How to destroy homosexuallity.

Ah, Christian Forums, I've lurked there before when I was more regular at IIDB. They've changed the look of that site at least 5 times in the last couple years and I swear it gets worse every time... They're good for a laugh, try www.rr-bb.com as well, they're often hilarious.
 
The easiest way to shut these shitnecks up is to point out their hypocrisy for everytime they've received or provided oral, anal, or anything but good ol' missionary-style-with-the-purpose-of-reproduction fucking. Even doin' the dag nasty while not trying to procreate is a sin for which they shall burn in the fires of hell for eternity.
 
[quote name='mykevermin']The easiest way to shut these shitnecks up is to point out their hypocrisy for everytime they've received or provided oral, anal, or anything but good ol' missionary-style-with-the-purpose-of-reproduction fucking. Even doin' the dag nasty while not trying to procreate is a sin for which they shall burn in the fires of hell for eternity.[/QUOTE]
It's only with sins they don't agree with, though. Those sins? Jesus didn't die for those ones.

Organized religion is terrifying.
 
[quote name='Brak']Organized religion is terrifying.[/QUOTE]

But also invigorating, considering that Pat Robertson can leg-press the weight equivalent of a 1.25 Ford Festivas.
 
Hahaha, I remember the first time I saw that shake on the Daily Show. Give Pat Robertson money and you can leg-press a ton!
 
[quote name='mykevermin']Not an ad, but poorly cropped from the page from which to purchase it.

http://www.cbn.com/communitypublic/shake.asp[/QUOTE]
Whoa...

Either a flat-out lie (obviously), or the stretch of the truth, in true advertising fashion -- in other words, he leg-pressed 2,000 lbs. in a six week period, accumulating over multiple work-out sessions.
 
[quote name='SpazX']Ah, Christian Forums, I've lurked there before when I was more regular at IIDB. They've changed the look of that site at least 5 times in the last couple years and I swear it gets worse every time... They're good for a laugh, try www.rr-bb.com as well, they're often hilarious.[/quote]

OMG! www.rr-bb.com is amazing! This for instance is the best thing I have ever seen posted online :

http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?t=257767

LOL:applause:
 
[quote name='dtarasev']OMG! www.rr-bb.com is amazing! This for instance is the best thing I have ever seen posted online :

http://www.rr-bb.com/showthread.php?t=257767

LOL:applause:[/quote]


I can't believe those people are serious... I want to make fun of them, but I'm much too lazy to make an account that would just be banned and deleted because I'm obviously a heretic.

They had this to say about the Da Vinci Code; "What he's done is exercise his imagination, strung together rumor, myth, and legend. "

Doesn't that describe another book of world renoun? Yes, I mean the bible.
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']He must have gone deep down the rabbit whole to come up with such innovative and thought provoking points.[/quote]

fucker is riding the Rainbow Railroad down Lollipop Lane to Marshmallow Metropolis.
 
I don't know why being Gay is so chatted about. After they've found gay men have female brains isn't it quite obvious? Real Homosexuality in terms of true gender is rare. What I mean is that Homosexuality for most people is a VERY minimal expression of Transgender. What I'm saying is that Sexual Orientation will almost ALWAYS affect Gender Identity but not the other way around. The gene for Sexual Orientation is just almost inextricably LINKED to Gender Identity.
Look at the average Gay Male population and compare the proportion of Drag Queens in that population to the proportion of Cross Dressers in the Straight Male population and I've made my point.
Also look at some Famous trademark Lesbians in the media who by NO means are indicative of all Lesbians, just using them as an example. Remember when Ellen said she didn't feel comfortable wearing a dress for the Grammies or wherever? She also looks like a gawky Prepubscent or Pubescent boy. Then look at Rosie, never seen her wearing dresses. I also think if you look at most facial structures MOST tend to look masculine. Granted some cases you might argue and I could throw Androgeny into that minority mix. For example you might argue Korean or Japanese in which case I would argue they have softer facial features in general so that point is mute.
Soz for going on but I think I made some decent arguments although what's more interesting in this whole thing is this. Think about the fact said person had a female mind in the womb. I'm almost wondering if the mother has some kind of effect on the fetus in terms of development of face and body, counteracting or minimizing what effect testosterones might have OTHERWISE had on them until out of the womb of course.
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']He must have gone deep down the rabbit whole to come up with such innovative and thought provoking points.[/QUOTE]
I think it was sociopathically designed...

For instance, the advice on "having sexual feelings for a male friend" (as though this were uncontrollable -- whomever one has sexual feelings for, not matter what gender, those "feelings" can be controlled, as you just don't go and mount them like a fucking animal...) Approach him about it..? He'll likely not be a friend anymore, scaring and scarring one into never acting on homosexual feelings ever again.

Just fucked advice.
 
[quote name='Brak']Jesus didn't die for those ones.[/quote]

Things became alot clearer when I started realising the difference between the real Jesus and the christian Jesus.

