[quote name='tehweezner']i'm fully convinced OP is just trolling. see this thread:
http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=174071
if he is actually
serious about his movie opinions, then ... i have no words
edit: and responding to prmononke's sentiments, the OP is hardly an idiot and he is entitled to his own views. however his opinions are juvenile in respect to the consensus of critics and fans of quality films. now i'm definitely not saying critics or the opinons of the majority are infallible and their word is gospel, but if a movie is getting tons of critical acclaim, chances are it's actually good.[/quote]
I agree that a massively critically acclaimed film will likely be good. I loved
No Country (but I loved
There Will Be Blood more), so I'm certainly of the opinion that it was one of the best movies in recent years.
However, saying "Typical one-dimensional moviegoer," is fairly ridiculous. Not everyone looks for deeper meaning in the movies they're watching. I know Brak is a big fan of David Lynch, whom many people can't stand. I liked
Mulholland Drive, although I found
Eraserhead to be way too abstract for my tastes. Does that make
me "one-dimensional?" No.
I like mindless action films like
300. It may have pretty shitty dialogue, along with a shallow plot, but the action is entertaining as hell.
At the same time, I can enjoy a film like
No Country For Old Men, which I came out of saying "That is absolutely the best film this year." Granted, I later changed my mind about that, deeming
There Will Be Blood to be slightly better (while a completely different type of film).
Anyway, my current plan is to major in film (assuming I can get into the Film and New Media program at the college I'm attending). I can understand Brak's sentiments. However, not everyone cares about movies to the extent that we would. And ultimately, that isn't a problem. People can like what they like, and who is
anyone to criticize that?