Been selling on amazon for past 3 months, have always heard how terrible an A to Z claim is, but never experienced one.
Just had my first.. terrible experience. I think the buyer intentionally scammed me and knows how to work the system.
Buyer placed an order, then emailed me telling me the item doesn't work. I know for a fact that it does, I test ALL of my games before listing them. I check to see that you can actually play and hold a save, it was perfect.
Responded back, telling him I will authorize the return and if I find it to be defective as he says, then I would be happy to give him a full refund.
I then respond once more, after noticing he didn't request a refund officially. So I told him to do so, so that I can accept it.
3 Hours later, I have an A to Z claim. I tell amazon my case, that I know that it worked. That I offered the buyer to return it to me, and that I would refund him. That I was timely in my responses (I responded in under 24 hours)
Then, once again hours later. I see that the A to Z claim was settled in the buyers favor.
After noticing this, I ask. Well then, where the hell is my game? How could he of already been refunded if I never received my game back?
Well turns out, as per amazon policy. The buyer is not required to send back the item. How is Amazon able to decide for me that the buyer gets to keep the item as well as get a refund? I don't know, but that seems like its on the border of being illegal. Amazon gave away something that they don't own.
I checked up on A to Z policy. The buyer has no grounds to open up the A to Z claim against me. The policy basically reads:
If a buyer contacts a seller and the seller does not respond, or if the seller is unsatisfactory in his response, the buyer is allowed to open an A to Z claim.
When he emailed me, all that I did was tell him that I would accept the return of my item and refund him in full.
Does anyone have any advice for me at all?
Just had my first.. terrible experience. I think the buyer intentionally scammed me and knows how to work the system.
Buyer placed an order, then emailed me telling me the item doesn't work. I know for a fact that it does, I test ALL of my games before listing them. I check to see that you can actually play and hold a save, it was perfect.
Responded back, telling him I will authorize the return and if I find it to be defective as he says, then I would be happy to give him a full refund.
I then respond once more, after noticing he didn't request a refund officially. So I told him to do so, so that I can accept it.
3 Hours later, I have an A to Z claim. I tell amazon my case, that I know that it worked. That I offered the buyer to return it to me, and that I would refund him. That I was timely in my responses (I responded in under 24 hours)
Then, once again hours later. I see that the A to Z claim was settled in the buyers favor.
After noticing this, I ask. Well then, where the hell is my game? How could he of already been refunded if I never received my game back?
Well turns out, as per amazon policy. The buyer is not required to send back the item. How is Amazon able to decide for me that the buyer gets to keep the item as well as get a refund? I don't know, but that seems like its on the border of being illegal. Amazon gave away something that they don't own.
I checked up on A to Z policy. The buyer has no grounds to open up the A to Z claim against me. The policy basically reads:
If a buyer contacts a seller and the seller does not respond, or if the seller is unsatisfactory in his response, the buyer is allowed to open an A to Z claim.
When he emailed me, all that I did was tell him that I would accept the return of my item and refund him in full.
Does anyone have any advice for me at all?