Although as a self-confessed Jungian, maybe I'm not the one to be pointing fingers :lol:

The last Christian died on the cross.
- Nietzsche

Thank God I'm Jung and not a Jungian!
- Jung​
 
[quote name='Sarang01']I don't know why being Gay is so chatted about. After they've found gay men have female brains isn't it quite obvious? [/quote]

They found the many gay men brains have characteristics of female brains (same with lesbians and men), but it's not a perfect correlation by any means. Homosexuality is most likely something that is influenced both by genetic biology and environment (both social and it's influence on biology). Though there's no evidence of sexuality being a choice, though obviously bisexual people can choose which gender to be with more easily than other people.

Real Homosexuality in terms of true gender is rare. What I mean is that Homosexuality for most people is a VERY minimal expression of Transgender. What I'm saying is that Sexual Orientation will almost ALWAYS affect Gender Identity but not the other way around. The gene for Sexual Orientation is just almost inextricably LINKED to Gender Identity.
Look at the average Gay Male population and compare the proportion of Drag Queens in that population to the proportion of Cross Dressers in the Straight Male population and I've made my point.
Click to expand...

That's not true, transgendered people, cross dressers etc. are quite often heterosexual, at least in relation to their biological sex. There is some evidence to suggest a minimal correlation between transgendered people and sexual orientation (though it's controversial), there's none when it comes to transvestites, cross dressers etc. And there's no evidence of a single homosexual gene. The connection between homosexuality and gender identity is minimal at best.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']They found the many gay men brains have characteristics of female brains (same with lesbians and men), but it's not a perfect correlation by any means. Homosexuality is most likely something that is influenced both by genetic biology and environment (both social and it's influence on biology). Though there's no evidence of sexuality being a choice, though obviously bisexual people can choose which gender to be with more easily than other people.



That's not true, transgendered people, cross dressers etc. are quite often heterosexual, at least in relation to their biological sex. There is some evidence to suggest a minimal correlation between transgendered people and sexual orientation (though it's controversial), there's none when it comes to transvestites, cross dressers etc. And there's no evidence of a single homosexual gene. The connection between homosexuality and gender identity is minimal at best.[/QUOTE]

Ok you mean to tell me that the mannerisms of gay men being what you'd usually see in a female is just a coincidence? Doubtful.
I'm not disagreeing with you completely on the environmental quotient, SOME Gay men didn't just always feel Gay, some were influenced by environment unfortunately and I don't mean if they had Gay parents either, I mean by such things as opposite sex rejection early in childhood as one example as well as borderline inappropriate touching from childhood to adolescence by the same sex.
 
[quote name='Sarang01']Ok you mean to tell me that the mannerisms of gay men being what you'd usually see in a female is just a coincidence? Doubtful.
I'm not disagreeing with you completely on the environmental quotient, SOME Gay men didn't just always feel Gay, some were influenced by environment unfortunately and I don't mean if they had Gay parents either, I mean by such things as opposite sex rejection early in childhood as one example as well as borderline inappropriate touching from childhood to adolescence by the same sex.[/quote]
I think mannerisms are more of a social construction, just like heterosexual mannerisms. There are social roles that people feel compelled to fill depending on their environment. Genders are social constructions of how different sex people are supposed to act and gay people often take on the other gender because that's kind of what they feel their place is or because of other environmental factors, but many gay people take on the gender that matches their sex and not their sexual orientation.

I don't think there is any correlation between sexual molestation in childhood and sexual orientation. There also isn't any identified gene and it doesn't seem to be a trait that's passed on, though there are probably other biological factors.
 
[quote name='SpazX']I think mannerisms are more of a social construction, just like heterosexual mannerisms. There are social roles that people feel compelled to fill depending on their environment. Genders are social constructions of how different sex people are supposed to act and gay people often take on the other gender because that's kind of what they feel their place is or because of other environmental factors, but many gay people take on the gender that matches their sex and not their sexual orientation.

I don't think there is any correlation between sexual molestation in childhood and sexual orientation. There also isn't any identified gene and it doesn't seem to be a trait that's passed on, though there are probably other biological factors.[/QUOTE]

I don't know if I mentioned this but I said it's a MINOR, read minor expression of Transgenderism, so minor there is no manifestation in a desire to BE a man or woman. Theorhetically I could argue this gene is commonly occuring but the penetrance rate is minimal resulting in this effect though maybe that might point to TS as a too common occurance in genepool therefore invalidating that. Well I go on too much.
 
[quote name='Brak']I think it was sociopathically designed...

For instance, the advice on "having sexual feelings for a male friend" (as though this were uncontrollable -- whomever one has sexual feelings for, not matter what gender, those "feelings" can be controlled, as you just don't go and mount them like a fucking animal...) Approach him about it..? He'll likely not be a friend anymore, scaring and scarring one into never acting on homosexual feelings ever again.

