Yeah, up until that line I was watching that and thinking, "Why is there a B&B revival?" And Butthead's reply got me to not think about that for a while.
I'm still not sure about the B&B revival, but in a way, it makes sense. B&B previously was, in part, mocking the so-called MTV generation and music videos, so as MTV has replaced the videos with reality TV, B&B returns to mock that.
My problem is that B&B were originally caricatures of MTV's target demographic, the dipshit teenaged headbanging male watching TV over the summer instead of getting outside. But now, MTV skews female, don't it? And Headbanger's ball has been dead for umpteen years. I'm not saying it has to be reproduced faithfully, I just don't know if B&B are the people to mock MTV's current programming, maybe it would be better to have an entirely new outlet for that.
I suppose it's easier (and lazier) to just talk B&B back into existence and relevance, but with some effort they might've tried something that followed the B&B format but gave us new characters who had two feet firmly planted in 2011 rather than having one in 2011 and the other in 1991.
[/buzzkill]
And why would they revive King of the Hill? It got a ton of seasons, they had more than enough time to play out just about every possible story they could. It did just fine, just as the original run of B&B did.