ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='confoosious']Not to mention the disgusting goatse pic he sent to my PM. After I had dinner.[/QUOTE]

Haha...Probably just a picture of Hal and his father.

Too low of a joke?
 
[quote name='sevendayrevolution']I took the response posed in the ECA post at the beginning page to mean that people were stacking 10% and 10% on single orders as the codes were from different batches that through Amazons website were considered 'different' so they would both apply. I skimmed though. But that's my take.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, that's exactly what happened, but that's a separate issue from this supposed joining, canceling, and rejoining business. The new batch of codes was only issued after the old one ran out, so if you didn't have the ones from the old batch already, you weren't getting them no matter how many times you canceled and rejoined. Only people who were already members earlier and who had saved up some of the older codes could stack like that.
 
[quote name='arcane93']Yeah, that's exactly what happened, but that's a separate issue from this supposed joining, canceling, and rejoining business. The new batch of codes was only issued after the old one ran out, so if you didn't have the ones from the old batch already, you weren't getting them no matter how many times you canceled and rejoined. Only people who were already members earlier and who had saved up some of the older codes could stack like that.[/QUOTE]

Not exactly true. I joined using the free membership code, and I was around long enough for at least two, possibly three, batches of codes. I stacked on one of my orders.
 
[quote name='blissskr']Lol thats exactly part of the problem but no one seems to address it. Until the Eca pissed off alot of members who in turn decided to take a closer look at the Eca and discovered that they don't really do much of anything besides release some statements or emails on issues, thats not worth giving them 20 dollars for imo. Fool me once shame on me, but your not going to fool me twice Eca lol.[/QUOTE]

Haha, well, I was asking these questions as far back as mid-October, but no one else seemed particularly interested at the time:

http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6412059#post6412059
http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6412595#post6412595
http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6413471#post6413471

Of course, at the time I wasn't feeling too bothered about it because at least (I thought) we had the Amazon discount. Now that they want me to be a member just on the merits of the organization, though . . . Um, what were those merits again, exactly?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Kirin Lemon']Not exactly true. I joined using the free membership code, and I was around long enough for at least two, possibly three, batches of codes. I stacked on one of my orders.[/QUOTE]

Right, but you couldn't, on any one given day, get one code from one batch, and then cancel your membership and rejoin (or pull other nefarious scammer tricks!), and get a code from another batch. You had to maintain a membership over the period of time that the separate code batches were offered (noting, in particular, that there were significant delays in time between each batch becoming available). So yes, it is exactly true.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']Uh...as many others have already ask...exactly how large could this group of idiotic "exploiters" actually have been? I realize the ECA keeps crying they are a small organization, but you can't tell me they don't have the manpower to control a few dozen morons who allegedly kept canceling and joining up again.[/QUOTE]

Worst case scenario I'd say it was a couple hundred people trying to scam, but I doubt that many people would go out of their way for a couple extra discount coupons to Amazon of all places since there are coupons and gift card opportunities for Amazon on the net galore.

The whole exploiter issue is nothing more than a tactic to demonize and thus dismiss the members who complained by trying to paint them all as scammers and not normal people with legit complaints.

The ECA could have handled the scammer issue in a number of ways that would have quickly and easily satisfied everyone and made them look like they actually cared about their members and their cause. Instead they are using the issue to mask their member contract changes, ridiculous cancellation policy, auto-renewal policy and horrible treatment of their members.

Honest people and organizations do NOT act in such a way. Dirtbags who are trying to hide stuff and trying to take advantage of you act this way.
 
[quote name='ravenz7']I found another one of ECA's sponsors that posted a comment on this controversy.
Sorry if this has been posted, I don't remember seeing it and couldn't find it in the search.

Dawdle
[/QUOTE]

Let's be clear: people at the ECA will be fired because of the controversy and the resulting reduction in membership dues that decreases their budget. This is not good for gamers.
I doubt this. Because according to Hal mostly free lazy finicky scammer members want to quit, so no loss in funds for the ECA.
 
[quote name='kodave']I doubt this. Because according to Hal mostly free members want to quit, so no loss in funds for the ECA.[/QUOTE]

I'd stop believing anything Hal Halpin has to say - especially on this issue.
 
[quote name='arcane93']Haha, well, I was asking these questions as far back as mid-October, but no one else seemed particularly interested at the time:

http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6412059#post6412059

Of course, at the time I wasn't feeling too bothered about it because at least (I thought) we had the Amazon discount. Now that they want me to be a member just on the merits of the organization, though . . . Um, what were those merits again, exactly?[/QUOTE]

I was following on the ECA forums about what they actually accomplish.
The way they handled that question is the exact reason I "unchecked" the auto-renew box.
They kept saying search around (which I did and found very little) and would never show link to anything the ECA had done.
 
