asked." [/QUOTE]
Lol
Hal "So Hal what do you think about .......?"
Hal "Well my stance is ...."
 
Here's my favorite part of the new interview -


Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?

No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.






Does that make any sense? Free trial members who wanted to get a refund?
 
[quote name='blissskr']Lol
Hal "So Hal what do you think about .......?"
Hal "Well my stance is ...."[/QUOTE]

I, too, got the feeling that he made the questions and reactions himself lol
 
Isn't gameculture another arm of the ECA like gamepolitics? I'd be much more impressed by this interview if a 3rd party conducted it. Otherwise it just sounds like more spin to a degree. Some of what he says is good because it's progress on the issues members had. Some of it is still very false. The auto-renew button was available in MAY...I used it. It wasn't there for only 3 weeks.
 
[quote name='mwoody8601']I still don't get why people are finding any sense of satisfaction out of this interview. Sure they're now starting to yield to our concerns, but only because it's seriously cost their company.[/QUOTE]

Which is exactly the point. Without saying it, Ol' Hal has admitted that this isn't about a few assholes with nothing better to do than harass the ECA. If this didn't seem like an actual problem for them, he would have zero reason to change course. He would leave it at his previous statements and basically tell us to go screw. But we're not going away, and they apparently know it. I won't be "satisfied" until we get an actual official apology and the online cancellation, but you have to see this as the first step in the right direction.
 
Just wondering, but has anyone sent off a request to G4tv.com to cover this story? They cover many random video game related stories so I see no problem.

If they were to write a story, I'd like them to avoid bias and be fair to both sides of this. In this recent Halpin article I still felt attacked. I'm going to be honest, yes, I did get a couple orders 20% off, but not by intentionally taking advantage of the system. Once you put the code into Amazon, regardless if you make an order, it stores it. It's not my fault if a month later I unknowingly stack a code and get an additional 10%. Hal should have at least mentioned this occurrence. The way he spun it made it sound like this did not happen by accident, but rather system manipulation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top