I really wish HAL would try a different visual style for 3DCG Kirby already. It’s been over a decade since they started using this one, and it just looks so generic and bland that it’s really hard to get hyped about new games. When the games were raster-based, the spritework was almost always eyecatching and appealing, and they tried different styles over time.
Bought when they were $30 and now again at $35. I love these and play Puyo Puyo Tetris and Tetris 99 with them (also Tecmo Bowl). You can alter the button configuration to make it usable in Tetris 99.
That's my reason for not buying them. The SNES ones work just fine for NES games and also have the ability to charge via USB-C, the NES ones only can charge like Joycons do.
Mine wiggles the tiniest bit but doesn't shift up and down.
I have an a different 3rd-party dock which is also limited to low resolution on my white oled. I figured it was intentional incompatibility added by nintendo with the new consoles.
I wonder if I can play the DLC I purchased for it awhile back from Walmart or do I need to own the actual game.
Man, that is a shame.
They've changed the rules a lot. Digital currency has been allowed since day one. You used to not be able to use the coupon online, but since covid started now you can. You couldn't use it on anything that was discounted, so if shirts were on sale for $10 your coupon just wouldn't apply. That seems to have been relaxed a bit. You also couldn't use it for digital download codes but right now that's squeaking by
$I saw something not too long ago about Burlington having them for way below retail, and I've seen them in person. I think it was Animal Crossing and Zelda versions. I have a Switch Lite so I never saw the need to get one myself.
I think I'm going to skip. As much as I wanted KH on the Switch, I wanted it for portability purposes. Cloud versions are not portable, and I don't really 'own' them, if the servers ever shut down or anything.
Same company that is trying to position mediocre, lazy app-tier pixel art-swaps of Final Fantasy 1-6 as their ''definitive edition''.
That's Square Enix for you. At least those cloud versions are $10 cheaper than the other platforms, but they've been out long enough there to get some decent enough discounts to make them more palatable without being locked to the Cloud.
This but unironically. FF6's previous versions have been good as is. LoM and especially Saga Frontier needed some extra love to bring out their full potential.
Nah, Square is the one who is pricing their games at $70 on PC. I doubt Disney has anything to do with the distribution and sale of legacy content besides collecting checks (given they already approved of the games way back when).
My point is that Square has demonstrated itself to be greedy/cheap independent of Disney.
Had they released 1&2 on a cart... I'd have been down for that. My internet is more than good enough for cloud gaming, but there's no way I'm spending money on a game only to be able to stream it.
