Jcaugustine
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 1 (100%)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGWhXL-ADGY
Fitting that Thor 2 is being directed by Alan Taylor aka Game of Thrones.
Fitting that Thor 2 is being directed by Alan Taylor aka Game of Thrones.
You can skip the end one although the ending credit song was pretty epic I'm going to have to download thatFYI - apparenlty there are 2 post credit scenes in the film.
A mid and one all the way on the very end.
Yeah I felt that, about Lady Sif, wished they had expanded on it.It feels like there's alot of deleted scenes in this movie for some reason, like there seems to imply alot of stuff going on with Lady Sith, but the movie never gets around to it. Though I enjoyed it, still prefer the first, but it was enjoyable.
Also the IMax footage of Captain America: Winter Soldier before the movie was ing awesome.
Wait, you're asking about the end credits sequence and you have an avatar of obscure Jewish Marvel hero Moon Knight and don't know of what happened at the end credits? Really? I...Really?Yeah I felt that, about Lady Sif, wished they had expanded on it.
Overall I enjoyed Thor.
Not the best comic book movie, but better than both IM3 and MoS in my opinion.
Speaking of Captain America, the crowd at my theater clapped after that trailer, and everyone got a kick out of the cameo!
The 1st end credit scene
is that Guardian of the Galaxy?
Infinity Gem?
I'm not familiar at all with GotG and couldn't hear whatWait, you're asking about the end credits sequence and you have an avatar of obscure Jewish Marvel hero Moon Knight and don't know of what happened at the end credits? Really? I...Really?
And the answer is it leads to it and second answer is either read comics or play more video games.
Who?Did anyone notice that was that soprano chick as the assistant in the trailer?
yeah well a lot of things are better then iron man 3Saw this last night with my girlfriend, liked it a lot. Far better than Iron Man 3
oh good to hear it was better than Iron Man 3. But that wasn't my concern. my concern was if it was going to be worse than Thor 1...seeing it tomorrow.
I guess some people can relate to him that's why he's liked.I I think he's a pretty lame character personally, just a mopey emo looking douche. To each their own I guess, but definitely pretty low on my list of villains in popular movies.
Not sure she would anyway. Apparently she got so injured on set she thought her lower body had been paralyzed and was scared shitless when it happened.That chick who played Sif could probably work as Wonder Woman. I don't know if there is some stupid contract Marvel puts on these actors saying that they can't play another character from DC....who knows.
There's a reason 2 Broke Girls is successful, and it's not the writing.Seriously Jane's assistant is pretty hot.
Well yeah. Have you read any of the comics? It's out there, man. I am very much looking forward to it though.GoTG is going to be one strange movie. That's all I can say about that.
I am assuming you mean the big twist right before the credits? ConsideringSaw this and thought it was awesome until the ending. I'd like to see anyone try and explain it.
It seemed pretty obvious to meSaw this and thought it was awesome until the ending. I'd like to see anyone try and explain it.
Pretty much this.It seemed pretty obvious to me
they almost beat it to death his illusion ability through the movie to that point as well as the fact that if he did anything to harm Thor a lot of very pissed off Asgardians would be on his ass. What better way to escape then to "heroically sacrifice" yourself saving both the hero and his lady in a short span? Thor wouldn't be pissed at him for his previous transgressions and if he thought he was dead then he also wouldn't keep looking for him.
Also, I'm fairly certain the Asgardian that reports to Odin that Loki was dead was one of the people Loki had already impersonated during that barrage of people after Thor springs him out, which is another tip about what was going to happen.
As for the broader question of why to keep Loki alive it's quite simply the fact that he's the most recognizable, lasting, and popular villain in the MCU right now. No other introduced villain has attained this level of recognition yet (although I suspect we haven't seen the last of Hugo Weaving/Red Skull) so they want to have a way to keep him around but not have to worry about him being in prison.
I'm guessing there isn't enough time to make a second Avengers movie already. Guardians is coming out next year, they couldn't release anything else in that timeframe since all the Avengers characters are involved in their solo projects. I'm guessing they'd rather do a team movie over pushing up one of the new solo movies such as Dr. Strange, Ant Man, etc.Never read the comics. Just wondering why there is a push to go make this a movie instead of sticking with the core avengers? ..... unless there is going to be a massive team up movie down the road. :O
Like Avengers, Fantastic Four, GotG and so on banding together to stop something huge.