ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds to me like both parties were playing rough.

The letter from ECA is so full of bs and spin it made me dizzy lol.

And as for all of the people here crying foul... well, you guys tried to screw the "system" and the "system" tried to screw you back. What's fair is fair. Move on.

No need to wish that the ECA fails, just don't sign up with them anymore lol.
 
[quote name='io']There didn't seem anything wrong with it. It's not like "getting something for cheaper and being quiet about it" like you said. That's a checkout mistake I assume - this is something that Amazon allowed to happen - you apply two coupon codes and they worked - how is that wrong?

I'm just a little sick myself of people getting all morally outraged over this. It's BS, plain and simple.
[/QUOTE]

Oh come on, signing up, canceling, signing up, canceling, sign up, canceling... that's not normal practice. That's a loophole.

I'm not saying I'm holy than thou haha, just saying you guys tried to work the system. At least be a better person than that Hal and not throw out some "spin" yourself.
 
[quote name='io']^

But in the end it was Amazon that created the glitch, if you even want to call it that. It was simply different sets of codes that applied together - hardly the stuff of nefarious scammers.

the root of the problem was the free membership they offered.

A lot of people ended up getting 20% by accident

Are you gonna say that you would pass that up? (In fact you couldn't pass it up if you had the older code already applied - you had no choice!)

Of course Amazon continued to make it worse just a few weeks later by coming out with a third batch that also stacked. [/QUOTE]


ROFL, I think Hal needs a PR person and you seem right for the job. ROFL
 
[quote name='kulsechsky']Oh come on, signing up, canceling, signing up, canceling, sign up, canceling... that's not normal practice. That's a loophole.

I'm not saying I'm holy than thou haha, just saying you guys tried to work the system. At least be a better person than that Hal and not throw out some "spin" yourself.[/QUOTE]

What the hell are you talking about? There was no need to sign up and cancel and sign up again and cancel. That is something from Hal that I never understood.
 
[quote name='kulsechsky']Oh come on, signing up, canceling, signing up, canceling, sign up, canceling... that's not normal practice. That's a loophole.
[/QUOTE]

Your argument may have worked had you actually known what occurred. Why would you attempt to argue for something which you obviously know nothing about?
 
[quote name='io']What the hell are you talking about? There was no need to sign up and cancel and sign up again and cancel. That is something from Hal that I never understood.[/QUOTE]

Oh, my fault. I'm just going off of what I've read in this thread.

And don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to condemn you guys to the 4th level of hell or anything. It just seems to me, looking in from the outside, that both sides are at fault (maybe one more than the other), but then both sides are trying to pass off blame.

Just read your post, you have more spin than Hal. haha
 
[quote name='dino88']Your argument may have worked had you actually known what occurred. Why would you attempt to argue for something which you obviously know nothing about?[/QUOTE]

That's where you have me wrong. I'm not on ECA's side, I'm just also not on your guys is side. How could I be, it seems like you guys are saying you did nothing wrong.

It's Amazon's fault for allowing it to happen, and it's the ECA's fault for not thinking things through.

(I completely agree that, renewing expired credit cards, requiring certified mail to cancel membership and all that is shady as shit, but all that seems like retaliation to me.)
 
Well, if recapping what actually happened is spin, then so be it ;).

The free membership didn't cause a huge influx of people using the ECA codes on Amazon?

The 20% didn't happen by accident? It sure as hell did. If you applied a code from before and then saw there was a new set of codes wouldn't you think you had to apply a new one now? A lot of people did that. Plus if you cancelled a preorder from before the code change, the original code was returned to your account and would stack whether you liked it or not with any new one you applied. It would have been hard to avoid in many cases. It isn't spin, it's the truth. This wasn't something that had to be "worked" or "gamed" in any way - it was simply different Amazon promos (from their perspective) that thus stacked. That is all - there's no spin there.

I'm not passing off blame on anyone (in that I'm not blaming Amazon, the ECA, or CAG for the codes going away - that was bound to happen anyway as it was just a promo to begin with). The only thing I'm upset about is the whole cancellation issue and the attitude of this Hal guy - especially in spreading this story about multiple account cancellations and re-signups. That's a bit of misinformation that apparently has gained traction. That this has become such a huge freaking mess with 172 pages of comment in just a few days is astounding to me. The discounts going away was always a possibility from the very beginning before any whiff of stacking occured. The way I view that is you needed to make use of it while you could (not stacking - just the codes in general). The best way was to wait for preorder games to show up as gold box quick picks and then use an ECA code to, get ready for it, stack an addtional 10% on top of it! That's all most of us were doing until the codes started changing around.

I understand the way things appear to those just popping in, or those who didn't actively use their discount when it was available, but things seem to have gotten out of hand in here and there is a lot of wild stuff thrown around. I basically just wanted to point out that this wasn't that big a deal when it was actually happening.
 
1st the title of this thread needs to be changed back.

2nd, the OP needs to be updated to make it clear, there was no 'interview' Hal 'owns' game culture. And wrote that piece of BS himself. Yes its a little toned down. But thats all.

3rd. Hal making it look like he is being interviewed when in fact his not, just futhers the fact that his nothing more then a scum bag

4th. Why the F**K does he talk about a 'core' group. We have ~600 members canceling at CAG alone. I'm sure there are plenty more. Given that he only have ~$7000 in dues last year, which would repersent at most 466 members (7000/15 dollar members ship). He is losing more members then he had last year.

Unless small core of members now means, just about everyone.

5th) how can anyone give him a pass after a fake, bs interview, where he tries to sneak in a threat?
 
I like how me wanting to cancel now makes me look like I was an Amazon exploiter. No, I have principles. I want out on that basis alone. I never even knew of the Amazon glitch until it was found out, and I wouldn't have done it anyway. Like many people, I believe the ECA was a good organization to join, and the benefits were just icing. But manipulating the ToS like that means the ECA is nothing but a bunch of hypocrites fighting against people like THEMSELVES.

So I want out. Thanks Hal, for making it seem like I'm a criminal for wanting to leave.
 
