[quote name='mykevermin']Once a week or so, I click 'view post' for your pants-on-head stupid tripe.
Your argument is a red herring. Nobody is arguing that Kyl 'is for baby rape.'
You're defending Kyl TAKING
ING CREDIT FOR A BILL HE DID NOT VOTE IN FAVOR OF. It's not a matter of support for one thing or another, it's (and I'll use caps again so perhaps it'll sink into you Dr. Thunder-dulled brain) TAKING
ING CREDIT FOR A BILL HE DID NOT VOTE IN FAVOR OF.
He deserves to be called out for patting himself on the back for something he didn't do.
Alternately, if we're going this route, I'd like to take this opportunity to say that I'm really proud of my contributions to stopping the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. We did a great job stopping the greatest environmental catastrophe in the history of our planet. Through our efforts, we've begun the cleanup of the discharged oil; something else we have done an excellent job of fixing.[/QUOTE]
So you are saying that he didn't support the inclusion of that part of the legislation? Its a big piece of legislation when they were working on it (all of them) did he voice his opinion against that particular piece? I have a feeling he supported that part. If that particular piece of the legislation went through all by itself do you think he would have still voted no?
Also unlike popular belief, Republicans accepted that reform was needed and supported some of the parts of bill but could not bring themselves to vote for the entire thing. To say that Republicans had no part in the process, or they didn't support any part of the bill is just dishonest. Dont get us wrong, he still doesn't support the whole bill, and neither do I and yet I can bring myself to accept pieces of it.