[quote name='SpecTrE3353']
What I currently have:
- ASRock 939Dual-SATA Mobo (has an AGP and PCIE slot... weird right?)
- Athlon X2 3800+ (2.2 Ghz)
- 2 GB DDR2 Crucial RAM
- WD 640 GB SATA Caviar Blue HDD
- BFG GeForce 260GTX OC 896MB
- 550W Antec TruePower PSU
What I want to upgrade:
CPU: Intel i5-750 -
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...=AFC-C8Junction&AID=10446076&PID=1312731&SID=
Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD4 -
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...=AFC-C8Junction&AID=10446076&PID=1312731&SID=
RAM: Crucial 4GB DDR3 PC3-10600 -
http://www.crucial.com/store/mpartspecs.aspx?mtbpoid=3EC793F9A5CA7304
Some questions for you experts:
- Is there anything wrong with the components above or anything I should know about recent tech? I haven't really paid much attention to hardware over the past 4+ years.[/QUOTE]
I think those are all good choices so far. I'm guessing you picked out a micro ATX motherboard because your case doesn't take full size ATX? It's still a solid mATX board though. As for memory, may I recommend
G.SKILL 4GB DDR3 1600? I know it's not Crucial brand that you're accustomed to, but G.SKILL has skyrocketed their status in reliable memory within the past 2 years with great overclocking and stable RAMs. But the Crucial RAM you picked out is fine too.
[quote name='SpecTrE3353']- Are the quad cores worth purchasing at this point? I notice that the i5 also comes in a dual core with a higher clock rate at around the same price.[/QUOTE]
I think quad cores are good buy right now. Their prices are reasonable, many of them (including the i5-750) are good overclockers. Just think of it like even if your quad core has a lower default clock speed, you can always overclock if you need more juice. But with dual core you cannot grow 2 more cores to make it a quad core. So right now if you are going to upgrade, it makes more sense to upgrade to a quad core.
[quote name='SpecTrE3353']- Is there some reason everyone is going with Kingston/Corsair/OCZ these days? I've always using Micron/Crucial for like a decade and it's always been extremely reliable.[/QUOTE]
I think because 5 years ago, you can clearly see the difference between a good brand like Crucial and Micron vs average brands like NEC, Samsung, and Hynix. Crucial had their little fallout couple years ago when many of their stock had faulty memory chips that blue screened many users. But since they picked up their slacks they've been solid again since. At the same time, no name companies like G.SKILL, OCZ, Patriot rose to their current high quality status along side Corsair and Crucial for their solid RAM products. So basically nowadays you just can't go wrong with Corsair, Crucial, Mushkin, G.SKILL, and Kingston. I put OCZ and Patriot below them because they're somewhat inconsistent with their RAM quality. Micron doesn't really market their own retail brand anymore.