ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='NexusMIT']http://www.411mania.com/games/colum...nlocked-12.03.09:-ECA-Forgets-Its-Purpose.htm
Note this site has some popups if they annoy you.

Nice article on this story (sorry if someone already mentioned it)

They make a particular good point on how Hal was railing Apple for their EULA and 'change without notice' clause and now the ECA is using just that.

Anyway, I'll probably wait a couple days and see how this pans out before sending a certified letter.[/QUOTE]

That guy pretty much nailed Halpin to the fucking wall. Very well said. :applause:
 
[quote name='n8rockerasu']I mean this in the kindest way possible. If you're going to reach out and contact these huge corporations as a representative of the "gamer masses", AT LEAST have a grasp on grammar and the English language. It's these kinds of wall of text, run-on-sentence, misspelled messages that make you look like an unintelligent, whiny, entitled idiot.

I recognize that it can be unfair to associate someone's intelligence with the way they type or speak. But I'm sorry. That's the world in which we live. I agree 100% with the sentiment behind your email, but do yourself and the rest of us a favor by running it through spell check first. Again, I apologize for any offense, but if you want to be taken seriously, it's something to consider.[/QUOTE]

No offense taking. Being high as a kite off roxicet all day having just had eye surgery, thus having only a single eye at the moment. I feel it turned out ok when I put it together but looking at it now I do see some silly errors. I thought I ran it through spell check but its apparent that happened only in my mind lol.
 
Ok I know I'm going to get flamed, but I didn't want to read the 67 pages to find my answer... What happens if we already used the auto-renew toggle that had set up... I did that right away when I got my account.. is it still active?
 
[quote name='ZildjianKX']LMAO, that's great. :applause:[/QUOTE]

All credit goes to ncc1701p for finding out about it. ^^

Some people have chosen the Comic postcard that says "Well... This is awkward."
Pretty fitting.
 
[quote name='JCAll']No, no this is wrong. When someone is trying to screw you, you do not bend over and take it for the sins of your fellow man. Because these people are in the wrong. And they may have been cheated, but that's no excuse them suddenly becoming irredeemable bastards and trying to screw over their whole consume base past present and future.

If they want to screw us, well screw them.[/QUOTE]

I'm not saying to bend over and take it. Fight for your money. I'm just saying that they I understand why they are in the situation and why they are doing what they are doing. What choice do they have? Think about it logically - although it seems at first that it is Amazon's fault, there is obviously something legally making this not their fault or else the ECA would have just washed their hands of this. If they have to pay that kind of $ back, that just leaves us cuz there is no way their non-profit org has it. It's not right but they likely have no alternative. Also, of course Hal is pissed - his organization is most likely going to go under and he will lose his job becuase people took advantage of the glitch losing them a ton of money that I doubt they have. He is just a hot-headed moron for showing that anger.
It's the same philosophy from both sides. "Don't bend over and take it" is exactly what the ECA is thinking after being screwed customers. You don't have to agree with it but that's just the way it is.
 
[quote name='Mako1215']Ok I know I'm going to get flamed, but I didn't want to read the 67 pages to find my answer... What happens if we already used the auto-renew toggle that had set up... I did that right away when I got my account.. is it still active?[/QUOTE]

Not this again (10% off Amazon ECA code thread all over again).

WHENEVER THERE IS A DOUBT...CONSULT THE OP!!!

Was there a button for auto-renewing?

Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware.

However, that button (at least according to the ECA) was never functional nor ever intended to be posted (which I still think is bullshit), so like EVERYONE...and I mean EVERYONE, you're going to have to send them an actual letter in order to cancel.

Seek the OP.
 
The eca is run by about 10 people. As an npo, I wonder if they have some sort of board of directors who we can also complain to.
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']I'm not saying to bend over and take it. Fight for your money. I'm just saying that they I understand why they are in the situation and why they are doing what they are doing. What choice do they have? Think about it logically - although it seems at first that it is Amazon's fault, there is obviously something legally making this not their fault or else the ECA would have just washed their hands of this. If they have to pay that kind of $ back, that just leaves us cuz there is no way their non-profit org has it. It's not right but they likely have no alternative. Also, of course Hal is pissed - his organization is most likely going to go under and he will lose his job becuase people took advantage of the glitch losing them a ton of money that I doubt they have. He is just a hot-headed moron for showing that anger.
It's the same philosophy from both sides. "Don't bend over and take it" is exactly what the ECA is thinking after being screwed customers. You don't have to agree with it but that's just the way it is.[/QUOTE]
Why do you keep stating that the Eca has to pay amazon for all the money lost from stacking back? Thats not even a logical thought and someone else already pointed that out but you still keep bringing it up.
 