[quote name='Scrubking']I'd stop believing anything Hal Halpin has to say - especially on this issue.[/QUOTE]

Did the sarcasm in his post escape you...Or did the sarcasm in your post escape me...?
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']We're all still trying to figure out WHAT good work they do. This response from Dawdle sounds like something Hal or one of his underlings wrote, because it contains the same sort of vague comments we're getting way too familiar with. What specific good have they done? We all get it that they "organize"...something...sometime...somewhere. And they "monitor"...stuff.[/QUOTE]

I don't know. I thought the 'keeps the ESA honest' finally provided something somewhat specific. I'd like to hear more details on what exactly they do to accomplish this, but it's more than we've heard from the ECA itself. I'm less than impressed with the monitoring of game-related legislation, as any group with a phone and internet access could do that fairly easily.

Anyway, from a PR standpoint, that Dawdle blog comes off very much as 'you've got a couple weeks to fix this and make people happy, or we're out too.' The 'people will be fired for this' doesn't come off like something Dawdle's been told, but more like a thinly veiled message to the ECA that some employees need to go. If I was doing their PR and was really pissed, but not quite to the point of severing ties, that blog's the type of statement I'd put out.
 
but you can't tell me they don't have the manpower to control a few dozen morons who allegedly kept canceling and joining up again.

I don't even quite understand how these people kept canceling their accounts, and resigning up anyway. If the online option to cancel auto renewal never worked, what did they do? Call? Send a letter? Multiple times a day?!?!
 
[quote name='maxfisher']I'd like to hear more details on what exactly they do to accomplish this[/QUOTE]

Exactly my point, though. Saying they keep the ESA inline or whatever is great, but how do they do that? That's what we'd like to know. We want some specifics.
 
[quote name='stillcharlie']I don't even quite understand how these people kept canceling their accounts, and resigning up anyway. If the online option to cancel auto renewal never worked, what did they do? Call? Send a letter? Multiple times a day?!?![/QUOTE]

According to Hal, people were calling all day long.

:roll:

(for codes that didn't even stack.)
 
According to Hal, people were calling all day long.

This isn't a call center is it? I assume they only have one or two people to answer the phones at most. If the same "small" group of people kept calling, why wasn't this issue dealt with more quickly. If they were calling, they had to receive the same Customer service rep multiple times.
 
[quote name='Rollett']Why Refuse compensation, Why not just request it be donated to the child's play.[/QUOTE]

[quote name='chakan']I'm donating next year's ECA dues to Child's Play[/QUOTE]

[quote name='simmias']Somebody mentioned earlier that I shouldn't refuse compensation, and should instead have Cheapy donate the money to Child's Play. Excellent idea, if he's so inclined. Mailing costs weren't bad at all... only about $13. Other costs (paper, printing, gas, etc) were probably $12, so maybe $25 to Child's Play?[/QUOTE]

[quote name='maxfisher']I like this idea and just donated $25. The way I look at it, if it wasn't for this thread, I would've got charged $20 next year and either had to eat the cost or go through a royal pain in the ass to get my money back. So there's $20 and I'll say the extra $5 is a fuck you to Hal to show him that even cheapasses don't mind giving money to a cause they know is legitimate and positive.[/QUOTE]

This, I believe, is a suggestion that every cancelling CAGger who can afford it should capitalize on. Those who were planning to renew and can currently afford the money, should donate those dues to Child's Play. Show the ECA that this is not about the money, this is about their handling of the situation, and do some great good at the same time!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

With that said, I'd like to mention the EFF that has been mentioned before. Everyone who has cancelled their ECA membership but still wants be involved in an advocacy group that does perform should definitely review the EFF to see if they can stand behind them. I've been following the EFF for over a decade now, and really feel that they are a group that does good in this world.

As for EFF and video games, I have a feeling that they wouldn't mind being involved in video game issues at all.... after all, they were founded in reaction to a pen-and-paper RPG maker being raided by the government. Steve Jackson Games was raided and had their equipment and manuscripts taken by the government, held for an unreasonable amount of time, and returned in poor shape with several private emails accessed and deleted. The EFF was formed after hearing of SJGs plight, and it was on behalf of SJG that the first lawsuit was lobbed by the EFF.
 
[quote name='stillcharlie']This isn't a call center is it? I assume they only have one or two people to answer the phones at most. If the same "small" group of people kept calling, why wasn't this issue dealt with more quickly. If they were calling, they had to receive the same Customer service rep multiple times.[/QUOTE]

Well if the CSRs are anything like who they hire for the forums...
 
[quote name='bubo']This, I believe, is a suggestion that every cancelling CAGger who can afford it should capitalize on. Those who were planning to renew and can currently afford the money, should donate those dues to Child's Play. Show the ECA that this is not about the money, this is about their handling of the situation, and do some great good at the same time!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

With that said, I'd like to mention the EFF that has been mentioned before. Everyone who has cancelled their ECA membership but still wants be involved in an advocacy group that does perform should definitely review the EFF to see if they can stand behind them. I've been following the EFF for over a decade now, and really feel that they are a group that does good in this world.

As for EFF and video games, I have a feeling that they wouldn't mind being involved in video game issues at all.... after all, they were founded in reaction to a pen-and-paper RPG maker being raided by the government. Steve Jackson Games was raided and had their equipment and manuscripts taken by the government, held for an unreasonable amount of time, and returned in poor shape with several private emails accessed and deleted. The EFF was formed after hearing of SJGs plight, and it was on behalf of SJG that the first lawsuit was lobbed by the EFF.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. Already donated to Child's Play- maybe more with next my next paycheck. And I'm definitely looking toward the EFF at this point, as I feel that the ECA has definitely shown their lack of professionalism with the way they've handled this current situation overall (not to mention, all of the questionable practices that caused or occurred during said situation).
 
[quote name='bubo']
With that said, I'd like to mention the EFF that has been mentioned before. Everyone who has cancelled their ECA membership but still wants be involved in an advocacy group that does perform should definitely review the EFF to see if they can stand behind them. I've been following the EFF for over a decade now, and really feel that they are a group that does good in this world.

As for EFF and video games, I have a feeling that they wouldn't mind being involved in video game issues at all.... after all, they were founded in reaction to a pen-and-paper RPG maker being raided by the government. Steve Jackson Games was raided and had their equipment and manuscripts taken by the government, held for an unreasonable amount of time, and returned in poor shape with several private emails accessed and deleted. The EFF was formed after hearing of SJGs plight, and it was on behalf of SJG that the first lawsuit was lobbed by the EFF.[/QUOTE]

The more I hear about the EFF, the more I wonder if anyone has brought this debacle with the ECA to their attention. It would be interesting what their take on this situation is. Hopefully it's something along the lines of "you're doing it all wrong."
 
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/0...hip-complaints
^---this is a must read

If *this* would have been posted instead of Hal's "fuck" you type initial comments; I think this whole shitstorm would have been avoided. The tone here is calm and collected and presents the facts. I don't believe ECA intended any harm, but they got way in over their head.

A good read. Still doesn't condone the ECA's middle-finger-to-everyone press release, but this was a very nice "history lesson" on this issue. I really don't think the ECA "meant" to do anything wrong, but they sure as hell made a lot of stupid decisions.

What I was really interested in reading was AMAZON'S motivations behind this promotion. The profit margin on videogames is not that large, so it very interesting to see Hal speculating on why Amazon decided to do this (and even then he wasn't sure). Apparently, Amazon took this as a loss just to get more awareness.

All I can say is "damit". I really wanted those multi-use coupons. :( I would still gladly pay $15/year for 10% off Amazon. For those who actually followed the "original" ECA thread, we were promised these damn multi-use coupons for weeks (if not months) and they never materialized...oh well...

I still don't think ECA can recover from this disaster; especially since Amazon seems to want to have nothing to do with them at this point.
 
[quote name='Jugglenaut']The more I hear about the EFF, the more I wonder if anyone has brought this debacle with the ECA to their attention. It would be interesting what their take on this situation is. Hopefully it's something along the lines of "you're doing it all wrong."[/QUOTE]

To be honest, I doubt that you'd get more than just an opinion piece over this, if you even get that. No actual "harm" has occurred here, just a lot of hurt feelings, crushed hopes, and disillusionment. To us, individually and as the CAG group, it is a major point for us, but the EFF tackles issues that are much larger than our small pond.

Now there's perspective for you, due to their limited scope, even if the ECA did have more pro-active actions, they'd still be just small pond stuff.
 
I am fully aware it's Hal talking to himself. Why does that matter? The main points of contention were addressed.

-Going to fix the inability to cancel online
-Apologized for previous press release
-In the future significant changes to TOS will be made available in the monthly newsletter

Good enough for me. What else do you want? Maybe there's something I'm missing here. True, yes, I am still somewhat baffled why anyone would "call in" to cancel an account and make a new one to get a new code. I honestly don't think they were "stacking them". You needed to have the different batches to do any stacking, and "new" members wouldn't have direct access to the older batches.

But, do you honestly believe no one was stupid enough to call in and do this "trick"? They probably didn't even realize they only needed to wait a day to generate a new code. Trust me man, there are some really stupid people in the world, and calling in to generate another code isn't even that high on the list; regardless of whether or not they knew how to clear their cache or do it from a different computer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Ndolger']I am fully aware it's Hal talking to himself. Why does that matter? The main points of contention were addressed.

-Going to fix the inability to cancel online
-Apologized for previous press release
-In the future significant changes to TOS will be made available in the monthly newsletter

Good enough for me. What else do you want? Maybe there's something I'm missing here.[/QUOTE]
Not everybody gets the monthly newsletter. They need to send a specific "we changed the TOS" email every time it's done. AND give people the opportunity to opt out of the changes, it's only right for a consumer organization to do this.

And has anybody been informed of any changes yet? They need to inform everyone of any changes that have been made to the TOS after they signed up. Seth's email that's somewhere in this thread seemed like it would be changing again, if it hasn't already. :roll:

And, also, I'd like them to actually, you know, DO something, instead of just talking a big game.
 
[quote name='Ndolger']

But, do you honestly believe no one was stupid enough to call in and do this "trick"? They probably didn't even realize they only needed to wait a day to generate a new code. Trust me man, there are some really stupid people in the world, and calling in to generate another code isn't even that high on the list; regardless of whether or not they knew how to clear their cache or do it from a different computer.[/QUOTE]

Just read the last 5 pages and you'll realize why this "trick" was useless. Nobody actually did it. Hal made it up.
 
Fair enough, they certainly have an uphill battle if they ever hope to win anybody back and definitely have some 'splain to do to their base, but let's all calm down and just wait.

We still have many, many months before most of our accounts even need to be renewed.

Oh...yeah, I have no idea what ECA does. I'm just here for the codes, bro. :)
 
[quote name='Ndolger']We still have many, many months before most of our accounts even need to be renewed.[/QUOTE]

My cancellation letter is on its way in a big box with 718 others, so my account will never need to be renewed, thanks.

[quote name='Ndolger']I'm just here for the codes, bro. :)[/QUOTE]

Uh . . . someone want to tell him?
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']
And has anybody been informed of any changes yet? [/QUOTE]

I think they are probably just waiting for the changes to be implemented to formally notify people. Honestly, after they do this, I don't know what more we can really ask. I think they realized they made mistakes and am hopeful they are in the process of remedying them.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Just read the last 5 pages and you'll realize why this "trick" was useless. Nobody actually did it. Hal made it up.[/QUOTE]

Yes, he is clearly wrong on people cancelling to "stack", but come on now; you don't believe ANYONE did this? Really? Nobody called? I find that incredibly hard to believe; especially since I am an extreme pessimist. Nobody from Fatwallet or Slick Deals or...gasp...CAG decided to call? I know the mantra is "DON'T EVER CALL", but we all know SOMEONE CALLS IN THE END. In this case, it lived up to its stereotype...someone calls and it ruins the party for everyone.

They made some knee-jerk reactions, and you can see it from the explanation Q&A. People were calling in and it was overwhelming their call center. In an attempt to make it stop they took it down and modified their TOS...and they severely underestimated the effect of doing that would be. They needed a scalpel and went with a chainsaw. They should have just killed the free code immediately.

What's your stance? That he's making it up? Why? For what purpose? Unless you believe Hal is "out to get you"? I don't buy it. Look at it rationally and it makes sense.

In no way am I defending ECA here, they made dumb decisions and there is a high probability I will cancel as soon as I have a means of easily doing so, but to suggest that this was done as some sort of scam is somewhat silly. Just looking at the evidence they may yet get sued over this though. I don't think a lot of what was done here was legal.
 
[quote name='Rollett']I really like to know honestly.. how many people signed up JUST for the codes... and not to actually support their movement.[/QUOTE]

Honestly? I was interested in the things that they claimed to do, but those things in and of themselves would never have been enough to get me to actually sign up. The codes were definitely what enticed me to take the leap. That being said, if I'd seen good things happening once I was a member, I probably would have renewed even without the codes. Since I haven't, though (even ignoring this whole current mess), I don't see a point.
 
[quote name='caltab']I think they are probably just waiting for the changes to be implemented to formally notify people. Honestly, after they do this, I don't know what more we can really ask. I think they realized they made mistakes and am hopeful they are in the process of remedying them.[/QUOTE]
It's fair to ask that until those changes are made, everyone who is a member with a credit card on file be notified that there was a change in the TOS...

[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']Not everybody gets the monthly newsletter. They need to send a specific "we changed the TOS" email every time it's done. AND give people the opportunity to opt out of the changes, it's only right for a consumer organization to do this.

And has anybody been informed of any changes yet? They need to inform everyone of any changes that have been made to the TOS after they signed up. Seth's email that's somewhere in this thread seemed like it would be changing again, if it hasn't already. :roll:

And, also, I'd like them to actually, you know, DO something, instead of just talking a big game.[/QUOTE]
Exactly. I still haven't seen anything done. There's been two biased press releases, but no action. It doesn't mean anything until they at the very least send out that notification.
 
[quote name='caltab']I think they are probably just waiting for the changes to be implemented to formally notify people. Honestly, after they do this, I don't know what more we can really ask. I think they realized they made mistakes and am hopeful they are in the process of remedying them.[/QUOTE]
Problem is they've already implemented at least one change that we know about. I guess Hal's too busy interviewing himself to bother the users with silly TOS changes.
 
[quote name='Rollett']I really like to know honestly.. how many people signed up JUST for the codes... and not to actually support their movement.[/QUOTE]

I would think the majority of people signed up for the codes AND the movement.

Like someone else said, if the KKK was giving out 10% amazon codes, not many people would join. (Except obviously white supremacists.)
 
[quote name='arcane93']Honestly? I was interested in the things that they claimed to do, but those things in and of themselves would never have been enough to get me to actually sign up. The codes were definitely what enticed me to take the leap. That being said, if I'd seen good things happening once I was a member, I probably would have renewed even without the codes. Since I haven't, though (even ignoring this whole current mess), I don't see a point.[/QUOTE]


I have a feeling a lot of people feel or felt that way, I just am a stingy bastard... i donate to child's play... mainly because i trust cheapy and like where his heart is in this.. but other then that im a stingy when it comes to donations because i like to know how and where my money is being spent... most wont directly tell me or im not happy with 25c out of every dollar doing something.
 
[quote name='confoosious']I would think the majority of people signed up for the codes AND the movement.

Like someone else said, if the KKK was giving out 10% amazon codes, not many people would join. (Except obviously white supremacists.)[/QUOTE]

I don't know man... FW and SD might jump on that one.. i have saw some really low moral standards over there to get a deal on :p
 
[quote name='arcane93']
Uh . . . someone want to tell him?[/QUOTE]

Haha, yes I am clearly aware that the Amazon codes no longer function. I still have about 10-12 old codes left. I am an "original" Amazon promotion member. I created an alumni account and paid my $15. I have been following this story since the beginning (well since the Amazon discount anyway). I saved a lot of money using these codes.

The best thing I can hope to come from this is that they patch things up with Amazon and they eventually roll out the mythical ultra super rare shiny unique-tied-to-account 10% code.

I am a CAG first. I don't let things like "feelings" and "unethical behavior" cloud my judgement on getting a deal.
 
[quote name='Ndolger']The best thing I can hope to come from this is that they patch things up with Amazon and they eventually roll out the mythical ultra super rare shiny unique-tied-to-account 10% code.

I am a CAG first. I don't let things like "feelings" and "unethical behavior" cloud my judgement on getting a deal.[/QUOTE]

Based on what Hal says (if you choose to believe him, and on this one point I do), that seems highly unlikely to happen.

Honestly, even if it does, though, something that I've noticed lately -- nearly every game that I got with an Amazon 10% code has ended up being available for the same price or cheaper within a month or two of my getting it (except when I was factoring other discounts in like the trade-in promos, but even then I've seen close on most of them). While it's great to have these games right when they come out, the truth of the matter is that with my backlog, the majority of them end up sitting on my shelf for a few months before I get around to them anyway, and if I'd had to wait for them for a little longer it wouldn't really have mattered. So while I'd certainly like to have the Amazon discount back, I don't feel that it's particularly worth compromising my values.
 
[quote name='Ndolger']Yes, he is clearly wrong on people cancelling to "stack", but come on now; you don't believe ANYONE did this? Really? Nobody called? I find that incredibly hard to believe; especially since I am an extreme pessimist. Nobody from Fatwallet or Slick Deals or...gasp...CAG decided to call? I know the mantra is "DON'T EVER CALL", but we all know SOMEONE CALLS IN THE END. In this case, it lived up to its stereotype...someone calls and it ruins the party for everyone.

...

What's your stance? That he's making it up? Why? For what purpose? Unless you believe Hal is "out to get you"? I don't buy it. Look at it rationally and it makes sense.
[/QUOTE]

Well, if anyone did call, they were the dumbest exploiters ever. Let's assume you're a smart exploiter. What did calling get you? The 2nd code of the day didn't stack. So you got 10% off another item? the original 10% off already applied to your entire cart. There was no reason for an exploiter to cancel over and over. Nobody (that is, ECA supporter, mod, etc) has been able to offer a reason for an exploiter to do this.

Here's what I think happened, you decide whether it was shady. All this is documented so someone will call me out if what I say isn't true.

- When signing up for the ECA, there was an "auto-renew" button which you could uncheck so that... you wouldn't auto-renew and get charged at the end of your term. This is pretty standard stuff.
- The ECA conveniently decided that the "auto-renew" button never worked so that anyone who thought they unchecked it previously didn't uncheck it (in the eyes of the ECA). They didn't communicate this to anyone directly. They just changed their TOS. If it weren't for caltab, a lot of people wouldn't even know about this and would have gotten charged next year.
- They also said that if your credit card expired, they would just keep guessing until they got the right expiration date.
- They decided the only way to cancel was to send in snail mail, which they might or might not ever get, so you better send it certified or FedEx. Also, you needed to send it in 30 days prior to your expiration date. But don't worry, they'd notify you 30 days before your expiration date.

Huge uproar over the need for snail mail and the fact that those who thought they cancelled via the uncheck auto renew option didn't actually uncheck it.

So far, all truths.

Now, here's my take on it.

- Instead of saying "our bad", Hal decided to go into attack mode.
- On a separate issue, there were people exploiting the 10% amazon discount.
- Hal decided the best way to defend his organization's actions was to blame the "exploiters." The exploiters, he said, kept calling into the ECA to cancel and then rejoining, then canceling. He said this was the reason why they had to implement the snail mail cancelation rule. (No mention of course about not communicating the non-auto-renewing auto renew button.)
- This is the salient point that ECA supporters refuse to accept: Because of the way the exploit worked, there was no need to cancel to get more codes.


So why the snail mail? Because they wanted to make it harder for people to cancel. (This was admitted by one of their mods on their forums.)

And, this is a classic method with which scammers run their business. Sign people up for a product, free at first, then make it harder to cancel as they happily charged your credit card. See Enzyte. (Although part of me thinks/hopes that this wasn't an outright scam. Just incompetence and arrogance.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just wanted to thank Reira and simmias for getting the Cancellation together and sending it out. I also appreciate the efforts of the CAG community in general regarding this whole fiasco. Even though I'm new to the community, I'm proud to be a part of it.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Well, if anyone did call, they were the dumbest exploiters ever. Let's assume you're a smart exploiter. What did calling get you? The 2nd code of the day didn't stack. So you got 10% off another item? the original 10% off already applied to your entire cart. There was no reason for an exploiter to cancel over and over. Nobody (that is, ECA supporter, mod, etc) has been able to offer a reason for an exploiter to do this.

Here's what I think happened, you decide whether it was shady. All this is documented so someone will call me out if what I say isn't true.

- When signing up for the ECA, there was an "auto-renew" button which you could uncheck so that... you wouldn't auto-renew and get charged at the end of your term. This is pretty standard stuff.
- The ECA conveniently decided that the "auto-renew" button never worked so that anyone who thought they unchecked it previously didn't uncheck it (in the eyes of the ECA). They didn't communicate this to anyone directly. They just changed their TOS. If it weren't for caltab, a lot of people wouldn't even know about this and would have gotten charged next year.
- They also said that if your credit card expired, they would just keep guessing until they got the right expiration date.
- They decided the only way to cancel was to send in snail mail, which they might or might not ever get, so you better send it certified or FedEx. Also, you needed to send it in 30 days prior to your expiration date. But don't worry, they'd notify you 30 days before your expiration date.

Huge uproar over the need for snail mail and the fact that those who thought they cancelled via the uncheck auto renew option didn't actually uncheck it.

So far, all truths.

Now, here's my take on it.

- Instead of saying "our bad", Hal decided to go into attack mode.
- On a separate issue, there were people exploiting the 10% amazon discount.
- Hal decided the best way to defend his organization's actions was to blame the "exploiters." The exploiters, he said, kept calling into the ECA to cancel and then rejoining, then canceling. He said this was the reason why they had to implement the snail mail cancelation rule. (No mention of course about not communicating the non-auto-renewing auto renew button.)
- This is the salient point that ECA supporters refuse to accept: Because of the way the exploit worked, there was no need to cancel to get more codes.


So why the snail mail? Because they wanted to make it harder for people to cancel. (This was admitted by one of their mods on their forums.)

And, this is a classic method with which scammers run their business. Sign people up for a product, free at first, then make it harder to cancel as they happily charged your credit card. See Enzyte. (Although part of me thinks/hopes that this wasn't an outright scam. Just incompetence and arrogance.)[/QUOTE]

I think this shit should be stickied...
 
I have a question:

Why would Amazon work on implementing a unique code that would give us the 10% off with no stacking, be happy with the "small" or "moderate" bump in membership increase, but then not give it to us because of abuse of the old system of codes for what was only a short period of a week or two I'd imagine.

I mean, either way there's nothing Amazon could do about the abuse until they pulled the codes. So why not right it and just let bygones be bygones and keep the customer base with the intended 10% off? Surely corporate giant Amazon wants us buying our games from them than Walmart and Best Buy, and that 10% easily kicks Walmart and Best Buy's asses. And I find it really hard to believe corporate giant Amazon had its feelings hurt by a few trolls sending nasty emails demanding codes. Surely they would just hit delete, ignore the emails, or the Indian tech-center filtering the emails wouldn't know what to make of them.

Either stacking lost them a shit ton of profit or there is more to this story...
 
[quote name='Jaysonguy']So you see no problem in what they did?
They are an underhand group that would have gotten away with this all of this if everyone was as stupid as they've been treating them.

They are a bad org that needs to be stopped because they're not doing any good. They're just understanding that in the future when they rip people off they're going to have to do a better job at it.

I'm shocked you support what they've been doing, disgusting[/QUOTE]


I know my reply is hours after this was made, but I was out till now.

Never ONCED did I say I support anything they did. I already had my letter made to send it, signed the google doc that was already sent in for the mass cancel and I called the ECA to cancel over the phone. You're taking every single thing I said out of context.

I think the news of what they are doing is accurate and I am very upset with it happening. But as I said this is still run by people and people mess up. There are also evil people out there who try to take advantage of everyone and everything they can.

My whole point is that as far as I was told they are trying to rectify the situation and to in the span of a single day (if not less) HATE a company so much that no matter what they did to fix the issue you wanted it destroyed then that to me is going off the deep end.

I fully understand that this could destroy the ECA and if it does so be it, as others have said, this was of their own doing. But if it does not and they become better for it, as in the listen to the community more because they now see how fast bad news spreads then I see that as a positive in this whole ordeal.

I had every intent on canceling my free membership that was actually given to me by Seth in a gift package, well before all this stacking nonsense happened as well as before the GIMAG code was out. Not because I did not support them, but because I am not financially able to support them sadly.

As far as what the ECA does as a company I would like to think that if they were able to get Amazon, Gamefly, Penny Arcade, Buy.com, as well as a number of other well recognized companies to be their partners/supporters they must be doing somethings. We do not know what every company, politician, or person in general does every second. Though I admit it would be nice to have some sort of section on their site that does list what they are currently trying to do for the gaming industry as well as their past endeavors. That might already exist on the site, I do not know, but if it does not it really should.
 
[quote name='Saix_XIII']

My whole point is that as far as I was told they are trying to rectify the situation and to in the span of a single day (if not less) HATE a company so much that no matter what they did to fix the issue you wanted it destroyed then that to me is going off the deep end.

[/QUOTE]

I don't see them addressing the auto renew issue at all. Even with this last one, Hal spent too much time, again, focusing on the Amazon code and the exploiters. The cancellation is important, yes, but what about this auto renewal issue. And why is he so afraid to actually address questions in an area where you can't get banned for confronting, his own forums, or a websites he controls. The ECA needs to do more to keep those of us who aren't interested in cancellation only. He still needs to apologize not just for his statements but the behavior of the mods and assure us the Nazis attitude we saw on the boards, isn't going to return when the boards return again.
 
[quote name='confoosious']- The ECA conveniently decided that the "auto-renew" button never worked so that anyone who thought they unchecked it previously didn't uncheck it (in the eyes of the ECA). They didn't communicate this to anyone directly. They just changed their TOS. If it weren't for caltab, a lot of people wouldn't even know about this and would have gotten charged next year.[/QUOTE]

Almost entirely correct, except for this one point -- they didn't actually change their TOS regarding the auto-renew button, it was never in the TOS in the first place. The argument that the ECA supporters give is that, since it wasn't in the TOS, we shouldn't have expected it to work. My counter argument is that if the button is present on their site, and to all appearances it works (and it did return a message saying that it had worked, and the box did maintain its checked/unchecked state after it was changed), I have no reason to expect its presence or lack thereof in the TOS to matter, as there's nothing in the TOS that says that it shouldn't be there either.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Well, if anyone did call, they were the dumbest exploiters ever. Let's assume you're a smart exploiter. What did calling get you? The 2nd code of the day didn't stack. So you got 10% off another item? the original 10% off already applied to your entire cart. There was no reason for an exploiter to cancel over and over. Nobody (that is, ECA supporter, mod, etc) has been able to offer a reason for an exploiter to do this.

Here's what I think happened, you decide whether it was shady. All this is documented so someone will call me out if what I say isn't true.

- When signing up for the ECA, there was an "auto-renew" button which you could uncheck so that... you wouldn't auto-renew and get charged at the end of your term. This is pretty standard stuff.
- The ECA conveniently decided that the "auto-renew" button never worked so that anyone who thought they unchecked it previously didn't uncheck it (in the eyes of the ECA). They didn't communicate this to anyone directly. They just changed their TOS. If it weren't for caltab, a lot of people wouldn't even know about this and would have gotten charged next year.
- They also said that if your credit card expired, they would just keep guessing until they got the right expiration date.
- They decided the only way to cancel was to send in snail mail, which they might or might not ever get, so you better send it certified or FedEx. Also, you needed to send it in 30 days prior to your expiration date. But don't worry, they'd notify you 30 days before your expiration date.

