Capcom having troubles with PS2 port of Resident Evil 4
- Thread starter AdamInPlaidum
- Start date
[quote name='jer7583']the 24 to 8 bits of memory applies to textures. GC RE4 textures can contain 24 bit color data. For example, when you're near a texture in a PS2 game, it's more likely that the texture will look blotchy and smudged, because the anti-aliasing has to smudge the texture, so that it can hide how blocky the image has become when enlarged.
On Gamecube, when you're near that same wall, since it can store higher quality texture data, there is less smudging going on to hide blockyness. This also makes it much much easier to do things like bump mapping and normal mapping, and why the GC game textures can be higher quality and clearer than PS2 games. That's not always the case, because a lot of developers are lazy and consider the gc a system for shovelware..
Hope that clears things up a bit. Those articles just wrote it without knowing what it meant, but it is an important difference.[/quote]
The problem is, that approach to stating the problem is incorrect. It implies hardware limitations in the PS2 that are simply untrue. The big issue is the additional 8 megabytes of RAM in the GameCube and how quickly textures can be moved around in that memory.
On the PS2 all of this has to fit in the 32 MB of main RAM with just a subset living in the Graphic Synthesizer's 4 MB of local memory. To make the textures fit in the available RAM lower detail is used with an emphasis for the distance that most frequently appears in the game. This means some loss of quality when an object is approached very closely but such is life. Texture quality could be maintained but it would mean making other choices, such as curtailing the size of environments to require more frequent disc accessing. If Sony hadn't screwed the pooch on hard drive support they could do RE4 as a game exclusively for the hard drive since that would provide fast enough caching to overcome much of the RAM limitations. For some unfathomable reason Sony designed the machine to support a drive and then spent years trying to remember why. A MMORPG should not have been the sole rationale for its existence. Such a version of RE4 would still attract taunts from GameCube aficianados but Sony would be crying all the way to the bank.
Part of this is just a matter of the bill of material for a design frozen in 1999 as opposed to a year later. The choice of how much RAM could be used for a reasonable cost forever after decides what the console can and cannot do. IF you gave PS2 developers a choice between 10% more RAM and 10% greater speed, they'll take the RAM almost unanimously. It does a lot more for you in the long run. (Just imagine if the Xbox had 128 MB as the motherboard designed allowed for.)
On Gamecube, when you're near that same wall, since it can store higher quality texture data, there is less smudging going on to hide blockyness. This also makes it much much easier to do things like bump mapping and normal mapping, and why the GC game textures can be higher quality and clearer than PS2 games. That's not always the case, because a lot of developers are lazy and consider the gc a system for shovelware..
Hope that clears things up a bit. Those articles just wrote it without knowing what it meant, but it is an important difference.[/quote]
The problem is, that approach to stating the problem is incorrect. It implies hardware limitations in the PS2 that are simply untrue. The big issue is the additional 8 megabytes of RAM in the GameCube and how quickly textures can be moved around in that memory.
On the PS2 all of this has to fit in the 32 MB of main RAM with just a subset living in the Graphic Synthesizer's 4 MB of local memory. To make the textures fit in the available RAM lower detail is used with an emphasis for the distance that most frequently appears in the game. This means some loss of quality when an object is approached very closely but such is life. Texture quality could be maintained but it would mean making other choices, such as curtailing the size of environments to require more frequent disc accessing. If Sony hadn't screwed the pooch on hard drive support they could do RE4 as a game exclusively for the hard drive since that would provide fast enough caching to overcome much of the RAM limitations. For some unfathomable reason Sony designed the machine to support a drive and then spent years trying to remember why. A MMORPG should not have been the sole rationale for its existence. Such a version of RE4 would still attract taunts from GameCube aficianados but Sony would be crying all the way to the bank.
Part of this is just a matter of the bill of material for a design frozen in 1999 as opposed to a year later. The choice of how much RAM could be used for a reasonable cost forever after decides what the console can and cannot do. IF you gave PS2 developers a choice between 10% more RAM and 10% greater speed, they'll take the RAM almost unanimously. It does a lot more for you in the long run. (Just imagine if the Xbox had 128 MB as the motherboard designed allowed for.)
[quote name='dcfox'][quote name='cheapass Gundam']
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.
[quote name='dpatel'][quote name='dcfox'][quote name='cheapass Gundam']
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.[/quote]
I'm not sure what you meant by "handled." was the xbox version of MGS2 bad?
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.[/quote]
I'm not sure what you meant by "handled." was the xbox version of MGS2 bad?
cheapass Gundam
CAGiversary!
[quote name='Milkyman'][quote name='dpatel'][quote name='dcfox'][quote name='cheapass Gundam']
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.[/quote]
I'm not sure what you meant by "handled." was the xbox version of MGS2 bad?[/quote]
Yes. It had framerate issues despite the allegedly superior graphics over the PS2 hardware.