Thanks for the Gmail card idea. I chose the Awkward one and entered the following:

On account of the substandard representation of the Electronic Consumers Association, please terminate my ECA membership, effective immediately.

Name: Redacted
Email: Redacted

Happy Holidays.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']Subscription-based services are allowed to obtain updated billing information in order to collect their fees.
[/QUOTE]

I've only gotten home and got to page 5 out of like 52, I don't think I can read all of this, but I'm, as expected, pissed off at these "people" or Hal Halpin, or whoever is the d0uche(s) behind this.

The information in my quote above is correct. I work for a major credit card company. Subscription charges, like a gym membership or netflix, etc... are a different type of "authorization". They're classified to be ongoing/indefinite, in that even closing an account (at least at my bank) will not stop the charge. They obtained "rights" not just the first time, for the initial charge, but a right to bill on an ongoing basis per the subscription/renewal terms. That's what I mean by a different type of authorization, it's for multiple charges, not a single transaction. Ordinarily, the burden rests on the consumer to cancel the relevant subscription/service, but this isn't an ordinary situation.

For example, if a cable provider has monthly charges, then closing the credit card account after the Cable provider was authorized the very first time won't stop the ongoing charges. At my bank (and from what I understand, others) the charges will post to a "closed account" still. I had to explain this everyday in the last department I worked in (I worked in Customer Retention and had to convince people not to close, and that's one of the reasons some would close an account)....You, as the consumer, have to *normally*, cancel with the service provider, whoever that is. This is a different scenario though.

In this case, the deplorable ECA is making that nigh impossible to get accomplished, so it's difficult to say how it's best. I don't recommend saying it's fraud, ie: stolen card/lost card. Call and just be honest and say the merchant/provider has become shady, will do anything to rebill like changing expiration dates, and you did what was considered to be the proper way to cancel already (whether you just clicked the magic button, or, did one better, and wrote a letter certified), that way you have "ammo" that you, as the consumer/cardmember, did what you were expected to at the time of agreement when you'd signed up. Even better though, is if you explain you wrote a letter, after they changed the terms, it shows even more initiative.

*ALSO, if you clicked the button previously, mention to the bank/card issuer, that at the time of authorization to subscribe/initiate these services, annually, the way to cancel was set up in an alternate fashion, and you did what you were asked (and then some if you say you mailed a letter too), and that the Merchant (the ECA) is now changing/has changed this method by making you jump through ridiculous hoops, and never even told you themselves. Let them know you'll just dispute the charge if it goes through, and with all that said, any competent adviser will grasp that they need to address this now, or you'll just call back in, and that you're doing what you were supposed to, and they won't want to lose a customer (most calls are recorded, and could be listened to later with a manager). Also mention your longevity with the company if you get resistance or hassles, and be polite but concise.
 
[quote name='Z(+)DIAC']Not this again (10% off Amazon ECA code thread all over again).

WHENEVER THERE IS A DOUBT...CONSULT THE OP!!!

Was there a button for auto-renewing?

Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware.

However, that button (at least according to the ECA) was never functional nor ever intended to be posted (which I still think is bullshit), so like EVERYONE...and I mean EVERYONE, you're going to have to send them an actual letter in order to cancel.

Seek the OP.[/QUOTE]

Thanks. I completely forgot about looking at the OP
 
[quote name='oxidative']Thanks for the Gmail card idea. I chose the Awkward one and entered the following:

On account of the substandard representation of the Electronic Consumers Association, please terminate my ECA membership, effective immediately.

Name: Redacted
Email: Redacted

Happy Holidays.[/QUOTE]

Mine was similar, I made mine say:

"I'd like to have my ECA membership canceled, and auto-renew disabled on my account indefinitely; along with my information deleted from your database.

Name: [ Name ]
Username: [ Username ]
E-mail: [ E-mail ]

Happy Holidays."

Whoever originally posted this option, I think I love you. This is amazing (also picked the "Comic" card; which says "This is Awkward..").
 
