Chinese Parents Suing Blizzard Over Death of Their Son (WOW Related.)

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
Youth’s Death Linked to Game
Blizzard faces a lawsuit from Chinese parents, who say World of Warcraft caused the death of their son.
November 18, 2005

In the latest saga over online gaming addiction in China, the parents of a 13-year-old Tianjin boy are suing the makers of World of Warcraft, blaming the game for the death of their son, according to the Chinese news agency Xinhua.

The parents filed a suit against Blizzard Entertainment on Wednesday, saying their son jumped to his death while reenacting a scene from the game, the report said. The parents are backed by the anti-Internet addiction advocate Zhang Chunliang.

Mr. Chunliang has spoken to 63 parents whose children have allegedly suffered from online gaming addiction and plans to file a class-action suit, according to the report.

Blizzard executives weren’t available to comment to RedHerring.com about the lawsuit.

The high-profile backlash to China’s booming online game market reflects the growing size of the industry. World of Warcraft alone has 1.5 million paying players.

China’s online game market brought in $580 million this year, and is the fastest-growing market in the world, according to research firm DFC Intelligence. That market is set to nearly triple in size to an estimated $1.7 billion by 2010.

Blizzard Entertainment developed the game and works with The9 in China as the local distributor. The9 already posted second-quarter revenue of $6.7 million, up from first-quarter revenue of $1.5 million.

Some analysts estimate the game is raking in more than $30 million per month in basic subscription fees.

Vivendi Universal Games, the parent company of Blizzard, recently said that through the first half of 2005, World of Warcraft brought the company’s revenue up 61 percent from the year before to €238 million ($290 million) (see World of Warcraft Storms Asia).

But the company, which now counts 4.5 million World of Warcraft players worldwide, must contend with the backlash of parents concerned with addictive behavior.

Many Chinese parents contend that their children spend hours gaming in Internet cafes at the risk of their health, work, and school (see Wang-ba Crusade).


China Clocks Gamers
The Chinese government is looking into how to respond to its own citizen’s concerns.

The Chinese government has already said it plans to restrict gamers to three hours of consecutive play, using a “fatigue technique” in games. After three hours of play, the online game would lose some player power, and after five hours, the player would lose most power. After that, there would be a delay of five hours before the game could be accessed to its full capacity.

Analysts and industry execs are concerned the restriction might dampen the growth of the Chinese online game industry.

Analysts like Elias Glenn with Shanghai-based Pacific Epoch think the regulation will have a major effect on the industry. “It has the potential to have a serious impact.”

But beyond government restrictions, other factors like piracy and an increasingly competitive market could throw a wet blanket on the industry’s growth.

“There are huge potentials, but there are also a lot of pitfalls,” said Alexis Madrigal, a DFC Intelligence analyst who recently authored a study on the industry.

Link
 
next theres gonna be rehab for gamers. . . score!


wtf was this kid reenacting?

i have yet to play WoW (i dont support online gaming + paying for it) i loved diablo 2 single player and the freeness of battle.net and hope diablo 3 (whenever it may come to be) is free online play.
 
I thought this article was gonna be about how another person played for 12 hours straight and their heart stopped. Then I got to the second part of the article and thought it said "China Glocks Gamers" and thought Gee, that wouldn't be so bad.
 
Video games don't affect kids. If they did everyone who played pacman would be running around in dark rooms listening to repetitive music while munching on pills.
 
[quote name='camoor']Video games don't affect kids. If they did everyone who played pacman would be running around in dark rooms listening to repetitive music while munching on pills.[/QUOTE]

wait...what about running around in dark rooms munching on acid......does that count? 8-[


anyway...this kid jumped to his death reenacting something in WoW? Didn't know you could jump in that game.....
 
This is like suing Smith & Wesson for being shot with a gun in a burglary.

I think people with severe gaming addictions (primarily with WoW, and the like) have a, well, severe problem. It's not Blizzard's fault that people abuse themselves by playing their game.
 
