I Guess they Weren't Gay Enough...

suspended from participating in the World Series for a year

They have enough time to get gay'er at least.

And no bisexuals?

I'd say it's a silly lawsuit.... but the organization acted ghey in allowing two hetro's per team and then being douchy on bi's...?!
 
Clearly bisexuals only count as half a heterosexual, so there should be up to 4 allowed per team (or two bisexuals and one heterosexual).
 
There's no better way to teach fractions than with sexual preference math. Unless you count kids trying to exploit scholarships during college application time.
 
[quote name='Strell']There's no better way to teach fractions than with sexual preference math.[/QUOTE]


Johnny wants to join a gay softball team that only allows 2 heterosexuals per team. This particular team already has 1 and 3/4 heterosexual members. Johnny considers himself bisexual and has had 3 gay sexual experiences and 4 heterosexual sexual experiences so far this year. How many more gay sexual experiences would Johnny have to have in order to join the team?
 
That's not enough information to solve the question. Much like imaginary numbers in Calculus, we must consider whether Johnny was born that way or if this is his choice. Each has drastic ramifications on clearly demarcating just how much sexual activity steers his overall gayosity, hereby referred to as a capital italicized G.

And I'm not even checking error percentages here regarding the true gayosity G of the partners involved in Johnny's activities. You get bonus points if the guy is wearing a funny hat you know.
 
So you're saying...

G = (gay) - H/b^2

Where (gay) is g-Ag / Ag*100
g = gayness
Ag = Actual gayness

And H = how much Hetero, while b = how much Bisexual?

That makes no sense.... you didn't factor in string theory... leather string theory.
 
johnny only has 1 year to be gay enough. how much gayer will johnny have to be each month in order to achieve adequate gayness by month 12?
 
[quote name='xxDOYLExx']we can compare our parabolas.........[/QUOTE]

Now THAT is gay.

If the 3 men had been asked to "prove" their gayness, would that have been enough evidence to allow them to compete, and thus, prevent, their disqualification?
 
[quote name='shieryda']If the 3 men had been asked to "prove" their gayness, would that have been enough evidence to allow them to compete, and thus, prevent, their disqualification?[/QUOTE]

Probably something to do with the business end of a baseball bat.

And/or bat boy. They probably call them *snicker* bat men though.
 
[quote name='Strell'] They probably call them *snicker* bat men though.[/QUOTE]

only in a non-nambla sponsored league.
 
8015d1084046988-pampest-cars-looks_like_you_caught_the_gay.jpg
 
bread's done
Back
Top