You all want to have a good belly laugh (or a depressing shake of the head) you've *got* to read the comments on freerepublic (there are many threads on the subject, but I think
this one has pretty much all the 'theories' in it).
The theories I find most
interesting (for entertainment purposes only)
1) It's not a 'long form birth certificate' because it it titled "Certificate of Live Birth"
2) It's only an annotated version of the document released back in 2008. Thus either the 2008 document or the 2011 document must be a lie (note: the 2008 doc was a Certification of Live Birth as opposed to the 2011 Certificate of Live Birth; FReepers not so good with subtlety)
3) It's a fake because there is no baby length or weight listed (note there is a pic of a Ms. Nordyke's Hawaiian certificate in the same thread who was born the day after Mr. Obama which no one claims is fake but is also lacking length weight info).
4) The signing doctor, with a last name of Smilan or Similar (post #85) cannot be found in Hawaiian records (The doctor's last name can clearly be read as Sinclair. Only thing odd about that is that you can actually read a doctor's signature
).
5) Mr. Obama Sr.'s race is listed as "African" not "Negro". African is too 'politically correct' for 1961. (As if there is no difference between a person from Africa and an 'American Negro').
But the biggest example of 'goalpost creep' is the argument that even if he was born in Hawaii and by 8 USC 1401 is a "citizens (sic) of the United States by birth". He is not and cannot be a "Natural Born Citizen". They assert that only a person who mother and father are US citizens and the child is born on US soil may be considered a "Natural Born Citizen".
Even in the thread, some of the more level headed posters show why this assertion is faulty, including some court opinions as old as the mid-1800s. But they "shall not be moved".
Like I said, hilarious and depressing all at the same time.
As for the original question, I'd have told them to shove all the BC questions up their asses like he basically has after releasing the 2008 doc. It was clear that no amount of proof will persuade the hardest of the hardcore birthers. Moreover, even if some of the 'wishy-washy' birthers would change there minds on this issue, they sure as hell aint gonna vote for him.
He's smarter than I am though, so I'm sure he thinks releasing it now buys him something politically. But I'll be damned if I could tell you *what* that something is!