ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course he answered his own questions. It's all under him.

I don't like the statement. He keeps on blaming his hindsight on the GIMAG code, but he's not saying how many PAYING members feel like leaving because of this nonsense. If we're such a small group of people, the ECA has to be incredibly large, with plenty of people adept at internet use. But none of their online groups seem to have a large userbase.

I sure do love PR.
 
[quote name='twinton']Here's my favorite part of the new interview -


Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?

No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.






Does that make any sense? Free trial members who wanted to get a refund?[/QUOTE]
I paid for my membership, but it happened to be just before they started letting everyone join free. Not only did that leave a sour taste in my mouth, but then they lost the Amazon discount. And now there's this going on. I'm done with this organization.
 
love how he is trying to make his company look like the victim...


I was told months ago i would get a prize pack for my troubles WHERE THE HELL IS IT HAL..

just another lie this company tells..

anything that comes out of this companys mouth is nothing but bullshit


go ahead and try to recharge my credit card, i will just dispute it


yea right its the customers FAULT the amazon code is gone..... no its your fault cause you dont know how the hell to run a business... yea give out free memberships and noone cares that is an outright lie right there .
 
[quote name='Reira']Here's a rough draft of the update letter. Please feel free to make comments or changes.

Dear ECA,

Enclosed you will find ___ cancellation letters from current ECA members. We, the aforementioned members, wish to immediately terminate our membership in the ECA. This includes closing our current accounts and removing our information for any future auto-renewal purpose. Consider these letters to be the written correspondence required to cancel our membership. Based on your actions and attitudes, we find the ECA to be an organization which we do not wish to be associated with any further.

Some of us may have sent other letters or postcards, but as you claim you cannot guarantee receipt of any mail, we have sent this as well. We expect confirmation by e-mail to each individual member that our account has been closed. All members have signed of their own volition and have submitted their name, ECA e-mail, and ECA username. We wish to make sure we are removed from your association as soon as possible.

If nothing else, let this package provide proof that the number of members you have offended is not "very small." We are not limited to any one site nor having free memberships. We have united for one goal: to be removed from the ECA. Your constantly changing policies, forum censorship, and lack of communication prove that this is not an organization with gamers' best interests in mind.

Sincerely,

Soon-to-be Former Members of the ECA


Reminder: Letter will be closed tomorrow. Currently 686 entries, so I'm sure we'll reach 700.
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en[/QUOTE]
I would get rid of the "If nothing else" and replace it with "Also" or something of that sort. It kinda gives them an out NOT to cancel the memberships.

Also, maybe specify "billing information" in the first paragraph. I'd like confirmation that my billing info (CC number and whatnot) has been removed from their databases completely.
 
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious.

Better watch out for the Hal-oogey man he knows where you sleep.
 
Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point.
Hal clearly still doesn't understand the stacking issue if he thinks that members were quitting and rejoining to get codes to stack. The only people that were able to stack were those who already had codes saved up from previous batches. Quitting and rejoining would have been useless, as those previous batches were gone. Just how dense is this guy, anyway?

and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional.
Actually, no, Hal, you didn't. You (or, rather, your lackey) simply said that the button was not supposed to be there, and then didn't respond at all when asked whether it had worked for those who had used it while it was there. It was a very simple question, but in fact, you never did really answer it directly (but, um, thanks for answering now). If you had just responded clearly when it was asked, I know that I wouldn't have been nearly as unhappy as I am. But that, as far as I'm concerned, was the start of this entire downward spiral.

Sorry, but I can't help but read this whole thing as the same shit with a different spin. There's no backing down or listening at all. It's all the fault of those pesky, complaining members. Boo-hoo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, Twinton, that was my favorite too! Let me highlight my favorite portion as well!

[quote name='twinton']Here's my favorite part of the new interview -


Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?

... When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.[/QUOTE]


That was my breaking point. It wasn't necessarily the notion that I would have to send in a letter. I send things out every day. The problem was that numerous paying members of the ECA have been posting throughout this entire thread saying that the ECA received their termination letters weeks ago and yet they were still members.

It just reached the point where if there is only one way to opt out and they cannot (or will not) spend the time to wade through one or two letters a day then what am I to expect if and when I want to leave? And if they cannot handle the heavy pace of snail mail then how am I to trust them on the more important issues and on actual advocacy? I know, the link between the two may be tenuous and they are still a young group but if I am going to pay to help advocate a worthy cause then I want to be certain that it is going to the right people.
 
