Homeland Security Officials Wrongly Arrested Peaceful Protesters

alonzomourning23

CAGiversary!
Feedback
26 (100%)
The American Civil Liberties Union today filed a federal lawsuit in Atlanta on behalf of two vegan protesters who were subjected to imprisonment, arrest and harassment by Homeland Security officials, RAW STORY has learned.
The lawsuit stems from a Dec. 2003 incident, when vegans Caitlin Childs and Christopher Freeman were protesting on public property outside a Honey Baked Ham store in Georgia's DeKalb County.

After the protest, the duo noticed they were being watched and photographed by a man in an unmarked car. They approached the car and wrote down the make, model, color and license plate number on a piece of paper. They then noticed the unmarked car was following them.

According to the ACLU suit, the car contained both a uniformed police officer and an undercover detective, later identified as Homeland Security Detective D.A. Gorman. The two pulled in behind Childs and Freeman and ordered them to exit their car.

Gorman then demanded that she turn over the piece of paper on which she had copied his license tag number. Childs refused to hand the paper over, and was handcuffed.

She was searched a male officer, despite her request to be searched only by a female officer, the ACLU says.

Both Childs and Freeman were arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. Police confiscated the piece of paper and Childs' house keys. Both were released from custody, but neither the piece of paper nor the keys were returned. The county has not pursued a criminal case.

To view the surveillance photos taken by Homeland Security, go to http://www.aclu.org/spyfiles/honeyham/1.html.



More from the ACLU's release:

"All across the country, the ACLU is uncovering information about Americans engaged in peaceful protest being spied on by Homeland Security, the FBI and local police," said Debbie Seagraves, Executive Director of the ACLU of Georgia. "It is deeply disturbing that the government would use resources intended to protect national security to instead spy on innocent Americans who do nothing more than express their opinions on social and political issues."

The ACLU argues that by stopping and detaining Childs and Freeman for no legal reason and then refusing to tell them why they had been pulled over, Detective Gorman and the DeKalb County Police Department deprived them of their right to be secure in their person and to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. The officials' actions violated the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the federal and state constitutions, charged the ACLU.

"People of this country need to realize that our basic human rights are being whittled away on a daily basis," Freeman said. "I hope this case brings to light the fact that anyone can come under government security and pay the price."

In addition to the lawsuit, the ACLU has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests on behalf of Childs and Freeman to uncover any surveillance files kept on the activists by Homeland Security or other law enforcement agencies. ACLU affiliates in 15 other states have filed similar requests with the FBI on behalf of more than 100 groups and individuals, as part of a nationwide effort to expose unlawful domestic spying.

Last month, the ACLU of Michigan obtained an FBI report summarizing a meeting that was intended to keep local, state and federal law enforcement agencies apprised of planned protests and activities by various groups and individuals. Among the groups discussed at the meeting were an affirmative action advocacy group and a peace and justice group.

The ACLU launched its national "Spy Files" effort last year in response to widespread complaints from students and political activists who said they were questioned by FBI agents in the months leading up to the political conventions. The FOIA requests seek two kinds of information: 1) the actual FBI files of groups and individuals targeted for speaking out or practicing their faith; and, 2) information about how the practices and funding structure of joint task forces between the FBI and local police may be encouraging rampant and unwarranted spying.


http://rawstory.com/news/2005/ACLU_sues_Homeland_Security_for_arresting_spying_on_vegans_who_protested_0922.html

This was the most complete article, but here's a link to more traditional news sites that corroborate the story

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLC,GGLC:1969-53,GGLC:en&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&ncl=http://www.macon.com/mld/macon/12719932.htm
 
This is getting ridiculous. Ever since 9/11 shit like this has been happening more and more. America is not going down a good path. I hope that when a new president is elected he will try to change all this, and I'm not saying Bush is a bad president(even though I think he is) Im just saying he would sacrifice our liberties for more security. It wouldnt be so bad if these arrest and the such actual helped anything but they havent. All they have done is piss people off real bad and given many more excuses to go to Canada(which is a pretty awesome country BTW).
 
[quote name='evanft']Stoopid Liberuhl Protestrs!!! How Dare Dey Exercise Theyre Right To Speach!!! Thgey Wre Probvaly Moslems!!![/QUOTE]
Shut up.
 
[quote name='Quillion']Shut up.[/QUOTE]

Well, you can't really argue with the sarcastic sentiment. There isn't any reason they should have been followed or watched, it's not even like animal rights activists have a terrorist element in this country (unlike in places like the u.k.).
 
[quote name='Quillion']Shut up.[/QUOTE]

Dammit, I'm working very hard to lower the level of discourse on this board. Don't screw it up!
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']Well, you can't really argue with the sarcastic sentiment. There isn't any reason they should have been followed or watched, it's not even like animal rights activists have a terrorist element in this country (unlike in places like the u.k.).[/QUOTE]

I wish I still had the link, but there was a news story a few years back about PETA supporting one of those violent animal activist groups. They didn't hurt anybody, but they did trash laboratories, and free the testing animals, vandalizing the buildings. There was even talk of getting PETA's tax exempt status revoked for the association.

I know there's no mention of PETA in the article, I just wanted to point out the history of violent protest.

Otherwise, if the story is completely accurate, the agents did act inappropriately.
 
[quote name='Quillion']I wish I still had the link, but there was a news story a few years back about PETA supporting one of those violent animal activist groups. They didn't hurt anybody, but they did trash laboratories, and free the testing animals, vandalizing the buildings. There was even talk of getting PETA's tax exempt status revoked for the association.

I know there's no mention of PETA in the article, I just wanted to point out the history of violent protest.

Otherwise, if the story is completely accurate, the agents did act inappropriately.[/QUOTE]

Since there was no mention of PETA, the point is somewhat moot.
 
[quote name='Quillion']I wish I still had the link, but there was a news story a few years back about PETA supporting one of those violent animal activist groups. They didn't hurt anybody, but they did trash laboratories, and free the testing animals, vandalizing the buildings. There was even talk of getting PETA's tax exempt status revoked for the association.

I know there's no mention of PETA in the article, I just wanted to point out the history of violent protest.

Otherwise, if the story is completely accurate, the agents did act inappropriately.[/QUOTE]

That's not really terrorism. But if vandalism is the worst of the animal rights movement, then that's pretty good. Especially when you consider that the emotions involved are on par with those of pro life people. My high school seemed to love all those revolutionary priests, and even had some of them speak at the school. One of them kept bragging about how he was always protesting nuclear activity, and even broke into a lab once and left his blood on some of the equipment, as a symbolic protest. He got arrested for it. The people in charge thought that was a good example of standing up for what you believe. Basically, what I'm saying is, that behavior is typical of every form of activism, and in this country animal rights groups have no really set themselves apart from other activist groups. This isn't true in the u.k. for example (known as the afghanistan of animal rights terrorism), where they have had terrorist incidents involving animal rights activists on par with what the pro life movement has in this country.

I'm not really trying to belittle it, but, when put into perspective I think it shows the generally non violent nature of animal rights activism in the u.s.

But, no mainstream, legal cause deserves this treatment, even causes that have a violent streak (like the pro life movement). Now if they're advocating illegal activities, like pedophilia, then that's something different.
 
bread's done
Back
Top