up the case like Sanford PD. If there's a drive through, there's a camera. up the case like Sanford PD. If there's a drive through, there's a camera. 
ing car. Hell, not to mention that you'd have to be in a pretty crazy situation to discharge a firearm in a car too. Shit like that can make you deaf.There's been a Very long history that continues to this day where white offenders get off much more easier than they should. The only recent case that comes to mind where punishment fit the crime was where New Orleans Police Officers gunned down black people in Katrina and covered it up. Feel free to educate yourself on that case.
If you didn't, you wouldn't have mentioned it.
Please contrast and compare, in detail, this case and the Sandford case.
Good thing that there's more than likely video of the incident.
Compare and contrast little buddy.
Lots of horrible cases don't make national news.
If he swung at the door, that's technically assault.
So the shooter doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt? This is news to me because you were posting link afer link after link in the other thread about Zimmerman as if his previous encounters with the police were irrelevant to the shooting as if they were libel.
No one witnessed Zimmerman shoot Martin, there wasn't any possibility of video, there were no witnesses or record of what happened after the 911 call and before the struggle. I'd say these are pretty important differences. And again, no one is defending the shooter here.
This is actually hilarious because in the other thread, you said that race didn't matter and that this should be an indictment on lax guns laws. The irony is palpable.
No one's being portrayed as a white knight or thug in this case nor does either party respectively have a habit of arguing with random dog walkers or random cars at a drive through. Atkins was developmentally challenged and he shouldn't have been shot, but that doesn't mean that they're the exact same thing that warrant the exact same public out cry. Hell, since you're so outraged by it, why don't you gather up some like-minded people and do a march at the nearest/biggest black neighborhood and proclaim that you want justice for Atkins.
Why should I have the same outrage if the only things the case have in common is someone being shot and killed with one person being black and another white. If you're trying to expose me as a hypocrite, you're going to have to look deeper than using tenuous reasoning.
So in other words, you and all the other white knights in this thread are race baiting. Glad we cleared up your confusion.
Hahaha...why should I question him? I know exactly what he means and I agree with him. I'm not the one denying race was an integral part of the Martin case and while there might be a racial component in this one, it's still not the same type(not talking black shooter:white victim) and it's from a perspective that you don't really understand, one of which is that you don't get to trot out the race card while throwing out the history of race relations(more like domination) in this country.
You provided your own definition. Now apply it to yourself, slidecage, and GBAstar to see if it fits. Oh, and show your work.
You made an equivalence between this case and the Martin case while saying that no one gives a shit when the victim is white. Where's the outrage, right?
Evidence?
AhaAHAhAha...what kind of person am I? Provide examples with proof.
ing thread title and in several posts. This is exactly the type of sentiment that spilled over from the other thread regarding how people only care if it's a black person beat/shot/killed by a white person/people. It's a lame attempt to highlight the joke of a concept called "reverse racism."Why doesn't every single case make national news then? There are about dozen cases that I've been following for the last year that haven't made national news that are very similar, and in some cases worse, than the Martin case because they were actually perpetrated by the police.