[quote name='bobright']To cancel do we put our actual name, or "member name" ?[/QUOTE]

I assume actual name, but would trying both be a bad idea?
 
[quote name='oxidative']Thanks for the Gmail card idea. I chose the Awkward one and entered the following:

On account of the substandard representation of the Electronic Consumers Association, please terminate my ECA membership, effective immediately.

Name: Redacted
Email: Redacted

Happy Holidays.[/QUOTE]


I used almost the same exact thing. I was nervous but hopefully it works. I just thought a sentence and my info was too vague.
 
[quote name='blissskr']Why do you keep stating that the Eca has to pay amazon for all the money lost from stacking back? Thats not even a logical thought and someone else already pointed that out but you still keep bringing it up.[/QUOTE]

I know it doesn't seem like it should be that way, but ok then tell me who the hell is taking the loss? Do you think Amazon is? Just because they have deep enough pockets to do it doesn't mean they will, and if they did, then why would the ECA be so adamant about continuing with this cancellation charade this in the face of all this negative PR and BBB threats. The fact that they are risking this implies that they have a severe need for money. When you think about it that way, it is the most logical conclusion. Usually when an org does something shady and the spot gets blown, they stop and get very copliant. The fact that they don't seem to care shows that they are desperate and know they are pretty much sunk anyway if they don't try get the money from doing something like this.

If anything, what you are suggesting makes no sense - that they are a bunch of evil scumbags who plotted all along to f*ck everybody over by doing this to make their $ and that they are voluntarily choosing to commit business suicide by doing this junk in the face of a tidal wave of negative PR and impending legal action.

Look I don't know why the ECA would be responsible cuz I don't know the terms of the agreement with Amazon but I'm sure that Amazon's legal department made it very favorable to Amazon in cases of arbitration. One thing is sure - that $ was lost from stacking codes and a lot of people did it. Even if the lost money was split between the two companies, I'm sure the ECA's share was too much for them to bear. Non-profit orgs can not easily absorb big losses and from the from the way this thing is playing out it seems that suddenly the ECA needs money very badly. If Amazon was the only party that lost money, then Hal would not be flipping a shit. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='bobright']Also for Recipients name I assume put simply "ECA" ?[/QUOTE]

I put "Entertainment Consumers Association", but I'm sure that or ECA would work just fine.
 
If ECA can't even properly implement an online cancellation tool how are they going to handle the mountain of letters they are about to receive? :bomb:
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']I know it doesn't seem like it should be that way, but ok then tell me who the hell is taking the loss? Do you think Amazon is? If so then why would the ECA be so adamant about continuing with this cancellation charade this in the face of all this negative PR and BBB threats. The fact that they are risking this implies that they have a severe need for money. When you think about it that way, it is the most logical conclusion.[/QUOTE]

They wont be able to charge anyone renew fee for a few months since that when they started offering amazon code. If they keep this quiet more than a few people would forget about canceling. Now that this became such a big deal just about everyone know about it.
 
[quote name='Outlaw Tracker']No - only a new expiration date of the original card number.
They cannot access your new card because it has a new account number.[/QUOTE]

Well, this is partially true at some banks, though I can't speak for all of them. Specifically, the old card number is linked with the new one, in the event the old one is found or needed for future reference. The information is not "destroyed" or deleted, it's stored as linked data behind the scenes and advisers can view it for years to come if you give them the old number. You give the old number, then that account and the new one comes up, you give them just the new one, the old one is also still viewable as well. You can get to both with either number where I work.

That said, that doesn't mean that the ECA calling your card company will result in the bank giving them new information. If it's fraudulently marked on file, and the old account number is the number that brought up both accounts (one leads to the other in our systems), then the adviser will be suspicious and is instructed to protect the data. For all the bank knows at that point, the person on the other end of the phone was the cause of legitimate fraud in the first place, either because they are really with the ECA and that particular person stole the information from the ECA, or, that person is falsely stating they're with the ECA and is phishing for information. Either way, calling in with a fraud number raises flags and the bank is NOT supposed to give out the new info, especially months later. This is a red flag, and banks deal with the authorities when it comes to fraud, I doubt the outcome would be in ECA's favor by trying to call with fraudulent card data.
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']I know it doesn't seem like it should be that way, but ok then tell me who the hell is taking the loss? Do you think Amazon is? If so then why would the ECA be so adamant about continuing with this cancellation charade this in the face of all this negative PR and BBB threats. The fact that they are risking this implies that they have a severe need for money. When you think about it that way, it is the most logical conclusion.[/QUOTE]