Just fucked advice.[/quote]

I was just going for the fact that his "advice" read like an antigay text book despite all the effort he put into his attempts to "think gay".

I honestly don't know how he wrote that first paragraph without being high on something.
 
[quote name='Sarang01']Ok you mean to tell me that the mannerisms of gay men being what you'd usually see in a female is just a coincidence? Doubtful.[/quote]

I must have missed the part where all gay men had female mannerisms. I've been asked out by 3 gay men, once on the street, and twice in coffee shops. None of them were stereotypically gay. And I've known homosexuals that did have some stereotypical mannerisms, and I've known some that did not.

The most stereotypically "gay" guy I've known wasn't gay at all.

Also, if you read about previous gay culture (ie. 50's and back), you realize that much of it involves social expectations.

I'm not disagreeing with you completely on the environmental quotient, SOME Gay men didn't just always feel Gay, some were influenced by environment unfortunately and I don't mean if they had Gay parents either, I mean by such things as opposite sex rejection early in childhood as one example as well as borderline inappropriate touching from childhood to adolescence by the same sex.
Click to expand...

I'm not aware of anything suggesting rejection by the opposite sex or inappropriate touching being linked to homosexuality. Now, if you have someone who is bisexual, or at least has bisexual tendencies, then of course that can play a role. But the attraction was already there.

Biology alone does not explain homosexuality. But environment is not as simple as many assume. Environment plays a significant role in biology, to the point where someone may be born biologically male but, due to the lack of testosterone in the womb, they are born female. Sometimes a change occurs at puberty, but not always. That is the result of environment, not genetics, and is considered an environmental influence.

Another environmental influence is seen in the amount of handling and affection shown towards children, which studies indicate may play a role in increasing intelligence. Again, environmental influences affecting biology.

No one really knows why some people are homosexual. We know there are some biological differences that are seen in many homosexuals (not all), but we don't know what causes them. And we don't know the degree to which environment plays in it. All we know is neither explain it fully.

Saying it's environmental, biological, social etc. does not imply choice.

Also, very few things are controlled by single gene. Most things are polygenetic. And I don't know of any evidence suggesting homosexuality is an expression of transgenderism in any sense.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']I must have missed the part where all gay men had female mannerisms. I've been asked out by 3 gay men, once on the street, and twice in coffee shops. None of them were stereotypically gay. And I've known homosexuals that did have some stereotypical mannerisms, and I've known some that did not.

The most stereotypically "gay" guy I've known wasn't gay at all.

Also, if you read about previous gay culture (ie. 50's and back), you realize that much of it involves social expectations.



I'm not aware of anything suggesting rejection by the opposite sex or inappropriate touching being linked to homosexuality. Now, if you have someone who is bisexual, or at least has bisexual tendencies, then of course that can play a role. But the attraction was already there.

Biology alone does not explain homosexuality. But environment is not as simple as many assume. Environment plays a significant role in biology, to the point where someone may be born biologically male but, due to the lack of testosterone in the womb, they are born female. Sometimes a change occurs at puberty, but not always. That is the result of environment, not genetics, and is considered an environmental influence.

Another environmental influence is seen in the amount of handling and affection shown towards children, which studies indicate may play a role in increasing intelligence. Again, environmental influences affecting biology.

No one really knows why some people are homosexual. We know there are some biological differences that are seen in many homosexuals (not all), but we don't know what causes them. And we don't know the degree to which environment plays in it. All we know is neither explain it fully.

Saying it's environmental, biological, social etc. does not imply choice.[/QUOTE]

I know there are true gendered Gay men, I'm just saying they're more in the minority than you think.
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']I was just going for the fact that his "advice" read like an antigay text book despite all the effort he put into his attempts to "think gay".

I honestly don't know how he wrote that first paragraph without being high on something.[/quote]
Hes Christian- ergo, high on himself.
 
[quote name='Sarang01']I know there are true gendered Gay men, I'm just saying they're more in the minority than you think.[/quote]

Give me evidence showing that homosexuality has something to do with transgenderism.
 
[quote name='Kayden']Hes Christian- ergo, high on himself.[/quote]
Holding your breath while spinning around in circlesand speaking out of your ass can only get you so high.;)
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']Holding your breath while spinning around in circlesand speaking out of your ass can only get you so high.;)[/quote]

Thats where the belittling of others beliefs comes into play. (And here I thought I was on a low irony diet.)
 
[quote name='Kayden']Thats where the belittling of others beliefs comes into play. (And here I thought I was on a low irony diet.)[/quote]

beliefs? There are no beliefs other than ours, only people tricked to walk the path of godlessness by Satan.
 
[quote name='zionoverfire']beliefs? There are no beliefs other than ours, only people tricked to walk the path of godlessness by Satan.[/quote]
Mmmmm dilusions of grandeur. :drool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top