Cheap ass link
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.[/quote]
I'm not sure what you meant by "handled." was the xbox version of MGS2 bad?[/quote]
Yes. It had framerate issues despite the allegedly superior graphics over the PS2 hardware.
Cheap ass link
sisco1986
CAGiversary!
It's all about the code. If you rebuild a game from the ground up, to take full advantage of the system and if the skill of the developer is top notch, you get eye candy on any system. Take a look at Silent Hill 3, some of best lighting on a console, high poly character models, detailed backgrounds, wonder full textures, looks stunning. Why does it look so good? Because Konami took full advantage of the hardware it had, and sculpted a hell of engine out of the system. Now, If Capcom rebuilds the RE4 engine from the ground up, taking full advantage of the system, I'm more than sure they can make a stunning looking RE4 on the PS2. If they directly port the GCN version over to the PS2, it's obviously not going to look as good and the game visual will go down some notches. I doubt (And Hope) Capcom will not release a half assed product, to soil the RE4 name. I don't understand why everyones having a titty attack over Resident Evil 4 port not looking as good as the GCN version, it's like a penis measuring contest with some of you. Will it look as good? Maybe not, but if it looks decent and the gameplay stays intact I don't understand how the game is going to suck, last time I checked GamePlay made a game great, not the graphics. The bottom line is this, no-body knows how it will look like we can make assumptions all we want but at the end of the day there just assumptions, I have faith in capcom making a good product for mono PS2 users unlike some. By the way, I own RE4 for the cube and wont be picking up the PS2 version (why wait a year if I can get it now?).
I know^
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
That, and the $ony cronies won't try anything else, other than the company that has the best controller for Madden.
The XBox is probably the most capable system I've ever used. The GameCube would be right beside M$, if they had a strong online presence, a larger medium, or an internal HDD to compensate for the smaller medium.
3rd parties would flock to the Big N, if they had a bit more to work with.
It's a shame though,,.............. for what the GC brings to the table, you'd think that people would give it a try.
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
Sorry CAGs, but the PS2 is garbage.
Also sorry for straying.
GOD,................. MilkyMan,............. tell me she can be cloned and purchased.
PLEASE!!!!
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
That, and the $ony cronies won't try anything else, other than the company that has the best controller for Madden.
The XBox is probably the most capable system I've ever used. The GameCube would be right beside M$, if they had a strong online presence, a larger medium, or an internal HDD to compensate for the smaller medium.
3rd parties would flock to the Big N, if they had a bit more to work with.
It's a shame though,,.............. for what the GC brings to the table, you'd think that people would give it a try.
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
Sorry CAGs, but the PS2 is garbage.
Also sorry for straying.
GOD,................. MilkyMan,............. tell me she can be cloned and purchased.
PLEASE!!!!
zionoverfire
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 133 (100%)
[quote name='drone8888']I know^
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
That, and the $ony cronies won't try anything else, other than the company that has the best controller for Madden.
The XBox is probably the most capable system I've ever used. The GameCube would be right beside M$, if they had a strong online presence, a larger medium, or an internal HDD to compensate for the smaller medium.
3rd parties would flock to the Big N, if they had a bit more to work with.
It's a shame though,,.............. for what the GC brings to the table, you'd think that people would give it a try.
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
Sorry CAGs, but the PS2 is garbage.
[/quote]
:lol: I just love how the PS2 is such "garbage" but everyone buys them up anyhow. God what are these idots thinking? Buying a system that actually has more than a handful of games you might actually want to play? What idiots!
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
That, and the $ony cronies won't try anything else, other than the company that has the best controller for Madden.
The XBox is probably the most capable system I've ever used. The GameCube would be right beside M$, if they had a strong online presence, a larger medium, or an internal HDD to compensate for the smaller medium.
3rd parties would flock to the Big N, if they had a bit more to work with.
It's a shame though,,.............. for what the GC brings to the table, you'd think that people would give it a try.
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
Sorry CAGs, but the PS2 is garbage.
[/quote]
:lol: I just love how the PS2 is such "garbage" but everyone buys them up anyhow. God what are these idots thinking? Buying a system that actually has more than a handful of games you might actually want to play? What idiots!
pumbaa
CAGiversary!
[quote name='jngx80']Hey everyone seems to be forgetting how Capcom makes Devil May Cry, Onimusha, and Maximo for the PS2 only. I'll take any of these three series over the RE series. Only part RE4 seems cool, I really like how it goes to over the shoulder view when you start aiming.[/quote]
So you mean the whole game then?
So you mean the whole game then?
sisco1986
CAGiversary!
[quote name='drone8888']I know^
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
That, and the $ony cronies won't try anything else, other than the company that has the best controller for Madden.