It could be that when Amazon got cheated and pulled their support for ECA, many of it's members lost the thing that brought them to the site in the first place and decided to jump ship. ECA didn't like this mass exodus and is reacting poorly.
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']I know it doesn't seem like it should be that way, but ok then tell me who the hell is taking the loss? Do you think Amazon is? If so then why would the ECA be so adamant about continuing with this cancellation charade this in the face of all this negative PR and BBB threats. The fact that they are risking this implies that they have a severe need for money. When you think about it that way, it is the most logical conclusion.[/QUOTE]

Amazon's taking the loss. ECA is upset because they are losing the biggest retail partner. With this loss, it can stem a propagation throughout the rest of their partners. Or at least make the partners wonder why Amazon is not a discounting partner anymore, which will expose the fact that they've been losing business to Amazon b/c codes were "improperly" stacking (they weren't meant to).
 
[quote name='BWS1982']
That said, that doesn't mean that the ECA calling your card company will result in the bank giving them new information. If it's fraudulently marked on file, and that's the number that brought up both accounts (one leads to the other in our systems), then the adviser will be suspicious and is instructed to protect the data. For all the bank knows at that point, the person on the other end of the phone was the cause of legitimate fraud in the first place, either because they are really with the ECA and that particular person stole the information from the ECA, or, that person is falsely stating they're with the ECA and is phishing for information. Either way, calling in with a fraud number raises flags and the bank is NOT supposed to give out the new info, especially months later. This is a red flag, and banks deal with the authorities when it comes to fraud, I doubt the outcome would be in ECA's favor by trying to call with fraudulent card data.[/QUOTE]


Either way, the ECA doesn't seem to have phones anymore so they wouldn't be calling any credit card companies
 
Probably old news, but it looks like the feedback/gripes portion of the ECA forum got nuked. Been on the sidelines today checking back periodically. I'll wait it out to see if this gets resolved to the point where there is either an option to disable auto-renew or the ability to painlessly cancel an account.

Disappointing that the response has been focused on stacking abuse (which I took care to avoid) and people canceling and rejoining (presumably using the GIMAG code otherwise I see this being a non-issue because of the ECA's no refund policy) which also doesn't apply to someone like myself who not only paid to join the ECA, but should I choose to cancel it would not be to immediately rejoin and take advantage of the membership benefits, especially considering I have only ever found the Amazon benefit to be useful.
 
[quote name='NexusMIT']http://www.411mania.com/games/colum...nlocked-12.03.09:-ECA-Forgets-Its-Purpose.htm
Note this site has some popups if they annoy you.

Nice article on this story (sorry if someone already mentioned it)

They make a particular good point on how Hal was railing Apple for their EULA and 'change without notice' clause and now the ECA is using just that.

Anyway, I'll probably wait a couple days and see how this pans out before sending a certified letter.[/QUOTE]

Don't mean to be annoying, but seriously, this article sums up the situation the best. It's great this got exposure on Consumerist, Kotaku, Joystiq, IGN, and other websites, but their journalistic integrity all rolled over once Hal Halpin spewed off his nonsensical BS response and accepted his word without challenging or commenting on it. At least this 411mania writer pointed out how much of a hypocrite Halpin is. PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE!
 
[quote name='smcmanus1980']I know it doesn't seem like it should be that way, but ok then tell me who the hell is taking the loss? Do you think Amazon is? If so then why would the ECA be so adamant about continuing with this cancellation charade this in the face of all this negative PR and BBB threats. The fact that they are risking this implies that they have a severe need for money. When you think about it that way, it is the most logical conclusion.[/QUOTE]

That makes ZERO sense.

If the AARP gave a 10% off coupon to old people at Wendy's and the cashiers at Wendy's took them stacked for 20% off, would Wendy's ask AARP to reimburse them? Of course not. The taking of the coupon is with the retailer/wendy's.

Have you ever dealt with Amazon? They bend over backwards to provide good customer service and they take their PR very seriously. They'd rather take the loss on their books than ask a non-profit organization for reimbursement on a coupon code that AMAZON screwed up.