Are we emailing these writers directly to let them know Hal is lying?

edit: nevermind: "Disclosure: GameCulture is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association."

This isn't even an interview. It's a press release.

fuck these guys.
 
I appreciate the fact that Hal not only came forward with more of a response to the situation than his previous had been, but that he also out and out apologized. That having been said, my position has not changed.

I am not going to address the "facts", the timeline, as it has been addressed enough. The course of events, the amazon exploit, all this is now irrelevant.

First, this statement is late. This is what should have been released last week, preferably in an email which also informed users of the situation directly. ECA, regardless of what it is doing now, did handle the situation poorly. That begs the question... if the ECA is not able to properly handle a situation with its own members, how can I trust it to handle any situation on Capitol Hill?

Secondly, Hal apologized that the tone of his first response seemed to blame the consumer. And yes, it did. I joined when the ECA was free, mainly because that was the first time I heard of the ECA, and I loved what I heard. I never used a single benefit in my time there, I joined for the very reason Halpin inserted the code to begin with: I believed in the issues. So, at worst, Hal blamed the consumers, and is now backtracking in an effort to save face. Such would be a HORRIBLE situation for any consumer advocacy group. But even in the best case, Hal's statement sends a message.

If it's true that Hal misspoke, making it sound as though all consumers were the problem, not just the scammers, this is also a huge problem. It shows that Hal cannot communicate effectively on an issue of importance. It shows that he (and by extension the ECA, for which is he speaking) is out of touch with the gamer, and as such, is unable to represent the consumer.

This entire situation was not simply about codes or promos, it was about the lack of respect, which fostered a lack of trust. And now, one week later, though I still admire the goals the ECA claims to advocate, I have no confidence in the ECA as an organization.
 
[quote name='mwoody8601']I still don't get why people are finding any sense of satisfaction out of this interview. Sure they're now starting to yield to our concerns, but only because it's seriously cost their company. I for one remain skeptical until they actually implement the online cancellation feature. I still think the ECA tried to pull a fast one on its consumers and was caught doing some unethical things, and is now caving to the pressure.[/QUOTE]

Exactly. They got caught trying to scam their own members and now they have to fix things. They are "supposedly" making things right and apologizing for previous statements and actions because it is now costing them money and they're trying to salvage what little reputation they have left here. They are scumbags to me no matter what happens at this point...the question is how big of scumbags?
 
It's a step in the right direction (and a pretty half-assed one at that), but it's too little too late. The whole situation completely blew up in his face due to his carelessness, and now he's trying to backhandedly make amends. When that online cancellation comes up, and I know for certain that my membership is forever null and void, then I'll be happy, but not with the ECA. I still think their actions are inexcusable.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Are we emailing these writers directly to let them know Hal is lying?

edit: nevermind: "Disclosure: GameCulture is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association."

This isn't even an interview. It's a press release.

fuck these guys.[/QUOTE]
Can we please change the title back? This was just smoke and mirrors with Hal interviewing Hal. Unless they actually do something, I'm not going to take their word on it.
 
[quote name='confoosious']This isn't even an interview. It's a press release.[/QUOTE]

Exactly. And a lot of ECA members are probably not even aware it exists.
 
If Hal would take half the effort it takes to write up these fake interviews and responses and email the members saying "Hey we changed the TOS and there was kinda a cancellation button that didn't work" this thing would not have blown up like it has.

He's simply trying to save face and bail water, not plug the hole in the hull.
 
[quote name='caltab']reading over it again I believe there may be some references to CAG, I'm not sure though. I know that he is actually a member here and is one of the last people to look at my profile.[/QUOTE]

Does he have any iTrader feedback? I'd love to trade him for his credibility. I have a copy of WarTech I'm looking to unload.

[quote name='Unrealevil']Exactly. And a lot of ECA members are probably not even aware it exists.[/QUOTE]

They're obviously lazy and finicky.
 
When today did that Game Culture interview go up? And not a single comment has been posted to it? Talk about fixing the game from the beginning. They left the ability to submit a comment on, but send them all to the circular file.
 
I'm glad we've managed to convince the ECA to change it's tone. That whole "All you dirty little gamers should be proud to line up and kiss my ass" vibe that they gave off in their last statement needed to be put down.

And now the hard part. Since they're telling about as close to the truth as you can possibly get from a group with political aspirations, we have to get them to follow up on their word and original intentions. Possibly with more well placed commentary and fewer cartoon penises.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Are we emailing these writers directly to let them know Hal is lying?

edit: nevermind: "Disclosure: GameCulture is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association."

