[quote name='Endaar']Strell, when one of your earlier posts quotes me saying "world is SUPER black and white," when in fact I said nothing of the sort[/quote]
You're implying that anything that isn't factually governed shouldn't be considered. So when you cherry pick out quotes from the founding fathers to color them as religious, when in fact there's more quotes to the contrary, your entire response is nothing more than "gosh, doesn't look wrong to me."
your whole "LOL@" post covers the mischaracterizing.
I just find it funny that someone already claims books to be liberal propoganda, and then proceeds to act surprised when people raise objections to books that clearly underline something more in line with your own ideology.
Perfect example: Everyone watch the King of the Hill episode about the reenactment of the Alamo. In that episode, a director casts all of the heroes as cowardly drug addicts that were in Texas merely to kill Mexicans in order to boost their political status, hiding behind a "You can't prove it's not true!" barrier.
No, I can't. But since it can't be proven either way any way, it makes zero sense to start banking on one over the other.
Same idea here. Seems that everything I grew up learning in school is now completely bunk. FDR ruined our country, the Native Americans are brushed aside, our country is Christian-founded, Thomas Jefferson is no longer important, and the Civil War was "the great war of Yankee aggression."
This country has writing on the wall, and it's definitely showing up in these textbooks.
Edit: See? There we go. FDR extended the depression. It's only been in the last decade that I've heard the guy did anything negative, while also seeing Reagan fellatio skyrocketing.