Domestic spying? Nope! Try "terrorist surveillance program", says Dubya

E-Z-B

CAGiversary!
You know, like the No Child Left Behind Act, Clear Skies Initiative, the Patriot Act, Healthy Forests, Operation Iraqi Freedom, etc..

WASHINGTON - President Bush heads to the National Security Agency on Wednesday for another speech defending his controversial spying program, one that he insists should be called a “terrorist surveillance program” — not domestic spying without a warrant.

The White House said the president might address reporters after his speech. He is expected to reiterate his claim that he has the constitutional authority to have intelligence officials listen in on international phone calls of Americans with suspected ties to terrorists without court approval.

Congress holds hearings starting Feb. 6 on whether the president has exceeded his authority.

Asked if the program should be referred to as domestic spying or terrorist surveillance, McCain said: “I don't know, that’s why I'm glad the president said he welcomes hearings.”

On Tuesday, U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said a 15-day grace period allowing warrantless eavesdropping under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act demonstrates that Congress knew such surveillance “would be essential in wartime.”

Speaking to students at Georgetown University law school, Gonzales was confronted by more than a dozen young people who turned their backs to him and held up for a banner for television cameras. The banner, loosely based on a Benjamin Franklin quote, read: “Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither.”

Before his appearance at Georgetown, Gonzales said in a television interview that some congressional leaders told the administration in 2004 that it would not be possible to write legislation regarding the warrantless surveillance effort without compromising its effectiveness.

“We did go to certain members of the congressional leadership a year and a half ago,” Gonzales said on CBS’s “The Early Show.”


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11018747/

I can't wait to start hearing the media going along with this spin. :roll:
 
George W. Bush "Something that you've been reading about in the news lately. It's what I would call a terrorist surveillance program. After the enemy attacked us and after I realized that we were not protected by oceans, I asked people that work for you, work for me: "How best can we use information to protect the American people?" We had ways to determine whether or not someone can be an Al-Qaeda affiliate, or Al-Qaeda, and if they're making a phone call in the United States, it seems like to me we'd want to know why. I'll repeat to you, you know, you hear words "domestic spying." These are not phone calls within the United States. This is a phone call of a Al-Qaeda, known Al-Qaeda suspect, making a phone call into the United States. I'm mindful of your civil liberties, and so I had all kinds of lawyers review the process. We briefed members of the United States Congress. You know, it's amazing when people say to me, "Well, he's just breaking the law." If I wanted to break the law, why was he briefing Congress?

iykfoh.jpg
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']George W. Bush "Something that you've been reading about in the news lately. It's what I would call a terrorist surveillance program. After the enemy attacked us and after I realized that we were not protected by oceans, I asked people that work for you, work for me: "How best can we use information to protect the American people?" We had ways to determine whether or not someone can be an Al-Qaeda affiliate, or Al-Qaeda, and if they're making a phone call in the United States, it seems like to me we'd want to know why. I'll repeat to you, you know, you hear words "domestic spying." These are not phone calls within the United States. This is a phone call of a Al-Qaeda, known Al-Qaeda suspect, making a phone call into the United States. I'm mindful of your civil liberties, and so I had all kinds of lawyers review the process. We briefed members of the United States Congress. You know, it's amazing when people say to me, "Well, he's just breaking the law." If I wanted to break the law, why was he briefing Congress?

iykfoh.jpg
[/QUOTE]

[quote name='Same Dude, Election Year']Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires-a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution.[/quote]

Can I put up a stupid picture too?

Flip-Flop.gif
 
I'm sure Fox News has already adopted that doublespeak.

And speaking of Fox News, I noticed this morning that Fox & Friends has new graphics for the intro to the show. It's full of street signs and I noticed that all of the arrows point to the right.

No conspiracy theory, just amused. :lol:
 
It took his marketing branch this long to come up with a mask term for his illegal activities? i'm a little disappointed to say the least.
 
[quote name='Metal Boss']It took his marketing branch this long to come up with a mask term for his illegal activities? i'm a little disappointed to say the least.[/QUOTE]
He rejected their first suggestion - The Happy Fun Time Phone Party.
 
bread's done
Back
Top