[quote name='bmulligan']You're a jackass communist. They aren't taking advantage of anything. This guy was taking an awful risk if MS decided to release 10 million consoles instead of 500,000. It's his property, he can do with it what he pleases. Your just pissed becuase you don't have one and can't afford to buy one from a guy like this. You should be offering to shoot Billy gates. After all, it's his company that is artificially restricting the supply. Didn't you take basic Econ ?[/QUOTE]
This is pure greed.
I'm sure whoever it was at Toys R Us that got him these 360's (if its not this guy himself), violated his agreement with his employer, and his employer's agreement with Microsoft. It should never have been his property in the first place, and he'll almost certainly be fired if he's caught. What right does an employee have to buy an entire store's supply, when they are restricted from doing so? Not only could he lose his job, he could be sued for damages. The store lost potential sales of accessories and games because none were sold to customers. Contractually, MS has the right to deny that store, and the entire chain, any future shipments. Is this appropriate, or legal, behavior for any employee? Is that employee not responsible for breeching Toys R Us's contract, because he made a few bucks?
By the way, I do have a 360, and I didn't buy it from someone like this. I also didn't spend 12 hours in line for it. And this isn't an artificial shortage, they have legitimate supply chain and manufacturing issues, though they did choose not to delay the launch until the spring. Delaying the launch after the announcement, and missing the holidays would have been a bigger disaster.