[quote name='io']What the hell are you talking about? There was no need to sign up and cancel and sign up again and cancel. That is something from Hal that I never understood.[/QUOTE]


Agreed. That bit of spin is total BS as anyone who followed the ECA thread can attest. IMO, the only reason for this whole Cancel button mess is because they are fearful they will lose members en masse and screw up their accounting numbers. It almost smacks of a scam since the whole write-in process is designed as a barrier for people to cancel (having to write a letter and send it certified mail is not difficult at all per se, but it's certainly not the same as just clicking a button once).
 
Yeah, I believe you that stacking occurred accidentally for some, but I would also believe that stacking was a purposeful act committed by MANY. Especially with the way things work around here.

Totally agree with you, what Hal did as retaliation is completely unacceptable. I'd be really surprised if it were illegal as well.

But you are passing off blame. Maybe it wasn't you personally, but as a group this thing got out of hand and people were definitely taking advantage of the situation. You admit it, but you totally down play it. That's all I'm saying.

I'm not trying to argue, I'm just trying to point it out from an outside perspective so that maybe you will take a step back from the situation and think about what happened. The ECA doesn't seem like a bad idea, it would be a shame for this situation to ruin it.
 
to people complaining about the new title of the thread...I changed it so people would see their is a significant update and actually come read it...after all, I believe informing fellow CAGs is the most important thing in all this.
 
[quote name='opfreak']

5th) how can anyone give him a pass after a fake, bs interview, where he tries to sneak in a threat?[/QUOTE]


No one's giving anyone a pass. The guy's a scum bag, obviously. I'm just saying both sides are guilty. It seemed like people here were like, "well, what Hal did was A LOT worse so what I did is nothing and should be forgotten."

I'm not saying I wouldn't have taken advantage of the deal as well, I'm just saying that if I had, at least I would own up to it. I guess if I were in your situation my line of thought would be, that fvcking assh0l3 needs to die, BUT I guess that's what I get for trying to sneak in a deal. And maybe I would learn from it.

Of course people like io did it on accident and are completely innocent, I'm talking about the 90% of you that did it on purpose haha.
 
[quote name='kulsechsky']Yeah, I believe you that stacking occurred accidentally for some, but I would also believe that stacking was a purposeful act committed by MANY. Especially with the way things work around here.
[/QUOTE]

(Edit: kulsechsky - To be clear, I never claimed to have done it completely by accident (though it did happen that way at first). But for many others it did happen that way. You couldn't even "uncheck" one of the codes to de-apply it (Amazon isn't set up that way). )

No doubt - I fully admit to doing it myself. My point was that it wasn't some intricate scheme that involved any trickery with your ECA account or credit card or whatever it is that they claim happened. It very easily happened on its own and very easily happened on purpose. But I ended up spending $1000 or so at Amazon (lots of preorders) and I'm sure they are happy to have that money - so, really, I don't feel all that bad about it.

I just think those claims by Hal have seeped into the the minds of a lot of people who weren't involved and they think it was some nefarious scheme to defraud Amazon and/or the ECA. No, it was simply people taking advantage of deal. And most of us considered it legitimate at the time - if the codes work, the codes work. Usually things that aren't allowed don't work, especially online - or if there is a true mistake, orders are cancelled. I mean, people scour the web all the time for coupon codes to use for all sorts of sites. They get posted here all the time. The original intent of these codes is often forgotten in the process or incidental to those using them - yet most people don't have a problem entering them in the little "enter promo code" boxes upon checkout - if they work, great, if not, oh well... I'm just trying to understand why this particular setup generates so much animosity. I get that some people who used it occasionally are upset because they think others ruined it. That may be the case, but that happens with any good deal, eventually. Plus we had no idea how long these codes were going to last anyway - remember, the original codes were set to expire Oct 31st. Before all this happened we were concerned they wouldn't be renewed anyway. So maybe Amazon just decided that was a good time to end it. Now maybe that's spin on my part, I dunno :lol:. I just don't think anyone can be absolutely sure about much of anything in this case (well, except for facts like the multiple ECA account cancellation thing being a farce).

Anyways, man, it is like 4:50 AM and I need to sleep sometimes.

Oh, and in case anyone doesn't realize this, anything I say here is my opinion only and does not reflect the views of Cheapy or any other mods (some of whom I know would be opposed to the stacking).

As for the ECA, it really is too bad. While I kind of view what they do as pretty low on the totem pole of important issues for our day, I did appreciate there was a group out there advocating for us. I was fully prepared to stick with them with my paid membership through next year until all this crap happened (and again, I don't mean the loss of the Amazon codes, I mean the way this was handled afterwards).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's all I was saying. I'm not one to pass judgment on people, something about glass houses lol. It just drives me nuts when people do something then turn around and say they are as innocent as the day they were born.

What ever happened to taking responsibility for your actions. You youngin's... I swear. :roll:


PS: that's a joke, I'm 25
 
[quote name='BWS1982']I'm pretty pissed at anyone who was hoarding and stacking multiple codes and pretending there's nothing wrong with it and claiming "everyone was doing it", but I'm also pissed at Hal's NEW letter with his "woe-is-me-- I'm a victim and these evil people are threatening us with their illogical rage" stance....Did you read the new OP letter? It's frustrating to see Hal talk like that, to be completely "I don't know what we did, they're just angry people with rage issues" attitude. Dude, you were a douchebag towards both rude AND CIVIL members, then you played the victim, AND you don't mention or acknowledge that you had ON YOUR SITE THAT JOINING ECA PAYS FOR ITSELF WITH AMAZON DISCOUNTS, and then go with the "Hey, 20 bad apples made me punish the orchard full of them and that's all I could do, it's a reasonable choice" response and think it's fine?! F- YOU HAL!

YES, a very small minority joined for free, pillaged all the codes, double and triple stacked them, but he should STILL have the option to opt out (and should have had it from the beginning) of auto-renewal and online cancel. If you left a loophole for exploitation, that IS YOUR BURDEN TO CARRY, NOT MINE. It's nice he says they're working on those options for the online pathway now, but he talks about people like they are irrationally angry and just full of sheer rage for no apparent reason. He's either an idiot or a liar, because he sure as hell better see why someone like ME is angry. I'm angry because I'm lumped in with a-holes who gamed their (and Amazon's) shoddy system, and I have a right to be. It's always the fractionally existent bad ones that ruin it for the masses of good ones.