This isn't even an interview. It's a press release.

fuck these guys.[/QUOTE]

This. As much as I want to believe he is being real about his stance, if you post this on a website you own, there goes the credibility. It really is a propaganda. :lol: I find it funny it's done in an interview style to confuse the unknown.

P.S. It's like a late night informercial. :lol:
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']Can we please change the title back? This was just smoke and mirrors with Hal interviewing Hal. Unless they actually do something, I'm not going to take their word on it.[/QUOTE]

Or at least change it to something more neutral....

I'm still not happy about the ECA. They need to get a 3rd party to interview them, instead of their in-house "interview" published by themselves, which will obviously be 100% biased towards them.

And I read about half the "interview" and skimmed the rest. I paid for my membership, I used one code, I was on the fence thinking about whether I should renew my membership with the ECA a mere week before all this started. Now instead of wondering if I should renew, I am wanting to get as far away as possible from this organization. I'm sure I'm not alone in that I'm a paid member, didn't mind staying with the ECA even without the codes, but now hates ECA.

The "interview" answered nothing, and gave false information in order to seem like they're solving the problem, which is a load of bull. It didn't address why people had been able to cancel before, how going through snail mail can possibly be less time-consuming than e-mail or telephone (especially since they're requiring so much with the mail that it's quite obviously an attempt at discouraging people from quitting, which further made them look bad). Or what they're doing with our money. Or any of the other questions people have.

tl;dr: Until a 3rd party interviews them, I'm not listening to what they say anymore.
 
[quote name='ryanflucas']And not a single comment has been posted to it? Talk about fixing the game from the beginning. They left the ability to submit a comment on, but send them all to the circular file.[/QUOTE]

I didn't even notice it was GameCulture because the layout is the same as GamePolitics. Difference is that apparently nobody posts comments at GC. You have to register at GP, but there's tons of comments there.
 
[quote name='elessar123']I'm still not happy about the ECA. They need to get a 3rd party to interview them, instead of their in-house "interview" published by themselves, which will obviously be 100% biased towards them.[/QUOTE]

He should let us interview him. Come on, Hal, I dare you . . .
 
[quote name='newtypex']If does seem like an implied threat. So what if he he has their information? What's he going to do? There is nothing illegal going on here. The sponsors weren't forced to sever ties with the ECA. They made that choice on their own based on feedback.[/QUOTE]

[quote name='Vader582']I'm glad they've started to change their tone a little. There's still a lot of "spin" there, some half-truths etc.

However, this comment from Hal seems like an mildly implied threat of some sort, imo.


Almost seems like a passive-aggressive way of saying "Shut up! We have your info and know where you live!"
I hope the ECA changes, for it's own sake but as a paying member, I no longer want to be associated with them for a multitude of reasons.[/QUOTE]


He's probably taking a jab at how all of his personal info was being tossed around online. I mean people in this thread were Google mapping his house and shit.

Don't get me wrong, I dislike the guy and this situation as much as anyone, but they will be making thinks easier regardless of their initial intentions. So while it doesn't make it right, at least none of us will have to send in any stupid letters.
 
[quote name='arcane93']He should let us interview him. Come on, Hal, I dare you . . .[/QUOTE]

CheapyD, someone from the Consumerist, ArsTechnica, or any of the sites that posted an article about it. Or, really, it would be nice if any of the members of the organization could contact said organization.

He needs more than a standard press release to get over this.
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']I would get rid of the "If nothing else" and replace it with "Also" or something of that sort. It kinda gives them an out NOT to cancel the memberships.

Also, maybe specify "billing information" in the first paragraph. I'd like confirmation that my billing info (CC number and whatnot) has been removed from their databases completely.[/QUOTE]

I was thinking the same thing about the 'If nothing else' part.
 
Sorry Hal... The letter is too late for me. I'm a paid member and still cancelling.

Oh yeah... It doesn't help that you post it on your own site-gameculture.com instead of 3rd party.

Sorry, I can't help fund your trip to all gaming convention anymore.
 
I'm tempted to put on my "I'm with the press" badge and contact Hal for an interview.

No, I'm not joking, I am with a newspaper.
 
"Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?!"

I love that quote....:whistle2:# Nice guy, that Hal, subtle threats are the way to make new friends.

I've been following this pretty much since it broke and saw the stacking topics from when they started till now. So I wanted to get that straight. Also, I was too lazy to bother with the process to save a few bucks. So I saved myself a big headache.

