You should lock your thread brah.Oh good you did it. I wasn't sure if you would.
What if I did neither?And everybody else just downloaded injustice from some foreign XBL market.
And no taste.What if I did neither?
Because I have standards. (very very very low ones)
whoknows you getting gta v? regular edition, or collectors edition?Better to have no taste than bad taste.
Collectors bro.whoknows you getting gta v? regular edition, or collectors edition?
i got gamestop exclusive collectors edition , and special editionCollectors bro.
Need the map in case I get lost while driving around.
well, you can get the dishonored game of the year edition for $40, to replay it all over again with a new box art.Knife of Dunwall and Brigmore Witches were both solid DLCs. Didn't realize how much I'd missed Dishonored.
Also, yay Avatar's back.
I think I might re-destroy Splinter Cell: Conviction on PC.
I'll be playing Injustice on PS3 by myself. My frown needs nerfed.
It's cute that you think I'll let people borrow my games.When I borrow uraizen's steam account am I included as a prestigious member?
I have every character except Zantanna and I have all the costumes already.I would have bought KoF if I thought my computer could run it/it was free. Only reason I got Injustice again was because it was free. I mean, hell. It being free was the only thing that got me into GS today to buy MSP to pick up DLC. Now I've double dipped for Batgirl and Scorpion and that means Indigdawg is in for some awesome matches.
I also bought a ton of costumes. It's gonna be a good night.
I liked that DLC video, Uraizen. <3
I played the first level of Dishonered and put it away cuz I had too much other shit out. I really want to play it though.Knife of Dunwall and Brigmore Witches were both solid DLCs. Didn't realize how much I'd missed Dishonored.
Also, yay Avatar's back.
I have all of that shit on the PS3 version (except costumes), I just got it for the 360 since it was on sale.I have every character except Zantanna and I have all the costumes already.
I did the same goddamn thing. There was just too much going on when it came out.You guys can have all my steam library. I don't give a.
Those $1 indie games are hard to find nowadays so I'd better share them.
I played the first level of Dishonered and put it away cuz I had too much other shit out. I really want to play it though.
And OMG AVATAR!
I know what you mean, but I don't mind the Halo way where they just add a second chief or make random characters just for co-op that aren't even in the story when you have 4 people (It does this in Reach), so if they did something like that I don't feel it ruins the story since they still have all the cutscenes normal and then you can just enjoy playing the games with your friendsJust adding co-op doesn't necessarily work well. Not for every game. If Gears were solo only and they patched in co-op, that could work... because it's a squad based shooter and you're always in pairs of two... but Vanquish? You'd totally break the game, as you don't normally have friendly support in your encounters...
Though I like this approach over, say, the army of two/RE5 & RE6/etc. approach.
And they really need to stop tying achievements to this crap.
Speaking of Vanquish, I should really step my game up and go try to finish that last challenge to get my platinum for it.
Because of KOF13, right?And no taste.
Sure, it's got "cooperative" multiplayer in the sense that you can get help from other human players, if you request it. So yeah, it is up to you... but furthermore, most co-op experiences (save those like Dark Souls and Journey) are DESIGNED for people like you and MoWiCe to say "dude, let's get our crew together and totally crush that new borderlands 2 dlc tomorrow night!". Dark Souls isn't having that... (neither did Demon's) -- the souls games say "hey, you can try to summon help for a boss encounter mostly -- and you can only do it in this small dose and not with anyone you know, really.". To me, that defeats the normal idea of what's the norm as far as cooperative multiplayer goes these days. This is why there was a HUGE number of Xbox gamers (new to the Souls series) who were off-put and bitching about how they couldn't play the game with people on their friends list. And why they developed an annoying workaround to try to play together for bits of the game.Lol, it's like the debate I'm having with Blue in the RPG thread...you can't say that the multiplayer in the DS games are definitely not co-op, because, yeah, it really is. Granted you can only do it where the game specifically tells you to, and it's not up to you whether the co-op happens, but it IS there.
Army of Two sucks ass. That doesn't mean I don't want devs to stop trying to make good co-op games. SR3's drop-in/drop-out is pretty good. I'm looking forward to GTA online with you nukkas as well...
Hahah. Yeah, or they try to. I was 3-0 in Demon's Souls and I was a scared noob all 3 times. After that I played mostly offline because being griefed when I'm just trying to control world tendencies was absolutely aggravating.True dark souls fans invade noob players and ruin their shit
I didn't mean story wise... I meant encounter design wise. It would remove a lot of the skill and challenge from the game because you'd have support instead of being forced into the army of one type situation... I'm sure if I could get a co-op partner for challenge 6 in Vanquish, I'd have my platinum... but personally, I'd rather do it solo, even if I had the option... oddly, this doesn't apply to all games, mind you, as I routinely don't mind grouping up on some of the more difficult Soul Sacrifice pacts... but Vanquish? I think that game needs to be "lone wolf" all day every day.I know what you mean, but I don't mind the Halo way where they just add a second chief or make random characters just for co-op that aren't even in the story when you have 4 people (It does this in Reach), so if they did something like that I don't feel it ruins the story since they still have all the cutscenes normal and then you can just enjoy playing the games with your friends![]()
It was one of my favorite games of last year, no doubt.I played the first level of Dishonered and put it away cuz I had too much other shit out. I really want to play it though.
And OMG AVATAR!
I'm the same way I'm mostly in hollow but I notice invasions are crazy in the forest my friend used to make me duel with him it'd be 2v1 and we'd still lose I was using elite knight gear I wasn't made for dueling I was made for loving.Hahah. Yeah, or they try to. I was 3-0 in Demon's Souls and I was a scared noob all 3 times. After that I played mostly offline because being griefed when I'm just trying to control world tendencies was absolutely aggravating.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRVi0paZlfI[/youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQJACVmankY
You should play survivors mode its like mercs but every zombie you kill gets sent to your opponent side. Best MP mode.Guys, I think we made a mistake.
RE6 has got to be the besting game ever made.
Ironically.
I enjoy doing that in Saints as well, love using the funny weapons to get it done, it's still fun in GTA with the normal weapons as well thoughI think my favorite part of GTA 4 is being able to kill drivers without blowing up the car. So satisfying.