[quote name='Cheese']Level1, do you realize that filling in unanswered questions about 9/11 with MAGIC CONSPIRACY BEANS, defeats your own truth-seeking goal?
The WTC collapse is the most researched engineering failure of the 20th century, every single legit study has come up with the same general story. From insurance researchers, independent contractors, multiple university studies, to several government investigations, to your average schmoe on the street. To claim that EVERYONE ON THE PLANET IS LYING to cover up a gov't plot isn't searching for the truth, it's paranoia. One of the best things about the Bush administration is they haven't been able to keep very much secret, due in large part to their own ineptitude. To believe that anyone in the administration was A) clever enough to think of this, B) Capable of organizing the tremendous amount of resources required - all in secret mind you, and C) stop anyone involved from ever saying anything about it ever; is a fantasy straight from Grimm. [/quote]
Even if 911 was an inside job, that doesn't mean Bush knew about it or had anything to do with it. That's where I depart from truthers. They want so badly to say it was planned and carried out by some secret cabal with Bush, but the evidence for that is shit.
The government is so compartmentalized, especially intelligence and military, that it's very possible for very very big things to happen by our government without 98% of the government even knowing about it.
The people you blame for this aren't capable of it.
Which is why I would agree with this statement.
Building 7 collapsed because a 10 story chunk of the North Tower fell 400 feet and landed on top of it, crippling it's structural integrity and smashing it's open atrium design. After several hours of fire and failing supports, it fell. End of story. The building wasn't prewired during it's construction, that's just bizarre, and would involve EVEN MORE people who have to have kept their mouths shut since 1987.
It is still the first building to completely collapse due to fire. Ever. That
is something to raise an eyebrow at. The structure being compromised by a chunk stuff is a little reaching to.
It's also worth pointing out that, from what I understand, the 911 commission didn't even cover building 7. Much less research has been done on it comparatively.
I recently read one theory that said WTC7 was brought down to cover up a banking scandal. Yes, to cover up a banking scandal (one supposedly more damaging then IndyMac or Fannie May or Bear Stearns) someone planned flying planes into WTC 1&2 in hopes that WTC7 would be damaged, then some out-on-bail CFO's of huge corporations would run headlong into the area, set up several tons of high explosives and bring the building down, destroying all the evidence.
Yeah. Who knows why it was brought down, or how. I admit that it's collapse is rather suspicious. But I won't try and fling weird ideas out there as to why.
I do find it very unscientific for the truthers to wrap their theories in motive and suspects, that's where they diverge into silly territory. I wish they would just stick with the facts that are suspicious about various events.
Seriously, where were the reptilians in all this? Did they plant the bombs? Did Bush41 and the Clintons fly the planes themselves?
It depends on wich reptilians you are talking about. The one's commonly seen in the base under
Dulce likely don't give a shit.