The XBox is probably the most capable system I've ever used. The GameCube would be right beside M$, if they had a strong online presence, a larger medium, or an internal HDD to compensate for the smaller medium.
3rd parties would flock to the Big N, if they had a bit more to work with.
It's a shame though,,.............. for what the GC brings to the table, you'd think that people would give it a try.
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
Sorry CAGs, but the PS2 is garbage.
Also sorry for straying.
GOD,................. MilkyMan,............. tell me she can be cloned and purchased.
PLEASE!!!![/quote]
A gamer games for the games, not features, cool factor, specs or anything else. I own every this generation console (and every past generation consoles for that mater) because I love to play games nothing more. You'd be wise to to keep that in mind, instead of just bashing a system becasue of it's weak points. It's fine to like a brand/console over another, nothing wrong with that but just saying "FLUCK! YOU! YOU ARE TEH SUCK! NANANANANANANANAAN AND I WON'T BUY YOU!!" is just pretty lame and makes gamers look stupid. There should be a systems wars section to keep you guys caged in one area.
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
That, and the $ony cronies won't try anything else, other than the company that has the best controller for Madden.
The XBox is probably the most capable system I've ever used. The GameCube would be right beside M$, if they had a strong online presence, a larger medium, or an internal HDD to compensate for the smaller medium.
3rd parties would flock to the Big N, if they had a bit more to work with.
It's a shame though,,.............. for what the GC brings to the table, you'd think that people would give it a try.
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
Sorry CAGs, but the PS2 is garbage.
Also sorry for straying.
GOD,................. MilkyMan,............. tell me she can be cloned and purchased.
PLEASE!!!![/quote]
A gamer games for the games, not features, cool factor, specs or anything else. I own every this generation console (and every past generation consoles for that mater) because I love to play games nothing more. You'd be wise to to keep that in mind, instead of just bashing a system becasue of it's weak points. It's fine to like a brand/console over another, nothing wrong with that but just saying "FLUCK! YOU! YOU ARE TEH SUCK! NANANANANANANANAAN AND I WON'T BUY YOU!!" is just pretty lame and makes gamers look stupid. There should be a systems wars section to keep you guys caged in one area.
[quote name='Milkyman'][quote name='dpatel'][quote name='dcfox'][quote name='cheapass Gundam']
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.[/quote]
I'm not sure what you meant by "handled." was the xbox version of MGS2 bad?[/quote]
Yep, they screwed it up big time. You can't do straight ports from the PS2. None of the other existing systems have a pipeline arranged the way the PS2 does things. It's one thing if you have an engine with optimized version for each platform that can use a lot of the same data unmodifed. The people Konami handed the Xbox port of MGS 2 to tried to get away with directly porting code optimized for the PS2's unique design instead of creating a proper engine for the Xbox. Since there was a PC version on the way as well it's a mystery why they took this stupidly cheap approach. Even worse, a lot of the effect they sweated blood to get from the PS2 were almost trivial to create with the Xbox's pixel shaders.
Going between Xbox and Gamecube is much easier. They have much more in common structurally. An RE4 port to Xbox would fairly painless.
If the GC is such a superior platform, how come no one's bothered to port MGS3 and GTA to the GC yet?[/quote]
Well I don't think theres any doubt that the GC can handle MGS3 and GTA.[/quote]
just like XBOX "handled" MGS2.
If those 2 games were made from the ground up for the GC then it could definetly handle it, same with MGS2 for XBOX. The problem is porting over a game originally meant for one system onto a completely different system.[/quote]
I'm not sure what you meant by "handled." was the xbox version of MGS2 bad?[/quote]
Yep, they screwed it up big time. You can't do straight ports from the PS2. None of the other existing systems have a pipeline arranged the way the PS2 does things. It's one thing if you have an engine with optimized version for each platform that can use a lot of the same data unmodifed. The people Konami handed the Xbox port of MGS 2 to tried to get away with directly porting code optimized for the PS2's unique design instead of creating a proper engine for the Xbox. Since there was a PC version on the way as well it's a mystery why they took this stupidly cheap approach. Even worse, a lot of the effect they sweated blood to get from the PS2 were almost trivial to create with the Xbox's pixel shaders.
Going between Xbox and Gamecube is much easier. They have much more in common structurally. An RE4 port to Xbox would fairly painless.
[quote name='drone8888']I know^
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
[/quote]
Her name is Waka Inoue, there's a small gallery of her here: http://clean.scanlover.com/waka-inoue/
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
[/quote]
Her name is Waka Inoue, there's a small gallery of her here: http://clean.scanlover.com/waka-inoue/
MaxBiaggi3
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 8 (100%)
[quote name='zionoverfire']Buying a system that actually has more than a handful of games you might actually want to play? What idiots![/quote]
I think all the systems have more than a handful of games worth playing, but I guess you're saying that's not the case for you. Let me take a wild guess here: the only system with more than a handful of games worth playing just happens to be the one system you own. It's strange how it worked out that way, heh?
