[quote name='Skylander7']
You preach with wisdom beyond your years, young one. Gimme Secret of Mana or good ole Chrono over FF Craptacular 10 anyday. These new RPG'ers who defend new RPG's over the classics are just missing out. It's almost as if our intelligence as gamers is being insulted.
Bring on a true Chrono sequel I say. Or another Panzer Dragoon Saga. What's sad though is that such games are not successful; when people think of RPG, they think of "Final Fantasy". Until that changes... fresh, new, and revolutionary RPG's just won't sell enough to be profitable to make.
Sorry for the double post... just had a little to drink and a lot to say
[/quote]
I don't think you have the right to say that. You grew up with those RPGs, and just about anything will be better than it really was just looking back and thinking about it. This generation of gamers will undoubtedly argue with the next about their RPGs.
And what do you mean "true" Chrono sequel? The story already wrapped up nicely, and Crono and his posse was found in
Chrono Cross anyway. I think that was a brilliant way to tie the two storylines, but if you didn't like it, there
was a true Chrono sequel,
Radical Dreamers, which
Cross is based off of. There's even a project trying to (or was trying to) rewrite
Cross to make it appeal more to
Trigger fans.
Of course fans will associate RPGs with
Final Fantasy - it's the most popular RPG for every generation and will continue to be as such. I don't understand your argument against it; minus
X-2, every
FF had a completely different storyline and battle system. Would it have made a difference if
Trigger was just called
Final Fantasy VII?
Lastly, I don't understand your comparison of
SoA and
DW7. I choose
SoA. It has random battles; what was your point exactly? I've never played the latter, but I'm sure it has random battles too.