CIA Fires Leaker: Donated $2,000 to Kerry, $5,000 to Ohio Democrats

PittsburghAfterDark

CAGiversary!
CIA Fires Employee for Alleged Leak

By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 24 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - In a highly unusual move, the CIA has fired an employee for leaking classified information to the news media, including details about secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe that resulted in a Pulitzer Prize-winning story, officials said Friday.

The Associated Press has learned the officer was a CIA veteran nearing retirement, Mary McCarthy. Reached Friday evening at home, her husband would not confirm her firing.

In McCarthy's final position at the CIA, she was assigned to its Office of Inspector General, looking into allegations the CIA was involved in torture at Iraqi prisons, according to a former colleague who spoke on condition of anonymity because the case is under investigation.

Without identifying McCarthy by name, CIA Director Porter Goss announced the firing in a short message to agency employees circulated Thursday. Such firings are rare. And it is the first time since Goss took over in September 2004, vowing to clamp down on leaks, that he has dismissed an intelligence officer for speaking with reporters.

Agency spokesman Paul Gimigliano confirmed an officer had been fired for having unauthorized contacts with the media and disclosing classified information to reporters, including details about intelligence operations.

"The officer has acknowledged unauthorized discussions with the media and the unauthorized sharing of classified information," Gimigliano said. "That is a violation of the secrecy agreement that everyone signs as a condition of employment with the CIA."

Citing the Privacy Act, the CIA would not disclose any details about the officer's identity or what she might have told the news media. However, a law enforcement official confirmed there was a criminal leaks investigation under way, but it did not involve the fired CIA officer.

The official said the CIA officer had provided information that contributed to a Washington Post story last year disclosing secret U.S. prisons in Eastern Europe. The law enforcement official spoke only on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the matter.

The Post's Dana Priest won a Pulitzer Prize this week for her reporting on a covert prison system set up by the CIA after Sept. 11, 2001, that at various times included sites in eight countries. The story caused an international uproar, and government officials have said it did significant damage to relationships between the U.S. and allied intelligence agencies.

Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. said on the newspaper's Web site, "We don't know the details of why (the CIA employee) was fired, so I can't comment on that. But as a general principle, obviously I am opposed to criminalizing the dissemination of government information to the press."

It was unclear if Priest or any other reporters who spoke to McCarthy would be brought into an investigation. Post spokesman Eric Grant said no reporter at the paper had been subpoenaed or had spoken to investigators about the matter.

Goss has pressed for aggressive probes about leaked information.

"The damage has been very severe to our capabilities to carry out our mission," Goss told Congress in February, adding that a federal grand jury should be impaneled to determine "who is leaking this information."

On Friday, another government official, also speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, said the fired officer had failed a lie-detector test.

It was not clear if the person was taking a routine polygraph examination, as is required periodically of employees with access to classified information, or if the lie-detector test was among those ordered by Goss to find leakers inside the agency.

Justice Department officials declined to comment publicly on the firing and whether the matter had been referred to federal prosecutors for possible criminal charges. One law enforcement official said there were dozens of leak investigations under way. Another said there had been no referral from the CIA involving the fired employee, normally a precursor to a criminal investigation.

Both spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter is under investigation.

Link

MCCARTHY, MARY O
BETHESDA,MD 20817

CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & INTERNATIONA

10/5/2004 $5,000 Democratic Party of Ohio

MCCARTHY, MARY O
BETHESDA,MD 20817

U.S. GOVERNMENT/ANALYST

3/14/2004 $2,000 Kerry, John

Opensecrets.com

Who says Democrats aren't treasonous rat bastards?

Oh that's right.

Democrats.

These actions speak volumes as to why you cannot trust the disloyal opposition with the defense of this country. I couldn't have made this up if I tried yet I'm not at all shocked by this disclosure. Once she was named by MSNBC freerepublic.com users found this tidbit within one hour of her name being released.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']So wait, individual supporters are the same as the group as a whole?[/quote]

Duh!
 
Greater government transparency is a good thing - whether it's pro-democracy chinese dissidents or American intelligence exposing torture camps.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']So wait, individual supporters are the same as the group as a whole?[/QUOTE]

Yes, especially when they are white racists. We all know that becuase of a few racists who happen to be white, the entire white race are racist bastards.
 
[quote name='bmulligan']Yes, especially when they are white racists. We all know that becuase of a few racists who happen to be white, the entire white race are racist bastards.[/quote]

Damn, I never realized I was such a racist bastard. Thanks for pointing that out. :roll:
 
She should be fired for leaking, but I'm blown away that I live in a "free and civil society" that is outraged that a member of said society would be lambasted by the citizens of this "free and civil society" for exposing institutionalized torture at the hands of our military. You applaud the torture, you want the torture (admit it, kids), and you chastise those who expect a "free and civil society" to set a better example to the world.

So, is it still a few bad apples, guys?
 
If PAD is so upset about this, why isn't he outraged that Bush authorized a leak revealing Valerie Plame? I guess it's ok for a president to commit an act of treason. At least California will soon be voting to impeach Bush and Cheney, which would then force the US House to postpone all other business in order to debate that issue.
 
[quote name='rumblebear']They didn't fire her because she leaked (she didn't). She was fired because she was not a Bush loyalist.[/quote]

So the CIA doesn't care that people leak classified info? Are you sure you want to argue that?
 
That's not what he said: he said that she wasn't fired because she leaked classified information, but for other reasons. That's appearing to be true, because there's strong evidence that she wasn't the one who leaked the information.
 
bread's done
Back
Top