Huge uproar over the need for snail mail and the fact that those who thought they cancelled via the uncheck auto renew option didn't actually uncheck it.

So far, all truths.

Now, here's my take on it.

- Instead of saying "our bad", Hal decided to go into attack mode.
- On a separate issue, there were people exploiting the 10% amazon discount.
- Hal decided the best way to defend his organization's actions was to blame the "exploiters." The exploiters, he said, kept calling into the ECA to cancel and then rejoining, then canceling. He said this was the reason why they had to implement the snail mail cancelation rule. (No mention of course about not communicating the non-auto-renewing auto renew button.)
- This is the salient point that ECA supporters refuse to accept: Because of the way the exploit worked, there was no need to cancel to get more codes.


So why the snail mail? Because they wanted to make it harder for people to cancel. (This was admitted by one of their mods on their forums.)

And, this is a classic method with which scammers run their business. Sign people up for a product, free at first, then make it harder to cancel as they happily charged your credit card. See Enzyte. (Although part of me thinks/hopes that this wasn't an outright scam. Just incompetence and arrogance.)[/QUOTE]

Great summary, dude.

The only perspective I can add, and this may or may not be true, is that I heard two versions of the CC expiration issue. The first is that they would keep putting in expirations until one stuck, and the other was that they would call up the company, explain that they had a contract (which since I work for a CC some merchants do) with the consumer, and that they need the new expiration.

Since I work for a CC company, I know the second scenario happens, but with the ECA, they're so ineptly run as far as TOS, I'm not sure how far they'd get on the phone asking for a new one. It probably WOULD be quicker to just guess at the years until one worked, but most (legitimate) services providers/merchants will call the company or the consumer to get it pushed through.

I wouldn't put it past the way they have been acting to try the "private" route, though, so who knows.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Well, if anyone did call, they were the dumbest exploiters ever. Let's assume you're a smart exploiter. What did calling get you? The 2nd code of the day didn't stack. So you got 10% off another item? the original 10% off already applied to your entire cart. There was no reason for an exploiter to cancel over and over. Nobody (that is, ECA supporter, mod, etc) has been able to offer a reason for an exploiter to do this.

(Although part of me thinks/hopes that this wasn't an outright scam. Just incompetence and arrogance.)[/QUOTE]

You're overthinking this. Why do you assume these people knew "anything" about the stacking? Why do you assume they're "smart"? Let's go with the lowest common denominator here. Assume they never read the ECA thread or knew any of the details about the promotion.

Very, very few people knew about the stacking as in-depth as to "L codes" and "J codes" and what not (does the old ECA thread still exist? this wasn't exactly common-knowlege) .

Put yourself in the mindset of average magazine reader or someone who happened upon this code. Let's do a walk-through...

1) Oh snap...I just got a code where I can get 10% off!
2) Uses it
3) Goes back to ECA to try and generate a new code..."wait, what is this; it's the same code; DAMIT"
4) *thinks hard* Hey, well I have this free sign up code...I'll just cancel my account, open up a new one, and get another 10% off! To a normal guy 10% off is incentive enough to do this relatively simple task of opening up a new account (not every person is a CAG; 10% would be incentive enough to average gamer to do this; forget about 20-30%)

If only a *handful* (and that's what been quoted) did this, he's going to overwhelm their phone line (was it written somewhere; one guy was taking the calls?). Although it is refreshing to see you place more faith in the human race than I do! You question the incentive and you say no one has explained what the incentive is to do this?!? It's quite simple...10% off games on Amazon!

I'm not sure what there's not to get here. You don't think the person might want to use ANOTHER code at some point?? Why do you assume they knew it regenerated every 24-hours or clearing your cookies did it? If you recall (maybe you don't), the day these new codes were implemented NO ONE KNEW ANYTHING about them. We had no idea if it was one and done or more would come.

And looking at the timeline you presented. Yes, that's correct. But at this point you either fall into one of two buckets of interpreting those events:

1) Hal Halpin is running a scam
2) Hal Halpin and co did a really bad job at predicting what would happen / preventing this from happening / handling the aftermath

If you read the latest article, there is strong evidence to suggest that 2) is the more plausible scenario. Keep it simple...this organization has been around for a few years. I find it incredibly improbable that they just decided one day..."OK, let's try and make some money".

And seriously if you think about it...$20 PER YEAR (max) per member is nothing. Somebody made a post about what their operating costs are. This revenue is pennies. There's no way they signed up more than a few thousand members.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top