ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='tim44']A mod must have posted something too revealing of the ECA or something.[/QUOTE]
Earlier it was found that the head mod Gypsyflypms, on her PMS forums, asked PMS members to actively post positive things about the ECA for her. Not only that, but despite ECA forum registration being closed she offered to give them ECA forum access if they needed it by personally emailing her. As soon as this was noticed, a number of ECA members decried that as unprofessional bullshit. A couple mods agreed that it was kind of sketchy, but Gameslaw and Gypsyflypms insisted there was nothing wrong with it.
 
[quote name='Guerrilla'] A couple mods agreed that it was kind of sketchy, but Gameslaw and Gypsyflypms insisted there was nothing wrong with it.[/QUOTE]

Have those two ever taken a different stance?
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']Earlier it was found that Gypsyflypms, on her PMS forums, asked PMS members to actively post positive things about the ECA for her. Not only that, but despite ECA forum registration being closed she offered to give them ECA forum access if they needed it by personally emailing her. As soon as this was noticed, a number of ECA members decried that as unprofessional bullshit. A couple mods agreed that it was kind of sketchy, but Gameslaw and Gypsyflypms insisted there was nothing wrong with it.[/QUOTE]

Can ECA get any shadier?!?
 
[quote name='kodave']
While I was lurking in their thread reading those email conversations, someone posted that Gypsyfly had a breakdown over my latest post, but before I could read it they took the forums offline. Sadness.
[/QUOTE]

Damn. I was looking forward to reading some more awesome responses on the ECA forums. Gotta love how the pms thread was locked though (claiming she doesn't have enough time, does this mean she's the only one who is capable of defending eca? some of the other members seemed to be in support of it.)
 
[quote name='kodave']An ECA Chapter president was having email correspondence with some of the mature dissenters, but the contents of his email were posted over on Neogaf.

While I was lurking in their thread reading those email conversations, someone posted that Gypsyfly had a breakdown over my latest post, but before I could read it they took the forums offline. Sadness.

I hope people made copies of their posts in this thread for posterity, or saved some of those threads to PDFs, or whatever they need to evidence things, because I can only assume the board is going to come back wiped out and with EXTREMELY limited registration and posting abilities.

Edit: Also, someone removed Lionel Hutz from Hal Halpin's wikipedia page.[/QUOTE]

Which thread did you reply to? I think it's pretty easy to do a google search for that thread and just cache it to find out what she said.
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']Earlier it was found that the head mod Gypsyflypms, on her PMS forums, asked PMS members to actively post positive things about the ECA for her. Not only that, but despite ECA forum registration being closed she offered to give them ECA forum access if they needed it by personally emailing her. As soon as this was noticed, a number of ECA members decried that as unprofessional bullshit. A couple mods agreed that it was kind of sketchy, but Gameslaw and Gypsyflypms insisted there was nothing wrong with it.[/QUOTE]



Off topic here but is it just me or is Gypsyfly one of the ugliest bitches you ever laid eyes on? Every time I see her forum pic I feel the need to motorboat my girlfriend just to give my eyes some relief.
 
This is a comment from the article Mindlog posted:

Submitted by SilverStar - August 21, 2007 at 5:33 am -0500 It seems to me that the ESA has simply shown its true colors recently. They're nothing but bank chasing reactionaries.

They don't give an honest damn about the video game industry, beyond how it affects their own bankroll. The only reason why they try to rally the VGVN against anything, is because they want to be the only ones who have any control over the game industry, once a game is able to hit the market.

And the big difference between a game developer and a game publisher, is that the developers want their games to be as high quality as possible. A publisher just wants face time. They only care about having their label on as many games as possible, and the faster they can get garbage out there, the higher their brand recognition.

Unfortunately, the ESA also wants people to think that supporting the publishers means supporting the developers. The only time that happens, is when they're one in the same(first-party, indy, or self-published titles, for example). Sadly, it's the actions of the publishers that cause the developing houses to get a bad rap, because when the developers want more time, the publishers don't give a damn, and they're all too happy to shift the blame to the developers when it goes bad, while taking praise when it goes good.

The ESA has shown it's honestly no better than the MPAA and RIAA, lobbying unwashed masses to do their bidding, by warping the facts.

The ESA is as good for the developers, the programmers, designers, artists, etc.. as the RIAA is for the recording artists and singers out there. All the ESA cares about, are the big houses, like EA.

The ECA, however, are the ones who currently stand for the developers, because without them, there would be no game industry. And, unlike in the movie and music industry, the ECA also stands up for the consumers. I think the ECA should create their own anti-ESA lobby voting group, to deal with things like the price fixing and anti-consumerism stances the core game industry has been taking, effectively telling the gamers themselves what's good for them, to ignore the men behind the curtains, and to shut up and pay out the ass for non-quality titles.

