CBS News-Democratic Party Connection

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
Who Is Dotty Lynch?

By Cliff Kincaid  |  March 14, 2005

Jeff Gannon was accused of being a fake journalist writing for a fake news organization using a fake name. Only the third part of that is true. He used a pseudonym or pen name because he didn't like the sound of his real last name, Guckert. Can anybody really blame him? While Gannon continues to come under fire, stories continue to appear about him that are themselves misleading, perhaps deliberately so. The worst offender has been CBS News.

The conservative website, World Net Daily, called him a "a journalistic neophyte who was ushered into the nation's inner media sanctum using an alias." Actually, Gannon used the temporary day press to get into White House press briefings. The same process was used by reporter Paul Sperry when he wrote for World Net Daily. The liberal site Salon.com followed with a story claiming that Gannon was "ushered into the White House-without undergoing a full-blown security background check-in order to pose softball questions to administration officials…" The fact is that no temporary pass holder gets a full background check. That is reserved for those getting permanent or hard passes.

But notice the phrasing, "ushered in," and "in order to," almost as if Gannon was part of a conspiracy to make the Bush Administration look good.

Who are these mysterious officials behind the plot? Dotty Lynch, political editor of CBS News, thought she had the answer. Her column ran under the intriguing headline, "Rove-Gannon Connection?" That's a reference to top Bush White House aide Karl Rove.

Ironically, despite the Lynch offering, Salon.com complained at length about the rest of the liberal media ignoring the Gannon story. Perhaps the Lynch column demonstrates why. The piece was full of implication and innuendo but few hard facts. The so-called Rove-Gannon connection consisted of Rove having once talked to GOPUSA, which owns Talon News, which employed Gannon. But there's more. Gannon had written stories for Talon News that were credited with playing a role in the defeat of former Democratic Senate leader Tom Daschle by John Thune. And Thune's campaign manager was "'an old political crony' of Rove's," Lynch revealed. If you're still having trouble understanding the connection between Gannon and Rove, join the crowd. There is none.

But CBS thought it was worthwhile to push this dubious link. The original headline over the Lynch piece was, "Karl Rove's Warning to GOP." It was changed to "Rove-Gannon Link?" because of the desire by the mainstream media to pump life into the Gannongate conspiracy theories circulating on the left-wing blogs. One of those bloggers was immediately out with the following headline: "CBS Speculates that Karl Rove was Jeff Gannon's contact inside the White House…" 

But lacking facts didn't deter Lynch, who offered her bottom line: "Planting or even just sanctioning a political operative in the WH [White House] press room is a dangerous precedent and Karl Rove's hope to become a respected policymaker will be hampered if the dirty tricks from his political past are more apparent than his desire to spread liberty around the globe."

Now where's the evidence of Rove planting or sanctioning a political operative in the White House press room? There is absolutely no evidence. Speaking of political operatives, did you know that Dotty Lynch is a self-described liberal who worked as a pollster for Democratic candidates and liberal causes from 1972 until 1985? Did you know that in 1984, by her own admission, she was an "ardent feminist?" Did you know that in 1984, by her own admission, she was "very involved" in the successful effort to get a woman, Geraldine Ferraro, on the Democratic ticket?  We could run our own story about Lynch headlined, "CBS News-Democratic Party Connection," and we wouldn't have to use a question mark.

Accuracy In Media Original Story
 
Hahaha

AIM conplaining "The piece was full of implication and innuendo but few hard facts"..that is pretty much AIM's m.o.

They have fasley accused reporters of lying in the past. I like how they say 'we could do it too but without a question mark" as if to pretend they actually have proof because of what Lynch did 20 years ago. What hacks.

not the say the Lynch article was good because clearly the connection was a leap. I remember when I read the article, I was disappointed it didn't show an actual link.
 
Despite the best efforts of the Corporate Media (more on them in a moment) the Gannon Scandal kept rolling last week. Since last week's Idiots, a number of new stories have come to light. First, it was revealed that Gannon was in fact selling himself for sex online selling himself for sex onlinewhile he was a member of the White House press corps. Then it came out that Gannon was actually in the White House as early as February 28, 2003 - a month before Talon News even existed, which completely disproves White House press secretary Scott McClellan's recent statement that "[Gannon], like anyone else, showed that he was representing a news organization that published regularly, and so he was cleared two years ago to receive daily passes, just like many others are." (Maureen Dowd meanwhile revealed that White House press passes simply aren't that easy to come by.)

Gannon himself decided to return to the airwaves, appearing on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 to "clarify" some of the earlier fibs he told, such as this one to Wolf Blitzer: "...before I came to Washington, I had registered various domain names for a private client. I was doing Web site development. Those sites were never hosted. There's - nothing ever went up on them. And the client went on to do something else. There's been so much about me on the Internet that people have, you know, made assumptions about..." During the Anderson Cooper interview (video courtesy of Crooks and Liars), Gannon refused to deny that he'd lied to Wolf Blitzer and portrayed himself as a victim who'd had his privacy violated (despite the fact that he was the only person responsible for posting naked pictures of himself online).

Our Jeff also had an interesting take on "journalism" when confronted with the fact that he'd plagiarized entire sections from White House press releases for his reports. "If I am communicating to my readers exactly what the White House believes on any certain issue," said Jeff, "that's reporting to them an unvarnished, unfiltered version of what they believe." Jesus Christ. Meanwhile, Ari Fleischer revealed that even he had doubts about Gannon's presence in the White House.

And with stories coming to light that Gannon was the person who broke the news that Mary Mapes was responsible for the CBS documents, had early access to the infamous August 6 PDB, may have had four hours advance knowledge of the bombing of Baghdad, and led the charge on unfounded accusations that John Kerry had an affair, we can't help wondering where he was getting his information from. Finally, Gannon went so far last week as to consider suing the bloggers who'd reported on this story for "political assassination." So now you can add frivolous lawsuits to the growing list of hypocrisies involved in this scandal. Heck, bring it on, I say. Let's get the whole story out there.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/05/187.html
 
Fox News is to the right, CBS news is to the left. Bush is paying journalist to be on his side and we have freedom of the press?

Maybe we need freedom from the biased bullshit.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']Jeff Gannon was accused of being a fake journalist writing for a fake news organization using a fake name. Only the third part of that is true.[/quote]

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Hands down the funniest thing I've read today.

Let me get this straight; Jeff Gannon was one of the people who purposely leaked the name of Valarie Plame/Wilson (in addition to Robert Novak and two NYT/Wash. Post writers), and yet he's just a good ol' WHPC nobody?

Not to mention, he's just a WHPC nobody *and* a hard-nosed journalist?

His reports contained White House/RNC press releases verbatim, with no citation. College freshman can plagarize better than him. Jeez.

myke.
 
[quote name='David85']Fox News is to the right, CBS news is to the left. Bush is paying journalist to be on his side and we have freedom of the press?

Maybe we need freedom from the biased bullshit.[/QUOTE]

I hope you're joking about that CBS comment. Seriously you haven't seen Liberal in the media yet, if Amy Goodman was in charge of it as I wish, the Corporations would be kicking and screaming like a person in the dentist's chair being drilled without Novacaine.
The whole incident with Gannon should be retitled "How Osama Bin Laden and any other terrorist can get into the White House with a few easy steps.". Damn not the best "Strangelove" wit but meh.
 
So a reporter who probably just had a case of the giggles (given the fact that he was just laughing without slurring his words) as a call-in to a morning radio show is worthy of a thread because "teh Drudge said he was drunk?". Your going to have to do better than that, chunkstyle.
 
bread's done
Back
Top