Alright, so here's the rundown:
Me and a friend of mine both purchase the Street Fighter press kits directly from Capcom last month and each of ours sold to the same seller.
Now, after 12 days have passed upon Delivery Confirmation of the Press Kit, the seller decides to file a dispute with both of us on the basis that the "item was not as described," in my case, there were supposed creases on the box.
The press kits had no flaws and remained in their shrink-wrap. They were packaged so securely in the shipping box, that there was no wiggle-room for the box to be damaged. Both our items were listed in "Brand New" condition, as we both kept the press kits in their shrink-wrapping and sealed the boxes up and shipped them out. The way that the press kits were packed with paper made it so that there was minimal to no room for the press kit to move within the box.
We both offered shipping insurance for a small fee on both of our auctions, yet he did not purchase it, wouldn't that mean he is at fault for any damage/loss of the package when I handed it over to USPS?
I also found some shady patterns in relation to his dispute. Our press kits both sold, but for different amounts. Out of ambiguity, kit B sold for twice as much as kit A. Yet, he asks for a full refund of kit A while he only wants a 50% refund of kit B, which sold for twice as much, which strikes me as odd.
He also claims to have won another SF press kit and claims that out of the 3 he purchased, both of ours were "not as described" and the other mystery one was perfect. Thing is, we can't find anything in his feedback or his feedback that he left for others on this third SF press kit. I did however find that he won a MegaMan press kit from another seller and he also complained with the same "item not as described" bullshit story.
From what I know, it's confirmed that he's bought 3 Capcom press kits from various sellers, and claims that all 3 were somehow damaged.
Not sure where to go with this, other than it seems like he's trying to pull some shady shit on me and my friend. The "missing" 3rd "perfect" press kit, the 3 out of 3 "damaged" press kits that he's received, the different refund amounts, doesn't seem to add up to a legit argument to me.
Me and a friend of mine both purchase the Street Fighter press kits directly from Capcom last month and each of ours sold to the same seller.
Now, after 12 days have passed upon Delivery Confirmation of the Press Kit, the seller decides to file a dispute with both of us on the basis that the "item was not as described," in my case, there were supposed creases on the box.
The press kits had no flaws and remained in their shrink-wrap. They were packaged so securely in the shipping box, that there was no wiggle-room for the box to be damaged. Both our items were listed in "Brand New" condition, as we both kept the press kits in their shrink-wrapping and sealed the boxes up and shipped them out. The way that the press kits were packed with paper made it so that there was minimal to no room for the press kit to move within the box.
We both offered shipping insurance for a small fee on both of our auctions, yet he did not purchase it, wouldn't that mean he is at fault for any damage/loss of the package when I handed it over to USPS?
I also found some shady patterns in relation to his dispute. Our press kits both sold, but for different amounts. Out of ambiguity, kit B sold for twice as much as kit A. Yet, he asks for a full refund of kit A while he only wants a 50% refund of kit B, which sold for twice as much, which strikes me as odd.
He also claims to have won another SF press kit and claims that out of the 3 he purchased, both of ours were "not as described" and the other mystery one was perfect. Thing is, we can't find anything in his feedback or his feedback that he left for others on this third SF press kit. I did however find that he won a MegaMan press kit from another seller and he also complained with the same "item not as described" bullshit story.
From what I know, it's confirmed that he's bought 3 Capcom press kits from various sellers, and claims that all 3 were somehow damaged.
Not sure where to go with this, other than it seems like he's trying to pull some shady shit on me and my friend. The "missing" 3rd "perfect" press kit, the 3 out of 3 "damaged" press kits that he's received, the different refund amounts, doesn't seem to add up to a legit argument to me.
Last edited by a moderator: