ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The semi-apology is nice, but I'm afraid the bridge has been burned.

That's awesome that over 700 requests of termination were sent...select few my ass.

This isn't over, nor should the whole fiasco be brushed off now, I'm disappointed to see the contacts for the sponsors missing from the Op.

EDIT - Nevermind, they've been spoilerized!

Anyhow, I think the sponsors should still be made aware of the true size of the 'incensed' members.
 
[quote name='caltab']everyone needs to read this...Hal has really said a lot of good stuff that people wanted to hear

http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints[/QUOTE]

too little and way to late.
I dont see how anyone would even consider staying on as a member with these ECA clowns.
From the clueless and annoying mods up to the "president" Hal. who the hell takes these guys seriously?
Other then they will seriously abuse your personal creditcard info whenever they feel like it.
Also I still havent found out what the ECA has actually done or is currently doing
. Honestly it seems like a big tax write off scam.
Make a nonprofit.. have big tax writeoffs. profit.
 
[quote name='Muthafodder']Are comments disable from this site?

I'm shocked nobody has replied.[/QUOTE]
I'm pretty sure they're being heavily moderated, since that's one of Hal-Hal's sites. Probably won't ever see comments posted, until weeks from now, if ever. Unless they get some shills to toe the party line. I'm sure those comments would be posted.
 
[quote name='arcane93']Oh, hey, I guess they do cover them! That's the only problem that I see with the EFF site -- it's almost information overload, they're doing so much. Then again, that's kind of refreshing after all of my attempts to find information on the ECA site that yielded nothing.

Thanks for the link![/QUOTE]

I agree EFF is a great example of a nonprofit actually DOING what they say and showing you the proof.

The ECA on the otherhand is a joke/scam.
 
[quote name='maxfisher']Actually looks like his last activity is now 4:25 today. Even though it says the same thing on most profiles, I get a kick out of "HalHalpin has not made any friends yet."[/QUOTE]
It needs to have a count of how many enemies he's made... ;)
 
Unfortunately I can't access this site from work, but as Reira said the package has been mailed around noon today (EST). The tracking number is 2307 1770 0000 1360 8470 if anyone wants to watch its progress.

Since each letter meets the criteria for cancellation outlined by the ECA, I don't see how they could deny them without causing more stink for themselves. But in any case, I can't wait for them to open up 700+ cancellation letters. :)

Somebody mentioned earlier that I shouldn't refuse compensation, and should instead have Cheapy donate the money to Child's Play. Excellent idea, if he's so inclined. Mailing costs weren't bad at all... only about $13. Other costs (paper, printing, gas, etc) were probably $12, so maybe $25 to Child's Play?
 
[quote name='simmias']Unfortunately I can't access this site from work, but as Reira said the package has been mailed around noon today (EST). The tracking number is 2307 1770 0000 1360 8470 if anyone wants to watch its progress.

Since each letter meets the criteria for cancellation outlined by the ECA, I don't see how they could deny them without causing more stink for themselves. But in any case, I can't wait for them to open up 700+ cancellation letters. :)

Somebody mentioned earlier that I shouldn't refuse compensation, and should instead have Cheapy donate the money to Child's Play. Excellent idea, if he's so inclined. Mailing costs weren't bad at all... only about $13. Other costs (paper, printing, gas, etc) were probably $12, so maybe $25 to Child's Play?[/QUOTE]
Thanks for this. It's very much appreciated.
 
[quote name='Jugglenaut']With a focus on music and movie DRM. No mention of game-specific DRM problems including activation limits and possible spyware. I'm not saying the EFF is failing us for missing on these, as the points of DRM that they do focus on (especially the broader points of the DMCA and other all-encompassing copyright law) are good. But there are some game-specific DRM issues that need to be address.[/QUOTE]

They seem to be very responsive to their members and the issues they raise. I would bet that if they had a reasonably significant number of members who asked them to address issues with game and software DRM, they would look into it.
 
[quote name='kodave']Why not just go down in person and ask for some clarification on things? See if the spin stops there.[/QUOTE]
I wonder who's actually in that office, though.
 
Thanks to everyone who helped in sending out that gigantic batch of letters. That certainly must have taken a while to prepare. :p
 
[quote name='imacgod']Hal's reply doesn't sound like the major problem was the stackers. I think the last straw for him was the eBay sellers. I know there were like one or two of "CAGs" (I think they were newbies) taking part in that, but I also know there was a lot of CAGs reporting it to the ECA. Doesn't really sound like CAG was the problem for that one. In fact, CAG was probably helping with that issue.
[/QUOTE]

Sorry to dig up an old post but this needs to be said again. In fact, it was CAGs who were monitoring eBay and looking for code resellers and reporting them to both eBay and the ECA. This was a big topic of discussion on the ECA discount thread for quite a while and I'm sure it was CAG and CAG alone that put several of them out of business. I don't remember any actual CAGs selling the codes - or at least none that let any of us know they were doing it, as that would have been grounds for an insta-ban here on CAG (I would have done it myself).