I paid full price for a membership back in July, saved maybe $25 and never even knew you could "stack" codes until the ECA codes were gone and done with. I didn't know people were hording them. I didn't know it was gone until a week or so afterwords. I'm an honest member, and consumer, and actually do support gamers' rights, and there are MANY of us. So what the hell, Hal?! You DID lump people like me in with your words and hoops to jump through, I've read your hot-headed responses, which were childish and immature, and you keep saying it was all because of a very vocal minority. Yeah, so, NOW you apologize, yet can't fathom why people are/were angry with you? You apologize either because you're an idiot who was convinced to, or because you mean it and you really DO know why people loathe you and your attitude, or you don't mean it and you're putting up some PR spin, and really, inside, you're still just a f---ing jerk. Take a pick, Hal.

Edit: and to clarify on being pissed at anyone stacking, I will admit, I'm angry that they ruined a good thing but it's the ones who said Amazon shouldn't have allowed them to do it, and that THEY did nothing wrong, it's Amazon's fault they got away with it. Really? Amazon is their conscience now? Yeah yeah, we all once in a while notice an item ring up at less than it's supposed to and keep quiet, find out this or that is wrong with a system and milk it for a buck or two. Well, the problem is that this was rampantly done, it was viral and out of control, and now it's gone for just members. This was an instance where a "dollar or two" f*cked over thousands of people who were honest, that's a different beast IMO. I'm not perfect, no one is, but when you game a system and 500 people lose out per one that gamed it, they have a right to be pissed at the one. That's who I'm mad at, and yes, Amazon allowed the glitch, and Hal behaved like a d0uche about it, but my reason for being angry at stackers/horders still stands, they should be the quiet ones, as they are the ones who had the most chips when this game was over.[/QUOTE]


^This. For the most part. I just want out at this point. I regret ever paying for a membership after all this crap.
 
I stacked and paid the $15 membership fee. I was never upset at ECA, I just thought it'd suck I'd have to mail in a letter lol. I know running a business is tough so no problem here really. If they implement an online solution great, if not, a letter is still fine. hell I even have like 4-5 games in pre-order on amazon with 30% off... so I can't be mad at all. Nice to see a statement. And yes, I AM giving this guy a pass. What'd he do wrong? Not allow you to cancel online? lol
 
[quote name='kulsechsky']That's all I was saying. I'm not one to pass judgment on people, something about glass houses lol. It just drives me nuts when people do something then turn around and say they are as innocent as the day they were born.

What ever happened to taking responsibility for your actions. You youngin's... I swear. :roll:


PS: that's a joke, I'm 25[/QUOTE]

It bugs me when people cant see the wrong actions of others.

Hal's an ass, and runs a D-bag scam of a website. End of story.

I'll pass judgement on those that do wrong. If I do wrong I'll take responsiblity.

People that cannot make up there minds... I swear.
 
ECA received my certified letter yesterday, 12/7, at 1:03 p.m. Now we get to wait and see if they actually cancel my account (since it still works this morning). I've also got a return receipt coming.
 
People are not upset that there's no way to cancel online, they're upset because they were told this after the fact and that ECA waited several months after the fact to do it--strange timing considering the Amazon code debacle. People are also not cool with the way ECA advised that they aren't responsible for not canceling your membership even if you do send in a written request. Finally, most are also not pleased with the arrogance and defensiveness of the founder.
 
[quote name='opfreak']It bugs me when people cant see the wrong actions of others.

Hal's an ass, and runs a D-bag scam of a website. End of story.

I'll pass judgement on those that do wrong. If I do wrong I'll take responsiblity.

People that cannot make up there minds... I swear.[/QUOTE]


There's a difference between seeing the wrong in people's action and judging people. I judge people all the time, just not for things I do myself lol.

Hal Halpin = scum bag.

CAG's = opportunist...? who am I kidding, you're all scum bags too lol :lol:
 
Good god. Just read Hal's 'interview' and I can't believe anyone involved with the ECA would still want him running the show. I mean, the guy's crisis management skills are incredibly inept. There was no reason this blow-up couldn't have been resolved within hours of the ECA discovering it. You simply issue an apology, say you made some mistakes and explain how you're going to fix them. Problem solved. Some people would still leave the organization, but I would've probably kept my membership and I'm guessing a lot of others would have as well. Instead, the guy's acted like a douchebag at every turn. If he can't represent his own organization better than this, why would anyone trust him to represent their interests?

Anyway, added my name to the Google doc this morning.
 
[quote name='maxfisher']Good god. Just read Hal's 'interview' and I can't believe anyone involved with the ECA would still want him running the show. I mean, the guy's crisis management skills are incredibly inept. There was no reason this blow-up couldn't have been resolved within hours of the ECA discovering it. You simply issue an apology, say you made some mistakes and explain how you're going to fix them. Problem solved. Some people would still leave the organization, but I would've probably kept my membership and I'm guessing a lot of others would have as well. Instead, the guy's acted like a douchebag at every turn. If he can't represent his own organization better than this, why would anyone trust him to represent their interests?

Anyway, added my name to the Google doc this morning.[/QUOTE]

Disco. You want to PAY THIS GUY to lobby on your behalf, given the skills of persuasion/speaking he's demonstrated thus far?
 
Second statement is better, but still sounds blaming and whiny. I think the problem really is just that he doesn't want to explain everything because he figures most people don't know about it and alerting them would just upset even more people. He basically seems to be dismissing any concerns and blaming the original exploiting asshole group for rallying people around them as if they didn't know anything. They just haven't taken as much responsibility as they should, imo, Hal acts like it was all a big uncontrollable misunderstanding when really it was just that they made these changes and didn't really say anything. It was a misunderstanding, but it was from a lack of communication on their part, not the fault of the members.

Anyway, I was a free member, added my name to the list, and won't be giving them any money anytime soon. Maybe if I hear they accomplish anything major then I'll join back up again.
 
[quote name='kulsechsky']
Hal Halpin = scum bag.

CAG's = opportunist...? who am I kidding, you're all scum bags too lol :lol:[/QUOTE]


This ^
:booty:
 
Spin, spin, spin. ECA is toast unless they get rid of this guy. He is physically incapable of recognizing that he is not the victim here.
 