I think all the systems have more than a handful of games worth playing, but I guess you're saying that's not the case for you. Let me take a wild guess here: the only system with more than a handful of games worth playing just happens to be the one system you own. It's strange how it worked out that way, heh?
crystalklear64
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 7 (100%)
[quote name='whoknows']I got a GC because RE and that is mostly what I have for it, and I feel that the GC purchase was worth the RE games. I got my PS2 for everything else, and my Xbox for.....ummm...well its actually just been sitting there collecting dust for a few months.
But I bet they get RE4 on the PS2 sooner or later, because they want more money. I feel this is good, so any non gamecube owners can experience RE4, because its such an awesome game.[/quote]
Woo! Share the love baby, share the love.
But I bet they get RE4 on the PS2 sooner or later, because they want more money. I feel this is good, so any non gamecube owners can experience RE4, because its such an awesome game.[/quote]
Woo! Share the love baby, share the love.
legion_stxds
CAGiversary!
Wow... didn't see this one coming... not.
[quote name='drone8888']
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
[/quote]
the ONLY thing? So basically you are saying if it weren't for the games, PS2 wouldn't be successful.
[quote name='drone8888']
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
[/quote]
Yes, because that is what I use to decide on what system I should get. It doesn't matter about the games, controller, online capabalities. As long as I have my ProScan, I'll be a happy gamer.
[quote name='drone8888']
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
[/quote]
And when mario games start showing up on other systems you will see a giant kneel away from nintendo. Same with FPS/action games for xbox. That is a pretty weak argument. ONLY rpg's and exclusives. That is a pretty big selection.
[quote name='drone8888']
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
[/quote]
The overally game will be about the same. Just the details that you mentioned will be inferior like polygon counts, load times, etc.. It will still be a great game for people who don't own a cube. If you have a cube and prefer that system, then get it for the cube. No need to whine that other people might be able to enjoy such a great game even if it will graphically inferior. If RE4 had only come to the PS2 then no one would really be complaining about inferiority. This is just a chance for cube fanboys to show that their system is superior. It's hard to compare the two based on this game. Cube has its strengths and so does Ps2.
If a game was built from the ground up on each system, then compared, it would be a much better comparison. I know that cube will still win simply because it had an extra year on the ps2 but the results would be much closer.
[quote name='drone8888']
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
[/quote]
What happened to your argument that cube was superior. Oh because they don't have online capabilities you decided to jump ship and support xbox.
Xbox live is superior in every way to online but for some people it is not as convenient. If I had the time, I would definetly prefer live over my ps2 online. BUt some months I rarely go without playing games online. Which is why I like my ps2 and pc online set up. I don't have to feel obligated to play because I am paying for it, but it is just there when I need it. I'm not much of an online gamer so ps2 is better for me despite having way more flaws than xbox. Usually when I do game online its with people I know so I don't have to worry about cheaters.
[quote name='drone8888']
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
[/quote]
We're cheapasses. Who cares if it isn't as good. Its FREE. I'd take it even it isn't as good. It's not costing me anything extra.
Anyway,......... GameCube is superior to the PS2.
The RPGs, and exclusives are the ONLY thing that keeps the PS2 afloat.
[/quote]
the ONLY thing? So basically you are saying if it weren't for the games, PS2 wouldn't be successful.
[quote name='drone8888']
Looking at ratios,....... the GC brings more ProScan games than the XBox, and the XBox delivers 5.1.
These 2 systems most DEFINITELY BLOW $ony out of the water.
[/quote]
Yes, because that is what I use to decide on what system I should get. It doesn't matter about the games, controller, online capabalities. As long as I have my ProScan, I'll be a happy gamer.
[quote name='drone8888']
When some more developers start developing RPGs, and obscurities for systems OTHER THAN $ony,.... you'll see the giant kneel.
[/quote]
And when mario games start showing up on other systems you will see a giant kneel away from nintendo. Same with FPS/action games for xbox. That is a pretty weak argument. ONLY rpg's and exclusives. That is a pretty big selection.
[quote name='drone8888']
RE4 is going to be alright on the PS2,......... but compared to the GC version,... it will fall VERY short.
No ProScan support, no surround sound, and horrid loading times.
[/quote]
The overally game will be about the same. Just the details that you mentioned will be inferior like polygon counts, load times, etc.. It will still be a great game for people who don't own a cube. If you have a cube and prefer that system, then get it for the cube. No need to whine that other people might be able to enjoy such a great game even if it will graphically inferior. If RE4 had only come to the PS2 then no one would really be complaining about inferiority. This is just a chance for cube fanboys to show that their system is superior. It's hard to compare the two based on this game. Cube has its strengths and so does Ps2.