So there's no "probably" about it - CAG members definitely helped stamp out several of the resellers. If there was any implication to the contrary in what Hal has said, then that is more BS for the pile.
 
[quote name='Kaidane']Thanks to everyone who helped in sending out that gigantic batch of letters. That certainly must have taken a while to prepare. :p[/QUOTE]


I just want to say the same thing
 
When news of this canceling issue broke I called the ECA and left a message for Seth, which I am sure you guys are somewhat aware of who he is. I was not expecting a call back because I am sure they got a large number of phone calls and the majority of them were not nice I would assume. I was a bit surprised when I get a phone call and my caller ID showed it was from "Lamorte Burns &"(it cut off after that) with a 203 area code. I thought it was for my mother, but when they were asking for me I was worried perhaps it was a legal firm or something so I asked who it was and he said it was Seth from the ECA in regards to my call about canceling my ECA account.

Now I think everyone here knows that there is at LEAST two sides to every story, and this one has a larger number than two. I do not know if I was told the whole truth, but I have dealt with Seth once before in the past when the Amazon codes were around and they were not working, he actually sent me a gift package with some nice things as well as a free year to the ECA. So my opinion of him is not negative at all, so I tend to believe what he is saying to a certain degree.

I asked him about the whole "we'll change your cards expiration date and charge you" issue which REALLY did NOT sit well with me and I am sure a large number of other people. He said that it was worded poorly and they are not going to be doing that and he apologized. He was unaware of the legal ramifications of said action, but he said it won't be happening.

I also asked if they are working on a way to cancel via the website and he said they absolutely are and the letter/snail mail rout is for those whose memberships are nearing the renewal date and want to cancel before then. If you have some time before the renewal date you should have plenty of time to cancel via a website feature that is in the works.

I also brought up the whole certified letter issue and he said that was a oversight and poorly worded on their part and it should never have said that. It should have said that you just need to send in a letter stating your name and that you want to cancel, it does not need to be certified or UPS or FedEx.

He said he was in the marketing department and did not know everything and I believe him because sadly, that is how companies work these days. They leave as many people in the dark as they can, customers and employees alike that way it's less of a headache and less work overall for the higher ups, sad but true.

I am not saying any of this to convert anyone to an ECA supporter after all that has happened with the ECA in the last week with this issue, because at this point I am a bit skeptical as well. The comments made by Hal have left me with a sour taste in my mouth, but if they are working on fixing it I would like to give them a bit of time to fix it. They are still human after all, everyone makes mistakes.
 
I've been spending some time browsing EFF's website, and I agree, they are doing much more than ECA ever did. I wonder if a group of us could join at the same time and express interest in gamer-specific issues like restrictive DRM, etc.

*EDIT
I'm sure there are some great people over at ECA like Seth and Leonharfs, but unfortunately Hal is thier leader, and people like Gypsyfly and Gameslaw are their mouthpieces. I encourage ECA staff of conscience to take a long deep look at how their organization has behaved this week, and maybe considering moving their time and energy to a different avenue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='io']Sorry to dig up an old post but this needs to be said again. In fact, it was CAGs who were monitoring eBay and looking for code resellers and reporting them to both eBay and the ECA. This was a big topic of discussion on the ECA discount thread for quite a while and I'm sure it was CAG and CAG alone that put several of them out of business. I don't remember any actual CAGs selling the codes - or at least none that let any of us know they were doing it, as that would have been grounds for an insta-ban here on CAG (I would have done it myself).

So there's no "probably" about it - CAG members definitely helped stamp out several of the resellers. If there was any implication to the contrary in what Hal has said, then that is more BS for the pile.[/QUOTE]

Absolutely. Multiple CAGs reported getting Thank You packages from the ECA for reporting ECA code re-sellers.

I never contacted ECA about it because I really wasn't looking for anything from them, but I immediately reported every ebay ECA-Amazon code reseller that was brought to our attention in those old ECA threads here, along with other CAGs I'm sure. Not that the code re-selling really affected Amazon because either way someone was going to use the codes, but it undermined the ECA, and you know, trying to help out the organization that is making this benefit accessible to us seemed like a good idea at the time,

I also remember CAG members sending letters to Amazon thanking them for supporting the ECA to encourage them to work out a solution to the codes.

Funny none of that got mentioned, but these supposed demanding and nasty letters to Amazon did get mentioned. Like who the hell was emailing Amazon and demanding they release more codes, like it was some kind of birth rite or something?
 
[quote name='chakan']I've been spending some time browsing EFF's website, and I agree, they are doing much more than ECA ever did. I wonder if a group of us could join at the same time and express interest in gamer-specific issues like restrictive DRM, etc.

*EDIT
I'm sure there are some great people over at ECA like Seth and Leonharfs, but unfortunately Hal is thier leader, and people like Gypsyfly and Gameslaw are their mouthpieces. I encourage ECA staff of conscience to take a long deep look at how their organization has behaved this week, and maybe considering moving their time and energy to a different avenue.[/QUOTE]

I sent the EFF an email asking specifically what their stance on video games consumers rights are and if they'll be doing any work specifically in that area. If they can give me any good info on that I'll donate the $15 I would have used on my ECA student account to them. And I believe that is tax deductible for any other cheap asses out there, because they're not giving us a "service" in return like the ECA.
 
God more lies from Hal. You can get infinite code by simply clearing your cookie. This is completely controllable by ECA. There is no need to join and rejoin.
 
[quote name='kodave']I sent the EFF an email asking specifically what their stance on video games consumers rights are and if they'll be doing any work specifically in that area. If they can give me any good info on that I'll donate the $15 I would have used on my ECA student account to them. And I believe that is tax deductible for any other cheap asses out there, because they're not giving us a "service" in return like the ECA.[/QUOTE]

I was looking through the EFF site last night as well, and I was impressed. They seem organized and have results to show for their efforts.

The ECA needs to make the changes everyone has discussed and Hal Halpin needs to be removed before I will send them any $$. I have zero confidence in him to lead that group after this debacle that could have easily resolved.

I still think his latest response is inadequate and dodges the main issue, that they were using very poor business practices and not communicating with consumers. His attitude is still self-righteous and that he is "conceding" on some things, but doesn't necessarily think he was wrong. This guy is just an idiot.
 
[quote name='Saix_XIII']When news of this canceling issue broke I called the ECA and left a message for Seth, which I am sure you guys are somewhat aware of who he is. I was not expecting a call back because I am sure they got a large number of phone calls and the majority of them were not nice I would assume. I was a bit surprised when I get a phone call and my caller ID showed it was from "Lamorte Burns &"(it cut off after that) with a 203 area code. I thought it was for my mother, but when they were asking for me I was worried perhaps it was a legal firm or something so I asked who it was and he said it was Seth from the ECA in regards to my call about canceling my ECA account.

Now I think everyone here knows that there is at LEAST two sides to every story, and this one has a larger number than two. I do not know if I was told the whole truth, but I have dealt with Seth once before in the past when the Amazon codes were around and they were not working, he actually sent me a gift package with some nice things as well as a free year to the ECA. So my opinion of him is not negative at all, so I tend to believe what he is saying to a certain degree.

I asked him about the whole "we'll change your cards expiration date and charge you" issue which REALLY did NOT sit well with me and I am sure a large number of other people. He said that it was worded poorly and they are not going to be doing that and he apologized. He was unaware of the legal ramifications of said action, but he said it won't be happening.

I also asked if they are working on a way to cancel via the website and he said they absolutely are and the letter/snail mail rout is for those whose memberships are nearing the renewal date and want to cancel before then. If you have some time before the renewal date you should have plenty of time to cancel via a website feature that is in the works.

I also brought up the whole certified letter issue and he said that was a oversight and poorly worded on their part and it should never have said that. It should have said that you just need to send in a letter stating your name and that you want to cancel, it does not need to be certified or UPS or FedEx.

He said he was in the marketing department and did not know everything and I believe him because sadly, that is how companies work these days. They leave as many people in the dark as they can, customers and employees alike that way it's less of a headache and less work overall for the higher ups, sad but true.

I am not saying any of this to convert anyone to an ECA supporter after all that has happened with the ECA in the last week with this issue, because at this point I am a bit skeptical as well. The comments made by Hal have left me with a sour taste in my mouth, but if they are working on fixing it I would like to give them a bit of time to fix it. They are still human after all, everyone makes mistakes.[/QUOTE]

While all of that may be true, and I appreciate you posting it, look back over that story and see how many times "oversight", "poorly worded", or "mistake" is used. It almost comes down to every single thing the ECA did after removing the "non-functioning" auto-renew button was a colossol failure. And the fact of the matter is, your organization is going to be judged based on these kinds of things. The fact that they initially tried to cover up some of these problems makes it even worse.

It's nice that they're finally owning up to some of these screw ups, but it scares me to think what would have taken place if this uproar hadn't occurred. It's easy to admit to something when someone has already called you out on it. I'm not saying there's just no going back for the ECA, but can they truly be surprised by the damage that THEY have inflicted upon themselves?

I think the bigger picture in all of this, that a lot of people seem to be overlooking, is that since the ECA is supposed to be advocating for gamer rights, they should be working on ways to make us WANT to remain members. I'm glad that they're addressing the issues with online cancellation, but this is a cause we were supposed to believe in and be donating our money to support. I've really yet to hear one reason why they're worth giving $20 a year to (and no, I'm not referring to Amazon codes). I'd really love to know more about what they actually do.
 
Thanks, kodave. I was considering writing something similar. If a representative of EFF posted here (hopefully bumped to the front page), they might have 718 potential donors/members.
 
Ya know, Seth Stebbins asked for my address after I reported the ebay sales of ECA codes.

I gave him it and he said "in the mail".

I never received such a package. -_-;.
 
[quote name='confoosious']PvtChurch. - the thing is that we DO know. 2 is a lie because exploiters had nothing to gain by canceling and rejoining.

Smokescreen.[/QUOTE]

Did you not read the entire interview? He clearly explained how they limited the codes to one per user per day. So people (many stackers) would get a code, call up and cancel their account, then restart their account and get another code. This all during a time when their batch of codes were limited as they were trying to make them last until multi-use account linked codes became available.

I'm not trying to be an ECA lapdog or anything but if you can't be bothered to read their full explanation of how events went down I can't bother to take you seriously. Not that you care I'm sure. People fuck up. It's a fact of life. Sometimes people fuck up and get put on the spot and do a poor job explaining themselves because there's so much going on. That appears to be what's happening here. Every answer Hal gave in the most recent interview (currently posted in the OP, you may wanna give it a re-read) was entirely rational, plausible, and made sense.

But hey, this is the internet. We don't respond to sensibility. We like to latch onto things we can hate and attack as a group. Logic has no place here.

Really the way you're reacting I hope you get caught between a rock and a hard place some day and no one gives you the benefit of the doubt.
 
I really can't see how anyone would still want to be a member after all this. Besides all the bullshit, the ECA hasn't done anything. At all. They've basically taken in money but I really don't see any evidence of the work they claim to be doing. The whole thing seems like a sham and I really think they should just call it a day and close up shop.
 
[quote name='PvtChurch']Did you not read the entire interview? He clearly explained how they limited the codes to one per user per day. So people (many stackers) would get a code, call up and cancel their account, then restart their account and get another code. This all during a time when their batch of codes were limited as they were trying to make them last until multi-use account linked codes became available.

I'm not trying to be an ECA lapdog or anything but if you can't be bothered to read their full explanation of how events went down I can't bother to take you seriously. Not that you care I'm sure. People fuck up. It's a fact of life. Sometimes people fuck up and get put on the spot and do a poor job explaining themselves because there's so much going on. That appears to be what's happening here. Every answer Hal gave in the most recent interview (currently posted in the OP, you may wanna give it a re-read) was entirely rational, plausible, and made sense.

But hey, this is the internet. We don't respond to sensibility. We like to latch onto things we can hate and attack as a group. Logic has no place here.

Really the way you're reacting I hope you get caught between a rock and a hard place some day and no one gives you the benefit of the doubt.[/QUOTE]

like I said before you can get as many code as you want by clearing your cookie from your browser
 
[quote name='n8rockerasu'] I'd really love to know more about what they actually do.[/QUOTE]

Look back a couple of pages or so - I looked into it and they haven't done anything activist that they've published on their website other than condemn a bill currently stuck in committee in the House of Representatives, and condemn 3 bills in the NY state legislature.

Searching gamepolitics.com, they apparently signed onto a letter condemning the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement that several countries are drawing up in secret.

We are concerned that any DMCA language in ACTA may cause enormous, unforeseen negative implications in US law. That is why ECA, together with the Consumer Electronics Association, the US Internet Industry Association, Intel, Yahoo, Verizon and others, sent a memo asking the USTR to carefully consider that any discussions of “Internet issues” in ACTA be carefully circumscribed, consistent with U.S. law, and not include any portions of the DMCA.
But here is what a group like the EFF is doing about it:

At issue is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). As Ars Technica reports, public interest advocacy groups Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Public Knowledge have filed suit in federal court against the U.S. Trade Representative, a part of the executive branch. The suit is essentially a demand for information about ACTA and is based upon the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
http://gamepolitics.com/2008/09/23/digital-rights-groups-go-court-over-secret-anti-piracy-treaty

Though I couldn't find it from the ECA's actual website, they have a form where we can send a letter to our Congressmen to Support Universal Broadband and Net Neutrality Now.

Needless to say that's an issue being fought by bigger parties as well, not that the ECA shouldn't join in that fight because of that though.

http://action.theeca.com/t/2858/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=2522


Hal Halpin also was a panelist on a FTC town hall meeting about DRM and EULA:

http://gamepolitics.com/2009/03/31/...-digital-distribution-will-mean-game-consumer

but that didn't speak to anything about an issue I brought up earlier (Repaying for "DLC" that's already on the purchased disc)

Apparently Hal also fought against a Washington state tax bill that would tax digital downloads, which the article notes would affect music and whatnot so I can only assume there were other avenues protesting this bill as well: http://gamepolitics.com/2009/02/25/eca-mobilizing-protests-against-digital-download-tax-proposals

In addition they hype all their community building and what not.

That's literally all I can find about what the ECA has done. The GamePolitics search I did doesn't give me any results earlier than 2009 for some reason, and the ECA hasn't been compelled to host any other pertinent information on their own servers - the news section just links to the closed forums, so I have to assume whatever the ECA has made 'headlines' for can't be all that important if they don't want a permalink for it on their own website.

Like I said in my earlier post, the main function of the ECA seems to be distributing information about how video games aren't bad through grassroots communities. Is that worth your $15-20 a year w/ discounts? I don't know.
 
[quote name='PvtChurch']Did you not read the entire interview? He clearly explained how they limited the codes to one per user per day. So people (many stackers) would get a code, call up and cancel their account, then restart their account and get another code. This all during a time when their batch of codes were limited as they were trying to make them last until multi-use account linked codes became available.

I'm not trying to be an ECA lapdog or anything but if you can't be bothered to read their full explanation of how events went down I can't bother to take you seriously. Not that you care I'm sure. People fuck up. It's a fact of life. Sometimes people fuck up and get put on the spot and do a poor job explaining themselves because there's so much going on. That appears to be what's happening here. Every answer Hal gave in the most recent interview (currently posted in the OP, you may wanna give it a re-read) was entirely rational, plausible, and made sense.

But hey, this is the internet. We don't respond to sensibility. We like to latch onto things we can hate and attack as a group. Logic has no place here.

Really the way you're reacting I hope you get caught between a rock and a hard place some day and no one gives you the benefit of the doubt.[/QUOTE]

I never used ECA that much. I had two codes (one whom got lost) and the other I used and saved $8. However, after reading what Hal had to say and seeing what people in here do, it doesn't surprise me how a small minority of people ruined it for many.

I think some of the things were poorly worded and people jumped the gun. I am actually surprised Hal said a few ruined it, but I suspect there were quite a few abusing the system. In almost every thread I go into, there are plenty of people that ask about how to gain the system either at a B&M store or online. Go ahead, check it yourself! Heck you don't need to, because if you have been here for a while you have no doubt come across it....

Sooner or later, the industry as a whole will stop being as consumer friendly, because frankly I have never in my life seen a more consumer friendly place than the US! Stores like Costco has already started clamping it down, by stopping TV/computer returns past the 90-180 days now. Just a matter of time before business goodwill will stop as I have already witnessed over the years of policy changes.

This whole ECA affair affects me as much as anyone here, but frankly it is gone completely overboard here. I guess, from now on I'm the hated member here though.
 
[quote name='n8rockerasu']While all of that may be true, and I appreciate you posting it, look back over that story and see how many times "oversight", "poorly worded", or "mistake" is used. It almost comes down to every single thing the ECA did after removing the "non-functioning" auto-renew button was a colossol failure. And the fact of the matter is, your organization is going to be judged based on these kinds of things. The fact that they initially tried to cover up some of these problems makes it even worse.

It's nice that they're finally owning up to some of these screw ups, but it scares me to think what would have taken place if this uproar hadn't occurred. It's easy to admit to something when someone has already called you out on it. I'm not saying there's just no going back for the ECA, but can they truly be surprised by the damage that THEY have inflicted upon themselves?

I think the bigger picture in all of this, that a lot of people seem to be overlooking, is that since the ECA is supposed to be advocating for gamer rights, they should be working on ways to make us WANT to remain members. I'm glad that they're addressing the issues with online cancellation, but this is a cause we were supposed to believe in and be donating our money to support. I've really yet to hear one reason why they're worth giving $20 a year to (and no, I'm not referring to Amazon codes). I'd really love to know more about what they actually do.[/QUOTE]


I agree with most of what you said and I'm not trying to defend their/Hal's actions. But I don't think it's fair to start a witch hunt with the intent to wipe them out. They need to make amends for what has happened recently and they need to realize how hypocritical it made them to a very large number of people, myself included.
 
[quote name='Saix_XIII']When news of this canceling issue broke I called the ECA and left a message for Seth, which I am sure you guys are somewhat aware of who he is. I was not expecting a call back because I am sure they got a large number of phone calls and the majority of them were not nice I would assume. I was a bit surprised when I get a phone call and my caller ID showed it was from "Lamorte Burns &"(it cut off after that) with a 203 area code. I thought it was for my mother, but when they were asking for me I was worried perhaps it was a legal firm or something so I asked who it was and he said it was Seth from the ECA in regards to my call about canceling my ECA account.

Now I think everyone here knows that there is at LEAST two sides to every story, and this one has a larger number than two. I do not know if I was told the whole truth, but I have dealt with Seth once before in the past when the Amazon codes were around and they were not working, he actually sent me a gift package with some nice things as well as a free year to the ECA. So my opinion of him is not negative at all, so I tend to believe what he is saying to a certain degree.

I asked him about the whole "we'll change your cards expiration date and charge you" issue which REALLY did NOT sit well with me and I am sure a large number of other people. He said that it was worded poorly and they are not going to be doing that and he apologized. He was unaware of the legal ramifications of said action, but he said it won't be happening.

I also asked if they are working on a way to cancel via the website and he said they absolutely are and the letter/snail mail rout is for those whose memberships are nearing the renewal date and want to cancel before then. If you have some time before the renewal date you should have plenty of time to cancel via a website feature that is in the works.

I also brought up the whole certified letter issue and he said that was a oversight and poorly worded on their part and it should never have said that. It should have said that you just need to send in a letter stating your name and that you want to cancel, it does not need to be certified or UPS or FedEx.

He said he was in the marketing department and did not know everything and I believe him because sadly, that is how companies work these days. They leave as many people in the dark as they can, customers and employees alike that way it's less of a headache and less work overall for the higher ups, sad but true.

I am not saying any of this to convert anyone to an ECA supporter after all that has happened with the ECA in the last week with this issue, because at this point I am a bit skeptical as well. The comments made by Hal have left me with a sour taste in my mouth, but if they are working on fixing it I would like to give them a bit of time to fix it. They are still human after all, everyone makes mistakes.[/QUOTE]

The portion I highlight is interesting...

See, herein lies the problem. Different stories to different people. This is not what Seth told me I needed to do - and I quote his email to me:
[FONT=&quot]Please include first name, last name , email address, date card was charged, and the last 4 digits of your cc.[/FONT]
I'd say that's a little bit more than just your name.
This is another reason I want no more to do with ECA.
 
[quote name='62t']like I said before you can get as many code as you want by clearing your cookie from your browser[/QUOTE]

That's a moot point when people weren't doing that and were instead canceling their subcriptions and resubscribing with a free code just to get mutliple discount codes in a day.
 
[quote name='PvtChurch']That's a moot point when people weren't doing that and were instead canceling their subcriptions and resubscribing with a free code just to get mutliple discount codes in a day.[/QUOTE]
How were they canceling their subscriptions? By a "non-functional cancellation button" or by a dumb employee who didn't notice the same person calling over and over?
 
[quote name='leesiulung']Wall of Text.[/QUOTE]

You do realize that people other than gamers search for deals, right?

I mean, have you ever looked at a website like Fatwallet or Slickdeals where moms are trying to stack 5 coupons on clearance cans of damaged soup at a B&M and whatnot? Or people who try to buy 100 HDTVs when there's a 9.99 price error instead of 999.99?

With this shit economy, a ton of people without lots of money in their pockets are looking to get crazy deals on anything and everything. Maybe that's the problem with a lot of the US - wanting a comfortable lifestyle without paying for what it costs. But this thread isn't really about that.

Hell, this thread isn't even about the Amazon codes but it keeps getting dragged in because the ECA wants to claim this has something to do with a few rotten apples who were too stupid to abuse the system in a clever manner and the best they could think of was to call and cancel then re-sign up. There were much smarter ways to "game" the system. Surely the ONE ECA employee who handles accounts noticed he was canceling the same accounts day in and day out over the phone. Or surely you'd expect their database to keep track of how many times someone has signed up and how long they were a member for.

The bottom line is the phone cancellation wasn't changed while the Amazon codes were still good. This snail mail stuff was new and it got sniffed out pretty fast.
 
[quote name='Saix_XIII']I agree with most of what you said and I'm not trying to defend their/Hal's actions. But I don't think it's fair to start a witch hunt with the intent to wipe them out. They need to make amends for what has happened recently and they need to realize how hypocritical it made them to a very large number of people, myself included.[/QUOTE]
Their credibility is all they have, since their actual contributions in consumer advocacy are slim to none. If they've thrown that over the cliff with the whole "we'll make it hard to cancel" and "hey quick! change the Terms of Membership and not tell anybody!" what do they have left that's worth salvaging?
 
[quote name='Saix_XIII']I agree with most of what you said and I'm not trying to defend their/Hal's actions. But I don't think it's fair to start a witch hunt with the intent to wipe them out. They need to make amends for what has happened recently and they need to realize how hypocritical it made them to a very large number of people, myself included.[/QUOTE]

Well, it depends what you define as a witch hunt. I don't think it was uncalled for at all to notify popular gaming news sites of the things that were taking place and being said (especially considering that's how some people learned of the problem in the first place).

And I don't think it was unreasonable for members to feel uncomfortable about the ECA having their billing information and to want to terminate their memberships ASAP. If that wipes out their organization, then it was their own doing.

But as for the fanaticism of looking up Hal's personal address and/or sending threats, yeah, that's completely out of line. But I'd say most people here were condemning any action along those lines. As long as nobody is making up stories, there's nothing wrong with people knowing the truth about what actually happened.
 
[quote name='Saix_XIII']I agree with most of what you said and I'm not trying to defend their/Hal's actions. But I don't think it's fair to start a witch hunt with the intent to wipe them out. They need to make amends for what has happened recently and they need to realize how hypocritical it made them to a very large number of people, myself included.[/QUOTE]
So you see no problem in what they did?
They are an underhand group that would have gotten away with this all of this if everyone was as stupid as they've been treating them.

They are a bad org that needs to be stopped because they're not doing any good. They're just understanding that in the future when they rip people off they're going to have to do a better job at it.

I'm shocked you support what they've been doing, disgusting
 
[quote name='n8rockerasu']
But as for the fanaticism of looking up Hal's personal address and/or sending threats, yeah, that's completely out of line. But I'd say most people here were condemning any action along those lines. As long as nobody is making up stories, there's nothing wrong with people knowing the truth about what actually happened.[/QUOTE]
Anyone wanting to do something like that is WRONG, period

The way people win against a company is by doing everything by the book, bringing all of this to light is the way to do it. If doing that brings them negative publicity then so be it.
 
I'm not drinking the Kool-Aid, this is all about ECA saving face and trying not to be seen as completely unprofessional by their associates, how anyone would ever take them seriously after this fiasco is beyond me. Hal should just hang them up and go do something else.
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']How were they canceling their subscriptions? By a "non-functional cancellation button" or by a dumb employee who didn't notice the same person calling over and over?[/QUOTE]

Again, if you read the interview in the OP he explains that people were calling to cancel over and over. Which is exactly why they stopped accepting calls as a means of cancellation. Which they are rectifying.
 
[quote name='PvtChurch']Did you not read the entire interview? He clearly explained how they limited the codes to one per user per day. So people (many stackers) would get a code, call up and cancel their account, then restart their account and get another code. This all during a time when their batch of codes were limited as they were trying to make them last until multi-use account linked codes became available.

I'm not trying to be an ECA lapdog or anything but if you can't be bothered to read their full explanation of how events went down I can't bother to take you seriously. Not that you care I'm sure. People fuck up. It's a fact of life. Sometimes people fuck up and get put on the spot and do a poor job explaining themselves because there's so much going on. That appears to be what's happening here. Every answer Hal gave in the most recent interview (currently posted in the OP, you may wanna give it a re-read) was entirely rational, plausible, and made sense.

But hey, this is the internet. We don't respond to sensibility. We like to latch onto things we can hate and attack as a group. Logic has no place here.

Really the way you're reacting I hope you get caught between a rock and a hard place some day and no one gives you the benefit of the doubt.[/QUOTE]

And once again, because you can't be bothered to read what many many people have said over and over again in the recent part of this thread, you miss the point entirely. Also because you take what Hal said to be the truth. I fully read what Hal said. And what Hal said is a crock of shit.

Read this carefully and perhaps you can tell me how canceling over and over makes any sense: You didn't need to cancel to exploit the system. Like many have said, you only needed to clear your cookie. And if you weren't tech savvy enough to clear your cookie, you just joined again and again and again.

I'm gonna highlight this part because I have yet to see any explain this away:

There was no need to cancel. So blaming the snail mail cancelation requirement because of the stackers/exploiters is a crock.

I'm waiting for you, Hal, the ECA, anyone to tell me how canceling (which of course you couldn't do via the non functioning cancel system - you had to do it by phone or snail mail) would benefit exploiters. I suspect I'll be waiting a long time. You are wrong and everyone here knows it.

And if you're gonna argue that people only had 1 email address at their disposal and had to call to cancel over and over, that the handful of employees at the ECA wouldn't recognize that one email address? Come on. That's just stupid.

I'll accept any good reasoned logical argument but it seems everyone who is here defending the ECA just relies on the "what Hal said is the truth" defense. OK then. I wonder which mod PvtChurch is on the ECA forums.


_______________

Are you going to tell me this happened multiple times within a day?

Assumption: Mr. Exploiter is too stupid to use multiple email addresses and too dumb to clear cookies.

Mr Exploiter gets an amazon code and realizes it's one per day. He can't cancel his membership because the membership button doesn't work so he calls the ECA:

Exploiter: Hi, I'd like to cancel my membership.
ECA rep: Ok, not sure why, the ECA is a great org.... but ok, what's your username and email address?
Exploiter: It's exploiter and email is [email protected]
ECA: done.


an hour later:

Exploiter: Hi, I'd like to cancel my membership.
ECA rep: Ok, not sure why, the ECA is a great org.... but ok, what's your username and email address?
Exploiter: It's exploiter and email is [email protected]
ECA: done.


two hours later:

Exploiter: Hi, I'd like to cancel my membership.
ECA rep: Ok, not sure why, the ECA is a great org.... but ok, what's your username and email address?
Exploiter: It's exploiter and email is [email protected]
ECA: done.



How many times could this possibly happen before the ECA rep (remember, there aren't many of them because apparently exploiters were overwhelming the call staff) thinks "hmmmm, i think i recognize this name and email address?"

You know how many times this happened? NONE. Because exploiters tend to know about shady shit like clearing cookies and multiple email addresses. They know not to ever CALL anyone. Isn't the first rule of these deal sites never to call? I'd be surprised if the ECA got more than a phone call a day from anyone canceling.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='PvtChurch']Again, if you read the interview in the OP he explains that people were calling to cancel over and over. Which is exactly why they stopped accepting calls as a means of cancellation. Which they are rectifying.[/QUOTE]
Cool, I already read it once and just wanted to make sure because the second time I stopped reading after Disclosure: GameCulture is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']Cool, I already read it once and just wanted to make sure because the second time I stopped reading after Disclosure: GameCulture is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.[/QUOTE]

Yeah it loses even more points with me how they did the "interview" style press release. Its like those ads you see in car magazines that have to say "paid advertisement" on the upper corner because its made to look like its a "story" in the magazine.
 
As far as I am concerned, the ECA hasn't really officially said anything. They've issued a couple of statements on a sites friendly to their cause. There have been no real interviews, and nothing, still nothing sent out to the membership base. And since they automatically default to TOS, what they say doesn't really matter does it it, until they change their TOS which, naturally, they could just turn around and change again without notification and claim they're doing nothing wrong.

Someone asked what gamers need to be protecting from and how often, our rights as consumers are pretty much challenged on a daily basis. The EULAs, DRM, DLCs, inability to return anything, represenatives and senators trying to make certain games illegal, others trying to force their own versions of morality on adults, Microsoft's willingness to pretty much brick Xbox's for the slightest thing they don't like... the list just goes on and on.
 
[quote name='confoosious']And once again, because you can't be bothered to read what many many people have said over and over again in the recent part of this thread, you miss the point entirely. Also because you take what Hal said to be the truth. I fully read what Hal said. And what Hal said is a crock of shit.

Read this carefully and perhaps you can tell me how canceling over and over makes any sense: You didn't need to cancel to exploit the system. Like many have said, you only needed to clear your cookie. And if you weren't tech savvy enough to clear your cookie, you just joined again and again and again.

I'm gonna highlight this part because I have yet to see any explain this away:

There was no need to cancel. So blaming the snail mail cancelation requirement because of the stackers/exploiters is a crock.

I'm waiting for you, Hal, the ECA, anyone to tell me how canceling (which of course you couldn't do via the non functioning cancel system - you had to do it by phone or snail mail) would benefit exploiters. I suspect I'll be waiting a long time. You are wrong and everyone here knows it.

And if you're gonna argue that people only had 1 email address at their disposal and had to call to cancel over and over, that the handful of employees at the ECA wouldn't recognize that one email address? Come on. That's just stupid.

I'll accept any good reasoned logical argument but it seems everyone who is here defending the ECA just relies on the "what Hal said is the truth" defense. OK then. I wonder which mod PvtChurch is on the ECA forums.[/QUOTE]

Your argument makes no sense. It doesn't matter that there wasn't a need to cancel. The fact of the matter is people WERE canceling to exploit the system. To fix this they changed their TOS. It was handled poorly. We've covered that and everyone agrees. That's why they apologized, explained what went down, and claim to be rectifying the situation. That's why if they rectify the situation I'm inclined to believe they never were trying to scam everybody.

Keep chasing reasons to hate em though. Clearly you're more interested in being part of an angry mob than you are intelligent discourse.
 
[quote name='PvtChurch']Your argument makes no sense. It doesn't matter that there wasn't a need to cancel. The fact of the matter is people WERE canceling to exploit the system. To fix this they changed their TOS. It was handled poorly. We've covered that and everyone agrees. That's why they apologized, explained what went down, and claim to be rectifying the situation. That's why if they rectify the situation I'm inclined to believe they never were trying to scam everybody.

Keep chasing reasons to hate em though. Clearly you're more interested in being part of an angry mob than you are intelligent discourse.[/QUOTE]

WHAT?! Are you kidding me.

Why would you cancel if there wasn't a need to? For shits and giggles? Clearly you have no interest in intelligent discourse because you refuse to see logic.

Dear lord. If you were exploiting a glitch and you didn't need to cancel to exploit it, why would you ever call someone to cancel?

If you can explain that, you win. (You want me to give you a few minutes so you can ask Hal what to say here?)

Hmmm... I can get 10% off amazon on video games. Holy crap i can get 20% off. Oh wow 30% off. I can do all this without canceling my membership But let me call and cancel this membership! This makes sense to you? WTF?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='mogamer']Well, at least 411mania gets it.

http://www.411mania.com/games/columns/123907[/QUOTE]

I wonder if Rod Oracheski is a CAG as well?

He posted a second article after Gypsyfly did the "secret registrations" for her friends, but one of the main editors at 411mania pulled it. I think someone on neogaf had a cached link to it but I can't find it at the moment.

And his initial article on this ECA stuff was good as well.
 
I'm still surprised they haven't actually rectified the real purpose of this thread. This was the original title:

"ECA: If you canceled your membership online, ECA's stance is you actually did not"

I still haven't seen any emails or anything on their main page that the cancellation I did months ago was invalid and I still could be charged for my membership. If I wasn't a member of this site, I still probably would not know that this issue occurred.
 
[quote name='confoosious']WHAT?! Are you kidding me.

Why would you cancel if there wasn't a need to? For shits and giggles? Clearly you have no interest in intelligent discourse because you refuse to see logic.

Dear lord. If you were exploiting a glitch and you didn't need to cancel to exploit it, why would you ever call someone to cancel?

If you can explain that, you win. (You want me to give you a few minutes so you can ask Hal what to say here?)

Hmmm... I can get 10% off amazon on video games. Holy crap i can get 20% off. Oh wow 30% off. I can do all this without canceling my membership But let me call and cancel this membership! This makes sense to you? WTF?[/QUOTE]

Probably because said exploiters were unaware there were easier methods to do so? Keep up the half-assed arguments though. You continue to amuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top