Anyway, I don't approve of what ECA did, I think it was pretty $#!tty. However, I also don't condone what many of you guys did by abusing this, and then wondering why the "$#!t hit the fan" when it all came back down on your face. I see many deals on here for save this % on a credit card deal, or get $XX back for doing this or that. I mean I'm a CAG to the bone, but I'm not an idiot, and while I'm not insinuating that you guys are, you need to seriously think before doing crap like this.

I don't drop my CC info with just anyone, and for a 10% off promo code, I sure as hell wouldn't drop it either. I think Cheapy needs to institute some sort of policy that we as CAG's or Cheap Ass Gamer as a entity, will not allow certain things to be posted without (at the very least) a stern warning of "Do this at your OWN risk!" and then let people do as they please, or just up and up ban these deals that cause this much headache and aren't worth the trouble to go through to get such an insignificant reward.

Anyway, I'm not trying to slag you guys, I sympathize with you, however, I cannot excuse the lack of common sense that was put into effect during this situation, you guys should know better than this, ECA is to blame for not just letting you guys walk away then banning you from ever joining up again, but you guys seriously need to quit being so greedy when it comes to stupid things like this, all for the something that saves you maybe $5-6.

The last thing I have to say is, was it worth it, for all this headache and hassle?

I don't think it was....
 
I got to say I have to chuckle a bit about him doing an inhouse interview and making it look like a normal magazine interview. That shit is brazen but also a little bit clever.
Trying hard to not make the cliche Wizard of Oz quote
 
[quote name='uncle5555'] The last thing I have to say is, was it worth it, for all this headache and hassle?[/QUOTE]

It was for me. I signed up because it was free to start, it allowed me to share potential job openings for friends of mine who were looking for jobs in the industry (although most of those postings were already old if you weren't already in the loop), and the organization, while young, had the right priorities. While most of my other memberships, my occupation, and being a CAG pretty much covered the rest of the ECA's consumer-based benefits, the additional savings for PAX East and NYCC were quite good!

And there haven't been too many hassles on my end save for typing up a letter (a whopping four minutes), reading this thread (an hour over the past week, thereabouts), and adding my name to the large opt-out letter (1 minute). Overall, not terrible!

It's a shame too since I was big on giving them the benefit of the doubt throughout most of this affair. It wasn't until the last few days where it really got ugly, and that goes for both sides. At the end of the day both the ECA and we have made some terrible mistakes in our handling of this issue, but the best we can do right now is to wait and see if we can opt-out online and receive a way not to be auto-charged at the end of our membership.
 
Nice to hear that turning off auto renewing should be an option eventually. I think my free membership will expire sometime next September, so hopefully they can manage to push this extremely basic tool out the door in less than 9 months.
 
I'm a paid member and I am cancelling and personally I felt kind of insulted by him calling us troublemakers and then he threatens us, if he was trying to make us happy by threatening us then something is seriously wrong with him. All we wanted was an easy to way to cancel autorenew/cancel. Did anyone else feel offended by his latest statement?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think people should continue to express their frustrations to the partners. This latest statement is a joke. Like some of you are saying, that comment is unnecessary -
"Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?!"
Also, the partners that have sided with ECA have not heard the consumer's voice or don't care. They have handled this poorly, by adding fuel to the fire.
 
[quote name='uncle5555']

I've been following this pretty much since it broke and saw the stacking topics from when they started till now. So I wanted to get that straight. Also, I was too lazy to bother with the process to save a few bucks. So I saved myself a big headache.

Anyway, I don't approve of what ECA did, I think it was pretty $#!tty. However, I also don't condone what many of you guys did by abusing this, and then wondering why the "$#!t hit the fan" when it all came back down on your face.

Anyway, I'm not trying to slag you guys, I sympathize with you, however, I cannot excuse the lack of common sense that was put into effect during this situation, you guys should know better than this, ECA is to blame for not just letting you guys walk away then banning you from ever joining up again, but you guys seriously need to quit being so greedy when it comes to stupid things like this, all for the something that saves you maybe $5-6.

The last thing I have to say is, was it worth it, for all this headache and hassle?

I don't think it was....
[/QUOTE]

If you're going to lecture us, please get your facts straight. The Amazon benefit was 10% off any purchase. You could generate more than 1 code. This was completely legitimate and permitted by the ECA and Amazon.

The problem arose when the first batch of codes expired. ECA received some more from Amazon and put them up. However, people had codes from the first batch which were still usable. So you could use a code from the two batches and receive 20% off the price. But not everyone took advantage of this loophole.