When the group you support becomes corrupt and shows that it cares nothing for you beyond your use as a drone, it isn't shameful to turn coat and join the new, right team for your cause.
 
[quote name='davegillmour']Off topic here but is it just me or is Gypsyfly one of the ugliest bitches you ever laid eyes on? Every time I see her forum pic I feel the need to motorboat my girlfriend just to give my eyes some relief.[/QUOTE]

Uncalled for!

I mean, I know its CAG and there's a reputation of being lazy and greedy and horrible to uphold for the outside world like ECA, but that's taking it too far.
 
[quote name='davegillmour']Off topic here but is it just me or is Gypsyfly one of the ugliest bitches you ever laid eyes on? Every time I see her forum pic I feel the need to motorboat my girlfriend just to give my eyes some relief.[/QUOTE]
Don't go there. She's a fine human, other than some of her forum antics.
 
[quote name='davegillmour']Off topic here but is it just me or is Gypsyfly one of the ugliest bitches you ever laid eyes on? Every time I see her forum pic I feel the need to motorboat my girlfriend just to give my eyes some relief.[/QUOTE]

I hate to be THAT guy, but this doesn't help us and distracts from our credibility, even if she could have a better attitude.

EDIT - Wow 3-4 posts of a similiar nature in seconds, see ECA/Gypsy the majority of us are not mean spirited or trying to directly attack anything other than policy.
 
[quote name='kodave']Uncalled for!

I mean, I know its CAG and there's a reputation of being lazy and greedy and horrible to uphold for the outside world like ECA, but that's taking it too far.[/QUOTE]




Yes, I'm aware. Just needed to get that out.
 
[quote name='kodave']Have those two ever taken a different stance?[/QUOTE]
Not that I'm aware of; they both toe the line, even when called out on it. At least the new mods seemed a little shocked by Gypsyfly's action...
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']Not that I'm aware of; they both toe the line, even when called out on it. At least the new mods seemed a little shocked by Gypsyfly's action...[/QUOTE]

I wish there was some record of that... I'm sure they're doing a large purge of their forums right now.
 
[quote name='davegillmour']Yes, I'm aware. Just needed to get that out.[/QUOTE]
As you get older, you'll learn not to have such a bad case of verbal diarrhea.
 
Wow, that post Gypsy made in the PMS forums is hilarious. Everyone is jumping on her for it, it's great.

I found this reply from her particularly funny:
BTW, folks at CAG...calling me a "*****" for being a messenger or any other name isn't helping your cause much and validates the need for communities like PMS Clan and H2O Clan, places that know how to respect each other.

Yes, *we* are the ones who don't understand the meaning of respect...
 
The only mod responses that matter are Hannah's and Gypsyfly's, as they're actually listed on the ECA Team page and can be construed as giving official stances of the ECA.

Everyone else is just some Chapter President, and while official sounding, don't make the policy or represent the official stance of the ECA other than official documentation they recite to their own chapters.

And then there's Gameslaw, who likes to talk big because he's gonna be a lawyer soon. He's probably looking for a job with the ECA in the future or something, especially since their current general counsel is also their Vice President. But nothing he says is official either, even though he tows the line.
 
[quote name='Warlock82']Wow, that post Gypsy made in the PMS forums is hilarious. Everyone is jumping on her for it, it's great.

I found this reply from her particularly funny:


Yes, *we* are the ones who don't understand the meaning of respect...[/QUOTE]

davegillmour knows respect.
 
I seriously hope someone has sent a link from the PMS forums thread posted by Gypsy to their gaming site/blog lists...seriously, I need to immediately wash my hands of this despicable organization.
 
[quote name='davegillmour']Off topic here but is it just me or is Gypsyfly one of the ugliest *****es you ever laid eyes on? Every time I see her forum pic I feel the need to motorboat my girlfriend just to give my eyes some relief.[/QUOTE]

Not cool. Not cool at all. While I am unhappy with the eca's actions. There's no need for that kind of behavior.
 
In case anyone missed it:
[quote name='GypsyFly']Please help ECA by visiting the forums and the following sites and commenting about your support for ECA and belief in the mission. If you are not currently registered there please let me know via email: [email protected] and I will add you as I have shut it down to new registrations. Spammers bombarded the site and I had to temporarily close it to new registrations until things calmed down (There were only two mods, including me
mvShock.gif
).