I can say with 99.99% certainty that Amazon did not ask the ECA to reimburse them for the stacked codes. That would make Amazon look like cunts. Are you calling Amazon cunts?
 
I have been a member of the ECA for over two years - way before the Amazon promotion - and I just filed a complaint with the BBB over this. No way I want to be associated with this organization anymore.

I can forgive them for making the mistake initially - the feature didn't work on their website and they realized it, so they took it down. I can't forgive them for defending themselves instead of apologizing and fixing the feature. There is absolutely no reason for them to require a hard copy of a cancellation request when they have a secure login area on their website. This sort of crappy EULA stuff is exactly the sort of thing I thought this organization was supposed to fight against.
 
[quote name='kodave']Don't mean to be annoying, but seriously, this article sums up the situation the best. It's great this got exposure on Consumerist, Kotaku, Joystiq, IGN, and other websites, but their journalistic integrity all rolled over once Hal Halpin spewed off his nonsensical BS response and accepted his word without challenging or commenting on it. At least this 411mania writer pointed out how much of a hypocrite Halpin is. PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE![/QUOTE]

Yes, you do mean to be annoying. Otherwise you wouldn't have made your font huge. Try not to be such a tool in the future.
 
Luckily I never signed up for this. Almost did, but noticed they required CC and whatnot so I didn't do it at all. I never like to pay for these "trial" things as it always turns into a huge pain in the ass...

Good luck to everyone who got screwed over by these guys!
 
Seriously, is the whole legal department at ECA run by a grade schooler? Judging by the Terms of Membership on the website, it certainly does considering how they describe the people (gamers) it's supposedly representing. Does the organization know anything about being a non-profit organization vs for profit company? So Hal says you want to borrow Apple's EULA? How Hal? You do not sell any products to the consumers, you get DONATION. The minute you start to even yank a penny without the person's consent, you will not be tax exempt. Kiss your salary goodbye. You ain't even a LLC nor a corporation so nothing to protect your liability. IRS will go after you as a sole proprietor and take every single dime you have. Your org. is gonna end like the dozen other cybergame tournament orgs. that ended few years back.

P.S. O ya, all those partners you supposedly listed out on your website, you are using the wrong terminology. Those are "Sponsors" not your "Partners". You are not legally binded with them to share profits are you?? Are you?? Stop confusing people. We are not stupid. Your non-profit org. veil will be pierced and you will face the wrath in the end.
 
[quote name='hpv']Yes, you do mean to be annoying. Otherwise you wouldn't have made your font huge. Try not to be such a tool in the future.[/QUOTE]

Says the human papillomavirus
 
This organization is a complete failure and I am furious that I ever gave them any money at all. The backhanded slap they gave to paying members when they knowingly opened the floodgates to throngs of internet users was bad enough. Not that I blame anybody for joining up during the "exclusive" promo code offered, but the ECA did nothing to reconcile the complaints of its many members. All we received was a blanket response and then the codes were gone and the president began to show his absolute ineptness on the boards. This recent tactic, however, is downright dirty. Making members work to cancel a membership is obviously in bad form yet the ECA sees no problem with it. They claim its so people don't cancel and auto-renew over and over, yet they throw out codes like candy just to pump up their membership numbers and gain a bit more credibility.

End of rant. Sticky for life.
 
I've written my Gmail holiday letter to them, but I'm stuck on how to sign it. I don't know which holiday Satan worshipers celebrate.
 
I 'll admit I haven't read all 69 pages here, but I want to say this: When you're writing your letter to cancel your membership, I strongly suggest everyone call for Hal Halpin to resign from the ECA in it. We can't get rid of such a sham of an organization entirely, but we can put pressure on them to remove their ineffective dolt of a leader and possibly change it for the better by getting someone honest to represent us.
 
I actually happen to live in Wilton, CT about 5 minutes away from that address (weird coincidence). On behalf of all the CAGs I will go down there and yell at them in person.
 
I've just send in my gmail card. Somehow I doubt they'll take it seriously and actually cancel, though.
 
[quote name='jaynatch']I actually happen to live in Wilton, CT about 5 minutes away from that address (weird coincidence). On behalf of all the CAGs I will go down there and yell at them in person.[/QUOTE]

I'm a few minutes over the state border from Ridgefield, then it's just a 15 minute drive down 33. Maybe I'll go over there next weekend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top