I still don't think the ECA is blameless at all here, but I think CAGs need to take some responsibility on the stacking codes issue. Anyone who doesn't think it was widespread on this site is kidding themselves, and while I accept it happened by accident for some people, there are also a lot of people who went to the lengths of pre-ordering games on Amazon and then phoning them up to add other games to the pre-order just so they could get the stacked discount.

I'm not saying I believe everything Hal said, but I can believe the stacking issue cost us the Amazon discount. I think we need to take responsibility for the fact that abusing the deal probably ended it. A valuable lesson to learn.

Unfortunately I suspect we won't learn it.
 
[quote name='caltab']to people complaining about the new title of the thread...I changed it so people would see their is a significant update and actually come read it...after all, I believe informing fellow CAGs is the most important thing in all this.[/QUOTE]

I definitely wouldn't have checked in without the title being changed, so thanks.

On a side note, I really don't like being lumped in with all the stackers that Hal seems to be doing. I got the membership for free and saved like ~$30 which was nice, but I wasn't stacking codes or selling them or anything like that. When they had Amazon codes and I needed one I'd log in there to go get one and then browse the forums briefly, but I haven't been there since the codes were down, and now the only time I'll go back to the site is when they get an option to cancel my subscription online. I don't really fault them for losing the Amazon codes, but unfortunately for them that was the only reason I was interested in their site.
 
[quote name='io'] My point was that it wasn't some intricate scheme that involved any trickery with your ECA account or credit card or whatever it is that they claim happened. It very easily happened on its own and very easily happened on purpose. But I ended up spending $1000 or so at Amazon (lots of preorders) and I'm sure they are happy to have that money - so, really, I don't feel all that bad about it.

I just think those claims by Hal have seeped into the the minds of a lot of people who weren't involved and they think it was some nefarious scheme to defraud Amazon and/or the ECA. No, it was simply people taking advantage of deal. And most of us considered it legitimate at the time - if the codes work, the codes work. Usually things that aren't allowed don't work, especially online - or if there is a true mistake, orders are cancelled. I mean, people scour the web all the time for coupon codes to use for all sorts of sites. They get posted here all the time. The original intent of these codes is often forgotten in the process or incidental to those using them - yet most people don't have a problem entering them in the little "enter promo code" boxes upon checkout - if they work, great, if not, oh well... I'm just trying to understand why this particular setup generates so much animosity. I get that some people who used it occasionally are upset because they think others ruined it. That may be the case, but that happens with any good deal, eventually. Plus we had no idea how long these codes were going to last anyway - remember, the original codes were set to expire Oct 31st. Before all this happened we were concerned they wouldn't be renewed anyway. So maybe Amazon just decided that was a good time to end it. Now maybe that's spin on my part, I dunno :lol:. I just don't think anyone can be absolutely sure about much of anything in this case (well, except for facts like the multiple ECA account cancellation thing being a farce).
[/QUOTE]

Thank you. This needs to be said.
 
Well I for one am glad to see that he apologized to some of the members who were lumped in with the Amazon code stackers. I joined for free but I didn't stack any damn codes or even use the Amazon discount and I was fairly pissed about his last response.

And seriously the ECA and these fake moral high horse people can cry about the fucking code stacking but bottom line is it was allowed so of course people are going to take advantage of it. To think otherwise is just mind blowingly naive. Was there any specific mention of the "illegality" of stacking these codes anyway?? If so I certainly haven't heard a thing about it. So as far as I can see, Amazon/the ECA fucks up and allows it to happen, then when shit goes south, THE ECA BLAMES ITS OWN MEMBERS?!

Anyway bottom line to me is that the ToS was changed to mail in letters only which affects EVERY SINGLE MEMBER OF THE ECA (not just the evil code stackers/sellers) and I was only made aware of that change because this thread was started. That does not make me a happy camper. That is not the code stackers fault, that blame goes completely to the ECA.
 
[quote name='benjamouth']I still don't think the ECA is blameless at all here, but I think CAGs need to take some responsibility on the stacking codes issue. Anyone who doesn't think it was widespread on this site is kidding themselves, and while I accept it happened by accident for some people, there are also a lot of people who went to the lengths of pre-ordering games on Amazon and then phoning them up to add other games to the pre-order just so they could get the stacked discount.

I'm not saying I believe everything Hal said, but I can believe the stacking issue cost us the Amazon discount. I think we need to take responsibility for the fact that abusing the deal probably ended it. A valuable lesson to learn.

Unfortunately I suspect we won't learn it.[/QUOTE]

In regards to the code stacking thing, I think people were just taking an advantage of a deal. That's what people on the internet do, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out going in.

I can't imagine that AMAZON fucking DOTCOM is incapable of making a nonstacking code, or a session cookie(you know, like they do MILLIONS OF TIMES PER DAY WITH THEIR ASSOCIATES BANNERS AND LINKS).

Why they didn't do that here? I have no clue.

In either case, the loss of the Amazon codes wasn't the issue that most people are upset with them for. It's the fact that they're treating the people they're supposed to support like enemies, lumping us all together as troublemakers, and not taking responsibility for their actions in the past week. (aside from the latest statements, to some degree)

Edit: For the record I wasn't a stacker,.. I wasn't even a member until after the Amazon codes were done.
 
[quote name='io']It's not so much that it is Amazon's fault. I don't even get the "conscience" thing - since, well, that only applies if this was the horrible crime you guys make it out to be. My point was that at the time it seemed like Amazon made different codes that could stack so therefore you could stack. There didn't seem anything wrong with it. It's not like "getting something for cheaper and being quiet about it" like you said. That's a checkout mistake I assume - this is something that Amazon allowed to happen - you apply two coupon codes and they worked - how is that wrong?

I'm just a little sick myself of people getting all morally outraged over this. It's BS, plain and simple.