If a game was built from the ground up on each system, then compared, it would be a much better comparison. I know that cube will still win simply because it had an extra year on the ps2 but the results would be much closer.
[quote name='drone8888']
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
[/quote]
What happened to your argument that cube was superior. Oh because they don't have online capabilities you decided to jump ship and support xbox.
Xbox live is superior in every way to online but for some people it is not as convenient. If I had the time, I would definetly prefer live over my ps2 online. BUt some months I rarely go without playing games online. Which is why I like my ps2 and pc online set up. I don't have to feel obligated to play because I am paying for it, but it is just there when I need it. I'm not much of an online gamer so ps2 is better for me despite having way more flaws than xbox. Usually when I do game online its with people I know so I don't have to worry about cheaters.
[quote name='drone8888']
I'd rather pay for the amounts of greatness on LIVE, than get jack sheot for free.
[/quote]
We're cheapasses. Who cares if it isn't as good. Its FREE. I'd take it even it isn't as good. It's not costing me anything extra.
hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban(AL QUAIDA) tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
You're turban(AL QUAIDA) tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[quote name='drone8888']
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
[/quote]
Oh the irony...
I wasn't putting down any system. I just pointing out that your reasons were pretty ignorant.
For the record. You can own as many systems and games as you want and still be a fanboy. Example: you.
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
[/quote]
Oh the irony...
I wasn't putting down any system. I just pointing out that your reasons were pretty ignorant.
For the record. You can own as many systems and games as you want and still be a fanboy. Example: you.
willardhaven
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 12 (100%)
Drone, go slit your wrists.
cheapass Gundam
CAGiversary!
[quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
WTF are turban tactics?!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
WTF are turban tactics?!
[quote name='drone8888']
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
funny...
[quote name='drone8888']
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
[/quote]
How so. Are they forcing you to buy it? Are they taking away the RE4 game that you have bought and been enjoying for weeks now? No. They are just letting other people who can't afford to have more than one system play it.
[quote name='drone8888']
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
[/quote]
I never said they weren't superior. I know its true they have better hardware simply because they had a year extra to develop their consoles. The only thing I said that was better on the PS2 (hardware-wise) was ps2 online. Still, that is a matter of preference. I know the xbox live has more capabilities and is more user friendly, but I just don't have the time to spend money on it. Which is why I prefer ps2 online.
[quote name='drone8888']
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
[/quote]
If all ps2 games are bottom of the barrel. How come you have "more" ps2 games than me.
[quote name='drone8888']
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
[/quote]
I'd take free online over no online.
Explain to me how these ps2 games are crap:
Metal Gear Solid 3, ICO, Ratchet & Clank, Devil May Cry, Jak & Daxter, Katamari Damacy, Grand Theft Auto, Final Fantasy, Suikoden, Gran Turismo, Twisted Metal, Disgaea, Ace Combat, Shadow Hearts, Beyond Good and Evil, Kingdom Hearts, Silent Hill, Tekken, and the list goes on..
[quote name='drone8888']
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]
Look at me. I can say "STFU" several times too!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
funny...
[quote name='drone8888']
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
[/quote]
How so. Are they forcing you to buy it? Are they taking away the RE4 game that you have bought and been enjoying for weeks now? No. They are just letting other people who can't afford to have more than one system play it.
[quote name='drone8888']
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
[/quote]
I never said they weren't superior. I know its true they have better hardware simply because they had a year extra to develop their consoles. The only thing I said that was better on the PS2 (hardware-wise) was ps2 online. Still, that is a matter of preference. I know the xbox live has more capabilities and is more user friendly, but I just don't have the time to spend money on it. Which is why I prefer ps2 online.
[quote name='drone8888']
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
[/quote]
If all ps2 games are bottom of the barrel. How come you have "more" ps2 games than me.
[quote name='drone8888']
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
[/quote]
I'd take free online over no online.
Explain to me how these ps2 games are crap:
Metal Gear Solid 3, ICO, Ratchet & Clank, Devil May Cry, Jak & Daxter, Katamari Damacy, Grand Theft Auto, Final Fantasy, Suikoden, Gran Turismo, Twisted Metal, Disgaea, Ace Combat, Shadow Hearts, Beyond Good and Evil, Kingdom Hearts, Silent Hill, Tekken, and the list goes on..
[quote name='drone8888']
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]Look at me. I can say "STFU" several times too!
[quote name='RedvsBlue'][quote name='cheapass Gundam'][quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
WTF are turban tactics?!
[/quote]
A racist slur I'd assume.[/quote]
yea. I'm indian. I guess its supposed to be funny.
Funny pic btw.
...Its true
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
WTF are turban tactics?!
A racist slur I'd assume.[/quote]
yea. I'm indian. I guess its supposed to be funny.