People weren't signing up to save $5-6. The potential savings were much greater than that. Many people joined when you had to pay $15/20. That's really were the ECA screwed up. They should have never offered free membership.
 
I don't really see what "hassle" any of us have gone through. If you're talking about our involvement in this thread, that's a choice we made. Frankly, I've enjoyed it, for the most part. Like I have said a bunch already in this thread. I simply like the fact that CAG has basically done what the ECA claims to do: protect the rights of game consumers.

I'm also a little tired of the "holier-than-thou" stance some people take when they stumble upon this thread. I never stacked codes, and I'll admit that I had an unkind word or two to say to some of the stackers in previous threads. At the end of the day, though, if you're a CAG, you've likely taken advantage of some kind of glitch or exploit or error over the years. It happens. And it's not the end of the world. Also, nothing about the "morality" of stacking the codes gave the ECA the right to pull any of this nonsense. We didn't "deserve" it or "bring it upon ourselves," especially if we happen to be in the group that never stacked the codes to begin with.
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']I would get rid of the "If nothing else" and replace it with "Also" or something of that sort. It kinda gives them an out NOT to cancel the memberships.

Also, maybe specify "billing information" in the first paragraph. I'd like confirmation that my billing info (CC number and whatnot) has been removed from their databases completely.[/QUOTE]

I agree.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']
I'm also a little tired of the "holier-than-thou" stance some people take when they stumble upon this thread. I never stacked codes, and I'll admit that I had an unkind word or two to say to some of the stackers in previous threads. At the end of the day, though, if you're a CAG, you've likely taken advantage of some kind of glitch or exploit or error over the years. It happens. And it's not the end of the world. Also, nothing about the "morality" of stacking the codes gave the ECA the right to pull any of this nonsense. We didn't "deserve" it or "bring it upon ourselves," especially if we happen to be in the group that never stacked the codes to begin with.[/QUOTE]

Well said, sir.
 
[quote name='uncle5555']"Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?!"

I love that quote....:whistle2:# Nice guy, that Hal, subtle threats are the way to make new friends.

I've been following this pretty much since it broke and saw the stacking topics from when they started till now. So I wanted to get that straight. Also, I was too lazy to bother with the process to save a few bucks. So I saved myself a big headache.

Anyway, I don't approve of what ECA did, I think it was pretty $#!tty. However, I also don't condone what many of you guys did by abusing this, and then wondering why the "$#!t hit the fan" when it all came back down on your face. I see many deals on here for save this % on a credit card deal, or get $XX back for doing this or that. I mean I'm a CAG to the bone, but I'm not an idiot, and while I'm not insinuating that you guys are, you need to seriously think before doing crap like this.

I don't drop my CC info with just anyone, and for a 10% off promo code, I sure as hell wouldn't drop it either. I think Cheapy needs to institute some sort of policy that we as CAG's or Cheap Ass Gamer as a entity, will not allow certain things to be posted without (at the very least) a stern warning of "Do this at your OWN risk!" and then let people do as they please, or just up and up ban these deals that cause this much headache and aren't worth the trouble to go through to get such an insignificant reward.

Anyway, I'm not trying to slag you guys, I sympathize with you, however, I cannot excuse the lack of common sense that was put into effect during this situation, you guys should know better than this, ECA is to blame for not just letting you guys walk away then banning you from ever joining up again, but you guys seriously need to quit being so greedy when it comes to stupid things like this, all for the something that saves you maybe $5-6.

The last thing I have to say is, was it worth it, for all this headache and hassle?

I don't think it was....
[/QUOTE]

Saying "I just don't drop my CC info with just anyone" really isn't a fair statement here. I mean, some people are terrified of doing ANY shopping online, and that's neither necessary, nor rational. I first heard of the ECA due to the thread on CAG. I checked out the site, and while I wasn't entirely impressed with it's design, I didn't think it looked sketchy in any way. It also had Amazon and several other reputable business associated with it.

Add to that the approval of CAG members, and it's not unreasonable at all to view it as a legitimate organization. Shortly after I signed up (and paid for my membership), an article was posted in one of the biggest gaming magazines about the organization which aided its credibility even more. It's not like this was a website posted in the back pages of some tabloid. How can you call people stupid for trusting the ECA, when they clearly obtained the trust of Amazon, Gamefly, Game Informer, etc.?

But things change and companies often make decisions that backfire on them. If this weren't true, you wouldn't see places like Circuit City and Comp USA go out of business. But it's not our fault for EVER believing in them. Don't even act like you saw this all coming.
 