-- (http://www.pmsclan.com/forum/showthread.php?t=49970)
[/QUOTE]
This has been the controversy of the day, which may be why the ECA forums are down. We'll know if their forums come back up without the posts regarding this issue.
 
[quote name='Warlock82']Wow, that post Gypsy made in the PMS forums is hilarious. Everyone is jumping on her for it, it's great.

I found this reply from her particularly funny:


Yes, *we* are the ones who don't understand the meaning of respect...[/QUOTE]
She's basically grasping at straws now. After all the other crap she tried to pull, now she's trying anything to make US look like the bad guys.
 
[quote name='Mindlog']One of my most amusing takeaways from this whole mess. I'm actually visiting ECA partners now. Mainline is now a company I'll be recommending (nice PCs/no bloatware) and I'm going to be picking up a knit cap off of Split Reason.[/QUOTE]

If you get it before the new year, remember their 15% off code "ANTIGRINCH". I'm pretty sure they have it on the main page, but this is the website dedicated to saving money.
 
It looks like they just go and appoint moderators out of nowhere to take care of issues that are way out of their league. This is not Invisionfreegamefansite; people paid for this. Not to say I want want anyone to have a breakdown or anything, but this is what happens when the people you "hire" are unprofessional and not actually tied to the ECA.

And while their lack of professionalism doesn't help, we still shouldn't be targeting them, because it isn't about Gypsy or any of the other moderators. This is about the people who put them in charge of shit.

It's as if they put children in charge of PR.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mostly I'm just simply disappointed... I believe in the premise that the ECA stands for and I really do believe gamers need and advocacy group.
 
Well even though the Eca now may be working on a solution, its not because there sorry or admitting fault at all they just must be realizing that they dug themselves too deep a hole and trying to save face now by just makes them look even worse when combined with the fact they generally have no people skills for a consumer driven organization from the top down.
 
maybe a good sign

I didn't create this and have no control over technical, marketing, or financial decisions of ECA and I"m definitely not going to let anyone abuse people who are trying to create a civil situation. I also have no control over the forum being down now that decision came from above so ECA could focus on implementing the online feature to cancel.


ECA just sucks at PR. ECA probably would have avoided the entire mess by just having their mods/chapter presidents not post on forums. And understand that online cancellation or phone cancellation is a necessity and implement it soon. They could have also sent out a mass email explaining the auto-renew form error(if it was an error) and locked out renew functions till the online button was in place.

I would have never heard of the ECA problems if the ECA mods didn't act like buffoons and actually react to the internet. And now Gypsy with that forum topic to incite ECA/H20/PMS member to encourage defending the ECA is just another bad move.

What happened to the Customer is always right? :p

Also I don't understand Hal's comment on trying to prevent people who've abused the amazon code from canceling. It's not like the amazon code is still active, and the other offers are more or less junk. Unless you want them to be screwed over and be forced to auto-renew...I don't see a point in removing the auto-renew option online and cutting off phone options.
 
[quote name='fff398']maybe a good sign

I didn't create this and have no control over technical, marketing, or financial decisions of ECA and I"m definitely not going to let anyone abuse people who are trying to create a civil situation. I also have no control over the forum being down now that decision came from above so ECA could focus on implementing the online feature to cancel.


ECA just sucks at PR. ECA probably would have avoided the entire mess by just having their mods/chapter presidents not post on forums. And understand that online cancellation or phone cancellation is a necessity and implement it soon. They could have also sent out a mass email explaining the auto-renew form error(if it was an error) and locked out renew functions till the online button was in place.

I would have never heard of the ECA problems if the ECA mods didn't act like buffoons and actually react to the internet. And now Gypsy with that forum topic to incite ECA/H20/PMS member to encourage defending the ECA is just another bad move.

What happened to the Customer is always right? :p

Also I don't understand Hal's comment on trying to prevent people who've abused the amazon code from canceling. It's not like the amazon code is still active, and the other offers are more or less junk. Unless you want them to be screwed over and be forced to auto-renew...I don't see a point in removing the auto-renew option online and cutting off phone options.[/QUOTE]


Where did you get that underlined portion from? Who is that attributable to?
 
[quote name='fff398']
Also I don't understand Hal's comment on trying to prevent people who've abused the amazon code from canceling. It's not like the amazon code is still active, and the other offers are more or less junk. Unless you want them to be screwed over and be forced to auto-renew...I don't see a point in removing the auto-renew option online and cutting off phone options.[/QUOTE]

Assuming they are speaking truth about people who are rapidly canceling and signing up again, their method to stop this was a really stupid workaround. All you had to do was put in a check that stops someone who cancelled their membership in the past y days from signing up again until x days have passed. Instead, they go ahead and completely remove a feature (??).
 