Funny pic btw.
...Its true
Trancendental
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 4 (100%)
I also was going to say something about "turban tactics"
Falls into that category of "so stupid it's funny"
Foolish Jedi, your turban tactics are no use on me.
Falls into that category of "so stupid it's funny"
Foolish Jedi, your turban tactics are no use on me.
[quote name='Milkyman'][quote name='drone8888']I know^
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
[/quote]
Her name is Waka Inoue, there's a small gallery of her here: http://clean.scanlover.com/waka-inoue/[/quote]
Instant wood. I now love you too Milkyman.
everytime Milkyman makes a post, I get a hard on.
Who is that goddess???
[/quote]
Her name is Waka Inoue, there's a small gallery of her here: http://clean.scanlover.com/waka-inoue/[/quote]
Instant wood. I now love you too Milkyman.
crystalklear64
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 7 (100%)
[quote name='dpatel']
[quote name='drone8888']
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
[/quote]
What happened to your argument that cube was superior. Oh because they don't have online capabilities you decided to jump ship and support xbox.
[/quote]
A fatty LOL to that one.
Actually, doesn't MKD have online capabilities? I know I saw a broadband connector for the GCN this weekend somewhere... I'm constantly slamming the GC for its lack of online play, but its all in good fun. I know each sys has its problems, you choose the sys that you feel has the most acceptable issues.
[quote name='drone8888']
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
[/quote]
What happened to your argument that cube was superior. Oh because they don't have online capabilities you decided to jump ship and support xbox.
[/quote]
A fatty LOL to that one.
Actually, doesn't MK
D have online capabilities? I know I saw a broadband connector for the GCN this weekend somewhere... I'm constantly slamming the GC for its lack of online play, but its all in good fun. I know each sys has its problems, you choose the sys that you feel has the most acceptable issues.[quote name='crystalklear64'][quote name='dpatel']
[quote name='drone8888']
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
[/quote]
What happened to your argument that cube was superior. Oh because they don't have online capabilities you decided to jump ship and support xbox.
[/quote]
A fatty LOL to that one.
Actually, doesn't MKD have online capabilities? I know I saw a broadband connector for the GCN this weekend somewhere... I'm constantly slamming the GC for its lack of online play, but its all in good fun. I know each sys has its problems, you choose the sys that you feel has the most acceptable issues.[/quote]
I wasn't really making fun of GC online. I don't mind that it doesn't have online. I was just making fun of his poor arguments.
BTW, the only online game it has is phantaasy star. Some games like Mario Kart are LAN and can be tricked into playing online via warpipe.com or something similar.
[quote name='drone8888']
BTW,........... the PS2's online capabilities SUCK!!!
LIVE! is by far, the most easily accessed, updated, and overall BEST service so far!!!! Worth every cheapass cent!!!
[/quote]
What happened to your argument that cube was superior. Oh because they don't have online capabilities you decided to jump ship and support xbox.
[/quote]
A fatty LOL to that one.
Actually, doesn't MK
D have online capabilities? I know I saw a broadband connector for the GCN this weekend somewhere... I'm constantly slamming the GC for its lack of online play, but its all in good fun. I know each sys has its problems, you choose the sys that you feel has the most acceptable issues.[/quote]I wasn't really making fun of GC online. I don't mind that it doesn't have online. I was just making fun of his poor arguments.
BTW, the only online game it has is phantaasy star. Some games like Mario Kart are LAN and can be tricked into playing online via warpipe.com or something similar.
legion_stxds
CAGiversary!
[quote name='cheapass Gundam'][quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
WTF are turban tactics?!
[/quote]
I know it's wrong... but I like this pic!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
[/quote]
WTF are turban tactics?!
I know it's wrong... but I like this pic!
XboxMaster
CAGiversary!
Why have regular users continued to argue with these noobs on our forums? All you need is a quick sentence saying they're a noob and ending it at that.
[quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]
I used to respect you and your opinion.. especially since you've been here for so long.. but seriously, go the
back to gamefaqs. Your best defense is namecalling, and even a ing racial slur. You're trying to force your opinion on someone. You can't force opinions. I hope you're banned.
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]I used to respect you and your opinion.. especially since you've been here for so long.. but seriously, go the
back to gamefaqs. Your best defense is namecalling, and even a ing racial slur. You're trying to force your opinion on someone. You can't force opinions. I hope you're banned.
[quote name='whoknows'][quote name='evilmax17']I remember when they were having trouble porting Code Veronica to the Ps2.[/quote]
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).
[quote name='kaji7p56'][quote name='whoknows'][quote name='evilmax17']I remember when they were having trouble porting Code Veronica to the Ps2.[/quote]
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).[/quote]
Yeah, but wasn't the PS2 and DC hardware pretty different? That could have helped causing the problems. And asl ong as the PS2 version plays as good as the GC version who cares what it looks like?