Like I keep saying over and over, Amazon eventually changed it so only one set of codes worked. And they continued to let that one set go for a few weeks before, apparently, finally telling the ECA that they wouldn't give them more codes. It was only when they shut down the multiple codes that Amazon decided they didn't want the stacking to occur. It could have been OK for them at first since it brought in a lot of business but then maybe it did get out of hand - I have no idea what the overall impact was. However, they allowed it for a great deal of time and if they had a problem with it at first, it would have gotten cut off much sooner. Plus, since the problem was solved at that point, the whole argument that stackers ruined it has no merit. Amazon could have come back with more of the single allowed code (or the account-linked codes that were rumored). There is some other reason they cut off the ECA. Perhaps it was the free membership thing which opened the floodgates, perhaps something else...[/QUOTE]

I respectfully, but totally disagree.

The benefit was "10% off Amazon" and you're trying to tell me "well maybe it's supposed to really be 20% or 30%, because it worked"...It was a glitch, not an underground doubling and tripling of savings.

Again, I respectfully disagree, and I mean that, but I can't fathom how you feel this wasn't to some degree a huge disappointment in the long term and that it's "not a big deal" to some of us. Allow me to explain....

For the most part, Amazon has the best prices on new games, 3 out of 4 times, when I shop around, and the fact that if 2010 rolled around and these codes still worked -- *because Hal had it worded "This pays for itself with the Amazon discount alone if you buy 4 or more games a year"*-- had me predicting I'd be saving perhaps $50-$100 next year with this. I know nothing is guaranteed, but it had been going on a while, and the way everyone talked about this discount around CAG here ("...with ECA..." this, "...with ECA I pay..." that, "...yeah but this week's Best Buy doesn't beat ECA", "Meh, ECA is a better deal" etc..etc...) and the fact that it was worded as an ONGOING benefit to ECA, it had me prepared to get some massive savings from what I consider the cheapest place to buy games even without it.

This kind of thing is a pet peeve of mine, injustice. I'm not saying you (or others like you) are "criminals" but it was wrong. There's minor exploitation, where it doesn't affect others on a mass scale, like the examples I gave, and then there's this type of issue, that I don't agree isn't a problem. So yes, "conscience" is an apt word for how I view this. It wasn't illegal, but it was "wrong" IMO.

I understand fully that you, and I'm sure some others, feel this was nothing and no big deal, but I consider this discount one of the best "deals" I learned about on CAG in the year I've been here, simply because it was presumed to be indefinite, and save me for 12 months. I could buy ANY game and save a nice chunk, it was massive. It wasn't a weekend deal, or a Madness deal on GoGamer, this was huge to me and many others as well. We could create our own "sales" and pick 10 games we want next year and save $60 bucks from it.

The fact that you want to tell me "well maybe it was supposed to be 20%" is something I don't feel you truly believe, but that's how it's sounds when you word it the way "but it worked, how am I to know it's an error"...C'mon, the benefit was worded as "10% off Amazon games" and you're getting up to 30% and trying to say it was meant to be doubled and tripled? You can't really believe that. It was a glitch, and I guarantee if you called up a customer service rep at Amazon and asked, "Hey, this 10% code is working twice, can I use it twice" that the answer would be a resounding but confused "no"....You really think they'd say "Yeah, go ahead, we appreciate your business"??? I think not. They were just slow to catch on, for some reason, perhaps due to the chaos, I don't know.

I have to think after all this, that the Amazon code-stackings were a part of why the codes were pulled. You talk of the timing, but the fact is, you can't guarantee to me that the 20% & 30% off people didn't create an environment where it was already on the verge of collapse, maybe the free ECA memberships was the straw that broke the camel's back, but there are some people out there who had gotten away with what I'm SURE Amazon didn't intend on (20 and 30% off). Maybe the stacking put it towards 90% shutdown, and it was on the brink of a pulled plug, we may never know, but that IS very plausible if you think about the ramifications of it and how small the margin of profit is already. 30% off a new game is huge.

I want to reiterate I mean this respectfully and civilly, and I understand there was the possibility to do this by accident, but I think those incidents were a minority, as after I looked into it, the "stacking" news was viral, many were doing it. If I'd had known about it, I can't say I wouldn't have been tempted, but that's the kind of thing that DOES cross over into my "I might get caught or this isn't right" territory, kind of like switching labels on products in a store where no cameras can see you. We all have our "line" we draw, and that's what this is about.

I don't mean to get on a moral high horse, mind you, but I think this comes down to "what am *I* willing to do as a CAG, how far will *I* go to save money" ....and I wouldn't have gone as far as others, and as a result, those others probably (under my assertion) ruined a good thing.

Peace to all gamers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='benjamouth']I still don't think the ECA is blameless at all here, but I think CAGs need to take some responsibility on the stacking codes issue. Anyone who doesn't think it was widespread on this site is kidding themselves, and while I accept it happened by accident for some people, there are also a lot of people who went to the lengths of pre-ordering games on Amazon and then phoning them up to add other games to the pre-order just so they could get the stacked discount.

I'm not saying I believe everything Hal said, but I can believe the stacking issue cost us the Amazon discount. I think we need to take responsibility for the fact that abusing the deal probably ended it. A valuable lesson to learn.

Unfortunately I suspect we won't learn it.[/QUOTE]

Now THIS I agree with. I believe some people are trying to free themselves of a possibility of being a variable in the codes debacle, and say it wasn't the stacking that did it, to eradicate guilt and avoid blame. I find that hard to digest, I'm sorry.

Hal's a douche on a whole other level, but the stacking codes wasn't just "that's just part of being a CAG, finding offers", in my opinion...
 
I just closed the letter for editing. It can still be viewed however. I sent simmias 3 versions of the list, and asked him to specify which he is using:

Version 1: No edits
Version 2: People who are missing BOTH e-mail & username deleted (approx. 5)
Version 3: People who are missing EITHER e-mail or username deleted (approx. 35)

EDIT: Got a response back from simmias that he says he will hopefully get them mailed out today. Make sure you thank him! I'm sure he'll post later with more info.
 
Thanks for the continuous updates, caltab. It's very helpful.

I'm glad to see that online options to cancel and disable auto-renewal are coming. Hal's apology helps a bit, but I still need to wait-and-see with the ECA.
 
