Well, when you think about it, it's a lot more satisfying to know there are starving, sick children suffering horribly from disease in this country, but at least we're stopping Joe and Mark from having a fabulous wedding reception. Praise be.
First of all I don't have to answer yes or no questions.
Secondly, they apparently are less progressive on the issue of gay marriage, and in my opinion, lagging behind in terms of providing their gay and bi citizens with the right to engage in a civil union.
What kind of question is: "Is...
That stuff sure rolled off his tongue pretty easily. You don't just make an outburst like that out of the blue. Completely unfunny - this guy's career is toast, for good reason.
I guess if you see social progression as an advancement you might see it my way but if you don't, then of course, you would prefer to maintain things the way they are because allowing for gay couples to have similar rights as their straight counterparts isn't very important.
Because a country with the economy of a small American grocery store has the balls to tell their gay and bi (and "commonlaw") citizens that they're not second class anymore and one of the greatest countries in the world still has a military that considers being gay a disorder.