Hurricane refugees told: We don't want you here

alonzomourning23

CAGiversary!
Feedback
26 (100%)
LIKE all good folk in Louisiana, the people of Estherwood were horrified by what they saw on television as hundreds of thousands of New Orleans residents were rendered homeless by Hurricane Katrina.

They sympathised with families who were left with nothing and shook their heads at news that Hurricane Rita now threatens further disaster on the Gulf coast of America.

NI_MPU('middle');But when the true test came and the Government came knocking for Estherwood’s help, the milk of human kindness came up sour. At a meeting yesterday, local officials rejected proposals that idle land beside their airstrip be turned into a government-funded sanctuary for 600 evacuee families.

Cecilia Broussard, chairwoman of the Acadian Parish Police Jury, the board that oversees local affairs, said: “We are not interested in any of that kind of activity in our parish.”

The move has prompted allegations of racism against Estherwood, a farming community with only one police officer. Of its 600 residents, 94 per cent are white. The evacuees are 90 per cent black.

John Humble, a jury member, said that people were against the idea because the proposed venue might be prone to flooding and the local infrastructure could not support the human influx. The parish should reject the idea, he said, “so the people of my district can sleep at night”. He added: “What would we do with 1,500 people out there in trailer houses? We don’t have the teachers, we don’t have the classrooms, we don’t have law enforcement, the sheriff doesn’t have the resources.”

But Alton Stevenson, a colleague, complained: “They can say what they want from the lip, but from the heart we all know it’s a racial thing. It’s all about putting a bunch of black people out there.

“If these evacuees were white, people in Estherwood would be out there praising the idea saying it would bring more money for the community and that their stores would be rich because the food stamps would be spent here and there would be more government money for the schools.”

Ron Lawson, president of the local airport commission, also believes that the concerns about infrastructure do not add up. The Federal Emergency Management Agency would have paid to install water pipes, sewage lines and electricity on the site, so allowing the airport to develop its business and improve the local economy, he said. There would have also been federal money. “It’s pretty sickening. Hopefully one day we will not be in a situation where we are looking for help from someone else,” he said.

Some are doing their bit, however. At the 222-pupil Estherwood Elementary School the principal, Johnette Leleux, has absorbed seven evacuee children — some of whom are black — from New Orleans into her classes. She was involved in a penny-drive that raised $700 (£390) for disaster relief. Neighbouring parishes are also gearing up to help.

Neighbouring parishes are also gearing up to help. However, a reporter from a local newspaper, the Crowley Post-Signal, witnessed a busload of Katrina’s victims being turned away from a burger bar in Iowa, a town near by, by a manager who claimed that local authorities had barred evacuees from stopping in the town. Ernie Broussard, a resident and former mayor of Estherwood, is among those worried about hosting the displaced. “I don’t think it has anything to do with colour of skin,” he said, adding that the influx would include families from all walks of life, including “people who don’t want to wash”.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,23889-1791688,00.html
 
600 familes, 1,200-2,400 people, with no homes, no jobs and this community has one cop and a population of 600?

I can't say I blame them. They would be overwhelmed for the reasons they listed. Plus, even if the feds paid for improving infrastructre like electricity, water and sewer lines what are these people going to do long term in a county of 600 people??? They may be able to spend food stamps and 6-9 months of unemployement or public assistance locally but if there are no jobs you've transplated urban poor into being rural poor.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']600 familes, 1,200-2,400 people, with no homes, no jobs and this community has one cop and a population of 600?

I can't say I blame them. They would be overwhelmed for the reasons they listed. Plus, even if the feds paid for improving infrastructre like electricity, water and sewer lines what are these people going to do long term in a county of 600 people??? They may be able to spend food stamps and 6-9 months of unemployement or public assistance locally but if they're no jobs you've transplated urban poor into being rural poor.[/QUOTE]

I agree 100% here. It's too commonplace for people to start crying racisim. That certainly is a possibility, but there are real reasons it's a bad idea too that were clearly outlined.
 
Ron Lawson, president of the local airport commission, also believes that the concerns about infrastructure do not add up. The Federal Emergency Management Agency would have paid to install water pipes, sewage lines and electricity on the site, so allowing the airport to develop its business and improve the local economy, he said. There would have also been federal money. “It’s pretty sickening. Hopefully one day we will not be in a situation where we are looking for help from someone else,” he said.

Oh yeah, FEMA - you can always trust them.

Although stuff like this always cracks me up:
Cecilia Broussard, chairwoman of the Acadian Parish Police Jury, the board that oversees local affairs, said: “We are not interested in any of that kind of activity in our parish.”

LoL at hypocrites.
 
[quote name='PittsburghAfterDark']600 familes, 1,200-2,400 people, with no homes, no jobs and this community has one cop and a population of 600?

I can't say I blame them. They would be overwhelmed for the reasons they listed. Plus, even if the feds paid for improving infrastructre like electricity, water and sewer lines what are these people going to do long term in a county of 600 people??? They may be able to spend food stamps and 6-9 months of unemployement or public assistance locally but if there are no jobs you've transplated urban poor into being rural poor.[/QUOTE]

It would be a government funded sanctuary being set up, not a permanent residence I'd assume. I assume some would stay, but they would be absored into the pre-existing and new infrastructure.

To the person who mentione dracism, considering the fact that people like david duke have been relatively recently elected in louisiana, it isn't hard to assume that race may play a factor,especially when those accusations are coming from within the community. There's also this part
witnessed a busload of Katrina’s victims being turned away from a burger bar in Iowa, a town near by, by a manager who claimed that local authorities had barred evacuees from stopping in the town.

Why would they be barred from simply stopping in the town, and why would a business owner turn away customers?

To camoor, FEMA has been good with sending money, the problem is they send money too often and to places that don't need it.
 
94 percent white? This means there are approximately 36 blacks in this parish. There is what is known as the "saturation effect," (I think that's what it's called, anyway). Essentially, people fear and stereotype that which they are not around.

With 36 blacks in the neighborhood, certainly they do not have enough experience around blacks, much less a *majority* of blacks.

They're probably rural, too (population 600?), so interacting with cityfolk is probably a nuanced concept in and of itself.

It is racism? Partly, without a doubt. Is it classism? Partly that, too. It is pure, unadulterated selfishness? You damn skippy it is.

Most of all, was this (rejecting or turning away evacuees, some sort of resentment for those whose lives were significantly altered by Katrina) inevitable? In this country, I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner.
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']To camoor, FEMA has been good with sending money, the problem is they send money too often and to places that don't need it.[/QUOTE]

I don't know though - it's easy to pull the race card on this one but it seems to me that there are many more factors.

This is a small town - I don't know much about keeping law and order but it doesn't seem to me that you throw some federal money their way and then double or triple the size of the town overnight.

If people want to accept others into their home out of the goodness of their heart, that is a very charitible, admirable, and humantiarian action. Ideally however, people should not be forced into this position.
 
bread's done
Back
Top