I was one of the people that filed a complaint with the BBB:
Complaint:
When I paid my $19.99 membership dues on 8/24/2009, theeca.com was offering a membership benefit that consisted of an ongoing 10% discount coupon code on all video games and video game accessories purchased from Amazon.com

Shortly after my paid membership (around 9/11/2009), theeca.com offered FREE memberships to anyone who joins by using a code "GIMAG" when creating an account. I was upset, having just spent $19.99 to join 2 weeks earlier. However, knowing the money I would be saving with the 10% off Amazon.com coupons they provide, I decided that the $19.99 fee was acceptable.

Through the duration of my membership, theeca.com has periodically taken the Amazon.com codes down from the website because they needed to get new working codes from Amazon. During this time, they always posted a note in the Member Benefit section that the codes would be returning. Sometimes the codes would be down for approximately 1 week.

However, less than 2 months later, the Amazon.com 10% off coupon was removed from the site. The Member Benefit page stated that the codes were again down, but they were working with Amazon to obtain new codes that would be unique to each member. Instead of having each member use a one-time random generated code, they were trying to get a reusable code that would be unique to each account. Apparently, there were problems with users "stacking" discount codes and getting up to 30% off, instead of the intended 10% discount. Having a unique code would prevent people from "stacking" the coupons and allow Amazon and theeca.com to track who was using the codes.

Then without notification to it's members, theeca.com changed the status of the Amazon benefit to "This promotion is no longer available." This was never listed or advertised as a temporary promotion, but rather an ongoing "benefit" of having an ECA membership.

I emailed Amazon directly to ask why my code was gone and the email response I received is the following:

------------------
10/26/09 10:30:47
Your Name: Justin Huffman
Comments: Can someone at Amazon tell me why the 10% off video game preorders code through ECA is no longer available?
As a member of www.theeca.com, I am supposed to be able to access a 10% off code. When I login to my account in ECA, I no longer have access to my codes.
---------------

RESPONSE FROM AMAZON:
Hello,

As indicated on the Entertainment Consumers Association website, no ECA member discount is currently available, nor is one planned.

Because this certificate is being provided by ECA as part of a promotion they sponsored, you will need to contact them for more information. You can visit the ECA member website to contact their customer service directly.

We're sorry for any confusion around this issue and hope to see you again soon.

Best regards,

Jofert C.
Amazon.com
We're Building Earth's Most Customer-Centric Company
-----------------

As you can clearly see in Amazon's response, they state that they no longer plan to offer a discount to theeca.com.

I feel that theeca.com should offer refunds to paying members for 2 reasons.
REASON #1
After paying for a membership, they started giving away free memberships to anyone who signed up using the "GIMAG" code. These free memberships included many users who abused the system and found a way to "stack" 10% discount coupons, sometimes up to 30% off instead of the intended 10% discount. This problem ultimately led to the second reason that I feel theeca.com should offer membership refunds.
REASON #2
The membership benefit of 10% off videogames and videogame accessories was removed from the site. This discount is why many people paid for a membership in the first place. This benefit was never listed as a temporary benefit. The only reason it was removed is because some users were taking advantage of this discount and Amazon decided to cancel this benefit for everyone.

Thank you,
Justin Huffman

Desired Resolution:
Because theeca.com started giving away free memberships which ultimately led to the loss of the key membership benefit, the Amazon.com 10% off coupon, I want my $19.99 Membership fee refunded to me and all members who paid for a membership should have the option to get their money back as well.

Formal response from ECA VP and Legal Counsel Jennifer Mercurio:
The Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA) is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization that represents consumers of interactive entertainment in the US and Canada. The association was founded to give gamers a collective voice with which to communicate their concerns, address their issues and focus their advocacy efforts. As such, the ECA is committed to a host of public policy efforts, empowering and enabling the membership to effect change. Additionally, the organization provides members substantial affinity benefits including discounts on games-related purchases and rentals, access to information, events and shows, as well as community and educational initiatives.

Like parallel (c)(4) associations, our members pay an annual dues fee, which in our case is $19.99 per year for a regular membership or $14.99 per year for a student or military membership. This funds the operations of the organization. While many members choose to join the association because of the government affairs efforts that ECA does at the State or Federal levels, some people choose to become a member because of the many affinity benefits, such as discounts that sponsors provide or access to trade and consumer shows and events. Because those benefits are substantial and gamers tend to spend a fair amount of money buying and renting games-related goods and services, the expense of the dues fee is often rationalized by the savings they choose to enjoy from those partners.

Similar to other membership organizations, such as AAA or AARP, the ECA Marketing staff works hard on establishing new and exciting partnerships with the many companies and brands that our members value, some of which can be found at http://www.theeca.com/membership_benefits. We disclose in advance that benefits may change, get better or go away. Section 1(c) of the Membership Terms & Condition states, ''All Benefits are subject to discontinuation, change, modification, improvement or substitution without notice and ECA makes no representations or warranties with respect to, and accepts no responsibility or liability for, out of date or erroneous information related thereto.'' Because we're typically working with quite large corporations, the negotiations and related contracts often also take time in finalizing. For that reason, we don't announce new or re-issued benefits until they're contracted, even though that may be frustrating to members who want to know about the latest discount(s) being offered and the exact date(s) an offer will come online.

ECA advertises benefits regularly, through our various publications, on social networking sites and in bartered and paid advertising. If a sponsor chooses to alter their offering or discount, those ads are amended or halted to reflect the change. Since there are so many member benefits and of such compelling value - as compared with the cost of the annual dues fee - it rarely becomes an issue that any one discount removed or added is significant.

In the case of Amazon's 10% off coupons, the vast majority of folks took more than their fair share of the coupons and some exploited Amazon's software to ''stack'' or ''double-up'' the codes, resulting in a twenty or thirty percent savings per order (instead of the normal 10%). Due to this activity, Amazon began working on a unique multi-time use code that could be assigned once per member, which - in theory - should have removed the exploit and their losses as a result. We removed the related advertising during the downtime, so as not to mislead members. We regularly posted the information and status updates in our Forums as we knew it, but that did little to appease those who were impatient.

When Amazon did an analysis of the code stacking and weighed it against the cost of new customer acquisition, it likely became untenable to rationalize and they halted the offer. We advised our members of the change and addressed related concerns and questions from those disappointed by the consequences of the actions of their fellow members.

