[quote name='MightySlacker'][quote name='zionoverfire'][quote name='greendc27'][quote name='zionoverfire'][quote name='greendc27'][quote name='ajh2298'][quote name='daikaiju']The real question is...at the same time?[/quote]
Yep, the girls really didnt do to much to each other just kiss and maybe some light touching, but that was more then enough for me.[/quote]
I call bull****.[/quote]
I'm just amazed it took someone so long to say it :shock:[/quote]
If he really did and wants to post some pictures I know I wouldn't complain about being proven wrong.[/quote]
I mean even a picture of them in the same room that doesn't look doctored would be enough to shut me up.[/quote]
Now fellas, take it easy. I think even if it is bullshit, most of you should be hoping that he's telling the truth. Then maybe you guys can have some hope
I mean, it would be totally different if someone could indeed verify that he was lying. Otherwise we should assume he is telling the truth. After all, who lies on the interent?
Seriously, say if someone here on CAG just happened to used to live in PA for a while and knew Jackie and could just call her and ask her. Like for example, perhaps his old roomate dated her back in the day. And maybe hypothetically, they all used to hang out together before she was a model. And hypothetically this random CAGer who knew Jaclyn Smith back in the day helped her work on her modeling portfolio. And maybe this guy would still have a few pics of her before she was a model. Maybe something like:
Only if ALL OF THE ABOVE happened would I then be forced to say this guy is lying. But all that stuff was HYPOTHETICAL so it doesn't matter, since the odds of that happening are like 10,000,000 to 1, right? RIGHT?
Woah, that's ODD. I wonder how I knew her name was Jaclyn Smith.

k
Dave Olson[/quote]

This keeps getting better, anyhow let us the verdict tomarrow if you don't mind.