The Mana Knight
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 41 (100%)
[quote name='DarkNessBear']I may be the most retarded assburgered ridden Sony fanboy here - but even I know the PSPGo is the dumbest move of this generation. Goodbye PSP.[/QUOTE]I will say it over and over again, you really have to get a PSP Go and tinker with it on your own. The GAF thread, and most everyone I know with one said it exceeded their expectations. It even did for me. I'll give out my true opinion between the PSP models.
-PSP-1000 was great at first because it had great graphics, but sucked because it was heavy, really couldn't fit in your pocket, and so on.
-PSP-2000 was mostly an improvement finally being able to hook it up to a TV, UMD cache helped a little for some UMD games. Smaller size was definitely a plus (although not small enough). Big issues still are the screen is not that bright, it actually feels a bit cheap compared to the 1000 in a way, and while hooking it up to the TV was nice, being component only and having to use the PSP itself for controls had kind of sucked (because the PSP component cable can only reach 7-8 feet from the back of your TV).
-PSP-3000 fixed the PSP screen issues (being a bit dark), but then had issues with lines appearing, Supporting both progressive and interlace was an improvement, for TV out.
-PSPGo actually has the best screen (bright and doesn't have the lines issues like the PSP 3000). Improves TV out by letting you use a PS3 bluetooth controller wirelessly. Can re-use the PS3 official headset on it. Actually feels quite durable like the PSP-1000 was, but its tiny. Being able to pause any game bringing up the XMB (somewhat like PS3 in a way, due to extra memory) and saving your state in a game is really huge IMO. The only fault I can really find with the Go is the price may be too steep for some initially, and not every UMD is up to download. If it was possibly to copy over every single UMD to the PSP Go, but in a way no one could cheat it, PSP Go would be the greatest handheld device ever IMO. But overall, I'd say the hardware is fantastic. Seriously, I was initially only going to buy it for mini downloads and use as an MP3 player, but now I'm making it my main PSP. I also have no issues buying digital downloads for game since PSN links them to a download mess, and isn't a mess like on 360 (where you have to play online or else you gotta call MS for codes, when you replace the 360) or Wii. Dunno how DSWare works though.
Like I always say, PSP Go is a TEST, not a replacement to every PSP out there. If it was a replacement, we would not see any more PSP-3000 bundles and we would not see UMD releases anymore. It's not cheap because its a test (no way Sony is going to take a loss on two gaming hardware). And besides, PSP-3000 sales were already on a decline despite good game releases, so they might as well try something.
I'll bring this up as one of the articles that stated it (back in June):
That's like the Uncharted 160GB PS3, Xbox 360 Elite, etc. were considered the Premium SKUs. Normally premium means its an extra, more expensive model, NOT meant to replace cheaper models. Only there to give some people the choice who want something more high end. Oh course this is CAG, where most probably want something cheaper. I'm someone who tends to buy premium and/or spend more (like I buy tons of video games at full price).
Also remember, Sony LOVES to have premium devices which are priced much higher than the competition. Just look at Vaio's, TV's cameras, etc. If you don't like their premium priced devices, you have other choices. Although for me, I get discounts at work on Sony stuff (unlike many other brands) that actually make them the same price, if not cheaper than other brands and stuff.
PS3 slim on the other hand was intended to be a lower cost PS3 to replace the original PS3, not serve as a choice of another SKU.
-PSP-1000 was great at first because it had great graphics, but sucked because it was heavy, really couldn't fit in your pocket, and so on.
-PSP-2000 was mostly an improvement finally being able to hook it up to a TV, UMD cache helped a little for some UMD games. Smaller size was definitely a plus (although not small enough). Big issues still are the screen is not that bright, it actually feels a bit cheap compared to the 1000 in a way, and while hooking it up to the TV was nice, being component only and having to use the PSP itself for controls had kind of sucked (because the PSP component cable can only reach 7-8 feet from the back of your TV).
-PSP-3000 fixed the PSP screen issues (being a bit dark), but then had issues with lines appearing, Supporting both progressive and interlace was an improvement, for TV out.
-PSPGo actually has the best screen (bright and doesn't have the lines issues like the PSP 3000). Improves TV out by letting you use a PS3 bluetooth controller wirelessly. Can re-use the PS3 official headset on it. Actually feels quite durable like the PSP-1000 was, but its tiny. Being able to pause any game bringing up the XMB (somewhat like PS3 in a way, due to extra memory) and saving your state in a game is really huge IMO. The only fault I can really find with the Go is the price may be too steep for some initially, and not every UMD is up to download. If it was possibly to copy over every single UMD to the PSP Go, but in a way no one could cheat it, PSP Go would be the greatest handheld device ever IMO. But overall, I'd say the hardware is fantastic. Seriously, I was initially only going to buy it for mini downloads and use as an MP3 player, but now I'm making it my main PSP. I also have no issues buying digital downloads for game since PSN links them to a download mess, and isn't a mess like on 360 (where you have to play online or else you gotta call MS for codes, when you replace the 360) or Wii. Dunno how DSWare works though.
Like I always say, PSP Go is a TEST, not a replacement to every PSP out there. If it was a replacement, we would not see any more PSP-3000 bundles and we would not see UMD releases anymore. It's not cheap because its a test (no way Sony is going to take a loss on two gaming hardware). And besides, PSP-3000 sales were already on a decline despite good game releases, so they might as well try something.
I'll bring this up as one of the articles that stated it (back in June):
http://www.gamasutra.com/news/e3/?story=23918So the PSP Go is Sony's answer to the continuing increases it sees ahead for digital content demand, but early game consumer reaction has suggested that its $250 price point may be prohibitive.
But Koller says Sony sees it as a "two-model strategy," wherein the PSP Go is the "premium-end" product to the PSP-3000's lower-end.
"From a target perspective the 3000 targets, and has been targeting, a lower income teen consumer... much more urban," says Koller. The demographics of the product are "very ethnic" ; 40 percent of PSP owners are Hispanic, for example.
"It's a different kind of [audience] than you usually see in portable [consumer electronics," says Koller. "It's much different than Apple's or Nintendo's products.
He describes the Go's demographic as someone in the 25-35 age range, "tech adopter, higher income... a little more digitally savvy." As with the earlier PSP models, colored hardware will be part of the strategy to attract this hardcore adopter demographic, although Sony's starting with just black and white hardware.
That's like the Uncharted 160GB PS3, Xbox 360 Elite, etc. were considered the Premium SKUs. Normally premium means its an extra, more expensive model, NOT meant to replace cheaper models. Only there to give some people the choice who want something more high end. Oh course this is CAG, where most probably want something cheaper. I'm someone who tends to buy premium and/or spend more (like I buy tons of video games at full price).
Also remember, Sony LOVES to have premium devices which are priced much higher than the competition. Just look at Vaio's, TV's cameras, etc. If you don't like their premium priced devices, you have other choices. Although for me, I get discounts at work on Sony stuff (unlike many other brands) that actually make them the same price, if not cheaper than other brands and stuff.
PS3 slim on the other hand was intended to be a lower cost PS3 to replace the original PS3, not serve as a choice of another SKU.