The same parent's that bought the game for him I bet. You buy a gun, they shoot themselvs, you buy a rope, they hang themselvs, this lawsuit should be counterd by Blizzard cases like this piss me off, the kid obviously was an idiot and they are def shitty parents for atleast 2 reasons:

1.Their kid has no sense of reality (they must let him live on video games)
2.They blame everyone but themselvs

:bomb::bomb::bomb::bomb::bomb:
 
[quote name='Brak']This is like suing Smith & Wesson for being shot with a gun in a burglary.

I think people with severe gaming addictions (primarily with WoW, and the like) have a, well, severe problem. It's not Blizzard's fault that people abuse themselves by playing their game.[/QUOTE]
Or suing Pilsbary if you OD on cookie dough.
 
So sad. Parents need to take responsibility for their kids.

[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']The parents are backed by the anti-Internet addiction advocate Zhang Chunliang.

Mr. Chunliang has spoken to 63 parents whose children have allegedly suffered from online gaming addiction and plans to file a class-action suit, according to the report.[/QUOTE]What's this guy's deal anyway.
 
[quote name='woobacca']So sad. Parents need to take responsibility for their kids.

What's this guy's deal anyway.[/QUOTE]


he's the Jack Thompson of the East.
 
Video games just don't affect people the way everyone says. If they do, I would have done the following:

1. Save the world from utter evil with my oversized sword and companions, including 2 fine girls.
2. Put about 90 million bullets in to demon's faces and whip out my chainsaw of justice when I ran out.
3. Find an ancient sword of electrical power, then when it flies off the wall and stabs me for no good reason, stand up with the sword still stuck in the ground so it tears completely through me. Then show my dominance of the sword with my pure badassness and be completely fine.
4. Guided a civilization from ancient times to modern times, and nuke the everliving fuck out of my enemies.
5. Save the world from utter evil with my katana and my companions, including 2 fine girls. And we travel through time.
6. Killed about 10,000 hookers.....ok, so I actually have done this. Like you punks haven't killed a hooker yourself.
7. Sit in a dark corner of an abandoned hospital as my sanity slips away and I travel between dimensions, or maybe just believe I do.
8. Jump on flying turtles about a bazillion times, and gain 1ups.
9. Use magical power to form attack and defensive spells, while that same power threatens to overwhelm my mind and erase it.
10. Save the world from utter evil with my companions, including 2 fine girls. Utterly fail, but a couple years after the world is ruined, we beat the hell out of the guy who did it.


Ok, now what games go to what action?
 
[quote name='camoor']Video games don't affect kids. If they did everyone who played pacman would be running around in dark rooms listening to repetitive music while munching on pills.[/QUOTE]

Media has some effect on normal people, but just for a short period after viewing. For example, after watching pornography people rate their partners attractiveness lower. Another study involved movies, where it was found that people who watched violent movies were more aggressive immediately after while people who watched funny or romantic movies were less hostile immediately after. With children this is easily reversed by reinforcing the fact that they should not behave in the way that the character in the game or movie just behaved.

But if you're dealing with an unstable or highly suggestive person then effects can be greater.

Either way, I don't think anyone, including jack thompson, is suggesting that everyone reacts that way. Instead the argument is over how many people react that way. I also don't think anyone will re-enact games with absolutely no basis in real life.
 
so where were the parents, when he jumped to his death? where were the parents when they kid showed severe signs of addiction...

why dont we just sue the drug companies for making advil that somebody od'd on...freaking ppl sue over everything. Its the most retarded thing ever.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']
Either way, I don't think anyone, including jack thompson, is suggesting that everyone reacts that way.[/QUOTE]

[quote name='Jack Thompson'] Honestly, are all of you gamers on drugs or what?( [/quote]