[quote name='n8rockerasu']
Add to that the approval of CAG members, and it's not unreasonable at all to view it as a legitimate organization. Shortly after I signed up (and paid for my membership), an article was posted in one of the biggest gaming magazines about the organization which aided its credibility even more. It's not like this was a website posted in the back pages of some tabloid. How can you call people stupid for trusting the ECA, when they clearly obtained the trust of Amazon, Gamefly, Game Informer, etc.?

But things change and companies often make decisions that backfire on them. If this weren't true, you wouldn't see places like Circuit City and Comp USA go out of business. But it's not our fault for EVER believing in them. Don't even act like you saw this all coming.[/QUOTE]

^^ This. This in no way is the same as saving x% for signing up for a credit card offer or doing referrals for some vague future payout. It was a very tangible benefit that the ECA touted as a great reason for joining up.

And, FWIW, it was well worth it, assuming I can cancel my renewal with minimal hassle at some point (I'm waiting it out for now).

I didn't read Hal's puff piece but is he really threatening people? And how does he know who did what anyway - all orders with Amazon would be independent of the ECA itself.

I also don't quite get all the outrage over the stacking. As "exploits" go, this was rather mild compared to most. And it was under Amazon's control the entire time - they could have pulled the plug any time (and eventually they did). But in the end it was Amazon that created the glitch, if you even want to call it that. It was simply different sets of codes that applied together - hardly the stuff of nefarious scammers.

And others have touched on this but the root of the problem was the free membership they offered. At least with the $15/$20 membership fee, that kept a lot of people from joining willy-nilly. Anyone who made even a small number of Amazon orders could see the benefit, though, and join. They would both enjoy the discount and help out what they thought was a good cause. It was win-win-win all around (you, ECA, Amazon).

But they had slight problems keeping the codes in stock before so most of the paying members knew they would be in short supply with the flood of new free members. I, and many others, took a few extra codes because we knew they'd run out again and we liked to maximize our discount by ordering things when they were in our Gold Box Quick Picks (5% off) or were the Deal of the Day. (I mean, I assume that is OK with you moralizers, right - or should we not have done that according to some arcane moral code of not stacking coupon codes? :roll:) Anyway, it was frustrating when the codes were gone off and on and you couldn't put an order in because of it. Sure enough, with the free membership, the discount codes ran out in about 12 hours. But I was set because I had "hoarded" a few. At the time there was no stacking - it was simply to use for normal orders as before. And, I should note, to enjoy a benefit that the ECA so proudly proclaimed would pay for your membership in just a few uses.

Then Amazon came out with a completely new batch for some inexplicable reason. I have no idea why they did this - they should have just continued with the old ones. A lot of people ended up getting 20% by accident (having a code already applied from before and then putting a new one in thinking the old ones were invalid now - voila, 20% off for no apparent reason). Are you gonna say that you would pass that up? (In fact you couldn't pass it up if you had the older code already applied - you had no choice!) Like I said before, that is so completely mild compared to a lot of glitches and exploits I've seen around here (some recent examples: the BB B2G1 glitch, and an oldie but goodie, the CC B2G1 where you could buy 2 $2 clearance games and get a $19.99 game for free if you did it in the right order). I mean, it was all of an additional 10% off - wow, shocking. And well worth threatening people over :roll:.

Of course Amazon continued to make it worse just a few weeks later by coming out with a third batch that also stacked. Again, they had to know there was a stacking issue so coming out with a third was just asinine. I mean, at this point I figured they didn't care because it had been going on for a while and now here was an additional 10%. It had to mean a huge increase in sales for Amazon despite the additional discount, making up in volume for the discount and gaining a lot of loyal Amazon buyers in the process.

But then, finally, Amazon did put an end to it by doing what they should have done originally and expiring two sets of codes and leaving just one of them active (strangely enough, the middle batch). At this point they could have provided more of those same codes to the ECA and things could have continued as originally intended. For whatever reason they chose not to do this, even once the problem was solved. The ECA during all this time said Amazon was working on the stacking problem (when in fact it had been fixed for a while) and kept leading everyone on that the discount would be back. I'd like to know the real reason Amazon severed their ties after the issue was resolved. The behavior of the ECA and its spokespeople since this all busted out all over the place gives me some idea why.
 