Also like those parallel organizations, we disclose in advance that membership dues are not refundable. Section 6 of the Membership Terms & Conditions states in part, ''Right to Cancel; Refund of ECA Service Fee. Members have the right to terminate this Agreement and membership in the ECA Service at any time. A Member may cancel this Agreement and membership in the ECA Service by sending such request to Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. If Member cancels before the end of a Membership Term for which Member has paid the Service Fee, the Member cannot receive a refund of such Service Fee nor any portion thereof. Due to the nature of the services provided by ECA (many of which are accessible immediately upon acceptance) it is understood that refunds cannot be issued. Member will remain liable for any other fees or charges to be paid pursuant to this Agreement or the ECA Service...'' People can terminate their membership at any time, but we do not process refunds. The reasoning is simple: unscrupulous people could otherwise join the association, take advantage of many of the benefits and then ask for a refund.

Similarly, we do not offer refunds to members who paid full price for their dues who are upset that someone else used a marketing promotion to get a discounted price. Be it airlines, hotels, soft drink companies or health club memberships, promotional special offers happen frequently, and discount services like Expedia and Hotels.com exist for a reason, but they do not negate the full price of the original carrier. That one person was able to hunt down, or be presented, an offer, while another person did not is unfortunate for the second individual, but it is also life.

I would need to double-check to be certain, but I believe that all of the above has been explained in detail to the few individuals who chose to submit complaints. It is posted repeatedly in our forums and by our Marketing and Accounting staff in individual emails (responding to the complainants). That they have chosen to ignore those efforts and communications and leave out that half of the discussion is surprising, but not shocking.

I hope that that answers any outstanding questions, comments or concerns. Should it not, please feel free to contact me directly through the email below.

Jennifer Mercurio
Vice President & General Counsel
Entertainment Consumers Association
[email protected]

The BBB case was closed because I didn't bother responding, but the fact of the matter is that there needs to be an organization to protect gamers from organizations like the ECA.
 
[quote name='BWS1982']I respectfully, but totally disagree.

The benefit was "10% off Amazon" and you're trying to tell me "well maybe it's supposed to really be 20% or 30%, because it worked"...It was a glitch, not an underground doubling and tripling of savings.

...

I understand fully that you, and I'm sure some others, feel this was nothing and no big deal, but I consider this discount one of the best on CAG in the year I've been here, simply because it was presumed to be indefinite, and save me for 12 months. I could buy ANY game and save a nice chunk.
[/QUOTE]


The glitch was equivalent to a pricing error. People acted like consumers, and Amazon had every right to cut the glitched coupons (which they did) and cancel orders (which they did not).

I am sorry this benefit was advertised as indefinite to you, and you took it as face value. From the get go, it was clear to many that in its current form (batches of codes), that the discount was not sustainable even though it was advertised as such. I, and many others made sure to get their worth early on, any use of the coupon thereafter was bonus. The incoming of the coupon glitch and free membership was a huge red flag that things, as they stood, where about to end.
 
[quote name='BWS1982']I respectfully, but totally disagree.

The benefit was "10% off Amazon" and you're trying to tell me "well maybe it's supposed to really be 20% or 30%, because it worked"...It was a glitch, not an underground doubling and tripling of savings.

Again, I respectfully disagree, and I mean that, but I can't fathom how you feel this wasn't to some degree a huge disappointment in the long term and that it's "not a big deal" to some of us. Allow me to explain....

For the most part, Amazon has the best prices on new games, 3 out of 4 times, when I shop around, and the fact that if 2010 rolled around and these codes still worked -- *because Hal had it worded "This pays for itself with the Amazon discount alone if you buy 4 or more games a year"*-- had me predicting I'd be saving perhaps $50-$100 next year with this. I know nothing is guaranteed, but it had been going on a while, and the way everyone talked about this discount around CAG here ("...with ECA..." this, "...with ECA I pay..." that, "...yeah but this week's Best Buy doesn't beat ECA", "Meh, ECA is a better deal" etc..etc...) and the fact that it was worded as an ONGOING benefit to ECA, it had me prepared to get some massive savings from what I consider the cheapest place to buy games even without it.

This kind of thing is a pet peeve of mine, injustice. I'm not saying you (or others like you) are "criminals" but it was wrong. There's minor exploitation, where it doesn't affect others on a mass scale, like the examples I gave, and then there's this type of issue, that I don't agree isn't a problem. So yes, "conscience" is an apt word for how I view this. It wasn't illegal, but it was "wrong" IMO.

I understand fully that you, and I'm sure some others, feel this was nothing and no big deal, but I consider this discount one of the best "deals" I learned about on CAG in the year I've been here, simply because it was presumed to be indefinite, and save me for 12 months. I could buy ANY game and save a nice chunk, it was massive. It wasn't a weekend deal, or a Madness deal on GoGamer, this was huge to me and many others as well. We could create our own "sales" and pick 10 games we want next year and save $60 bucks from it.

The fact that you want to tell me "well maybe it was supposed to be 20%" is something I don't feel you truly believe, but that's how it's sounds when you word it the way "but it worked, how am I to know it's an error"...C'mon, the benefit was worded as "10% off Amazon games" and you're getting up to 30% and trying to say it was meant to be doubled and tripled? You can't really believe that. It was a glitch, and I guarantee if you called up a customer service rep at Amazon and asked, "Hey, this 10% code is working twice, can I use it twice" that the answer would be a resounding but confused "no"....You really think they'd say "Yeah, go ahead, we appreciate your business"??? I think not. They were just slow to catch on, for some reason, perhaps due to the chaos, I don't know.

I have to think after all this, that the Amazon code-stackings were a part of why the codes were pulled. You talk of the timing, but the fact is, you can't guarantee to me that the 20% & 30% off people didn't create an environment where it was already on the verge of collapse, maybe the free ECA memberships was the straw that broke the camel's back, but there are some people out there who had gotten away with what I'm SURE Amazon didn't intend on (20 and 30% off). Maybe the stacking put it towards 90% shutdown, and it was on the brink of a pulled plug, we may never know, but that IS very plausible if you think about the ramifications of it and how small the margin of profit is already. 30% off a new game is huge.

