[quote name='Quillion']I respectfully disagree. How often do screener leaks jump start FBI investigations?
I fully expect that they'll be able to find the culprit due to watermarking/forensic marking. Why shouldn't we be able to read and discuss the prosecution here?[/QUOTE]
I haven't seen any of the discussions warranting locking, but the criminal response to this most recent and rather large leak is interesting from a policy standpoint. Reactions to, and treatment of, potential pirates is fascinating, IMO. Whether it's RIAA prosecuting Napster users, movie studios selling dvds in China to underprice bootleggers/pirates, or the FBI going after a film leaker, the policy response is worthy of discussion. I'd hope that talk about the reaction to the leak would be allowed, if not the content of the leaked media itself.
But if the rules are to be that strictly enforced, then shit. Cuz we voted dumb, then.