[quote name='Grammar Police']I don't see the logic there, but okay. Every time I decide to watch Star Wars, I'd want to see something cooler than that artwork. I prefer each trilogy's individual art. It doesn't make me less of a fan.
I just don't think the six movies should be represented by the child actor that that gave a less-than-stellar performance in 3/4 of a prequel film. There are better things to signify Star Wars. Something Light/Dark related,
collage of the six, etc. That's all I'm getting at.[/QUOTE]
I agree that the artwork for the individual trilogies is much better than the artwork for the complete collection. I also agree that the child actor from Jingle All the Way (Daniel Lloyd or whoever the

) was horrible and shouldn't be on the boxart. There are countless better choices for cover art.
I would understand not buying this set because of George Lucas alterations. I would understand not buying this set if the discs were housed in horrible packaging like the original Back to the Future blu-ray release. But if you passed on this deal because of the artwork, and you buy the individual trilogies minus the three loaded special feature blu-ray discs, I think you're not much of a Star Wars fan. It's just my opinion. By even writing this post I've proving my self to be a huge nerd and my opinion shouldn't be taken too seriously anyway.
If you buy the individual trilogies because they are cheaper and you don't care about special features, that's very justifiable.
[quote name='Grammar Police'] Every time I decide to watch Star Wars, I'd want to see something cooler than that artwork.
[/QUOTE]
Every time I decide to watch Star Wars, I just want to see "Star Wars."
Consumers have different tastes though, so to each his own. I apologize in advance for my grammatical errors but I'm tired as hell right now.