[quote name='Scorch'][quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]
I used to respect you and your opinion.. especially since you've been here for so long.. but seriously, go the shaq-fu back to gamefaqs. Your best defense is namecalling, and even a shaq-fuing racial slur. You're trying to force your opinion on someone. You can't force opinions. I hope you're banned.[/quote]
I agree he should be banned for using a racial slur, and his last posts really show he is a gamefaqer...
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).[/quote]
Yeah, but wasn't the PS2 and DC hardware pretty different? That could have helped causing the problems. And asl ong as the PS2 version plays as good as the GC version who cares what it looks like?
[quote name='Scorch'][quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]I used to respect you and your opinion.. especially since you've been here for so long.. but seriously, go the shaq-fu back to gamefaqs. Your best defense is namecalling, and even a shaq-fuing racial slur. You're trying to force your opinion on someone. You can't force opinions. I hope you're banned.[/quote]
I agree he should be banned for using a racial slur, and his last posts really show he is a gamefaqer...
[quote name='"whoknows"'][quote name='kaji7p56'][quote name='whoknows'][quote name='evilmax17']I remember when they were having trouble porting Code Veronica to the Ps2.[/quote]
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).[/quote]
Yeah, but wasn't the PS2 and DC hardware pretty different? That could have helped causing the problems. And asl ong as the PS2 version plays as good as the GC version who cares what it looks like?
---------------------------------------------------------
Well, if you don't mind the graphics, then it should play alright.
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).[/quote]
Yeah, but wasn't the PS2 and DC hardware pretty different? That could have helped causing the problems. And asl ong as the PS2 version plays as good as the GC version who cares what it looks like?
---------------------------------------------------------
Well, if you don't mind the graphics, then it should play alright.
[quote name='"kaji7p56"'][quote name='whoknows'][quote name='kaji7p56'][quote name='whoknows'][quote name='evilmax17']I remember when they were having trouble porting Code Veronica to the Ps2.[/quote]
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).[/quote]
Yeah, but wasn't the PS2 and DC hardware pretty different? That could have helped causing the problems. And asl ong as the PS2 version plays as good as the GC version who cares what it looks like?
---------------------------------------------------------
Well, if you don't mind the graphics, then it should play alright.[/quote]
I already have the GC version, and will get the PS2 version for the fact that its a RE game. Besides I doubt it will look really bad. I think it will look pretty good, but by no means as good as the GC version.
They were? Oh well that turned out well...maybe there is hope for RE4.[/quote]
I'm not so sure. The PS2 had more power than the Dreamcast (where Code Veronica debuted). Now, it's the other way around (Cube is more powerful, so the PS2 version won't look nearly as good).[/quote]
Yeah, but wasn't the PS2 and DC hardware pretty different? That could have helped causing the problems. And asl ong as the PS2 version plays as good as the GC version who cares what it looks like?
---------------------------------------------------------
Well, if you don't mind the graphics, then it should play alright.[/quote]
I already have the GC version, and will get the PS2 version for the fact that its a RE game. Besides I doubt it will look really bad. I think it will look pretty good, but by no means as good as the GC version.
[quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]
You gotta calm down their sparky, this is video games we're talking about, remember.
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]You gotta calm down their sparky, this is video games we're talking about, remember.
cheapass Gundam
CAGiversary!
[quote name='stocker08']i just got into RE a few weeks ago after buying 3 and CV for DC. They are very fun but i am a poontang when it comes to scary games.........[/quote]
Those aren't all that scary. Try Silent Hill (original) or Fatal Frame and you will be scared silly.
Those aren't all that scary. Try Silent Hill (original) or Fatal Frame and you will be scared silly.
[quote name='drone8888']hey patel.................... STFU!!!
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]
you wanna come out and trying saying that face to face?
where is the "report post to moderator" button?
You're turban tactics are futile!!!
I own all 3 systems, and I can back up my words.
If a developer decides to cut costs, and port something to the PS2,.. than so be it.
They lose face in true gamers' book.
The GC and XBox are the superior consoles,........... and you are just a fanboy.
Facts speak louder than your misguided words.
Every game on the PS2 is bottom of the barrel.
I have more games than you, on all platforms,... and I know what is up. You can throw your close minded, limited knowledge around all you like.
Those of us who own all 3, KNOW who takes the time to give us what we've paid for.
You think overflooding the market with crap, and then giving us a free online enabled system to make up for it is generous???
You're a moron.
GC delivers the quality,... and M$ delivers the online bliss.
PS2 is the biggest let down I've ever beleived in.
YOU, shame the gaming community, with your blind faith.
Loser!!
Back to what I was saying,............ STFU!!!!
No hard feelings,......... it's just you're a moron, with no common sense.
Thanks.
