Has anyone had to break a lease? I am about half way into my current lease, and the company that I worked for closed their CT site. My new job is in the Phila area, so commuting from this apartment is definately not realistic.
I talked with a guy from the rental office, and he seemed like they wanted to be reasonable. I received a paper today that asked when I would be leaving, and said that I would be liable for rent until the end of my lease unless the landlord would find another tenant in the meantime. In addition, a fee is being assessed against my security deposit for breaking the lease. A statement was made on said paper that if I provided an incorrect date, the landlord intended to sue me (breaking contract plus money for inconveniencing the new resident). This complex is owned by a company in NYC, for what that is worth.
I won't have my moving estimate done until next week, and, even though my intention is to push for a quick move, I won't know the exact date until after this estimate is complete. Given the statement about potentially suing me, it is tempting to eat a few weeks rent to be on the conservative side.
Based on your experience, is this standard? Were you liable for paying utilities up until the end, even though you were not living in the place? What about repairs to the apartment that were clearly not your fault (roof leaked, for example), but might prevent another tenant from moving in immediately if noticed? Did you need to retain a lawyer's services for breaking your lease, or am I stressing out too much about the worst case scenerios?
Thanks.
I talked with a guy from the rental office, and he seemed like they wanted to be reasonable. I received a paper today that asked when I would be leaving, and said that I would be liable for rent until the end of my lease unless the landlord would find another tenant in the meantime. In addition, a fee is being assessed against my security deposit for breaking the lease. A statement was made on said paper that if I provided an incorrect date, the landlord intended to sue me (breaking contract plus money for inconveniencing the new resident). This complex is owned by a company in NYC, for what that is worth.
I won't have my moving estimate done until next week, and, even though my intention is to push for a quick move, I won't know the exact date until after this estimate is complete. Given the statement about potentially suing me, it is tempting to eat a few weeks rent to be on the conservative side.
Based on your experience, is this standard? Were you liable for paying utilities up until the end, even though you were not living in the place? What about repairs to the apartment that were clearly not your fault (roof leaked, for example), but might prevent another tenant from moving in immediately if noticed? Did you need to retain a lawyer's services for breaking your lease, or am I stressing out too much about the worst case scenerios?
Thanks.