[quote name='Jack Thompson'] My website and email are for people harmed by these games, not for people the moral equivalent of Saddam Hussein. (Ed: This is in response from gamers asking Thompson to have an open debate on the issue. This response was sent to all of them)[/quote]


[quote name='Jack Thompson'] You just watch. There is going to be a Columbine-times-10 incident, and everyone will finally get it. Either that, or some video gamer is going to go Columbine at some video game exec's expense or at E3, and then the industry will begin to realize that there is no place to hide, that it has trained a nation of Manchurian Children. [/quote]

I think Jack does believe all games affect all people negtively (sp). However, I also think Jack likes to believe he's not a freaking looney.
 
That just looks like he's suggesting a substantially larger amount of people react that way than evidence suggests or most believe. I don't really care one way or the other about him though, just that I'd be suprised if he believed that everyone has long term effects from it.
 
stupid kid. damn addicts need to get knocked out to see what reality is like again. theres no respawn points in real life.
 
[quote name='Logain8955']Video games just don't affect people the way everyone says. If they do, I would have done the following:

1. Save the world from utter evil with my oversized sword and companions, including 2 fine girls.
2. Put about 90 million bullets in to demon's faces and whip out my chainsaw of justice when I ran out.
3. Find an ancient sword of electrical power, then when it flies off the wall and stabs me for no good reason, stand up with the sword still stuck in the ground so it tears completely through me. Then show my dominance of the sword with my pure badassness and be completely fine.
4. Guided a civilization from ancient times to modern times, and nuke the everliving fuck out of my enemies.
5. Save the world from utter evil with my katana and my companions, including 2 fine girls. And we travel through time.
6. Killed about 10,000 hookers.....ok, so I actually have done this. Like you punks haven't killed a hooker yourself.
7. Sit in a dark corner of an abandoned hospital as my sanity slips away and I travel between dimensions, or maybe just believe I do.
8. Jump on flying turtles about a bazillion times, and gain 1ups.
9. Use magical power to form attack and defensive spells, while that same power threatens to overwhelm my mind and erase it.
10. Save the world from utter evil with my companions, including 2 fine girls. Utterly fail, but a couple years after the world is ruined, we beat the hell out of the guy who did it.


Ok, now what games go to what action?[/QUOTE]

1. FF7
2. Devil May Cry?
3.
4. Civilization
5. Chrono Trigger
6. San Andreas
7.
8.Mario
9.
10.FF6
 
They agree to a license agreement before signing up for WoW, stating they need to spend time with the families/take breaks etc. They will fail.
 
What was this moron kid reenacting?

I don't have any sympathy for stupidity that could've been easily averted
 
[quote name='Zakman86']1. FF7
2. Devil May Cry?
3.
4. Civilization
5. Chrono Trigger
6. San Andreas
7.
8.Mario
9.
10.FF6[/QUOTE]


Almost, everything except #2 is correct. Close though!
 
[quote name='b0bx13']3- DMC
7- SH4?[/QUOTE]


Correct and correct. (Though a hospital has appeared in each of the SH games.) One more to go.
 
[quote name='Logain8955']Video games just don't affect people the way everyone says. If they do, I would have done the following:
...
Ok, now what games go to what action?[/QUOTE]
That was a subtle way to go off topic. You should create a separate thread for this. Could be fun.
 
What part of the game was he reenacting?

For all we know, he could have committed suicide and blamed the game in his suicide note to make his parents feel better. Or maybe there wasn't even a note and the parents are looking for scapegoats.
 
[quote name='woobacca']That was a subtle way to go off topic. You should create a separate thread for this. Could be fun.[/QUOTE]


Yeah, didn't realize it would pull things off topic. I'll make a new thread.

EDIT: Oh, for those wondering, #9 is Phantom Dust. 9 out of 10 aint bad.
cookiestext.jpg



Yet Another EDIT: New thread is up at http://cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74774

Sorry for pulling things off topic.
 
bread's done
Back
Top