I want to reiterate I mean this respectfully and civilly, and I understand there was the possibility to do this by accident, but I think those incidents were a minority, as after I looked into it, the "stacking" news was viral, many were doing it. If I'd had known about it, I can't say I wouldn't have been tempted, but that's the kind of thing that DOES cross over into my "I might get caught or this isn't right" territory, kind of like switching labels on products in a store where no cameras can see you. We all have our "line" we draw, and that's what this is about.

I don't mean to get on a moral high horse, mind you, but I think this comes down to "what am *I* willing to do as a CAG, how far will *I* go to save money" ....and I wouldn't have gone as far as others, and as a result, those others probably (under my assertion) ruined a good thing.

Peace to all gamers[/QUOTE]

:applause: I agree with this
 
[quote name='Lan_Zer0']The glitch was equivalent to a pricing error. People acted like consumers, and Amazon had every right to cut the glitched coupons (which they did) and cancel orders (which they did not).

I am sorry this benefit was advertised as indefinite to you, and you took it as face value. From the get go, it was clear to many that in its current form (batches of codes), that the discount was not sustainable even though it was advertised as such. I, and many others made sure to get their worth early on, any use of the coupon thereafter was bonus. The incoming of the coupon glitch and free membership was a huge red flag that things, as they stood, where about to end.[/QUOTE]

Well I didn't join (paying member here) just because of it, but it was the tilting point that made me give in anyways. I have a BFA in media arts and animation, so I'm headed into the industry, hopefully, and have been a gamer for a long time. Back then (July), the ECA wasn't known to be deceitful, so I supported their "cause" as well. There were also other benefits I saw, though they paled to the Amazon discount.

It wasn't "clear" to me that the batches were a sign of failure, because there was talk that they were working on member-based permanent codes, which is what we all thought they should have offered in the first place. I saw no sign of collapse or any lack of sustainability, and I'm sure I'm not alone. In retrospect, I wish I *had* horded a few extra, but I only took what was needed. Sometimes I think I'm too "innocent" to get in on "deals" in this world....Maybe I need to be more aggressive or cynical or something, so that I don't get screwed over like I often do. I took what codes I needed, applied them once, and got shafted in the end for doing things the right way. Of course I'm going to be pissed off, but thanks for understanding.
 
[quote name='Lan_Zer0']The glitch was equivalent to a pricing error. People acted like consumers, and Amazon had every right to cut the glitched coupons (which they did) and cancel orders (which they did not).

I am sorry this benefit was advertised as indefinite to you, and you took it as face value. From the get go, it was clear to many that in its current form (batches of codes), that the discount was not sustainable even though it was advertised as such. I, and many others made sure to get their worth early on, any use of the coupon thereafter was bonus. The incoming of the coupon glitch and free membership was a huge red flag that things, as they stood, where about to end.[/QUOTE]

I respectfully disagree. The glitch needed to be manipulated by a person in order to work. This is more like the equivalent of changing stickers on items.
 
[quote name='Reira']I just closed the letter for editing. It can still be viewed however. I sent simmias 3 versions of the list, and asked him to specify which he is using:

Version 1: No edits
Version 2: People who are missing BOTH e-mail & username deleted (approx. 5)
Version 3: People who are missing EITHER e-mail or username deleted (approx. 35)

EDIT: Got a response back from simmias that he says he will hopefully get them mailed out today. Make sure you thank him! I'm sure he'll post later with more info.[/QUOTE]
That post on the ECA's forums said you just needed name/email to cancel. I think as long as you have 2 pieces of the info, the ECA should be able to find an account with that unique info. Just a name, maybe not so much, as there's a possiblity that more than one "Mike Smith" (name made up) that joined, so they might not be able to locate a unique account with just a name.

If it were me, I'd send an unedited one, you don't want people claiming they had their info deleted or whatnot.
 
He needs to shut the hell up about the stackers and "scammers".

He should have just said we made some mistakes, we are working on adding a disable auto renew online, and we will give everyone 60 days to cancel their membership and get their dues back if they accidently are auto-renewed. And oh btw, this is what ECA actually does and why people should stay/become members.
 
[quote name='Dahk']I respectfully disagree. The glitch needed to be manipulated by a person in order to work. This is more like the equivalent of changing stickers on items.[/QUOTE]

I don't want to get into arguments of analogies, but applying a coupon code requires no manipulation. And this is probably the last thing I say on the matter.

You buy a box of cereal. You have two different $1 coupons. Both say "cannot be combined with another offer". You hand over both coupons and inform the cashier that you are not sure if they will work. Cashier scans them, and they both go through and you walk out of the store with the cereal. Did you just scam the store? Are you a thief?
 
[quote name='Dahk']I respectfully disagree. The glitch needed to be manipulated by a person in order to work. This is more like the equivalent of changing stickers on items.[/QUOTE]
Completely and utterly incorrect.

I'm assuming that the ability to stack codes was uncovered by the internet at large by accident, as I discovered it, due to cancellation of orders or applying multiple coupons to your account for convenience. The underlying problem was with Amazon's programming of the codes, which at some point or another would force people to either stack discounts or use no discounts at all - EVER (yes, if you're in line to be the pope some day, I'm sure you'd choose the latter), so regardless of any malevolent intentions, eventually the stacking of codes would have led to Amazon discontinuing the promotion - the concerted efforts of those who exploited it simply sped up the process.

No matter the culpability of those who stacked codes, this is little more than a red herring for all the bullshit from Hal. No one (or maybe 6-8 people) was canceling and rejoining in order to use daily codes because that didn't help you exploit anything anymore than just waiting to get one code per day. The number of people who would have had enough of the previous two batches of codes to make hoarding the last batch worthwhile would have been infinitesimally small.

All this said, if Hal's latest "interview" had been the first response by the ECA, this would never have blown up to what it has. Though I'd have taken it much more seriously if he didn't write the whole thing himself.
 
[quote name='Dahk']I respectfully disagree. The glitch needed to be manipulated by a person in order to work. This is more like the equivalent of changing stickers on items.[/QUOTE]

Nice to see those who aren't trying to justify themselves by taking advantage of a simple error made by Amazon, who was kind enough to even offer the 10% discount in the first place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top