[/quote]you wanna come out and trying saying that face to face?
where is the "report post to moderator" button?
willardhaven
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 12 (100%)
[quote name='cheapass Gundam'][quote name='stocker08']i just got into RE a few weeks ago after buying 3 and CV for DC. They are very fun but i am a poontang when it comes to scary games.........[/quote]
Those aren't all that scary. Try Silent Hill (original) or Fatal Frame and you will be scared silly.[/quote]
Silent Hill definitely has a more disturbing sense of fright... Resident Evil is the king of jumps and spooks.
Those aren't all that scary. Try Silent Hill (original) or Fatal Frame and you will be scared silly.[/quote]
Silent Hill definitely has a more disturbing sense of fright... Resident Evil is the king of jumps and spooks.
Hey there.
I had no idea you guys took it that way.
I was having a REALLY bad day, and I posted a bunch of stupid, angry stuff.
"Turban Tactics", was referring to the Taliban.
You know, like the Iraqi's voting rights/threats???
My wife is Cambodian, which you all know, .....they are pretty much Indian. Some of her family still lives in India.
Also,.... where in the world do you get the idea that Indians wear turbans??
Anyhow,... I am really sorry.
I will definitely hesitate to post when I'm in such a mood again.
I'm sorry dpatel............. which after thinking about your name makes sense.
I always pronounced it to myself as "p datel", like the manufacturer.
SORRY.
I had no idea you guys took it that way.
I was having a REALLY bad day, and I posted a bunch of stupid, angry stuff.
"Turban Tactics", was referring to the Taliban.
You know, like the Iraqi's voting rights/threats???
My wife is Cambodian, which you all know, .....they are pretty much Indian. Some of her family still lives in India.
Also,.... where in the world do you get the idea that Indians wear turbans??
Anyhow,... I am really sorry.
I will definitely hesitate to post when I'm in such a mood again.
I'm sorry dpatel............. which after thinking about your name makes sense.
I always pronounced it to myself as "p datel", like the manufacturer.
SORRY.
[quote name='drone8888']Hey there.
I had no idea you guys took it that way.
I was having a REALLY bad day, and I posted a bunch of stupid, angry stuff.
"Turban Tactics", was referring to the Taliban.
You know, like the Iraqi's voting rights/threats???
My wife is Cambodian, which you all know, .....they are pretty much Indian. Some of her family still lives in India.
Also,.... where in the world do you get the idea that Indians wear turbans??
Anyhow,... I am really sorry.
I will definitely hesitate to post when I'm in such a mood again.
I'm sorry dpatel............. which after thinking about your name makes sense.
I always pronounced it to myself as "p datel", like the manufacturer.
SORRY.[/quote]
p datel? Then why did you refer to me as 'patel'?
Anyway. I don't really care. I don't really take things that people say to me on the internet too seriously.
I had no idea you guys took it that way.
I was having a REALLY bad day, and I posted a bunch of stupid, angry stuff.
"Turban Tactics", was referring to the Taliban.
You know, like the Iraqi's voting rights/threats???
My wife is Cambodian, which you all know, .....they are pretty much Indian. Some of her family still lives in India.
Also,.... where in the world do you get the idea that Indians wear turbans??
Anyhow,... I am really sorry.
I will definitely hesitate to post when I'm in such a mood again.
I'm sorry dpatel............. which after thinking about your name makes sense.
I always pronounced it to myself as "p datel", like the manufacturer.
SORRY.[/quote]
p datel? Then why did you refer to me as 'patel'?
Anyway. I don't really care. I don't really take things that people say to me on the internet too seriously.
[quote name='dental_regurgitation'][quote name='cheapass Gundam'][quote name='stocker08']i just got into RE a few weeks ago after buying 3 and CV for DC. They are very fun but i am a poontang when it comes to scary games.........[/quote]
Those aren't all that scary. Try Silent Hill (original) or Fatal Frame and you will be scared silly.[/quote]
Silent Hill definitely has a more disturbing sense of fright... Resident Evil is the king of jumps and spooks.[/quote]
oh i know, i played that silent hill 3 game, the Bunny Rabbit sitting on the bench almost made me piss my pants, very disturbing, i just dont like the enemies in Resident Evil, like the giant moths, or the guys who spit out cockroaches............giant moths laying eggs on your back, it makes me tremble.
Those aren't all that scary. Try Silent Hill (original) or Fatal Frame and you will be scared silly.[/quote]
Silent Hill definitely has a more disturbing sense of fright... Resident Evil is the king of jumps and spooks.[/quote]
oh i know, i played that silent hill 3 game, the Bunny Rabbit sitting on the bench almost made me piss my pants, very disturbing, i just dont like the enemies in Resident Evil, like the giant moths, or the guys who spit out cockroaches............giant moths laying eggs on your back, it makes me tremble.
bread's done