I bet he was a Tea Party Expresser...

you are right, all brown people are a threat. QUICK PUT THEM IN CAMPS BEFORE THEY BLOW UP EVERYBODY!!!!!!!

thank god we have richard cook to provide fair & balanced coverage to this liberal forum and stand up for the poor downtrodden people of the tea party. maybe them stomping on a protester's head isn't so bad after all when we have these people trying to blow up our train stations
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Sporadic']you are right, all brown people are a threat. QUICK PUT THEM IN CAMPS BEFORE THEY BLOW UP EVERYBODY!!!!!!!

thank god we have richard cook to provide fair & balanced coverage to this liberal forum and stand up for the poor downtrodden people of the tea party. maybe them stomping on a protester's head isn't so bad after all when we have these people trying to blow up our train stations[/QUOTE]

Yup, yup... man stomps someone's head into a curb - all tea party members are violent, racist bigots.

Man tries to carry out attacks that would kill hundreds, if not thousands of random, innocent lives... well, it's all good because we deserved it for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Man tries to carry out attacks that would kill hundreds, if not thousands of random, innocent lives... well, it's all good because we deserved it for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.[/QUOTE]

Jesus where the fuck is this coming from?
 
The funny part is that while I don't claim all muslims are terrorists after an incident such as this, but the lefties on this forum very readily and instantly claim all tea partiers are radicals, and "as bad as those terrorists" when an incident happens.

The hypocrisy is unbelievable, but I guess it is ok because they do not respect tea partiers or agree with their ideology so it is perfectly fine to demonize the vastly peaceful group as radicals that resort to violence. Right? /sarcasm
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Yup, yup... man stomps someone's head into a curb - all tea party members are violent, racist bigots.

Man tries to carry out attacks that would kill hundreds, if not thousands of random, innocent lives... well, it's all good because we deserved it for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki.[/QUOTE]

Needs a correction. "Its all good for brown middle east people to bomb us because we deserve it for the past couple decades we have been rolling tanks in their cities, dropping bombs on them, marching troops in their street, setting them on fire from the air and making them the butt end jokes of countless jokes. American people need to stop being the babe in the woods or acting butt hurt because we have been the bully smacking around the little guy in highschool for a long time and then act surprised when he finally hits back". There you go, all set now.

And whats with this tea party comment? That must be the new buzzword people use on the internet so they sound suave, savy and sophisticated infront of others on forums. Lately its tea party this or tea party that and 90% of the time it makes no sense when its used. Its kind of like how people love the word ironic but few even know what the hell it actually means but they will use it any chance they get.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Whoo-whooo! All aboard the Tea Party Express!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11657132

Apparently, the individuals behind these credit watching Glenn Beck with giving them the encouragement to partake in this.[/QUOTE]

What's this Bob? The stay classy Muslims thread?

In case you haven't realized.

Muslims = 1.57 billion people
Tea Party = US-only extreme political subset mostly made up of scared older white people

[quote name='UncleBob']It's amusing to me that the idea that Glenn Beck is, basically, hypnotizing people is just something plain as day... but the idea that Obama could do the same is, apparently, laughable.[/QUOTE]

Glenn Beck is a shitbag preying off of older white peoples' fear while feeding them misinformation. How can you not expect some people to become unhinged and do insane shit when he is saying things like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUnUi8CpA7s&feature=player_embedded#at=19

What exactly is Obama hypnotizing people to do?

- edit Oh and more fun. Palin called into Beck's show.

PALIN: So, you know, when I speak of your love of our Founding Fathers, and how you are helping to educate Americans about respecting our nation's history so that we don't lose what makes America exceptional, and the far, far left mouthpieces, they're twisting and perverting that message. No, what I do, I go back to what Abraham Lincoln said about standing with anybody who stands right. You stand with him when he stands right, you part with him when he goes wrong. I stand with you Glenn.

[...]

