[quote name='UncleBob']
Do I think it's a little out of the way to do that? Yeah. However, again, if someone else can come up with a better method of protecting Nintendo's rights to their IP that doesn't rely on the honor method, then sell it to Nintendo and fix the situation for everyone.[/QUOTE]
YES!!!! OF COURSE WE CAN THINK OF A BETTER METHOD! I've already said it a dozen times in
THIS THREAD!!!
APPLE. iTunes.
It's DRM lets you deauthorize a piece of hardware whenever you want, and reauthorize a new piece of hardware in it's place. The only time a network connection is needed is when you get a new piece of hardware. It's still not perfect (still requires the service exist, and that the hardware be functional enough to deauthorize), but it's a hell of a lot better than Nintendo's non-method.
Apple's method was around for
YEARS prior to the release of the 360, let alone the Wii or Playstation 3.
Apple's method would GAIN SALES FOR NINTENDO. I would buy nearly every VC game I was interested in if the DRM was fair. I'm not alone in that. I have no problem with dropping $5-10 on an interesting game. I *DO* have a problem flushing $5-10 down the toliet.
In the case of the VC, the very people who are going to be most interested in it-people who like access to older games, and collectors, are the very ones who are going to lose interest when they learn they don't really OWN the stuff they supposedly BOUGHT!
My current VC investment $0. My investment if it had more fair DRM-probably easily. $50-100 with the current offerings. I'm not alone. (Okay, I can't actually find a Wii yet, but that's what I'm sure I would have spent by now, and would spend once I get a Wii...if the DRM didn't cheat consumers.)
[quote name='UncleBob']Have you ever had a system replaced by Nintendo out of warranty? I can't speak for the Wii, but I know "super-cheap" doesn't always mean "as much as a new console". I had a mother with her young kid come in awhile go with an original DS (out of warranty) that had been chewed to bits by the family dog. At the time, DSLites were still near-impossible to come by, so I asked her to hang on a second. I called Nintendo's customer service and the rep hooked the mother up with a new unit (and a box to ship back the old one) for $50. Less than half the cost of a new unit (and, I think, cheaper than a used one from EBGames/GameStop).[/quote]
I'd much rather have the new unit for double the cost. And often when a system breaks or needs to be changed for a newer model it'll be later in a life cycle when the price has come down.
And Nintendo has given absolutly no indication that they're not going to do this.
And they also haven't said they're going to buy me a pony. That's not an argument.
The fact that they have the ability to do this and the fact (i.e.: my opinion) that, for the most part, Nintendo has the best damn customer service of any company in the industry tells me that if and when new colors/better systems come out in the future, they'll offer this service.
If they were going to do it, they'd sooner fix it so WE can do it, which is both cheaper, will lead to higher game sales, and higher customer satisfaction. I agree that Nintendo always seems good to deal with, but regardless they're not handling this issues fairly at all.
And the DRM system doesn't need "fixed" because it isn't "broken". Just because you don't agree with it, it doesn't make it "broken".
Of course it's broken. Under the current scheme you can't rationally say you "own" a game that you "buy", and it's vastly inferior to DRM schemes in place years before the Wii's launch.