[quote name='doubledown']Well, I think the original trilogy set the bar SOOOO high, the rest of the movies do not seem as good. In all honesty though, I enjoyed EP I & II. I thought they were decent films....not classics like the 1st 3, but still good. Honestly, the acting in the oriinal trilogy was not "great" by any means....I found myself chuckling at a few parts because of bad dialog in the original 3.[/quote]
I think you hit it on the head dude. I like Episode I and II, but there is no way they could recapture the magic and impact that the original trilogy had in the late 70's and early 80's. Even with the fairly generic formula driven story of the first trilogy, the technology made it stand out. Let's face it, Mark Hamill's acting in Episode IV is not going to win any awards. The first trilogy had a coolness and newness factor that can't be duplicated.
The same thing happened with The Matrix. It had that same newness and coolness factor, even though other movies had tread into that territory before The Matix did (ahem Dark City). In between The Matirx and Reloaded th ough, plenty of other movies came out that were just as cool. Plus The Matrix, like the original Trilogy just set a high bar. If you look at Episode I and II and Reloaded and Revolutions on their own, all four are good popcorn movies with good action, even if the stories don't make a whole lot of sense and the acting is not great.