PALIN: Glenn, you know I abhor violence. I know you do. Hating war, hating civil war, and praying for peace, and wanting peace and freedom for our kids in a civil society. That is the mission here, is explaining to Americans what the threats are to our peace and to our opportunities and to our freedoms in America.

BECK: Yeah.

PALIN: That is what I see you doing, and that is why I support what you are doing.
Click to expand...

- edit let's get some humor into this thread

(skip to 6:50)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXM3z-Omhzg#t=06m50s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Inspiring hope and change in people vs. scaring the shit out of people, yeah that's a fair comparison.
 
Now now sporadic.

Glenn Beck is no more responsible for his devotees taking the insane shit he says seriously than the guys who ginned up outrage against their countrymen in Rwanda.
 
[quote name='Clak']Inspiring hope and change in people vs. scaring the shit out of people, yeah that's a fair comparison.[/QUOTE]

Yup yup... I mean, I never hear the rhetoric from Obama's team talking about the scary Republicans and such.

"The question is whether hope once again overcomes fear. The other side is trying to ride fear all the way to the ballot box on November 2."
Click to expand...
 
[quote name='UncleBob']Yup yup... I mean, I never hear the rhetoric from Obama's team talking about the scary Republicans and such.[/QUOTE]

Let's compare the two.

1) The question is whether hope once again overcomes fear. The other side is trying to ride fear all the way to the ballot box on November 2.
2) That is the mission here, is explaining to Americans what the threats are to our peace and to our opportunities and to our freedoms in America.

1) Implying that the Republicans are running on a platform of fear and they are running on platform of hope. Not exactly off base (although I don't get what platform of hope they are putting out there since it was been business as usual with no real big change). Trying to inspire people (democrats) to get out and vote.
2) Painting the other side as enemies. Enemies that are trying to take your freedom, your way of life and plunge this nation into chaos.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't pay much attention to Obama, do you? The man, and his team, constantly talk about the Republicans as enemies, how they want to destroy society by changing or ending the various social programs and turn this country into a corporate paradise. Of course, since you agree with that point of view, you won't see it as the exact same type of fear-mongering that you're accusing the right wingers of partaking in.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']You don't pay much attention to Obama, do you? The man, and his team, constantly talk about the Republicans as enemies, how they want to destroy society by changing or ending the various social programs and turn this country into a corporate paradise. Of course, since you agree with that point of view, you won't see it as the exact same type of fear-mongering that you're accusing the right wingers of partaking in.[/QUOTE]

Let's see some links and quotes, jackass. If it is constantly happens, it should be well documented.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']I'm sure whatever I provide won't be good enough for you, but here:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39875964/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/

How is this any different than the stuff that spews from Beck's mouth, except that you agree with Olbermann and disagree with Beck?[/QUOTE]

lol i don't watch olbermann (and i don't even watch network or local news) and that has nothing to do with obama unless you consider them to be on the same team.
 
I would consider Olbermann to be on the same team as much as Beck is on the same team as the Republicans.

Here, if you wish, direct from Obama's mouth:
'If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, "We’re going to punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us".'
Click to expand...

Speaking, of course, for Latinos to vote for Democrats ("our friends") instead of Republicans ("our enemies") or not at all.
 
[quote name='Clak']I thought Beck was supposed to be a Libertarian?[/QUOTE]

He is the type of Libertarian that just happens to support Republicans 99% percent of the time.

Which is to say a run of the mill Libertarian.
 
Yeah, Beck is very much a Cato Libertarian.

Speaking of loons, I'm waiting for Ed Schultz to come out in full clown regalia, doing that evil clown laugh while his head rotates a la that Fallout: New Vegas glitch. Dude has lost his marbles, he almost makes Beck look sane. Almost all of MSNBC has started frothing at the mouth, now that I think about it. It's funny watching FNC and MSNBC pretend they aren't cheerleaders for the Republican and Democratic parties.
 
He was pissed that his food stamps were being cut, so he figured he'd kill some liberals.

Lulz
 
[quote name='UncleBob']I bet all the people at this party were Tea Party members and the one victim was wearing an Obama t-shirt...
http://www.ajc.com/news/coroner-douglas-teen-died-729168.html[/QUOTE]

???