I'm pretty pissed at anyone who was hoarding and stacking multiple codes and pretending there's nothing wrong with it and claiming "everyone was doing it", but I'm also pissed at Hal's NEW letter with his "woe-is-me-- I'm a victim and these evil people are threatening us with their illogical rage" stance....Did you read the new OP letter? It's frustrating to see Hal talk like that, to be completely "I don't know what we did, they're just angry people with rage issues" attitude. Dude, you were a douchebag towards both rude AND CIVIL members, then you played the victim, AND you don't mention or acknowledge that you had ON YOUR SITE THAT JOINING ECA PAYS FOR ITSELF WITH AMAZON DISCOUNTS, and then go with the "Hey, 20 bad apples made me punish the orchard full of them and that's all I could do, it's a reasonable choice" response and think it's fine?! F- YOU HAL!

YES, a very small minority joined for free, pillaged all the codes, double and triple stacked them, but he should STILL have the option to opt out (and should have had it from the beginning) of auto-renewal and online cancel. If you left a loophole for exploitation, that IS YOUR BURDEN TO CARRY, NOT MINE. It's nice he says they're working on those options for the online pathway now, but he talks about people like they are irrationally angry and just full of sheer rage for no apparent reason. He's either an idiot or a liar, because he sure as hell better see why someone like ME is angry. I'm angry because I'm lumped in with a-holes who gamed their (and Amazon's) shoddy system, and I have a right to be. It's always the fractionally existent bad ones that ruin it for the masses of good ones.

I paid full price for a membership back in July, saved maybe $25 and never even knew you could "stack" codes until the ECA codes were gone and done with. I didn't know people were hording them. I didn't know it was gone until a week or so afterwords. I'm an honest member, and consumer, and actually do support gamers' rights, and there are MANY of us. So what the hell, Hal?! You DID lump people like me in with your words and hoops to jump through, I've read your hot-headed responses, which were childish and immature, and you keep saying it was all because of a very vocal minority. Yeah, so, NOW you apologize, yet can't fathom why people are/were angry with you? You apologize either because you're an idiot who was convinced to, or because you mean it and you really DO know why people loathe you and your attitude, or you don't mean it and you're putting up some PR spin, and really, inside, you're still just a f---ing jerk. Take a pick, Hal.

Edit: and to clarify on being pissed at anyone stacking, I will admit, I'm angry that they ruined a good thing but it's the ones who said Amazon shouldn't have allowed them to do it, and that THEY did nothing wrong, it's Amazon's fault they got away with it. Really? Amazon is their conscience now? Yeah yeah, we all once in a while notice an item ring up at less than it's supposed to and keep quiet, find out this or that is wrong with a system and milk it for a buck or two. Well, the problem is that this was rampantly done, it was viral and out of control, and now it's gone for just members. This was an instance where a "dollar or two" f*cked over thousands of people who were honest, that's a different beast IMO. I'm not perfect, no one is, but when you game a system and 500 people lose out per one that gamed it, they have a right to be pissed at the one. That's who I'm mad at, and yes, Amazon allowed the glitch, and Hal behaved like a d0uche about it, but my reason for being angry at stackers/horders still stands, they should be the quiet ones, as they are the ones who had the most chips when this game was over.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Instead of putting the time and energy into this further propaganda Hal should be focusing on getting the ability to terminate memberships online via the website and email, as well as allowing phone calls. Do that and most complaints would end. Allow me to easily sever ties with the ECA. Simple.

Here’s the problem for me – and always has been – the claim that the ECA wasn’t even aware of a cancellation button on its site. And months (no, Hal, not ‘weeks’) passed before the ECA realized it. He blames this on his ‘development company’ who did an ‘upgrade.’ I have always found this suspicious. And his continuing excuses make me more suspicious. A professional web designer could have already added a functioning button.
Hal blames his ‘development company.’ Who is that?

Was it Acro Media – the web designer listed at the bottom of the ECA front page –they haven’t come out with any disclaimers themselves even though such an oversight is very serious and could affect their reputation and future customers. They designed the Game Politics site as well.
http://www.acromediainc.com/
The link to the ECA portfolio:
http://www.acromediainc.com/portfolio/crest_group?from=portfolio
Gee, I hope Avro Media isn’t also connected to Hal?

Unless, of course, Hal will claim it wasn’t Acro Media, but another unnamed web designer. Or was it just a bunch of interns tinkering around?
It is by implication that his ‘development company’ was Acro Media.

I think it curious that a statement from the actual design ‘company’ could clear this up and prove Hal is or isn’t lying. If I were Hal I’d insist on a statement – or at least name the company. After all, this designer contributed to the firestorm – why would Hal protect them if they made such a goof?