[quote name='theloserboy']Assuming they are speaking truth about people who are rapidly canceling and signing up again, their method to stop this was a really stupid workaround. All you had to do was put in a check that stops someone who cancelled their membership in the past y days from signing up again until x days have passed. Instead, they go ahead and completely remove a feature (??).[/QUOTE]

Look, we all know that they made the call to try to keep as many members as possible after they reaped thousands of new people from discounts. They got caught and now have to retcon their decisions.
 
[quote name='theloserboy']Assuming they are speaking truth about people who are rapidly canceling and signing up again, their method to stop this was a really stupid workaround. All you had to do was put in a check that stops someone who cancelled their membership in the past y days from signing up again until x days have passed. Instead, they go ahead and completely remove a feature (??).[/QUOTE]

I am pretty sure the best workaround would have been to remove the GIMAG code.
 
[quote name='fff398']that decision came from above so ECA could focus on implementing the online feature to cancel. [/QUOTE]

Funny, if they had just sent out e-mails to those who cancelled online and said "Sorry, our bad, we'll fix it or you can cancel via e-mail or phone." This would of all blown over with a few people annoyed that their cancellation didn't go through. However after all that's been said and done so far, I seriously doubt that they're working on this.
 
[quote name='theloserboy']Assuming they are speaking truth about people who are rapidly canceling and signing up again, their method to stop this was a really stupid workaround. All you had to do was put in a check that stops someone who cancelled their membership in the past y days from signing up again until x days have passed. Instead, they go ahead and completely remove a feature (??).[/QUOTE]

still I don't understand why they would do that in the first place? If people were abusing the creation of multiple accounts, wouldn't you want to set a check(Duplicate address/Credit Cards Info) at the creation of the account? Or do something about the code?(I never used the amazon code, I signed up while ECA were advertising the amazon code but while it was inactive) I am not sure what locking out the cancellation does to prevent this, asides from forcing all users to auto-renew...including the people who created multiple accounts
 
[quote name='tim44']Don't go there. She's a fine human, other than some of her forum antics.[/QUOTE]

From what we've seen of her I would go less "fine human" and more "cunt".

She does look attractive, though, but that's neither here nor there.
 
[quote name='distgfx']Funny, if they had just sent out e-mails to those who cancelled online and said "Sorry, our bad, we'll fix it or you can cancel via e-mail or phone." This would of all blown over with a few people annoyed that their cancellation didn't go through.[/QUOTE]

it still blows my mind they haven't done this. Despite the fact they are obligated to inform people of their billing mistake, it's just the right thing for a consumer oriented organization to do. Maybe when they get the online cancellation up well get an email. I wish people would stop with the personal attacks of the mods and such, it just gives them ammo to attack us as immature.
 
[quote name='theloserboy']Assuming they are speaking truth about people who are rapidly canceling and signing up again...[/QUOTE]


See, I don't even buy that happened.

Why, with the free GIMAG code, would you sign up and cancel right repeadedly?

If anything, you should have signed up for MULTIPLE accounts with the GIMAG code and kept them all active.

That way you could generate even MORE Amazon codes to hoard after they put the 1 per day per account limitation on the Amazon code generation.

Then the only problem you'd be left with is 1 person trying to cancel 10 accounts or whatever at the same time. - But that's definitely not the same as "sign up, cancel, sign up, cancel."

If anyone was doing "sign up, cancel, sign up, cancel" - they were exploiting Amazon and the ECA the wrong way, meaning they were probably from SlickDeals or something.

And I really can't imagine that it was a situation that was out of control. They were probably just tired of dealing with it when it came up so they decided to stick it to everyone and try to rake in some cash.

EDIT: And not to mention, the TOS didn't change until after the Amazon and GIMAG codes had ended - so if this was a problem when the Amazon abuse was going on, they surely didn't act quickly to address it at that time. Hence why Hal Halpin and the ECA's stance smells like baloney.
 
She closed the PMS forum sticky lol. After a lengthy "I'm just a person" sarcastic EXCUSE ME! post. NO REBUTTAL FOR YOU!

Funny...she thinks she's indestructible...

http://www.facebook.com/Gypsyxxxxxx

Consumerist said it best. The best way to combat the "multiple sign-ups/cancellations" is to limit the cc card # to one account.
 
[quote name='Jesus_S_Preston']From what we've seen of her I would go less "fine human" and more "cunt".

She does look attractive, though, but that's neither here nor there.[/QUOTE]
These types of posts add nothing to what most of us have been trying to accomplish, except get us lumped in with those who keep making them.
 