Seriously? Your defense of Tea Party violence is to post an example of random violence? Because, what, the tea party violence wasn't as severe? Because random violence "could happen anywhere"?

You've also got a tremendous false equivalency between comparing the Obama statements that Glenn Beck and Fox News are "using fear", to those same folks talking about FEMA death camps, Nazis, Czars, Marxists, and whatever else.

One is needlessly hyperbolic and one is a potentially accurate portrayal. I'd let you decide, but you clearly can't distinguish, based on your last comment.
 
The violence in this story was not random at all.

But, seriously, if you feel that the political leader of a country calling those in the party that disagrees with his agenda "the enemy" is just the Democratic party being awesome... well, kudos for you.
 
[quote name='Quillion']???

Seriously? Your defense of Tea Party violence is to post an example of random violence? Because, what, the tea party violence wasn't as severe? Because random violence "could happen anywhere"?

You've also got a tremendous false equivalency between comparing the Obama statements that Glenn Beck and Fox News are "using fear", to those same folks talking about FEMA death camps, Nazis, Czars, Marxists, and whatever else.

One is needlessly hyperbolic and one is a potentially accurate portrayal. I'd let you decide, but you clearly can't distinguish, based on your last comment.[/QUOTE]

Well, at least he isn't using Muslims anymore and moved on to all minority based violence to prove that the tea party people are a-ok.

[quote name='UncleBob']But, seriously, if you feel that the political leader of a country calling those in the party that disagrees with his agenda "the enemy" is just the Democratic party being awesome... well, kudos for you.[/QUOTE]

wat

do you actually follow what the republicans and tea partyers say? because they actually use terms like enemy when describing other parties (also again, please link to a source to back the horseshit you post. are you talking about obama again with the "political leader of a country" thing? because i think that obama calling the tea party the enemy would be massive news covered everywhere)
 
[quote name='Sporadic']Well, at least he isn't using Muslims anymore [...][/QUOTE]

It's funny - and sad - that all I did was post stories about terrorist attacks planned against the US - never once mentioning the religious beliefs of those involved - and you chime in with the "Muslim" angle.

When Bill O' goes on TV and makes comments about Muslims and terrorists, he's chastised. Now here's Sporadic taking stories about terrorism and trying to make it about Muslims... will Sporadic be chastised as well?
 
[quote name='UncleBob']It's funny - and sad - that all I did was post stories about terrorist attacks planned against the US - never once mentioning the religious beliefs of those involved - and you chime in with the "Muslim" angle.
[/QUOTE]

honestly, blow me bob. are you really trying to say that you only linked to "terrorist" articles in the beginning (with no idea that they were muslims and no ulterior motives) before switching gears to a news story that of a black kid being beaten to death by three black guys. REALLY? that is all a coincidence that you chose those specific stories?

or is that the real point? i'm going to show how much a hypocrite those LIEberals are by linking solely to muslim = terrorist and black people = violence stories to prove that my scared white people party is getting a bum rap from the media and isn't actually what they think it is (scared white people prone to violence when confronted)
 
Actually, I linked to the third story because of the "stomping" aspect. It actually came up in a news feed that I had set up for the Conway/Paul stomping thing.

By the way, there were four people, not three, involved in the beating. I suppose if you skimmed the article and just looked at the pictures to see the skin color, you might have thought that it was just three.

But to your original point - there were two large stories in the media relating to terrorist activities within the US. I linked to both of them. You can choose to have the "take-away" that the terrorists were Muslims if you want. Just like Bill O'Riley and so many others. I just linked to the stories about terrorism.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']It's funny - and sad - that all I did was post stories about terrorist attacks planned against the US - never once mentioning the religious beliefs of those involved - and you chime in with the "Muslim" angle.

When Bill O' goes on TV and makes comments about Muslims and terrorists, he's chastised. Now here's Sporadic taking stories about terrorism and trying to make it about Muslims... will Sporadic be chastised as well?[/QUOTE]
You act like such a damn victim, grow up.
 