But look, a web designer in no way shape or form would arbitrarily add something so critical and then not inform the customer. (Nor would a concerned, responsible customer take a site live without checking every aspect of the ‘upgrade’ – it’s not a difficult thing to do.) Now, even if a web designer goofed – ECA is claiming they had no responsibility to verify their own website’s functions?

Finally, as a designer myself, it doesn’t take weeks or even days to redesign a simple module – because that is all it is. A simple module of code that can be inserted into the already existing code. In fact, there are many ‘free’ modules available for whatever code you choose to use. In other words this is not something you have to build from the ground up. The framework exists and can be easily modified (assuming, of course, you know how to design and write code!) to suit your requirements. No offense, but building a website isn’t rocket science. The only valid excuses for a delay this long would be stubbornness, ineptness or a server meltdown!

Considering the time that has passed since this scandal erupted – a professional web designer could have already set up a functioning cancellation/do not renew module – fully tested it – and had it public by now. And all Hal would have to do is make a simple statement – you don’t like us? Go to the now functioning button and press it.

So, Hal, why not just do it!?
 
I love how Hal's latest statement while finally getting the point and giving in, is still full of rationalized lies and misdirection. Hal blames us, the media, and bloggers for misunderstanding them and not giving them a charitable position but it's clear what their intentions were. If he isn't lying about certain things, then he is an idiot who should not be running a non-profit organization.

I understand the interviewer wanted to give Hal a fair rebuttal but he should have asked some harder questions at some points. Hal is dead wrong and he knows it when he said that it's a small amount of people who're concerned about this. While I'm sure there were some nasty emails, phone calls, etc. most of us emailed or sent them respectful letters that politely asked to cancel our memberships.

I hope the ECA goes down as a result of their inability to run an organization.
 
While his tone isn't insulting like it usually was on the forums, it's still obnoxious. "Boo-hoo! I put a bunch of shady bullshit in my EULA and policy statements and people said it was shady bullshit. Then, when I insinuated that I would try and take their money whether they gave consent or not, they got angry and said things that didn't feel like sunshine and rainbows. I'm a victim."

He's moving in the right direction, but he and his organization are still a rotten bag of dicks.
 
Well, it doesn't look like I'm getting a call to work today, so I'll let the letter run for a bit longer this morning (until about 9 EST). Up to 745 entries!

http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

As for the letter, I changed the "if nothing else" and rewrote the other one like so:
"This includes closing our current accounts and removing our billing information (including name, e-mail, and credit card number) from your database for any future auto-renewal purpose. " As for the "own volition" part, my thought was to try to prevent the thought of "well, they just grabbed ECA members' info," but I know they can still say that...I think I will leave it in there, though, unless I hear more thoughts.

And one question that I probably should have thought of earlier...What about those with incomplete information? A couple of did not include either their e-mail or their username, so I will probably delete them, but what do you guys think about those that only listed e-mail or username?
 
[quote name='BWS1982']
Edit: and to clarify on being pissed at anyone stacking, I will admit, I'm angry that they ruined a good thing but it's the ones who said Amazon shouldn't have allowed them to do it, and that THEY did nothing wrong, it's Amazon's fault they got away with it. Really? Amazon is their conscience now?[/QUOTE]

It's not so much that it is Amazon's fault. I don't even get the "conscience" thing - since, well, that only applies if this was the horrible crime you guys make it out to be. My point was that at the time it seemed like Amazon made different codes that could stack so therefore you could stack. There didn't seem anything wrong with it. It's not like "getting something for cheaper and being quiet about it" like you said. That's a checkout mistake I assume - this is something that Amazon allowed to happen - you apply two coupon codes and they worked - how is that wrong?

I'm just a little sick myself of people getting all morally outraged over this. It's BS, plain and simple.

Like I keep saying over and over, Amazon eventually changed it so only one set of codes worked. And they continued to let that one set go for a few weeks before, apparently, finally telling the ECA that they wouldn't give them more codes. It was only when they shut down the multiple codes that Amazon decided they didn't want the stacking to occur. It could have been OK for them at first since it brought in a lot of business but then maybe it did get out of hand - I have no idea what the overall impact was. However, they allowed it for a great deal of time and if they had a problem with it at first, it would have gotten cut off much sooner. Plus, since the problem was solved at that point, the whole argument that stackers ruined it has no merit. Amazon could have come back with more of the single allowed code (or the account-linked codes that were rumored). There is some other reason they cut off the ECA. Perhaps it was the free membership thing which opened the floodgates, perhaps something else...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top