[quote name='Sir_Fragalot']
http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/glenn-j1.1.1.html
Ron Paul has been shafted many many times by Republicans because I firmly believe they refuse to let him in because he actually wants to change all the corruptness in the government. They want Romney to win for the sole reason of keeping the nice little pay offs they are getting from everyone.
It's sickening, and while I am not the one to discuss politics, being around people who are in the know really opened my eyes.
I hate Romney with a passion.[/QUOTE]
While I don't doubt some of the accusations in the article you linked, the problem when it comes to Paulistinian cries of oppression are twofold:
1) Paulistinians, on the whole, have never seen a conspiracy they didn't like. There are too many false negatives (i.e., phony conspiracies) that his supporters will vehemently embrace. Worse yet, the less evidence there is to support said conspiracy, the greater their veracity of the event (because the absence of evidence is, to them, clear evidence of a well orchestrated coverup).
2) Paul supporters require victimhood to feel relevant in the GOP. They can not accept that they are a small portion (estimated at 10%) of self-identified Republicans, so rather than recognizing that and working towards growing within the party, they claim that they are the true voice of the majority, ushered out by the body politic of the GOP.
Now, don't get me wrong - I do believe Paul supporters are deliberately silenced. But it's more due to Paul and his supporters conspiracies of the new world order, the "amero" fears, their desire to reduce and eliminate collusion between government and corporations, their recognition of teeming conflicts of interest b/w regulatory agencies and corporations (and throw the federal reserve in there for good measure) - Paul supporters are both an embarrassment to the party as well as a threat to the corporate interests that have become the modern Republican party. Corporations would do very well if Paul was in office, but they do better with pro-collusion Republicans.
(on that note, I empathize with the desires of Paul supporters to reduce corporate corruption - but unlike them, I see the profit motive of corporations as that which drives greed and corruption, so therefore greater deregulation, which they see as the panacea to that corruption, is not at all what would eliminate that link in my view. They view the world through a gov't-is-always-the-villain lens, where I see the need for a motivated offender to initiate corruption - which means corporations first.)