[quote name='Outinthedark']She closed the PMS forum sticky lol. After a lengthy "I'm just a person" sarcastic EXCUSE ME! post. NO REBUTTAL FOR YOU!

Funny...she thinks she's indestructible...

[/QUOTE]

Take out that link before she starts getting harassed. Respect her privacy at least.
 
[quote name='koji126']Take out that link before she starts getting harassed. Respect her privacy at least.[/QUOTE]

Anyone with 2 brain cells can put that one together...
 
[quote name='theloserboy']Assuming they are speaking truth about people who are rapidly canceling and signing up again, their method to stop this was a really stupid workaround. All you had to do was put in a check that stops someone who cancelled their membership in the past y days from signing up again until x days have passed. Instead, they go ahead and completely remove a feature (??).[/QUOTE]

Assuming they were talking about GI code abuse, they could have avoided the whole thing by making it harder for people to sign up again, not to cancel. They required a CC on file for even free accounts; make registration refuse to apply the code on a credit card used to create an account in the past 90 days.

Making it harder to cancel is just flat-out stupid, because scammers could still sign up for a billion different accounts if needed. I believe the "don't auto-renew" checkbox was still available at the time? So the scammers couldn't know the ECA planned to bill them anyway. They could still mass-generate Amazon codes, and they could still constantly reuse the GI coupon. None of the supposed 'abuse' they were trying to stop relied on the cancellation portion.

The biggest problem is that the ECA claims to be an action organization, when the vast majority of members are only members for the discounts. I paid my $20 six months ago for Amazon codes; the ECA has been at the forefront of absolutely none of the videogame politics stuff that intersts me.

Losing the Amazon codes had to be devestating for them--the GI ad brought an exciting rush of memberships, but almost none of those people were going to shell out the additional $20 for another year. And worse, the people like me who'd paid dues this year for access to the codes were unlikely to pay next year because their other 'discounts' don't add up to much. Giant money pit for them.

And when the chastising about how shallow anyone must have been to join the ECA for Amazon discounts instead of because of a strong belief in the ECA's mission failed to make people change their minds, instead prompting people to ask what exactly the ECA does, they had to realize that next year the organization was screwed.

I don't know how much of what happened recently was intentionally shady, how much was accidentally shady, and how much is just the embarassingly incompetent "proffesionalism" of the ECA reps, but the more excuses they come up with, the less sense the whole thing makes.
 
[quote name='elrechazao']Look, we all know that they made the call to try to keep as many members as possible after they reaped thousands of new people from discounts. They got caught and now have to retcon their decisions.[/QUOTE]

Please put heavy emphasis on where I said assume.

[quote name='Kaltic']I am pretty sure the best workaround would have been to remove the GIMAG code.[/QUOTE]

Well, yeah, but that probably would have hurt member registration pretty bad. I'm just saying if this were a job/assignment for me I probably would have prevented rapid cancel and renewal instead of completely removing the cancelling.

[quote name='fff398']still I don't understand why they would do that in the first place? If people were abusing the creation of multiple accounts, wouldn't you want to set a check(Duplicate address/Credit Cards Info) at the creation of the account? Or do something about the code?(I never used the amazon code, I signed up while ECA were advertising the amazon code but while it was inactive) I am not sure what locking out the cancellation does to prevent this, asides from forcing all users to auto-renew...including the people who created multiple accounts[/QUOTE]

No, not really, because you could have your kids/siblings sign up for multiple accounts using the same card/same address. Doing that hurts sales..er... I mean membership. but once someone quits, why the hell would you let them sign up again immediately, and repeat the process multiple times no less? If they do that, they're obviously making a profit off of your benefits.

To be clear, all I'm trying to say is their solution to their claimed problem is solving the problem, but is creating a bunch of new ones. If the ECA is to be believed, they are not very good with handling resources. Seriously? They are willing to burn more money hiring people to read all these letters and enter them into their database to stop abusers than just hiring someone to do a few simple edits to their code? Even if the ECA is telling the truth, do you really want people who solve problems this way with your money?
 
[quote name='davegillmour']Off topic here but is it just me or is Gypsyfly one of the ugliest bitches you ever laid eyes on?[/QUOTE]It's not just you.
 
[quote name='koji126']Take out that link before she starts getting harassed. Respect her privacy at least.[/QUOTE]

Not that I'm advocating harassing her in any way, but her full name is publicly available on ECA's website. It's not hard to find any Facebooks, Twitters, MySpaces, or other information that's publicly available albeit somewhat-restricted on the internets.

People are going to be douches whether or not the link is here, but it's probably best for trying to appear mature to remove the link.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top