[quote name='Clak']You act like such a damn victim, grow up.[/QUOTE]

I don't think I'm the victim here - It's obvious to me that all Muslims are the victim here. I mean, there's two stories about terrorists posted and Sporadic goes on a tear about Muslims. I'm going to get up and walk off stage in protest now.
 
[quote name='UncleBob']I don't think I'm the victim here - It's obvious to me that all Muslims are the victim here. I mean, there's two stories about terrorists posted and Sporadic goes on a tear about Muslims. I'm going to get up and walk off stage in protest now.[/QUOTE]

!

[quote name='Sporadic']are you really trying to say that you only linked to "terrorist" articles in the beginning (with no idea that they were muslims and no ulterior motives) before switching gears to a news story that of a black kid being beaten to death by three black guys. REALLY? that is all a coincidence that you chose those specific stories?

or is that the real point? i'm going to show how much a hypocrite those LIEberals are by linking solely to muslim = terrorist and black people = violence stories to prove that my scared white people party is getting a bum rap from the media and isn't actually what they think it is (scared white people prone to violence when confronted)[/QUOTE]
 
Bob, you make vague allusions to things, and then when we call uyou out on it, you act like you have no idea what we're talking about. You're trying to say something without saying it, then trying to use it to make us look bad when we connect the dots in your messed up little picture.
 
And let me go one step further than my previous post.

If this is some type of half assed way of proving hypocrisy, you are going about it all wrong. If you want to get across a message of "the tea party is getting a bum rap, this is only a tiny amount of people getting into the news and it is the same on the other side", you should actually use examples of the other side. Violence/misbehavior from the left at rallies, increased domestic terrorism when a Republican president is in office, etc. But you can't because it really isn't there (only thing I can think of is the Weathermen from the 70s). Any event/rally is fairly uneventful unless the police get involved.

But I bet you are thinking...what about the Muslims? "How is it fair for you to say that the tea partyers are prone to violence but I can't say that the Muslims are terrorists when the majority of terror attacks are from them?" Well, because the people behind the terror attacks are extremists and not representatives for the entire (massive) religion. "BUT THAT IS THE SAME CASE WITH TEA PARTY PEOPLE!", you scream. And I respond...eh, not really.

[quote name='Sporadic']In case you haven't realized.

Muslims = 1.57 billion people
Tea Party = US-only extreme political subset mostly made up of scared older white people[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='dabamus'] I find it amusing that your link is to a George Soros funded website...[/QUOTE]

I find it amusing you're not actually refuting anything in the article, you're just attacking the funding of the website.

I'm not even sure why Soros funding that site is relevant, but whatev.
 
[quote name='IRHari']I find it amusing you're not actually refuting anything in the article, you're just attacking the funding of the website.

I'm not even sure why Soros funding that site is relevant, but whatev.[/QUOTE]

It's relevant because he is one of the puppeteers behind Barry.
 
dabamus, Glenn Beck is telling half the story (at best).

He hasn't touched, and won't touch, the MIC, banking, and oil interests from the right that are just as globalist-minded as Soros.

Not to go all conspiratorial here, but he's gone so far off the deep end on a McCarthyist binge, I wouldn't be surprised if he's revealed to be a disinfo agent. He's almost too deranged and focused on one aspect of the corporatist elite to be real.
 
[quote name='Sporadic']If you want to get across a message of "the tea party is getting a bum rap, this is only a tiny amount of people getting into the news and it is the same on the other side", you should actually use examples of the other side.[/QUOTE]

It wouldn't matter - those acts of violence get shrugged off just the same.

Look at the same event where the head stomping took place. A Jack Conway supporter stomped the foot of an older lady (Rand Paul supporter) who's foot was in a frickin' brace.. Of course, that barely makes for a foot note (heh) in most of the stomping stories... Hell, one poster here even went to imply that it was a Tea Party protester that did the foot stomping...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top